Advanced endoscopic resection for colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis

Interventional inflammatory bowel disease: current and future practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are associated with several well described neoplastic and structural complications. Increasing disease prevalence, healthcare barriers, and medication refractory phenotypes contribute to ongoing complications despite significant strides in medical management. Enhancements in endoscopic technology and techniques have allowed a minimally invasive approach for what has historically required surgery. In this article, we review the current and future landscape of endoscopic IBD intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endoscopic resection is the first line for managing conventional and complex colitis-associated dysplasia. Evidence supporting endoscopic submucosal dissection is mounting, yet there is a paucity of studies evaluating modified endoscopic mucosal resection techniques or hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection. We also have more clarity in how best to approach fibrostenotic disease, as we learn how to position endoscopic stricturotomy and stenting, relative to balloon dilation. Finally, applications in managing penetrating and postsurgical complications have been described, but still require further study.

SUMMARY

While important knowledge gaps still exist, the application of endoscopic therapies in IBD is more refined, especially within the management of colitis-associated dysplasia and strictures. The indications for endoscopy in perianal disease and other penetrating manifestations of Crohn's disease presents exciting opportunities for growth.

The Management of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Individuals with IBD are at an increased risk of developing intestinal neoplasia, particularly colorectal neoplasia (CRN) (including colorectal dysplasia and colorectal cancer [CRC]), as a consequence of chronic colonic inflammation.1 –4 Given that CRC in patients with IBD appears to be preceded by dysplastic changes in the colonic mucosa, prevention strategies to reduce CRC-associated morbidity and mortality have been recommended by multiple society guidelines and independent consensus groups, and include risk assessment, mitigation of inflammation with medical therapies, and screening and surveillance strategies with colonoscopy, with histopathologic assessments at appropriate intervals. Despite these efforts, prevention and management of neoplasia in IBD remains a complex and often confusing topic, requiring careful reappraisal of the evolving evidence base and practicable approaches to clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In this meta-analysis, we studied the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched, and studies were retrieved based on pre-specified criteria until October 2022. The outcomes assessed were resection rates, procedural complications, local recurrence, metachronous tumors, and the need for surgery after ESD in IBD. Standard meta-analysis methods were followed using the random-effects model, and I2% was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies comprising 291 dysplastic lesions in 274 patients were included with a median follow-up of 25 months. The pooled en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and curative resection rates were 92.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9%-95.4%; I2=0%), 81.5% (95% CI, 72.5%-88%; I2=43%), and 48.9% (95% CI, 32.1%-65.9%; I2=87%), respectively. The local recurrence rate was 3.9% (95% CI, 2%-7.5%; I2=0%). The pooled rates of bleeding and perforation were 7.7% (95% CI, 4.5%-13%; I2=10%) and 5.3% (95% CI, 3.1%-8.9%; I2=0%), respectively. The rates of metachronous recurrence and additional surgery following ESD were 10% (95% CI, 5.2%-18.2%; I2=55%) and 13% (95% CI, 8.5%-19.3%; I2=54%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is safe and effective for the resection of dysplastic lesions in IBD with an excellent pooled rate of en-bloc and R0 resection.

Pathology and Clinical Significance of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Colorectal Dysplastic Lesions

Timely diagnosis and effective management of colorectal dysplasia play a vital role in preventing mortality from colorectal cancer in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease. This review provides a contemporary overview of the pathologic and endoscopic classification of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease, their roles in determining surveillance and management algorithms, and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that might further enhance patient management.

Interval Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk of dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC). Moreover, colitis-associated CRC is responsible for a disproportionate number of CRC-related mortality. For this reason, societies recommend screening and surveillance colonoscopy as the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. Nonetheless, interval cancer defined as CRC detected within the appropriate surveillance interval might still occur despite following guideline recommendations. Even though there is limited data on risk factors associated with interval CRC in IBD, patient and disease-associated factors and technical aspects of the surveillance might play a role. This review aims to provide information on the epidemiology of interval CRC in IBD, the factors that might be associated with its occurrence, and the challenges of CRC screening and dysplasia management in patients with IBD.

Advancements in Endoscopic Resection for Colitis-Associated Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Turning Visible into Resectable

Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) face a two to three-fold higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population. In recent years, significant progress has been made in comprehending the natural history of IBD-associated CRC (IBD-CRC) and refining its treatment strategies. The decreased incidence of IBD-CRC can be attributed to improved therapeutic management of inflammation, advancements in endoscopy, and early detection of precancerous lesions via surveillance programs. Advanced imaging technologies have made previously undetectable dysplasia visible in most cases, allowing for a much more precise and detailed examination of the mucosa. Additionally, new tools have facilitated the endoscopic resection (ER) of visible lesions in IBD. Particularly, the key to effectively manage colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia (CAN) is to first identify it and subsequently guarantee a complete ER in order to avoid surgery and opt for continuing surveillance. Advanced ER techniques for CAN include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and hybrid ESD-EMR (h-ESD). This narrative review aims to consolidate the current literature on IBD-CRC, providing an overview of advanced techniques for ER of CAN in IBD, with a particular emphasis on the impact of ESD on the long-term outcomes of IBD patients.

DECIDE: Delphi Expert Consensus Statement on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Dysplasia Shared Management Decision-Making

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease colitis-associated dysplasia is managed with either enhanced surveillance and endoscopic resection or prophylactic surgery. The rate of progression to cancer after a dysplasia diagnosis remains uncertain in many cases and patients have high thresholds for accepting proctocolectomy. Individualised discussion of management options is encouraged to take place between patients and their multidisciplinary teams for best outcomes. We aimed to develop a toolkit to support a structured, multidisciplinary and shared decision-making approach to discussions about dysplasia management options between clinicians and their patients.

METHODS

Evidence from systematic literature reviews, mixed-methods studies conducted with key stakeholders, and decision-making expert recommendations were consolidated to draft consensus statements by the DECIDE steering group. These were then subjected to an international, multidisciplinary modified electronic Delphi process until an a priori threshold of 80% agreement was achieved to establish consensus for each statement.

RESULTS

In all, 31 members [15 gastroenterologists, 14 colorectal surgeons and two nurse specialists] from nine countries formed the Delphi panel. We present the 18 consensus statements generated after two iterative rounds of anonymous voting.

CONCLUSIONS

By consolidating evidence for best practice using literature review and key stakeholder and decision-making expert consultation, we have developed international consensus recommendations to support health care professionals counselling patients on the management of high cancer risk colitis-associated dysplasia. The final toolkit includes clinician and patient decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making.

Update on Endoscopic Dysplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

As medical management of inflammatory bowel disease makes great advances, most patients with inflammatory bowel disease will have long life expectancies without need for total colectomy. With prolonged disease duration, however, there is increased risk of dysplasia leading to colorectal cancer. Multiple consensus and guideline documents have been published over the last decade with recommendations to optimize early detection and management of dysplastic lesions. Endoscopic technology has improved tremendously, even over the past few years. Previously invisible dysplasia has become visible in most cases with advanced imaging technologies that now allow for much clearer and more detailed mucosal inspection. New tools to facilitate endoscopic resection of visible lesions have also enabled patients to avoid colectomy, with resulting need to continue colon surveillance. There are limited or conflicting data leading to inconsistent recommendations regarding the need for random biopsies, the preferred endoscopic imaging technique, and surveillance intervals after resection of dysplasia. Similarly, there remains significant variability in the application of guidelines into daily practice and availability of and training with advanced imaging technologies. Here, we present a narrative review of which patients are at highest risk for dysplasia, the current guidelines on surveillance colonoscopy, factors affecting optimal mucosal visualization, enhanced imaging techniques, standardized reporting terminologies for surveillance colonoscopy, endoscopic management of dysplasia, indications for colectomy, and briefly on future potential technologies to assist in dysplasia detection.