Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Rectal metastasis from lung cancer diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy: A case report

A 73-year-old man visited our hospital due to hyperintestinal peristalsis and diarrhea. He had been undergoing regular annual checkups for dust lung disease. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan showed edematous thickening of the rectal wall with contrast effect. A colonoscopy revealed a submucosal tumor-like protrusion in the Rb lesion of the rectum without neoplastic epithelial changes. Forceps biopsies of the overlying mucosa were non-diagnostic; however, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy revealed that the specimen was poorly differentiated non-small cell invasive carcinoma. Then, we performed a chest computed tomography and a newly detected mass lesion in the upper lobe of the right lung. Based on immunohistochemical analysis and image findings, the patient was diagnosed with rectal metastasis from lung cancer. Subsequently, sputum cytology confirmed the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Rectal submucosal tumor-like protrusions are occasionally encountered. When a non-exposed rectal tumor is identified, it is important to differentiate metastatic diseases, consider endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy, and make a definitive diagnosis through detailed immunohistochemical evaluation and systemic imaging surveillance.

The feasibility of endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (e-GIST) is a rare type that is distinct from gastric GIST (g-GIST), and comprehensive studies are limited. The present study aims to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between e-GIST and g-GIST, evaluate the feasibility of using endoscopic resection (ER) to treat e-GIST, and explore its clinical implications.

METHODS

Patients with GISTs from January 2010 to May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Comprehensive clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and systematically analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 46 e-GIST patients and 366 g-GIST patients were enrolled. The distinct characteristics of e-GIST were as follows: (1) greater prevalence in male patients than in female patients, in contrast with the predominance of females among patients with g-GIST; (2) the median onset age was 61 years (range 20 to 80 years), with 58.7% of patients aged > 65 years in e-GIST; (3) the proportion of larger tumors was much more frequent in the esophagus; (4) greater incidence of ulceration/bleeding than in g-GIST; (5) increased mitotic count (≥ 5/50HPF). These factors collectively contribute to significantly shorter overall survival in e-GIST patients. Importantly, our analysis revealed that the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) were comparable to those of surgical resection for selected e-GISTs (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding, and mitotic count < 5/50HPF), with no significant differences in recurrence rate or survival time between these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the distinct clinicopathological features of e-GIST from those of g-GIST with increased tumor size, ulceration/bleeding, and higher mitotic counts identified as significant prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that ER is a feasible and effective treatment approach for carefully selected e-GIST cases (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding), as assessed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). These results provide valuable insights for the management of this rare tumor subtype.

Asymptomatic small gastric subepithelial lesions arising from the muscularis propria: outcomes and surveillance in a medical center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are frequently identified incidentally during endoscopy, with those originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer posing diagnostic and management challenges. The optimal surveillance duration for these lesions remains debated. This study aimed to assess size changes in SELs from the MP layer and recommend appropriate surveillance intervals.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed asymptomatic gastric SELs (≤2 cm) diagnosed via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) from 2013 to 2018, with follow-up data and no excision within 1 year. Significant progression was defined as a > 20% increase in diameter during EUS surveillance. Lesion-related adverse outcomes, size changes, and histological findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 561 patients (median surveillance duration: 80 months) were included. One lesion-related adverse outcome (0.2%), liver metastasis from a gastrointestinal stromal tumor, occurred after 62 months. Among the EUS subgroup (n = 313), no differences were observed in progression rates (22.6% vs. 25%) or size increase rates (0.3 mm/year vs. 0.9 mm/year) between micro-SELs (<10 mm) and mini-SELs (10-20 mm). Progressive lesions exhibited faster growth (2.6 mm/year) and more heterogeneous echotexture (43.8%). Most excised lesions were gastrointestinal stromal tumors or leiomyomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a mean surveillance period of 25.5 months, 13 lesions grew beyond 20 mm. No lesion-related adverse outcomes occurred within the first three years. Histological diagnosis remains the gold standard, but when tissue acquisition is unfeasible, EUS surveillance may be an alternative. Our findings suggest that for asymptomatic micro-SELs (<10 mm) from the MP layer without high-risk features, the surveillance interval can be safely extended to two years.

Gastric schwannoma: Computed tomography and perigastric lymph node characteristics

BACKGROUND

Gastric schwannoma (GS) is often misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors due to the high incidence of the latter. However, these two types differ significantly in pathology and biological behavior.

AIM

To evaluate the computed tomography characteristics of GS and provide insights into its accurate diagnosis.

METHODS

Twenty-three cases of GS confirmed between January 2011 and December 2023 were assessed clinically and radiologically. Imaging characteristics, including tumor location, size, contour, ulceration, growth pattern, enhancement degree and pattern, cystic change, calcification, and perigastric lymph nodes (PLNs), were reviewed by two experienced radiologists.

RESULTS

Our sample included 18 females and 5 males, with a median age of 54.7 years. A total of 39.1% of cases were asymptomatic. GSs appeared as oval and well-defined submucosal tumors, with exophytic (43.5%) or mixed (endoluminal + exophytic; 43.5%) growth patterns. The tumors were primarily located in the gastric body (78.3%). Ulcerations were observed in 8 cases (34.5%), and PLNs were observed in 15 cases (65%). The average degree of enhancement was 48.3 Hounsfield units. Twenty cases (87%) showed peak enhancement in the delayed phase. Most GSs were homogeneous, while cystic change (13.0%) and calcification (17.4%) were rare.

CONCLUSION

GS predominantly showed gradual homogenous enhancement with peak enhancement in the delayed phase. PLNs around GS are helpful in differentiating GS from other gastric submucosal tumors.

Imaging features and preoperative diagnostic insights of esophageal schwannomas as a rare type

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze and summarize the key features of esophageal schwannomas to provide new insights into preoperative diagnosis and enhance clinical recognition.

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed esophageal schwannoma who underwent surgical resection between January 2013 and January 2023 were enrolled. Imaging results from barium swallow, CT, MRI, 18F-FDG PET-CT, esophagoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound were compiled and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 10 males and 11 females, with mean age of 55.86 ± 9.09 years. The mean tumor size was 5.69 ± 1.32 cm, with tumors commonly located in the upper to middle esophagus. 83.3 % (10/12) presented smooth filling defects with intact canal walls in barium meal. Most tumors (71.4 %, 15/21) were oval-shaped, exhibiting intracavitary growth with well-defined borders. Mild enhancement was observed on CT with pre-contrast attenuation of 36.0 ± 53.87 HU and post-contrast enhancement of 52.75 ± 7.45 HU. Most lesions showed plateau dynamic enhancement on MRI (85.7 %, 6/7). Air crescent signs (95.2 %, 20/21) and fascicular signs (87.5 %, 7/8) were observed in most cases. Neither calcifications nor target signs were observed, and cystic changes were infrequent. All lesions showed high uptake on PET-CT (SUVmax: 11.19 ± 3.41). Endoscopic lesions typically exhibit smooth surfaces, soft textures, and colors ranging from normal to slightly lighter hues (94.7 %, 18/19). Endoscopic ultrasound indicated minimal blood flow within lesions (53.8 %, 7/13), and elastography displayed a blue-green pattern (100 %, 5/5).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal schwannomas exhibit distinct imaging characteristics. MRI provides additional diagnostic information for more accurate evaluation, while high metabolic activity on PET-CT may mimic malignancy.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD®) for the Management of Gastrointestinal Lesions: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has emerged as a transformative technique for managing gastrointestinal (GI) lesions, previously deemed unsuitable for endoscopic removal. Unlike conventional endoscopic resection methods, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), EFTR enables en bloc excision of both intraluminal and subepithelial lesions by resecting all layers of the GI wall, followed by defect closure to prevent complications. The introduction of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) has significantly enhanced the feasibility and safety of EFTR, particularly in the colon and upper GI tract, with increasing adoption worldwide. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of FTRD®, focusing on its clinical applications, procedural methodology, and comparative efficacy against other endoscopic resection techniques. The indications and contraindications for EFTR are explored, highlighting its utility in treating non-lifting adenomas, subepithelial tumours, and T1 carcinomas without lymph node involvement. This review synthesizes current clinical data and FTRD® advantages. Despite its strengths, EFTR via FTRD® incorporates challenges such as limitations in lesion size, procedural complexity, and potential adverse events. Strategies for overcoming these challenges, including hybrid techniques and modifications in procedural approach, are examined. The review also emphasizes the need for further research to optimize surveillance strategies and determine the long-term clinical impact of EFTR in GI lesion management. By integrating recent evidence, this paper provides valuable insights into the evolving role of EFTR in therapeutic endoscopy.

Slicing Through the Options: A Systematic Review of Esophageal Leiomyoma Management

Esophageal leiomyomas are rare, benign tumors that can remain asymptomatic or cause dysphagia and chest discomfort when they grow large. Despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, optimal management remains debated. This systematic review evaluates current diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches, synthesizing findings from a comprehensive PubMed search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 51 studies were included, comprising six original studies, 26 case reports, nine retrospective cohort studies, nine case series, and two cross-sectional studies. Findings indicate that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most accurate diagnostic tool (89% accuracy), while computed tomography (CT) and barium swallow studies provide complementary structural assessments. Immunohistochemical staining differentiates leiomyomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with leiomyomas expressing desmin and smooth muscle actin (SMA) but lacking CD34 and KIT. Surgical intervention is recommended for symptomatic tumors or those exceeding 5 cm. Minimally invasive techniques, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), offer superior outcomes compared to traditional open surgery. RATS demonstrates a negligible mucosal injury rate versus 1-15% for other approaches, while STER minimizes blood loss and accelerates recovery. Postoperative outcomes are generally favorable, though transient gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common complication. While STER and RATS present effective alternatives with reduced morbidity, this review highlights limitations, including variability in study designs, small sample sizes, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize patient selection and establish long-term efficacy. This review provides insights to inform clinical practice and guide future research in the management of esophageal leiomyomas.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical and Technology Review

This Technical and Technology Review from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) represents an update of the previous document on the technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology, including the available types of needle, technical aspects of tissue sampling, new devices, and specimen handling and processing. Among the most important new recommendations are:ESGE recommends end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles over reverse-bevel FNB or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needles for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic lesions; FNA may still have a role when rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is available.ESGE recommends EUS-FNB or mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) equally for tissue sampling of subepithelial lesions ≥20 mm in size. MIAB could represent the first choice for smaller lesions (<20 mm) if proper expertise is available.ESGE does not recommend the use of antibiotic prophylaxis before EUS-guided tissue sampling of solid masses and EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Role of Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic Ultrasound

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is widely used for the diagnosis of biliopancreatic and gastrointestinal tract diseases, but it is one of the most operator-dependent endoscopic techniques, requiring a long and complex learning curve. The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in EUS is growing as AI algorithms can assist in lesion detection and characterization by analyzing EUS images. Deep learning (DL) techniques, such as convolutional neural networks, have shown great potential for tumor identification; the application of AI models can increase the EUS diagnostic accuracy, provide faster diagnoses, and provide more information that can be helpful also for a training program.

Radiomics analysis for prediction and classification of submucosal tumors based on gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasonography

Objectives

To identify and classify submucosal tumors by building and validating a radiomics model with gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images.

Methods

A total of 144 patients diagnosed with submucosal tumors through gastrointestinal EUS were collected between January 2019 and October 2020. There are 1952 radiomic features extracted from each patient's EUS images. The statistical test and the customized least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used for feature selection. Subsequently, an extremely randomized trees algorithm was utilized to construct a robust radiomics classification model specifically tailored for gastrointestinal EUS images. The performance of the model was measured by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

The radiomics model comprised 30 selected features that showed good discrimination performance in the validation cohorts. During validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated as 0.9203 and the mean value after 10-fold cross-validation was 0.9260, indicating excellent stability and calibration. These results confirm the clinical utility of the model.

Conclusions

Utilizing the dataset provided curated from gastrointestinal EUS examinations at our collaborating hospital, we have developed a well-performing radiomics model. It can be used for personalized and non-invasive prediction of the type of submucosal tumors, providing physicians with aid for early treatment and management of tumor progression.

Endoscopic ultrasound-based radiomics for predicting pathologic upgrade in esophageal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on managing patients with endoscopic suspicion of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) but biopsy-confirmed low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-based radiomics nomogram for predicting esophageal LGIN pathological progression before diagnostic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

In the development phase, EUS images of 535 patients who had biopsy-confirmed LGIN and were undergoing ESD were retrospectively included. Concurrently, 251 patients were prospectively included for independent model validation. A radiomics signature (RS) was constructed using Pearson test and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. A radiomics nomogram was then developed with multivariate logistic regression to predict pathologic upgrade before ESD. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Following stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, statistically significant clinical features were incorporated into the clinical predictive model. From EUS images, 105 radiomic features were extracted, with 11 key features selected for RS development. The RS showed strong predictive performance in identifying pathologic upgrade (AUC = 0.786). Moreover, when integrated with the clinical model (AUC = 0.648), the RS performance remarkably improved (AUC = 0.818). These results were subsequently validated in the prospective test cohort (RS: AUC = 0.792; Clinical model: AUC = 0.669; Combined model: AUC = 0.821). The combined model presented as a nomogram also excelled in calibration tests and DCA, underlining its potential for clinical application.

CONCLUSION

The EUS-based radiomics nomogram showed potential for predicting pathologic upgrade in esophageal LGIN, which helps to distinguish high-risk from low-risk cases and assists clinicians in assessing the necessity of diagnostic ESD.

Multicenter analysis of endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal lesions in Poland

OBJECTIVES

The full thickness resection is an innovative technique that enables non-exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of superficial and subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions. This retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EFTR in gastroduodenal and colorectal resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 105 consecutive EFTR procedures at 6 Polish endoscopic centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 'difficult adenoma', adenocarcinoma, or subepithelial lesion (SEL). Outcomes assessed were R0 resection and adverse event rates, with subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 105 patients (mean age: 67 ± 10.3 years; 59% male): 48 (46%) with 'difficult adenoma', 31 (30%) with adenocarcinoma, and 26 (25%) with SEL. Of these, 82 patients (78%) underwent colorectal EFTR, while 23 (22%) underwent gastroduodenal EFTR. Technical success was achieved in 101 procedures (96%), with a median time of 30 (20; 40) minutes. Among the technically successful EFTRs, R0 resection was confirmed in 86 patients (97%): 18 (95%) in the SEL group, 45 (100%) in the 'difficult adenoma' group, and 23 (92%) in the adenocarcinoma group (p = 0.1806). In 13 EFTR procedures (13%), a scar from a previous endoscopic resection was removed without any pathological lesion. Curative resections were obtained in 21 (88%) patients in the SEL group and 20 (67%) patients in the adenocarcinoma group (p = 0.0001). Clinical adverse events occurred in 12 patients (11%): Clavien-Dindo grade I (5%), II (2%), and IIIb (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

EFTR is reasonably safe and effective for resection of colorectal and gastroduodenal lesions, which would otherwise most likely require surgical treatment.

Successful diagnosis of small gastrointestinal stromal tumor using modified mucosal incision-assisted biopsy with a cold snare

Watch a video of this article.

Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors

Subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) are normally benign intramural esophageal lesions of mesenchymal origin. Although rare, the incidence of SET has increased in recent decades due to the more widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic imaging. The current review aims to provide an overview of the histopathologic spectrum and the most frequent entities including leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diagnostic workup, and multidisciplinary treatment options. Staging for SET should include endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and tissue sampling. Current consensus guidelines recommend that SET suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 20 mm or lesions with high-risk stigmata should undergo tissue sampling. Most SET have an excellent long-term outcome, but malignancy may be present in certain subtypes. Asymptomatic SET without high-risk stigmata discovered incidentally usually do not require specific treatment. However, depending on the size and location of the lesion symptoms may occur. Therapeutic interventions range from endoscopic interventional resections to major surgical procedures. Enucleation via minimally invasive or robotic-assisted access remains the standard of care for most SET sub-entities.

The efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in treating large esophageal subepithelial lesions

BACKGROUND

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is considered an effective, safe and minimally invasive treatment for esophageal subepithelial lesions (SELs) with maximal dilameter less than 3.0 cm, yet its efficacy for lesions over 3.0 cm remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the application value of STER for SELs of varying sizes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with esophageal SELs who underwent STER were retrospectively enrolled from May 2017 to March 2024. Baseline characteristics, surgical information and prognosis were collected and compared among patients with SELs of different sizes, as defined by the maximal diameter of the postoperative specimen.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were included, among whom 69 with SELs < 3.0 cm, 31 with SELs between 3.0 and 5.0 cm, 33 with SELs ≥ 5.0 cm. 1 case with SELs ≥ 5.0 cm was converted to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) due to the tumor's adhesion to the epithelial layer. Among those who completed the STER procedure, the en bloc resection rate was 100.0% for all three subgroups, and the recurrence and metastasis rates were 0.0%, demonstrating that STER is effective for SELs of all sizes. However, SELs ≥ 5.0 cm were associated with more adverse events, a higher number of difficult procedures, and more frequent intensive care unit (ICU) transfers (all p < 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

STER is effective and safe for treating esophageal SELs. For lesions exceeding 5 cm, while still feasible, the procedure requires meticulous planning, advanced techniques and careful monitoring due to increased complexity and risks.

The value of a nomogram model based on CT imaging features in differentiating duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors from pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

To construct a nomogram model based on multi-slice spiral CT imaging features to predict and differentiate between duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors (NENs), providing imaging evidence for clinical treatment decisions.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of clinical information, pathological results, and imaging data was conducted on 115 cases of duodenal GISTs and 76 cases of pancreatic head NENs confirmed by surgical pathology at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University from November 2013 to November 2022. Comparative analysis was performed on the tumor's maximum diameter, shortest diameter, long diameter/short diameter ratio, tumor morphology, tumor border, central position of the lesion, lesion long-axis direction, the relationship between tumor and common bile duct (CBD), duodenal side ulceration of the lesion, calcification, cystic and solid proportion within the tumor, thickened feeding arteries, tumor neovascularization, distant metastasis, and CT values during plain and enhanced scans in arterial and venous phases. Statistical analysis was conducted using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ2 tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors for differentiating duodenal GISTs from pancreatic head NENs. Based on these independent predictors, a nomogram model was constructed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. The nomogram was validated using a calibration curve, and decision curve analysis was applied to assess the clinical application value of the nomogram.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the duodenal GISTs group and the pancreatic head NENs group in terms of longest diameter (P < 0.001), shortest diameter (P < 0.001), plain CT value (P < 0.001), arterial phase CT value (P < 0.001), venous phase CT value (P = 0.002), lesion long-axis direction (P < 0.001), central position of the lesion (P < 0.001), the relationship between tumor and CBD(< 0.001), border (P = 0.004), calcification (P = 0.017), and distant metastasis (P = 0.018). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified uncertain location (OR 0.040, 95% CI 0.003-0.549), near the duodenum (OR 0, 95% CI 0-0.009), with the lesion long-axis direction along the pancreas as a reference, along the duodenum (OR 0.106, 95% CI 0.010-1.156) or no significant difference (OR 4.946, 95% CI 0.453-54.017), and the relationship between tumor and CBD (OR 0.013, 95% CI 0.001-0.180), shortest diameter (OR 0.705, 95% CI 0.546-0.909), and calcification (OR 18.638, 95% CI 1.316-263.878) as independent risk factors for differentiating between duodenal GISTs and pancreatic head NENs (all P values < 0.05). The combined diagnostic model's AUC values based on central position of the lesion, calcification, lesion long axis orientation, the relationship between tumor and CBD, shortest diameter, and the joint diagnostic model were 0.937 (0.902-0.972), 0.700(0.624-0.776), 0.717(0.631-0.802), 0.559 (0.473-0.644), 0.680 (0.603-0.758), and 0.991(0.982-0.999), respectively, with a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 93.0% for the joint diagnostic model. The nomogram model's AUC value was 0.985(0.973-0.996), with a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 93.9%, respectively. The calibration curve indicated good agreement between predicted and actual risks. Decision curve analysis verified the clinical application value of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model based on CT imaging features effectively differentiates between duodenal GISTs and pancreatic head NENs, aiding in more precise clinical treatment decisions.

Gastric Leiomyosarcoma Completely Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection after a Precise Preoperative Diagnosis

A 68-year-old woman was diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) based on preoperative biopsy of the gastric body. As tumor invasion confined to the submucosa with no breaking of the submucosal layer was confirmed on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), the patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric LMS, resulting in complete tumor resection. No apparent recurrence was observed in the 2.5 years after treatment. This is an extremely rare case of gastric LMS that underwent ESD after a precise preoperative diagnosis, with no signs of recurrence after treatment. ESD may be an acceptable option for gastric LMS when EUS findings allow this treatment method.

Double Band Ligation-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Resection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison With Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Ligation (With Video)

INTRODUCTION

Based on endoscopic mucosal resection with ligation (EMR-L), we developed double band ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (ESR) for complete resection of small submucosal rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Both procedures use a multiband device to perform resection, with the only difference being that ESR adds an additional band to obtain deeper resection margin. The aim of this retrospective study was to validate its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness compared with EMR-L.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients with small (≤10 mm) suspected submucosal rectal NETs who underwent ESR (n = 45) or EMR-L (n = 26) between June 2018 and October 2023 at West China Hospital. En bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, procedure time, margin distance, and adverse events were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

En bloc resections were achieved in all patients. The complete resection rate of ESR was higher than EMR-L (100% vs 88.5%, P = 0.045). The vertical margin distance and lateral margin distance were significantly longer in ESR group than EMR-L group (vertical margin distance 782.31 ± 359.45 μm vs 363.84 ± 222.78 μm, P < 0.001; and lateral margin distance 4,205.75 ± 2,167.43 μm vs 3,162.94 ± 1,419.22 μm, P = 0.008, respectively). There were no significant differences in procedure time, adverse events, postprocedural hospital stay, or medical cost between 2 groups. In addition, there was no evidence of recurrence or metastasis during the follow-up.

DISCUSSION

ESR seems to be safe and effective for complete resection of small submucosal rectal NETs. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further assess this technique.

Endoscopic calabash technique for gastric mesenchymal tumours: A low hanging fruit or a novel endoscopic technique?

The term subepithelial lesions encompasses a wide array of pathology of which numerous benign and malignant pathologies are grouped. A subset of these lesions are termed gastric mesenchymal tumours of which some have innate malignant potential. Currently there is various guidance on the recommended approach to the investigation and management of these lesions and there exists multiple methods of resection. Lin et al have developed and proposed a new method of resection of these gastric mesenchymal tumours within the field of endoscopy, a procedure they have termed endoscopic calabash ligation and resection. This editorial aims to outlay the current landscape for gastric mesenchymal tumours with regards to the various guidelines and resection techniques while comparing Lin et al's new technique to those that are already established in the field of endoscopy. Advancements in endoscopy that maintain or improve patient outcomes compared to the gold standard approach are exciting developments. Lin et al's study suggests that their technique is comparable in regard to patient outcomes while simultaneously being more efficient in its use of hospital resources including procedural time. Whilst the data and analysis proposed in the study is promising, there are areas that need to be addressed before advocating the procedure for widespread use. However, with further studies and analysis this may be foreseeable in the future.

Endoscopic semi-blunt dissection technique is safe and effective for treating gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria

BACKGROUND

Needle knives are the most commonly used instrument during endoscopic treatment for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The conventional resection method involves fully extending the needle-shaped knife head, which allows it to more easily penetrate the muscularis propria while stripping the muscle layer of the tumor. We propose a semi-blunt dissection method that can effectively reduce damage to the muscularis propria.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric SMTs originating from the muscularis propria were retrospectively analyzed. The conventional method consisted of 73 patients; The other group consisted of 40 patients underwent the semi-blunt dissection method.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, or lesion location. The intraoperative operational variable, the maximum diameter of gastric muscularis propria damage, was significantly greater in conventional method group than the other group (1.06 ± 0.48 cm vs. 0.46 ± 0.09 cm, p < 0.001). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of histological diagnosis, postoperative complications and the percentage of histologically positive resection margins.

CONCLUSION

The semi-blunt dissection method has certain advantages in the endoscopic resection of gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria, including a small extent of gastric muscularis propria damage and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Evolution in Management and Endoscopic Resection Techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are tumors originating from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract wall (muscularis mucosa, submucosa, or muscularis propria) and are covered by overlying mucosa. They are typically incidental findings during routine endoscopy. This article reviews the latest advancements in endoscopic techniques and devices used to resect subepithelial lesions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) should be employed to characterize SELs, with fine needle core biopsy (FNB) utilized with EUS for histopathologic tissue acquisition. EUS can be used as "endoscopic mapping" to mitigate serious complications prior to endoscopic resection. Techniques such as Submucosal Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER), Device-Assisted Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection, and Freehand Full Thickness Resection are available for the complete resection of SELs. The choice of technique depends on the characteristics of the lesion and the level of expertise of the endoscopist. Multiple endoscopic resection techniques for SELs have been developed, each utilizing different tools and devices. A significant shift has occurred from traditional laparoscopic surgical resection to minimally invasive, organ-sparing endoscopic resection. Advancements in "third space" endoscopy and the innovation of novel devices continue to offer less invasive resection techniques for lesions arising from the GI tract wall.

Clinicopathological features and treatment of gastrointestinal schwannomas

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal schwannomas (GIS) are rare neurogenic tumors arising from Schwann cells in the gastrointestinal tract. Studies on GIS are limited to small case reports or focus on specific tumor sites, underscoring the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges they pose.

AIM

To comprehensively examine the clinical features, pathological characteristics, treatment outcomes, associated comorbidities, and prognosis of GIS.

METHODS

The study population included patients diagnosed with GIS at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between June 2007 and April 2024. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed from medical records, including demographic characteristics, endoscopic and imaging findings, treatment modalities, pathological evaluations, and follow-up information.

RESULTS

In total, 229 patients with GIS were included, with a mean age of 56.00 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.83. The mean tumor size was 2.75 cm, and most (76.9%) were located in the stomach. Additionally, 6.6% of the patients had other malignant tumors. Preoperative imaging and endoscopy frequently misdiagnosed GIS as gastrointestinal stromal tumors. However, accurate preoperative diagnosis was achieved using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with immunohistochemical analysis, in which S100 and SOX-10 markers were mostly positive. Smaller tumors were typically managed with endoscopic resection, while larger lesions were treated with surgical resection. Follow-up results showed that most patients experienced favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative diagnosis of GIS via clinical characteristics, endoscopy, and imaging examinations remains challenging but crucial. Endoscopic therapy provides a minimally invasive and effective option for patients.

Natural Course and Long-Term Outcomes of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are often incidentally detected during endoscopic examinations, with most patients being asymptomatic and lesions measuring <20 mm. Despite their generally indolent nature, certain SELs, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, require resection. Current guidelines recommend periodic surveillance; however, the natural course and long-term outcomes of gastric SELs have not been sufficiently investigated. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the progression, growth rate, and risk factors associated with gastric SELs to inform clinical management strategies. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2000 and November 2024. Eligible studies included original studies on the follow-up and progression of gastric SELs. Non-English articles, reviews, case reports, and unrelated topics were excluded. In total, 277 articles were screened, with 15 additional articles identified through manual screening. Ultimately, 41 articles were included in the analysis. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024614865). Results: Large-scale studies reported low growth rates of 2.0-8.5% over 2.0-5.0 years, while smaller studies reported a broader range of growth rates of 5.4-28.4%. The factors contributing to these discrepancies include patient selection, follow-up duration, and growth criteria. Risk factors for lesion size increase include larger initial lesion size, irregular margins, heterogeneous echo patterns, and certain tumor locations. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for individualized management strategies based on lesion size, imaging characteristics, and risk factors. The close monitoring of high-risk lesions is crucial for timely intervention. Standardized growth criteria and optimized follow-up protocols are essential for improving clinical decision making and patient outcomes.

A subepithelial lesion algorithm for endoscopic (SAFE) resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Complete excision of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (U-SELs) eliminates diagnostic uncertainty, obviates the need for surveillance, and may be necessary for definitive diagnosis and management. Current guidelines lack precision and cohesion, and surgery is associated with significant morbidity. We describe and report on the outcomes of our SEL algorithm for endoscopic (SAFE) resection.

METHODS

U-SELs were enrolled prospectively over 115 months until March 2023. All subjects underwent axial (computed tomography) imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to exclude a large exophytic component or invasion into local structures, and assess for muscularis propria (MP) involvement.

RESULTS

106 U-SELs (41 esophageal, 65 gastric) were resected (mean patient age 60.6 [SD 13.4]; 51.9% male). Esophageal U-SELs underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; n = 22) or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) if MP involvement was suspected (n = 19). Gastric U-SELs underwent STER (n = 6 at cardia), ESD (n = 47), or exposing endoscopic full-thickness resection (e-EFTR; n = 12). Technical success rates were 97.6% and 92.3%, respectively. Among the noncardiac gastric U-SELs, five resections (9.6%) were completed laparoscopically owing to deep and broad full-thickness involvement; five (9.6%) required laparoscopic gastrotomy and surgical retrieval after successful resection and closure owing to a large lesion size (mean 47 mm). There was no delayed bleeding, perforation, or recurrence at 13 months.

CONCLUSION

U-SELs may be effectively and safely treated by endoscopic resection. The SAFE approach provides a framework that facilitates structured decision-making. Esophageal U-SELs suspected of involving the MP should undergo STER. Gastric SELs are best managed by ESD, with a view to proceeding to e-EFTR. A laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgeon should be available in case surgical retrieval of the specimen or laparoscopic completion is required.

The progression rate and risk factor analysis of small gastric subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Small gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) in the stomach can be managed through surveillance or resection. However, it is still controversial how often the lesion would progress if left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate the progression rate of small SETs and identify risk factors influencing tumor growth.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies until March 2023. Patient information, endoscopic features of SETs, and surveillance information were extracted from each included study. A random-effects model was applied along with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Based on 14 studies with 5405 SETs smaller than 3.5 cm, the annual incidence of size increase was 4.0 (95%CI 2.2-5.8) per 100 person-years, and the overall incidence was 12.8% (95%CI 8.3%-17.3%) across a surveillance duration of 51.3 ± 16.9 months. The predicted risk factors for tumor growth included ≥ 1 cm lesion size (1-2 cm vs. < 1 cm, OR 2.61, 95%CI 1.80-3.79; and > 2 cm vs. 1-2 cm, OR 1.25, 95%CI 0.87-1.81), origin in the muscularis propria (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.41-3.10), mucosal change (OR 3.27, 95%CI 1.95-5.50), irregular margin (OR 3.16, 95%CI 1.15-8.69), and hypoechoic pattern (OR 3.06, 95%CI 1.34-7.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Most small gastric SETs, particularly those smaller than 1 cm, did not increase in size during surveillance. Special attention should be given to lesions larger than 1 cm, originating from the muscularis propria, or exhibiting mucosal change, irregular margin, and hypoechoic pattern.

Mucosal snare resection-endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumors: a retrospective study (with video)

Aims

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with submucosal tumors treated with endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and those treated with mucosal snare resection-endoscopic submucosal excavation (MSR-ESE).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients who underwent ESE or MSR-ESE at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2023 and January 2024. Factors such as operation time, intraoperative perforation, postoperative adverse events, postoperative fasting time, antibiotic use, hospitalization duration, costs, and pathological diagnosis were compared between the two procedures.

Results

A total of 180 patients with submucosal tumors were included in this study. The MSR-ESE group consisted of 75 patients (41.7%), while the ESE group had 105 patients (58.3%). Propensity score matching (PSM) showed no significant differences in postoperative antibiotic use, fasting time, or intraoperative perforation between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the MSR-ESE group demonstrated shorter operation and hospitalization times, lower hospitalization costs, and a reduced incidence of postoperative peritonitis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified operation time as an independent risk factor for unplanned intraoperative perforation, with the likelihood of perforation increasing significantly as operation time increased (P=0.007, OR=1.015, 95% CI, 1.004 to 1.026).

Conclusion

MSR-ESE outperforms ESE with shorter operation times, lower costs, and fewer postoperative complications, making it a safe and effective treatment for gastric submucosal tumors.

Minimally invasive treatment strategies for submucosal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Advances in innovative endoscopy-based therapies

The increasing detection of submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) is due to the increased clinical use of endoscopy and imaging technology. Some of these SMTs have malignant potential and may cause clinical symptoms. Thus, it is recommended in clinical guidelines to consider resection of these SMTs. Endoscopic techniques have become widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of SMT in the UGI as compared with traditional surgery due to their advantages of minimally invasive, quick recovery, and economical cost. Recently, new endoscopic techniques and instruments have been continuously implemented, leading to revolutionary innovation in endoscopic treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of these innovative techniques remain unclear. Therefore, we have comprehensively summarized the various techniques used in the treatment of UGI tumors in recent years, evaluated the indications and effects of each technique, and compared their benefits and disadvantages. We hope that this review will provide a more comprehensive reference for clinical and endoscopic practitioners, and help them develop more individualized treatment plans for different patients. This will ultimately expand the patient population that can benefit from these innovative technologies.

Gastric polyps are not created equal: Know your enemy

Gastric polyps are commonly detected during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. They are most often benign and rarely become malignant. Nevertheless, adequate knowledge, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies should be the endoscopist's readily available "weapons" to defeat the potentially malignant "enemies". This article sheds light on the valuable effort by Costa et al to generate a new classification system of gastric polyps as "good", "bad", and "ugly". This comprehensive overview provides clinicians with a simplified decision-making process.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to verify the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

Among a consecutive series of resections for gastric GISTs performed in a single center, the outcomes of patients who had ER were compared to standard surgical resection (SR).

RESULTS

In the cohort, 329 consecutive primary localized gastric GISTs patients (n, ER/SR = 251/78) were enrolled. Patients receiving ER were revealed to have preferable post-treatment outcomes, prolonged overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Tumor diameter, the only independent risk factor for a complicated post-operative course, was utilized for propensity score matching (PSM). In the PSM cohort, patients receiving ER and SR with similar tumor size (4.0 [2.7-4.5] cm) shared similar aggressiveness in terms of stomach layers of tumor origination and invasion, and modified National Institutes of Health (mNIH) risk criteria. Shorter operative time, fewer economic costs, and shorter post-operative stay were still observed in the ER group (ER vs. SR: 80 [49-120] vs. 120 [98-160] minutes, p < 0.001; 44 [38-51] vs. 60 [49-84] thousand Renminbi [kRMB], p < 0.001; 7.0 [6.0-8.0] vs. 8.5 [6.0-12] days, p = 0.018, respectively). No significant difference in OS and DFS was demonstrated in the PSM cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

ER is safe and effective, thus a feasible treatment option for indicated gastric GISTs patients with the advantage of faster recovery and lower economic costs.

Neuroendocrine tumors in the stomach: An epidemiological analysis of Belgian Cancer Registry data 2010-2019

The prevalence of gastric NEN is estimated worldwide at 8.9% of all gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) and only 0.3%-1% of all gastric neoplasms, but is rising in the last decades. The aim of this project was to map the epidemiology of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm (gNEN) in Belgium. This is a population-wide retrospective cohort study over 10 years (2010-2019), based on data from the Belgian Cancer Registry. A total of 641 patients were included; 605 patients with gNEN and 36 with MiNEN. The AAIR of gNEN was 0.67 per 100,000 person-years, increasing over the years and with a slight female predominance (55.4%). Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) accounted for 15.7% (N = 95), with an AAIR of 0.11 per 100,000 person-years. The other 510 patients were diagnosed with gNET: G1 NET was most prevalent (54.3%) followed by G2 (32.5%) and G3 NET (3.5%). Concerning the clinical classification (type) of gNET, a diagnosis of type 1 tumors was presumed in 67.6%, type 3 tumors in 17.1% and type 2 tumors in 0.6% of patients. In only 3.8% of patients, the clinical classification was explicitly stated in the pathology report. Stage IV tumors were diagnosed in 13.4% (N = 81). A favorable evolution in pathology reporting is seen. Some variables-for example, clinical classification of gNET-were heavily underreported, stressing the importance of registries integrating clinical and pathological information.

Correlation of preoperative CT features with intra- and postoperative parameters of endoscopic resection in patients with gastric submucosal tumor (1~3 cm)

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) possesses minimal trauma, expedited recovery, and reduced costs. Nonetheless, intraoperative challenges, including imprecise surgical risk assessment, prevail. Hence, we investigated the correlation between preoperative CT observation features and perioperative parameters for predicting outcomes in SMT patients.

METHODS

Subjects diagnosed with SMT and undergoing endoscopic surgery conducted at West China Hospital's Endoscopy Center from September 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively selected. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computer tomography (CT) were utilized for evaluating SMT. The study assessed the correlation between preoperative CT findings and perioperative parameters.

RESULTS

Increased lesion size on contrast-enhanced CT correlates with increased operative duration, hospital stay, postoperative antibiotic use. Of utmost significance, we observed a significantly higher intraoperative perforation rate for patients with tumor outgrowth compared to those with lesion involvement of the lumen (96.88% vs 29.11%, P < 0.001). These patients also demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative blood stream infections (P = 0.012), necessitating higher antibiotic grade (P = 0.048), along with prolonged gastrostomy tube retention (P = 0.001) and hospitalization (P = 0.018). In addition, CT provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of tumor size (P = 0.037) and growth pattern (P = 0.026) than EUS.

CONCLUSION

CT assessment of tumor size closer to reality than EUS. Importantly, these features can assist in pinpointing lesions with elevated surgical complexity and high risk of complications, leading to improved preoperative preparation, thereby increasing anticipation of surgical risks and reducing incidence of complications.

Development and validation of a machine-learning model for preoperative risk of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have malignant potential, and treatment varies according to risk. However, no specific protocols exist for preoperative assessment of the malignant potential of gastric GISTs (gGISTs). This study aimed to use machine learning (ML) to develop and validate clinically relevant preoperative models to predict the malignant potential of gGISTs.

METHODS

This study screened patients diagnosed with gGISTs at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College. Moreover, this study employed the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and logistic regression to identify risk factors. Subsequently, an ensemble of ML models was used to determine the optimal classifier. In addition, this study used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for tailored risk profiling.

RESULTS

This study included 318 patients with gGISTs. Using LASSO regression and multifactorial logistic regression, this study analyzed the training dataset, revealing that the presence of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) high-risk features, tumor border clarity, tumor diameter, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were significant predictors of high malignancy risk in gGIST. As determined by our ML approach, the logistic classification model demonstrated optimal performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.919 for the training set and 0.925 for the test set. Furthermore, decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical relevance of the model.

CONCLUSION

High-risk EUS features, ill-defined tumor margins, larger tumor diameters, and elevated MLR independently predicted increased malignant potential in gGIST. This study developed logistic regression models based on these factors, which were further interpreted using the SHAP methodology. This analytical approach facilitated personalized therapeutic decision-making among diverse patient populations.

A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions

To date, no prospective study has been conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) and endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) for treating gastric muscularis propria lesions. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of ESR-EB with those of ESR-C for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter. A total of 64 patients were enrolled prospectively from May 2023 to November 2023 at Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University, and the People's Hospital of Zhongshan City. The study compared clinical characteristics, tumour features, and surgical outcomes between the two groups. Of 64 patients, 29 underwent ESR-C, and 35 underwent ESR-EB. There were no differences in age, gender, location, tumour size, growth pattern, resection time, histology diagnosis, or follow-up time (P > 0.05). Complete resection was achieved in all the patients. The operation time was significantly greater in the ESR-C group than in the ESR-EB group (41.31 ± 9.87 min vs. 26.26 ± 10.32 min, P = 0.000). In the ESR-C cohort, 21 patients (72.41%) had perforation, and 1 patient (3.45%) had bleeding. In the ESR-EB group, 7 patients (20.00%) had perforation. The complication rate varied significantly between the two groups (P = 0.000). No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during the follow-up period. Both ESR-C and ESR-EB achieved a 100% complete resection rate for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter.ESR-EB had the potential to reduce the operation time and lower the occurrence of complications. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier ChiCTR2300072856.

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors: 20-Year experience in a reference center

Few studies have been published on the long-term outcomes of patients with gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs). We analyzed their management over a two-decade period, focusing on endoscopic and clinical outcomes. Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, surgical, and histopathological data from Types 1 and 3 gNETs histologically diagnosed between March 2000 and December 2021 at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO, Milan) were retrospectively collected. Sixty-nine patients were included (60 Type 1, 9 Type 3): 53 (77%) were treated endoscopically, 6 (9%) surgically, and 10 (14%) did not receive any treatment. Overall, 293 lesions were removed endoscopically: 74% by forceps, 20% by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and 5% by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). No differences were observed between EMR and ESD in terms of complete resection rate (p value = .50) and complications rate (p value = .084). The median follow-up period was 5.8 years (range: 0.3-20.5), during which no gNET-related deaths were observed. Metachronous gNETs developed in 60% of patients with Type 1 gNET. Six patients with lymph node metastases (LNM) were younger (p value = .006) and had larger lesions (p value <.001) than patients without LNM. Most Type 1 gNETs were successfully excised using forceps, with EMR and ESD being equally effective. The presence of incomplete resection was not associated with a worse prognosis, which remains excellent in this highly recurrent disease. Younger age and a size ≥10 mm were associated with an increased risk of LNM. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Project code UID 2854.

The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal subepithelial lesions: A review

Esophageal subepithelial lesions (ESELs) encompass a variety of diseases, including leiomyoma, granular cell tumors, hemangioma, lipoma, stromal tumors, leiomyosarcoma, schwannoma, neuroendocrine tumors and more. These lesions often present asymptomatically, leading to a generally low clinical diagnosis rate. Common imaging techniques for diagnosing ESELs include conventional endoscopy, spiral computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Among these, EUS is currently regarded as one of the most accurate methods for diagnosing ESELs. In recent years, EUS has increasingly been combined with advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, submucosal saline injection, high-frequency impedance measurement, and enhanced imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce missed diagnoses. This article reviews the application and recent advancements of EUS in diagnosing esophageal submucosal lesions.

Endoscopic resection for esophageal granular cell tumors: report of 62 cases

BACKGROUND

To analyze the clinical manifestations, endoscopic features, pathological features, endoscopic resection, and prognosis of esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs).

METHODS

The present study retrospectively analyzed and followed up the clinical data of 62 patients diagnosed with esophageal GCTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between July 2007 and March 2022. The clinicopathological features, endoscopic diagnosis, and treatment experience of esophageal GCT patients were summarized.

RESULTS

Among the 62 patients with esophageal GCT, there were 34 males and 28 females, with an average age of 49.3 ± 11.7 years. Only 11 patients had symptoms, such as epigastric discomfort, regurgitation or dysphagia. One patient had multiple lesions, and the rest had single lesions, totaling 63 lesions. Most lesions (53/63) were located in the median and lower esophagus, the diameters ranged from 3 to 22 mm. The endoscopic morphology of the GCTs was molar, flat, hemispherical, or irregular submucosal protuberance. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed in 38 cases, most cases (31/38) were hypoechoic, and 32 cases were appeared as homogeneous lesions. There were no complications during or after the endoscopic operations, and the en bloc resection rate was 100%. The negative rate of microscopic incisional margin was 63.5% (40/63). No patients developed recurrence during the follow-up period. The follow-up duration was 21-197 months (100.5 months for average).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal GCT is a rare disease with no obvious symptoms and a good prognosis. Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective method of diagnosis and treatment for esophageal GCTs. A microscopic positive tumor margin may not increase the rate of recurrence.

Gastric Epithelial Polyps: Current Diagnosis, Management, and Endoscopic Frontiers

Polyps are defined as luminal lesions that project into the mucosal surface of the gastrointestinal tract and are characterized according to their morphological and histological features [...].

Endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in small bowel subepithelial lesions: experience in treating fifteen cases

AIM

The study objective was to evaluate the primary feasibility of endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) to treat small bowel subepithelial lesions (SELs).

METHOD

A retrospective case series study was performed. The first fifteen consecutive patients who underwent ESD (n = 10) and EFTR (n = 5) via BAE to remove small bowel SELs from November 2016 to December 2023 were included. The main outcome measures were the technique success rate, operative time and complication rate.

RESULTS

This research focused on 15 cases of jejunoileal SELs, four cases of lipomyoma, three cases of ectopic pancreas, two cases of NETs, three cases of benign fibrous tumours and three cases of angioma. The overall technique success rate was 86.7%, with 100% (10/10) and 60% (3/5) for BAE-ESD and BAE-EFTR, respectively, in removing small bowel SELs. Two cases of EFTR failed, as the BAE operation was unsuitable for tumour resection and suture repair of a perforated wound. No serious bleeding or any postoperative complications occurred. The median time of endoscopic resection via BAE for SELs was 44 min (range 22-68 min).

CONCLUSION

ESD and EFTR via BAE might be alternative choices for treating small SELs in the small bowel, with the advantages of clear and accurate positioning and minimal invasiveness. However, its superiority over surgery still needs to be further investigated.

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of heterotopic pancreas

Heterotopic pancreas, a rare congenital malformation, manifests outside the normal pancreas. Research suggests that abnormal embryonic development is linked to the presence of heterotopic pancreas. Three prevailing theories explain its mechanism: Dislocation theory, metaplasia theory, and totipotent stem cell theory. Clinical presentations of heterotopic pancreas are often nonspecific, with most patients being asymptomatic and incidentally discovered during unrelated surgeries or examinations. Endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are commonly employed diagnostic tools for heterotopic pancreas. However, the accuracy of diagnosis based on these methods is not consistently high, necessitating histopathological confirmation in many cases. Treatment options for heterotopic pancreas typically involve endoscopic resection, surgical resection, or observation through follow-up.

III BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND

BACKGROUND

In the past decades, endoscopic ultrasound has developed from a diagnostic tool to a platform for many therapeutic interventions. Various technological advancements have emerged since the last Brazilian Consensus, demanding a review and update of the recommendations based on the best scientific evidence.

METHODS

A group of 32 renowned echoendoscopists selected eight relevant topics to be discussed to generate clinical questions. After that, a literature review was conducted to answer these questions based on the most updated evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-three statements were formulated and voted on by the experts to reach a consensus. The Oxford System was used to grade the level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

There is mo-derate evidence to support that the needle shape, gauge, or aspiration technique does not influence the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling of pancreatic solid lesions. There is moderate evidence to support using EUS-TTNB of the cyst wall to differentiate between mucinous and non-mucinous cystic neoplasms. There is little evidence to support the EUS-guided treatment of gastric varices. There is a high level of evidence to support that EUS-guided biliary drainage and ERCP present similar outcomes in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. There is a high level of evidence for using EUS to diagnose neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect necrosis before indicating drainage. There is moderate evidence to support EUS-GE over duodenal stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with a life expectancy higher than 2 months. There is a high level of evidence to support the use of RFA in treating both functioning and non-functioning types of NET.

Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management

Background and objectives: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract present a diagnostic challenge due to their heterogeneous nature and varied clinical manifestations. Usually, SELs are small and asymptomatic; generally discovered during routine endoscopy or radiological examinations. Currently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the best tool to characterize gastric SELs. Materials and methods: For this review, the research and the study selection were conducted using the PubMed database. Articles in English language were reviewed from August 2019 to July 2024. Results: This review aims to summarize the international literature to examine and illustrate the progress in the last five years of endosonographic diagnostics and treatment of gastric SELs. Conclusions: Endoscopic ultrasound is the preferred option for the diagnosis of sub-epithelial lesions. In most of the cases, EUS-guided tissue sampling is mandatory; however, ancillary techniques (elastography, CEH-EUS, AI) may help in both diagnosis and prognostic assessment.