Novel Classification of Acromegaly in Accordance with Immunohistochemical Subtypes: Is There Really a Clinical Relevance?

Pathologic Characteristics of Somatotroph Pituitary Tumors-An Observational Single-Center Study

The pathologic evaluation of a tumor tissue is an essential part of an acromegaly patient's assessment. This study aimed to analyze the pathologic characteristics of pituitary tumors in patients with acromegaly. The demographic data, in addition to the hormonal, imaging, and pathologic results of 120 patients with acromegaly after pituitary surgery, were extracted from the Polish Acromegaly Registry. We compared sparsely and densely granulated tumors, GH(+), mixed GH(+)/PRL(+) and plurihormonal tumors, α-subunit-positive and α-subunit-negative tumors, and tumors of various Ki-67 indices in terms of the abovementioned features. Sparsely granulated tumors were more frequent in women than in men (p = 0.001) and in younger patients (p = 0.011), and they were larger (p < 0.001) compared to densely granulated tumors. Tumors with positive α-subunit were smaller (p = 0.013), showed extrasellar extension less often (p = 0.039), and were more often densely granulated (p < 0.001) compared to α-subunit-negative tumors. Patients with a higher Ki-67 index were younger (p < 0.001) and more often diagnosed with genetic syndromes (p = 0.02); they had higher GH concentrations (p = 0.007), larger tumors (p = 0.006), and cavernous sinus invasions more frequently (p = 0.022). Conclusions: The pathologic characteristics of somatotroph pituitary tumors are associated with patient's age, sex, hormonal results, tumor size, and the degree of extrasellar expansion.

Prognostic Models in Growth-Hormone- and Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

Growth-hormone (GH)- and prolactin (PRL)-secreting PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine tumors) are divided into multiple histological subtypes, which determine their clinical and biological variable behavior. Proliferation markers alone have a questionable degree of prediction, so we try to identify validated prognostic models as accurately as possible. (1) Background: The data available so far show that the use of staging and clinical-pathological classification of PitNETs, along with imaging, are useful in predicting the evolution of these tumors. So far, there is no consensus for certain markers that could predict tumor evolution. The application of the WHO (World Health Organisation) classification in practice needs to be further evaluated and validated. (2) Methods: We performed the CRD42023401959 protocol in Prospero with a systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science databases and included original full-text articles (randomized control trials and clinical trials) from the last 10 years, published in English, and the search used the following keywords: (i) pituitary adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction), (ii) growth hormone pituitary adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction), (iii) prolactin pituitary adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction); (iv) mammosomatotroph adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction). (3) Results: Two researchers extracted the articles of interest and if any disagreements occurred in the selection process, these were settled by a third reviewer. The articles were then assessed using the ROBIS bias assessment and 75 articles were included. (4) Conclusions: the clinical-pathological classification along with factors such as GH, IGF-1, prolactin levels both preoperatively and postoperatively offer valuable information.