1
|
Nakai Y, Saito T, Hamada T, Sato T, Hakuta R, Takahara N, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Fujishiro M. Controversies in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided management of walled-off necrosis. Dig Endosc 2024. [PMID: 38895801 DOI: 10.1111/den.14869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Walled-off necrosis (WON) develops as local complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Although less invasive interventions such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy are selected over surgical interventions, delayed and step-up interventions are still preferred to avoid procedure-related adverse events. However, there is a controversy about the appropriate timing of drainage and subsequent necrosectomy. The advent of large-caliber lumen-apposing metal stents has also brought about potential advantages of proactive interventions, which still needs investigation in future trials. When step-up interventions of necrosectomy and additional drainage are necessary, a structured or protocoled approach for WON has been reported to improve safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment, but has not been standardized yet. Finally, long-term outcomes such as recurrence of WON, pancreatic endocrine, and exocrine function are increasingly investigated in association with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. In this review we discuss current evidence and controversy on EUS-guided management of WON.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryunosuke Hakuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah J, Fernandez Y Viesca M, Jagodzinski R, Arvanitakis M. Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management. Indian J Gastroenterol 2024; 43:578-591. [PMID: 38625518 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01506-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis is a common gastrointestinal disease requiring hospitalization and multiple interventions resulting in higher morbidity and mortality. Development of infection in such necrotic tissue is one of the sentinel events in natural history of necrotizing pancreatitis. Infected necrosis develops in around 1/3rd of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis resulting in higher mortality. So, timely diagnosis of infected necrosis using clinical, laboratory and radiological parameters is of utmost importance. Though initial conservative management with antibiotics and organ support system is effective in some patients, a majority of patients still requires drainage of the collection by various modalities. Mode of drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis depends on various factors such as the clinical status of the patient, location and characteristics of collection and availability of the expertise and includes endoscopic, percutaneous and minimally invasive or open surgical approaches. Endoscopic drainage has proved to be a game changer in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis in the last decade with rapid evolution in procedure techniques, development of novel metal stent and dedicated necrosectomy devices for better clinical outcome. Despite widespread adoption of endoscopic transluminal drainage of pancreatic necrosis with excellent clinical outcomes, peripheral collections are still not amenable for endoscopic drainage and in such scenario, the role of percutaneous catheter drainage or minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy cannot be understated. In a nutshell, the management of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis involves a multi-disciplinary team including a gastroenterologist, an intensivist, an interventional radiologist and a surgeon for optimum clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Michael Fernandez Y Viesca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Wei Z, Huang Q, Yang S, Fang Y, Ren Y, Jiang X, Jiang B. Effect of Plastic Stents Following Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement on Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024:00129689-990000000-00240. [PMID: 38812290 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred to initial drainage in pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) in recent years. However, unlike plastic stents, the long-term placement of LAMS is not recommended due to a high risk of local complications. This meta-analysis attempted to evaluate the effect of using plastic stents for prolonged drainage after LAMS removal on recurrence of PFCs in DPDS. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception until January 2023, to identify articles investigating the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of plastic stents compared with no plastic stents following LAMS removal in patients with PFCs and DPDS. The primary outcome measures included recurrence of PFCs and need for reintervention. RESULTS We identified 3 eligible articles including 520 patients with PFCs, 246 of whom with DPDS. There was a total of 143 and 103 patients in the plastic stents group and in the no plastic stents group, respectively. The plastic stents group exhibited a lower rate of PFCs recurrence following LAMS removal after PFCs resolution compared with the no plastic stents group (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P=0.02). However, there was no difference in the rates of reintervention between the two groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.15-1.83; P=0.31). There was no severe adverse events and mortality associated with stent placement or exchange in all patients. CONCLUSION Deployment of plastic stents for long-term drainage after LAMS replacement can decrease the risk of PFCs recurrence in patients with DPDS following resolution, but it does not impact reintervention rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shizhong Yang
- Centre of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Jong DM, Stassen PMC, Schoots IG, Verdonk RC, Bruno MJ, Voermans RP, de Jonge PJF. Impact of long-term transmural plastic stents on recurrence after endoscopic treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38626890 DOI: 10.1055/a-2307-7123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic transmural drainage (ETD) using double-pigtail stents (DPSs) is a well-established treatment for walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients undergoing ETD with DPSs left indwelling versus those where stents were removed or migrated. METHODS This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with WON who underwent ETD using DPSs between July 2001 and December 2019. The primary outcome was recurrence of a pancreatic fluid collection (PFC). Secondary outcomes were long-term complications and recurrence-associated factors. Competing risk regression analysis considered DPS removal or migration as time-varying covariates. RESULTS Among 320 patients (median age 58; 36% women), DPSs were removed in 153 (47.8%), migrated spontaneously in 27 (8.4%), and remained indwelling in 140 (43.8%). PFC recurrence was observed in 57 patients (17.8%): after removal (n = 39; 25.5%); after migration (n = 4; 14.8%); in patients with indwelling DPSs (n = 14; 10.0%). In 25 patients (7.8%), drainage of recurrent PFC was indicated. Risk factors for recurrence were DPS removal or migration (hazard ratio [HR] 3.45, 95%CI 1.37-8.70) and presence of a disconnected pancreatic duct (HR 5.08, 95%CI 1.84-14.0). CONCLUSIONS Among patients who undergo ETD of WON, leaving DPSs in situ seems to lower the risk of recurrent fluid collections, without any long-term DPS-related complications. These results suggest that DPSs should not be routinely removed and can be safely left indwelling indefinitely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M de Jong
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pauline M C Stassen
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jan F de Jonge
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hawa F, Chalhoub JM, Vilela A, Quingalahua E, Shannon C, Philips GM, Kwon RS, Wamsteker EJ, Schulman AR, DiMagno MJ, Machicado JD. Efficacy and safety of long-term indwelling plastic stents after resolution of pancreatic fluid collections with endoscopic transmural drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2350-2358. [PMID: 38509392 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10784-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) may recur after resolution with endoscopic transmural drainage (ETD) and standard stent removal (SSR). Herein, we compared the efficacy and safety of leaving long-term indwelling plastic stents (LTIS) vs. standard stent removal after PFC resolution with ETD. METHODS We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to September 2022. Full-text articles comparing long-term (> 6 months) outcomes of LTIS and SSR were eligible, as well as single-arm studies with ≥ 10 patients with LTIS. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Measured outcomes included the following: (A) PFC recurrence; (B) interventions for PFC recurrence; (C) technical success; and (D) adverse events (AEs). Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models. RESULTS We included 16 studies, encompassing 1285 patients. Compared to SSR after PFC resolution with ETD, LTIS was associated with significantly lower risk of PFC recurrence (3% vs. 23%; OR 0.22 [95%CI 0.09-0.52]; I2 = 45%) and need for interventions (2% vs. 14%; OR 0.35 [95%CI 0.16-0.78]; I2 = 0%). The superiority of LTIS on reducing PFC recurrence was found with walled-off necrosis, with or without disconnected pancreatic duct, and with placement of ≥ 2 LTIS. When using LTIS, the pooled proportion of AEs was 8% (95%CI 4-11%) and technical success was 93% (95%CI 86-99%). CONCLUSIONS Our results show that LTIS after PFC resolution with ETD is feasible, safe, and superior to SSR in reducing the risk of PFC recurrence and need for interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi Hawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jean M Chalhoub
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Ana Vilela
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Elit Quingalahua
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Carol Shannon
- Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - George M Philips
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Erik-Jan Wamsteker
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Allison R Schulman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew J DiMagno
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jorge D Machicado
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Floor 3 Reception D, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saito T, Omoto S, Takenaka M, Tsujimae M, Masuda A, Sato T, Hamada T, Ota S, Shiomi H, Takahashi S, Fujisawa T, Nakagawa K, Matsubara S, Uemura S, Iwashita T, Yoshida K, Maruta A, Okuno M, Iwata K, Hayashi N, Mukai T, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Nakai Y. Risk factors for adverse outcomes at various phases of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Data from a multi-institutional consortium. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:600-614. [PMID: 37702186 DOI: 10.1111/den.14683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES No comprehensive study has examined short- and long-term adverse outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) including walled-off necrosis (WON) and pseudocysts. METHODS In a multi-institutional cohort of 357 patients receiving EUS-guided treatment of PFCs (228 with WON and 129 with pseudocysts), we examined PFC type-specific risk factors for procedure-related adverse events (AEs), clinical failure, and recurrence. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using the logistic and Cox regression models, respectively, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Adverse events were observed predominantly in WON, and risk factors were WON extension to the pelvis (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.00-6.19) and endoscopic necrosectomy (OR 5.15; 95% CI 1.61-16.5). Risk factors for clinical failure in WON treatment included higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR for ≥3 vs. ≤2, 2.58; 95% CI 1.05-6.35), extension to the pelvis (OR 3.63; 95% CI 1.57-8.43), nonuse of a lumen-apposing metal stent (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.10-7.54), and percutaneous drainage (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.27-10.9). Patients with pseudocysts extending to the paracolic gutter and the need for more than two endoscopic/percutaneous procedures had ORs for clinical failure of 5.28 (95% CI 1.10-25.3) and 5.52 (95% CI 1.61-18.9), respectively. Pseudocysts requiring the multigateway approach were associated with a high risk of recurrence (HR 4.00; 95% CI 1.11-11.6). CONCLUSION The adverse outcomes at various phases of EUS-guided PFC treatment may be predictable based on clinical parameters. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Omoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tsujimae
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shogo Ota
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Sho Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Fujisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keito Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shinya Uemura
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kensaku Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Hayashi
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gornals JB, Velasquez-Rodriguez JG, Bas-Cutrina F, Garcia Garcia De Paredes A, Esteban JM, Teran A, Gonzalez-Huix F, Perez-Miranda M, Guarner-Argente C, Vila JJ, Garcia-Sumalla A, Foruny JR, Fisac-Vazquez J, Moris M, Miquel-Salas I, De-la-Serna Higuera C, Murzi-Pulgar M, Sanchez-Yague A, Salord S, Ruiz-Osuna S, Busquets J, Sanllorente-Melenchon M, Videla S, Moreno R, Tebe-Cordomi C, Hereu P, Vazquez-Sequeiros E. Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2148-2159. [PMID: 38448625 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10699-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have displaced double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) as the standard treatment for walled-off necrosis (WON),β but evidence for exclusively using LAMS is limited. We aimed to assess whether the theoretical benefit of LAMS was superior to DPS. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was carried out in 9 tertiary hospitals. Between June 2017, and Oct 2020, we screened 99 patients with symptomatic WON, of whom 64 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DPS group (n = 31) or the LAMS group (n = 33). The primary outcome was short-term (4-weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of collection. Secondary endpoints included long-term clinical success, hospitalization, procedure duration, recurrence, safety, and costs. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT03100578. RESULTS A similar clinical success rate in the short term (RR, 1.41; 95% CI 0.88-2.25; p = 0.218) and in the long term (RR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.92-1.58; p = 0.291) was observed between both groups. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (35 vs. 45-min, p = 0.003). The hospital admission after the index procedure (median difference, - 10 [95% CI - 17.5, - 1]; p = 0.077) and global hospitalization (median difference - 4 [95% CI - 33, 25.51]; p = 0.82) were similar between both groups. Reported stent-related adverse events were similar for the two groups (36 vs.45% in LAMS vs. DPS), except for de novo fever, which was significantly 26% lower in LAMS (RR, 0.26 [0.08-0.83], p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS The clinical superiority of LAMS over DPS for WON therapy was not proved, with similar clinical success, hospital stay and similar safety profile between both groups, yet a significant reduction in procedure time was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan B Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Julio G Velasquez-Rodriguez
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Francesc Bas-Cutrina
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ana Garcia Garcia De Paredes
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose-Miguel Esteban
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Teran
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Carlos Guarner-Argente
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Pathology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Juan J Vila
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Albert Garcia-Sumalla
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jose Ramon Foruny
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Fisac-Vazquez
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Moris
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Isabel Miquel-Salas
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | - Marianette Murzi-Pulgar
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Pathology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Andres Sanchez-Yague
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain
| | - Silvia Salord
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sandra Ruiz-Osuna
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Juli Busquets
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Hepato-bilio-Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mireia Sanllorente-Melenchon
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC), Plataforma Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCRen), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sebas Videla
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC), Plataforma Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCRen), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ramon Moreno
- Economics and Finance Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Cristian Tebe-Cordomi
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biostatistics Department, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Pilar Hereu
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC), Plataforma Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCRen), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bang JY, Wilcox CM, Navaneethan U, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Treatment of walled-off necrosis using lumen-apposing metal stents versus plastic stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized trials. Endoscopy 2024; 56:184-195. [PMID: 37673106 DOI: 10.1055/a-2169-0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Walled-off necrosis (WON) is highly morbid disease most effectively managed by endoscopic drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) or plastic stents, with or without necrosectomy. This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of patients included in randomized trials treated using LAMSs or plastic stents. METHODS The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify all data collected from randomized trials comparing LAMSs and plastic stents for the treatment of WON. The primary outcome measure was need for endoscopic necrosectomy. RESULTS Three studies comprising 206 patients met inclusion criteria. Except for procedure duration, which was significantly shorter for LAMSs (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.22, 95%CI -1.64 to -0.79), there was no significant difference in need for necrosectomy (38.5% vs. 41.2%; risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95%CI 0.79-1.45), number of interventions (SMD -0.09, 95%CI -0.40 to 0.22), treatment success (90.7% vs. 94.5%; RR 0.96, 95%CI 0.87-1.06), recurrence (4.6% vs. 0.6%; RR 3.73, 95%CI 0.42-33.0), readmission (42.6% vs. 50.2%; RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.62-1.14), length of hospitalization (SMD -0.06, 95%CI -0.55 to 0.43), mortality (8.5% vs. 9.8%; RR 0.70, 95%CI 0.30-1.66), new-onset organ failure (10.6% vs. 14.6%; RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.16-3.32), bleeding (11.0% vs. 10.7%; RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.34-3.44), procedural adverse events (23.6% vs. 19.2%; RR 1.38, 95%CI 0.82-2.33), or overall costs (SMD -0.04, 95%CI -0.31 to 0.24) between LAMSs and plastic stents, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Except for procedure duration, there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes for patients with WON treated using LAMSs or plastic stents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Young Bang
- Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iwashita T, Sato T, Hamada T, Saito T, Iwata K, Shiomi H, Takenaka M, Maruta A, Uemura S, Masuda A, Matsubara S, Mukai T, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Nakai Y. Risk of recurrence with or without plastic stent after EUS-guided treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E188-E198. [PMID: 38348330 PMCID: PMC10861320 DOI: 10.1055/a-2226-1237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Recent advances in endoscopic transmural treatment have improved the clinical outcomes of patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, there is still a debate about the preventive effect of long-term placement of a transmural plastic stent (PS) on recurrence after successful endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of PFCs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate PFC recurrence rates with and without a transmural PS after EUS-guided treatment. Patients and methods A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database was conducted to identify clinical studies comparing outcomes with and without transmural PS published until September 2022. Data on PFC recurrence and adverse events (AEs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Results Nine studies including 380 patients with long-term transmural PS and 289 patients without PS were identified. The rate of PFC recurrence was significantly lower in patients with transmural PS (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.08-0.65], P = 0.005). In a subgroup analysis limited to studies focusing on patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome, which has been reported to be a risk factor for PFC recurrence, the OR was numerically lower than that for the entire cohort (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.04-0.46]). The rate of AEs was significantly higher with long-term transmural PS (OR = 14.77, 95% CI [4.21-51.83]). Conclusions In this meta-analysis, long-term PS placement reduced the risk of PFC recurrence. Given the potential AEs of indwelling PS, further research is required to evaluate the overall benefits of long-term PS placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shinya Uemura
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Capurso G, Tacelli M, Vanella G, Ponz de Leon Pisani R, Dell'Anna G, Abati M, Mele R, Lauri G, Panaitescu A, Nunziata R, Zaccari P, Archibugi L, Arcidiacono PG. Managing complications of chronic pancreatitis: a guide for the gastroenterologist. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:1267-1283. [PMID: 38093702 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2295498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic pancreatitis is a heterogeneous and complex syndrome that, in most cases, causes pain as a cardinal symptom and affects both the morphology and function of the pancreas, leading to several serious complications. AREAS COVERED The present review, based on a non-systematic PubMed search updated to June 2023, aims to present the current available evidence on the role of gastroenterologists in the diagnosis and treatment of both local and systemic complications by either endoscopic or medical treatments. EXPERT OPINION At diagnosis and during chronic pancreatitis follow-up, particular care is needed to consider not only the clinically manifest signs and symptoms of the disease, such as pain, jaundice, gastrointestinal obstruction, and pseudocysts, which require multidisciplinary discussion to establish the best treatment option (endoscopic or surgical), but also less evident systemic complications. Pancreatic exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, together with chronic inflammation, addiction, and dysbiosis, contribute to malnutrition, sarcopenia, and osteopathy. These complications, in turn, increase the risk of infection, thromboembolic events, and death. Patients with chronic pancreatitis also have an increased risk of psychiatric disorders and pancreatic cancer onset. Overall, patients with chronic pancreatitis should receive a holistic evaluation, considering all these aspects, possibly through multidisciplinary care in dedicated expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ponz de Leon Pisani
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dell'Anna
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Abati
- Nutrition Service, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Mele
- Nutrition Service, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Lauri
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Afrodita Panaitescu
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Bucharest Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Rubino Nunziata
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
| | - Piera Zaccari
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Livia Archibugi
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boxhoorn L, Verdonk RC, Voermans RP. Response to letter to the editor: lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis. Gut 2023; 72:2002-2003. [PMID: 36229173 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Boxhoorn
- Dept of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Dept of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Dept of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Basha J, Lakhtakia S. Management of Disconnected Pancreatic Duct. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:753-770. [PMID: 37709409 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Disconnected pancreatic duct (DPD) is common after acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). Its clinical implications vary according to the course of disease. In the early phase of ANP, parenchymal necrosis along with disruption of pancreatic duct cause acute necrotic collection that evolves into walled-off necrosis (WON). In the later phase, DPD becomes evident as confirmed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Clinical manifestations of DPD can vary from being asymptomatic, recurrent pain, recurrent pancreatic fluid collection (PFC), obstructive pancreatitis, or external pancreatic fistula (EPF). Few patients develop new-onset diabetes. Long-term indwelling plastic stents have been proposed to prevent the recurrent PFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jahangeer Basha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India
| | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vitali F, Zundler S, Jesper D, Strobel D, Wildner D, de Pretis N, Frulloni L, Crinó SF, Neurath MF. Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatology: Focus on Inflammatory Diseases and Interventions. Visc Med 2023; 39:131-139. [PMID: 37899796 PMCID: PMC10601533 DOI: 10.1159/000533433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a main tool in pancreatology for both diagnosis and therapy. It allows minimally invasive differentiation of various diseases, with a minimal degree of inflammation or anatomic variations. EUS also enables interventional direct access to the pancreatic parenchyma and the retroperitoneal space, the pancreatic duct, the pancreatic masses, cysts, vascular structures for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Summary This review aimed to summarize the new developments of EUS in the field of pancreatology, with special interest on inflammation and interventions. EUS enables way to perform pseudocyst drainage, necrosectomy, transenteral drainage and transenteric access of the main pancreatic duct, or the direct visualization or therapy of vascular structures adjacent to the pancreas. Key Messages EUS has a deep impact on pancreatology, and the development of new diagnostic and interventional approaches to the retroperitoneal space and the pancreas has increased in the last years exponentially, allowing minimal invasive diagnostics and therapy and avoiding surgery and percutaneous therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Vitali
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zundler
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Jesper
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Deike Strobel
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dane Wildner
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nicoló de Pretis
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinó
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus F. Neurath
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nakai Y, Hamada T, Saito T, Shiomi H, Maruta A, Iwashita T, Iwata K, Takenaka M, Masuda A, Matsubara S, Sato T, Mukai T, Yasuda I, Isayama H. Time to think prime times for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: Pendulum conundrum. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:700-710. [PMID: 37209365 DOI: 10.1111/den.14598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) typically develop as local complications of acute pancreatitis and complicate the clinical course of patients with acute pancreatitis and potentially fatal clinical outcomes. Interventions are required in cases of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) (matured PFCs with necrosis) and pancreatic pseudocysts (matured PFCs without necrosis). In the management of necrotizing pancreatitis and WON, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage combined with on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy (i.e. the step-up approach) is increasingly used as a less invasive treatment modality compared with a surgical or percutaneous approach. Through the substantial research efforts and development of specific devices and stents (e.g. lumen-apposing metal stents), endoscopic techniques of PFC management have been standardized to some extent. However, there has been no consensus about timing of carrying out each treatment step; for instance, it is uncertain when direct endoscopic necrosectomy should be initiated and finished and when a plastic or metal stent should be removed following clinical treatment success. Despite emerging evidence for the effectiveness of noninterventional supportive treatment (e.g. antibiotics, nutritional support, irrigation of the cavity), there has been only limited data on the timing of starting and stopping the treatment. Large studies are required to optimize the timing of those treatment options and improve clinical outcomes of patients with PFCs. In this review, we summarize the current available evidence on the indications and timing of interventional and supportive treatment modalities for this patient population and discussed clinical unmet needs that should be addressed in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seicean A, Pojoga C, Rednic V, Hagiu C, Seicean R. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: do we know enough about the best approach? Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231180047. [PMID: 37485492 PMCID: PMC10357067 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231180047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collection often occurs as a local complication of acute pancreatitis, and drainage is indicated in symptomatic patients. The drainage may be surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided. In symptomatic collections older than 4 weeks and localized in the upper abdomen, EUS-guided drainage is the first choice of treatment. Lumen-apposing metal stents are useful in cases of walled-off necrosis, facilitating access to the cavity; however, they do not reduce the number of necrosectomy sessions required. In most pancreatic pseudocysts requiring drainage, plastic stents remain the first choice of treatment. This review aimed to summarize the principles and techniques of step-up therapy of pancreatic fluid collections, including preprocedural and postprocedural assessment and practical approaches of drainage and necrosectomy, making available evidence more accessible to endoscopists aiming to train for this procedure. Successful and safe EUS drainage connotes early recognition and treatment of complications and the presence of a multidisciplinary team for optimal patient management. However, the best time for necrosectomy, modality of drainage method (lumen-apposing metal stents or plastic stents), and duration of antibiotherapy are still under evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrada Seicean
- ‘Iuliu Hațieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ‘Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor’, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Voicu Rednic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ‘Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor’, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Claudia Hagiu
- ‘Iuliu Hațieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ‘Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor’, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Radu Seicean
- First Department of Surgery, ‘Iuliu Hațieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rana SS, Sharma R, Sharma G, Gupta R. Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Transmural Plastic Stent Placement After Removal of Lumen Apposing Metal Stent in Resolved Pancreatic Fluid Collections with Duct Disconnection at Head/Neck of Pancreas. Dig Dis Sci 2023:10.1007/s10620-023-07973-7. [PMID: 37269369 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07973-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Replacing lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) with permanent indwelling plastic stents after the resolution of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) in patients with disconnected pancreatic duct (DPD) is a debatable issue. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of replacing LAMS with long-term indwelling transmural plastic stents in patients with DPD at head/neck of pancreas. METHODS The database of patients with PFC who underwent endoscopic transmural drainage with LAMS over the last three years was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients with DPD at the level of the head/neck of the pancreas. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A where LAMS could be replaced with plastic stents and Group B, where LAMS could not be replaced with plastic stents. The two groups were compared for recurrence of symptoms/PFC and complications. RESULTS Out of 53 patients studied, 39 patients (34 males; mean age: 35.7 ± 6.6 years) were included in Group A and 14 patients in Group B (11 males; mean age: 33.4 ± 5.9 years). The demographic profile as well as indwelling time of LAMS was comparable between two groups. PFC recurrence was observed in 2/39 (5.1%) patients in group A and 6/14 (42.8%) patients in group B (p = 0.0001) with one patient in group A and 5 patients in group B requiring repeat intervention for recurrent PFC. CONCLUSIONS Long-term transmural plastic stent placement after removal of LAMS in pancreatic duct disconnection at head/neck of the pancreas is safe and effective strategy to prevent the recurrence of PFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder S Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
| | - Ravi Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Gaurav Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Rajesh Gupta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Attwell AR. Endoscopic Management of Necrotic Pancreatic Fluid Collections in the Setting of Disrupted Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: Out Like a LAMS? Dig Dis Sci 2023:10.1007/s10620-023-07974-6. [PMID: 37269370 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07974-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
In this commentary, the recent study "Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Transmural Plastic Stent Placement After Removal of Lumen Apposing Metal Stent In Resolved Pancreatic Fluid Collections With Duct Disconnection at Head/Neck of Pancreas" is addressed. Some background information regarding endoscopic management of walled off necrosis is mentioned, then the study is summarized, followed by a critique about the strengths and limitations of the study. Further areas of research are also mentioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augustin R Attwell
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17Th Ave., B158, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chavan R, Lakhtakia S, Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Reply to van Malenstein et al. Endoscopy 2023; 55:396. [PMID: 36990081 DOI: 10.1055/a-1975-0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika Chavan
- Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Zaheer Nabi
- Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - D Nageshwar Reddy
- Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lera Dos Santos ME, Proença IM, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, Matuguma SE, Cheng S, de Freitas Júnior JR, Luz GDO, McCarty TR, Jukemura J, de Moura EGH. Self-Expandable Metal Stent (SEMS) Versus Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) for Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Cureus 2023; 15:e37731. [PMID: 37214030 PMCID: PMC10191807 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aim Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is the gold standard approach for the treatment of encapsulated pancreatic collections (EPCs) including pseudocyst and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), and is associated with an equivalent clinical efficacy to surgical drainage with fewer complications and less morbidity. Drainage may be achieved via several types of stents including a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). However, to date there have been no randomized trials to compare these devices. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the SEMS versus LAMS for EUS-guided drainage of EPCs. Methods A phase IIB randomized trial was designed to compare the SEMS versus LAMS for the treatment of EPCs. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and procedure time were evaluated. A sample size of 42 patients was determined. Results There was no difference between the two groups in technical (LAMS 80.95% vs 100% SEMS, p=0.107), clinical (LAMS 85.71% vs 95.24% SEMS, p=0.606) or radiological success (LAMS 92.86% vs 83.33% SEMS, p=0.613). There was no difference in AEs including stent migration rate and mortality. The procedure time was longer in the LAMS group (mean time 43.81 min versus 24.43 min, p=0.001). There was also a difference in the number of intra-procedure complications (5 LAMS vs 0 SEMS, p=0.048). Conclusion SEMS and LAMS have similar technical, clinical, and radiological success as well as AEs. However, SEMS has a shorter procedure time and fewer intra-procedure complications compared to non-electrocautery-enhanced LAMS in this phase IIB randomized controlled trial (RCT). The choice of the type of stent used for EUS drainage of EPCs should consider device availability, costs, and personal and local experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, BRA
| | - Igor Mendonça Proença
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, BRA
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Sergio Eiji Matuguma
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Spencer Cheng
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - João Remi de Freitas Júnior
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Gustavo de Oliveira Luz
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - José Jukemura
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, BRA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Malenstein H, Laleman W, van der Merwe SW. Plastic stent replacement after metal stent removal - what about patients with residual walled-off necrosis collections? Endoscopy 2023; 55:395. [PMID: 36990080 DOI: 10.1055/a-1949-0607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah van Malenstein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wim Laleman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Schalk W van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jearth V, Rana SS. Endoscopic step up: When and how. Surg Open Sci 2022; 10:135-144. [PMID: 36193259 PMCID: PMC9526220 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of (peri)pancreatic collections has undergone a paradigm shift from open surgical drainage to minimally invasive endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical interventions. Minimally invasive interventions are associated with less morbidity and mortality compared to open necrosectomy. The (peri)pancreatic collections are currently treated with a “step-up approach” of an initial drainage procedure followed, if necessary, by a more invasive debridement. The step-up approach for management of (peri)pancreatic collections is mainly of two types, namely, surgical and endoscopic. Surgical step up includes initial image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by minimally invasive video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement. Endoscopic step-up approach includes endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary by direct endoscopic necrosectomy. The development of endoscopic ultrasound and lumen apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has revolutionized the endoscopic management of (peri)pancreatic collections. Compared to surgical step-up approach, endoscopic step-up treatment approach has been reported to be associated with less new-onset organ failure, pancreatic fistula, enterocutaneous fistula, or perforation of visceral organ and shorter hospital/intensive care unit stay. This review will mainly focus on indications, techniques, timing, and recent advances related to endoscopic step-up approach in management of symptomatic(peri)pancreatic collections.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rana SS, Gupta R. Long-term transmural plastic stenting after metal stent removal in disconnected pancreatic duct: is the debate over? Endoscopy 2022; 54:920. [PMID: 36007510 DOI: 10.1055/a-1857-5600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder S Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Rajesh Gupta
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vanbiervliet G. Prevention of pancreatic fluid collection recurrence after metal stent removal: plastic is not so fantastic! Endoscopy 2022; 54:869-870. [PMID: 35468629 DOI: 10.1055/a-1811-6811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffroy Vanbiervliet
- Endoscopie Digestive, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chavan R, Nabi Z, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN. Reply to Rana and Gupta. Endoscopy 2022; 54:921. [PMID: 36007511 DOI: 10.1055/a-1881-4653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika Chavan
- Gastroenterology, Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad
| | - Zaheer Nabi
- Gastroenterology, Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chavan R, Nabi Z, Lakhtakia S. Reply to Dhar et al. Endoscopy 2022; 54:729. [PMID: 35764086 DOI: 10.1055/a-1855-6975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zaheer Nabi
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dhar J, Sachan A, Samanta J. To stent or not to stent: do we have an answer yet? Endoscopy 2022; 54:728. [PMID: 35764085 DOI: 10.1055/a-1823-0974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jahnvi Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Grecian Superspeciality Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India
| | - Anurag Sachan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|