Long-term results of an endoscopic screening program for superficial esophageal cancer in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Efficacy of 18FDG-PET/CT in Detecting Synchronous Malignancies in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) in detecting second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients with treatment naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus searched from 1946 to December 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies reporting the performance of 18FDG-PET/CT in patients with treatment-naïve, index HNSCC for detection of SPMs were included. The reference standard was histopathology, clinical follow-up over the duration of study, and other imaging modalities. Multiple investigators completed depth full-text analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed. Methodologic and diagnostic accuracy data were abstracted independently by multiple investigators. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool independently. Bivariate random-effects model meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression modeling were used.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies examining 4624 patients with a total of 475 SPMs were included in the final analysis. Eleven studies were found to be at low risk for bias, while the rest were in the high-risk category. 18FDG-PET/CT demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.88) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) in detecting SPMs. Further subsite analysis revealed varied diagnostic performance across different anatomical regions, with sensitivity and specificity of esophageal SPMs being 0.47 (0.30-0.64) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), and sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (0.73-0.94) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00) for head and neck SPMs. Finally, this imaging modality showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.92 (0.84-0.96) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00) for lung SPMs.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest varied accuracy of 18FDG-PET/CT in detecting SPMs during initial workup for HNSCC, highlighting the importance of screening modalities such as esophagoscopy in high-risk patients.

A single-center prospective study evaluating the usefulness of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a real-time setting

BACKGROUND

Several pre-clinical studies have reported the usefulness of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted this study to evaluate the usefulness of an AI system for real-time diagnosis of ESCC in a clinical setting.

METHODS

This study followed a single-center prospective single-arm non-inferiority design. Patients at high risk for ESCC were recruited and real-time diagnosis by the AI system was compared with that of endoscopists for lesions suspected to be ESCC. The primary outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy of the AI system and endoscopists. The secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 237 lesions were evaluated. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI system were 80.6%, 68.2%, and 83.4%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of endoscopists were 85.7%, 61.4%, and 91.2%, respectively. The difference between the accuracy of the AI system and that of the endoscopists was - 5.1%, and the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval was less than the non-inferiority margin.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-inferiority of the AI system in comparison with endoscopists in the real-time diagnosis of ESCC in a clinical setting was not proven.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs052200015, 18/05/2020).

Screening for head and neck tumors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and vice versa: a nationwide survey among medical specialists

Background and study aims  Retrospectively, minimally 5% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and 11 % with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in Western countries developed a second primary tumor (SPT). SPT screening in ESCC and HNSCC patients is not implemented routinely in daily practice in many Western countries. This study aimed to assess medical specialist knowledge and opinions regarding screening for head and neck SPTs (HNSPTs) in ESCC patients and vice versa in the Netherlands. Methods  A nationwide survey among gastroenterologists and head and neck (HN) surgeons was conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. The survey consisted of 27 questions and focused on knowledge of medical specialists of the prevalence and opinions toward implementing screening for HNSPTs in ESCC patients and vice versa. Results  One hundred twenty-eight gastroenterologists (20.5 %) and 31 HN surgeons (50.0 %) completed the survey. The expected median prevalence of HNSPTs in ESCC was 7.0 % (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.0-15.0) among gastroenterologists and 5.0 % (IQR:3.0-8.0) among HN surgeons. For ESPTs in HNSCC, the expected median prevalence was 9.5 % (IQR: 5.0-12.0) among gastroenterologists and 4.0 % (IQR: 2.0-5.0) among HN surgeons. Screening for HNSPTs and ESPTs was considered promising by 35.2 % and 39.6 %, respectively, which increased to 54.7 % of the specialists after providing incidence data on SPTs. Of the HN surgeons, 41.3 % felt they were as capable as gastroenterologists of performing esophageal screening. Conclusions  This Dutch nationwide survey revealed a lack of knowledge and different perspectives among specialists about screening to detect SPTs in ESCC and HNSCC patients. Adequate education seems essential to increase awareness among specialists and improve SPT detection, independent of the need for implementation of screening for SPTs in ESCC and HNSCC patients.