[Health in All Policies Within Local Public Health Reporting in Public Health Service]

[Key Topics and Activities of Local and District Health Conferences between 2013 and 2022: Results of a Non-Reactive Online Screening]

OBJECTIVES

The tasks of the Public Health Service include, amongst others, health promotion and disease prevention, health reporting and health planning. In many places, local or district health conferences (HCs) have been established to network and coordinate municipal stakeholders. HCs have been defined in the laws of the German states of Baden-Wurttemberg, Berlin, Hamburg, Hesse, and North Rhine-Westphalia. As systematic and comprehensive studies of HCs are not available, a descriptive analysis of the characteristic features, key topics and activities of HCs in selected states was performed.

METHODS

Based on a non-reactive survey of the activities from 2013 to 2022, all HCs in four states (n=110) were covered. Data on structural features, topics and HC activities were gathered in a systematic approach. The topics these conferences dealt with were matched against the health objectives of the states. Following an internal verification of the results, univariate and bivariate analyses were performed for individual states, districts, and the year of establishment.

RESULTS

Overall, topics frequently covered by the HCs are primary care, children's and adolescent health, health at old age, infection prevention and control, physical exercise and diet as well as addiction; in some cases, frequencies of these topics differed heavily among the states and municipalities. The topics covered by the HCs showed a strong association with the health objectives of the respective states. Health care is addressed more often in administrative districts (Landkreise) than in independent cities (kreisfreie Städte). Conferences established more recently (after 2011) exhibited greater activities than older ones in terms of plenary sessions and press releases.

CONCLUSION

HCs are marked by a wide range of key topics which are based on health objectives of the respective states; however, noticeable differences exist between rural and urban areas. Conferences established more recently show a higher level of activity than older ones, which might point to sustainability issues under the current constraints. Whereas differences between rural and urban areas had already been noted for health-reporting activities, this was not the case for HC activities. The hypotheses derived from this descriptive analysis warrant further examination in order to ensure that the HCs create a sustainable impact.

[Health Promotion and Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases by Public Health Departments in Baden-Württemberg during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of an Online Survey]

OBJECTIVES

Disease prevention and health promotion are among the core tasks of German public health services (Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst - ÖGD), particularly local public health departments (Gesundheitsämter). Little is known about the extent to which the departments were able to continue activities in the field of health promotion and prevention of non-communicable diseases (HPP-NCDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the example of public health departments in Baden-Württemberg (BW), we therefore investigated how much staff was available to the departments for HPP-NCDs services, how much staff was actually dedicated to HPP-NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic, which HPP-NCDs activities were carried out during the pandemic, which were cancelled, and which should be resumed as a priority, according to the public health departments.

METHODS

We developed a largely standardized online questionnaire for the survey of the 38 public health departments in BW. Per department one questionnaire was to be completed. The survey took place from 9/1/2022 to 11/4/2022. The data of this explorative cross-sectional study were analyzed in a descriptive-statistical manner using SPSS, version 28.

RESULTS

Of the 38 departments, 34 participated in the survey (89%). Departments had a mean of 2.44 full HPP-NCDs staff as planned (median 2.00; SD 1.41; range 0.20-5.00). Under pandemic conditions, a mean of 1.23 full HPP-NCDs staff were deployed (median 0.95; SD 1.24; range 0.00-4.50). Respondents gave examples of 61 HPP-NCDs activities that were conducted under pandemic conditions, and they described 69 HPP-NCDs activities that had to be cancelled. Of the latter, respondents felt that 40 should be resumed as a matter of highest priority. Analysis of the priority activities to be resumed reveals characteristic differences: e. g., resumption of structural prevention activities was viewed more frequently as a matter of hightest priority than resumption of behavioral prevention activities.

CONCLUSIONS

During the pandemic, local public health departments in BW deployed, on average, actually only half of their full staff allocated as planned to HPP-NCDs. Comparing different categories of HPP-NCDs activities (cancelled during the pandemic) in terms of the relative frequency with which their resumption is viewed as matter of highest priority, characteristic differences can be observed. It remains an open question which conclusions can be drawn from such differences.