1
|
Karsenti D, Perrod G, Perrot B, Quénéhervé L, Chabrun E, Koch S, Vanbiervliet G, Rahmi G, Velut G, Moreno-Garcia M, Cavicchi M, Dray X. Impact of linked color imaging on the proximal adenoma miss rate: a multicenter tandem randomized controlled trial (the COCORICO trial). Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38740373 DOI: 10.1055/a-2324-8807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Missed lesions are common during standard colonoscopy and are correlated with post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Contrast-enhanced technologies have recently been developed to improve polyp detection. We aimed to evaluate the impact of linked color imaging (LCI) on the proximal adenoma miss rate in routine colonoscopy. METHODS This national, multicenter, tandem, randomized trial compared the outcomes of colonoscopy with white-light imaging (WLI) versus LCI for polyp detection in the right colon. Two consecutive examinations of the right colon (upstream of the hepatic flexure) were made with WLI and LCI by the same operator. First-pass examination by WLI or LCI was randomized 1:1 after cecal intubation. According to statistical calculations, 10 endoscopy units had to include approximately 700 patients. The primary outcome was proximal adenoma miss rate. Secondary outcomes were the proximal miss rates for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), advanced adenomas, and polyps. RESULTS 764 patients were included from 1 January 2020 to 22 December 2022, and 686 patients were randomized (345 WLI first vs. 341 LCI first). Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics and indications. The proximal adenoma miss rate was not significantly higher in the WLI-first group (36.7%) vs. the LCI-first group (31.8%) (estimated mean absolute difference: 4.9% [95%CI -5.2% to 15.0%], P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in miss rates for SSLs, advanced adenomas, and polyps in the proximal colon. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to previous data, this study does not support the benefit of LCI to the proximal adenoma miss rate in routine colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Karsenti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pôle Digestif Paris Bercy, Clinique Paris-Bercy, Charenton-le-Pont, France
| | - Guillaume Perrod
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Bastien Perrot
- UMR 1246 SPHERE (MethodS in Patient-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch), INSERM, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Lucille Quénéhervé
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Edouard Chabrun
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Clinique Saint-Joseph, Trélazé, France
| | - Stéphane Koch
- Gastroenterology Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besancon, France
| | - Geoffroy Vanbiervliet
- Pôle DIGi-TUNED, Endoscopie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Nice, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Velut
- Center for Digestive Endoscopy, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Maira Moreno-Garcia
- Research and Development Unit, French Society of Digestive Endoscopy, Paris, France
| | - Maryan Cavicchi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pôle Digestif Paris Bercy, Clinique Paris-Bercy, Charenton-le-Pont, France
| | - Xavier Dray
- Center for Digestive Endoscopy, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zessner-Spitzenberg J, Waldmann E, Rockenbauer LM, Klinger A, Klenske E, Penz D, Demschik A, Majcher B, Trauner M, Ferlitsch M. Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Colonoscopy Findings and Colorectal Cancer Deaths in a Nation-Wide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01194. [PMID: 39007693 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate bowel preparation is paramount for a high-quality screening colonoscopy. Despite the importance of adequate bowel preparation, there is a lack of large studies that associated the degree of bowel preparation with long-term colorectal cancer outcomes in screening patients. METHODS In a large population-based screening program database in Austria, quality of bowel preparation was estimated according to the Aronchick Scale by the endoscopist (excellent, good, fair, poor, and inadequate bowel preparation). We used logistic regression to assess the influence of bowel preparation on the detection of different polyp types and the interphysician variation in bowel preparation scoring. Time-to-event analyses were performed to investigate the association of bowel preparation with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) death. RESULTS A total of 335,466 colonoscopies between January 2012 and follow-up until December 2022 were eligible for the analyses. As compared with excellent bowel preparation, adenoma detection was not significantly lower for good bowel preparation (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9971-1.0329, P = 0.1023); however, adenoma detection was significantly lower in fair bowel preparation (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.9408-0.9939, P = 0.0166). Individuals who had fair or lower bowel preparation at screening colonoscopy had significantly higher hazards for PCCRC death (hazard ratio for fair bowel preparation 2.56, 95% CI 1.67-3.94, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION Fair bowel preparation on the Aronchick Scale was not only associated with a lower adenoma detection probability but also with increased risk of PCCRC death. Efforts should be made to increase bowel cleansing above fair scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Waldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Klinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Entcho Klenske
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Penz
- Department of Internal Medicine I, St. John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandra Demschik
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Majcher
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Trauner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Monika Ferlitsch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Bleijenberg AGC, Depla A, Montazeri NSM, Dekker E. Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2024; 56:412-420. [PMID: 38191001 DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-7823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies demonstrated that a higher proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among endoscopists is associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence and death for their patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning resource on PSPDR. METHODS We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial within the Dutch fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopists were randomized using block randomization per center to either receive a 60-minute e-learning resource on serrated polyp detection or not. PSPDR was calculated based on all colonoscopies performed during a 27-month pre-intervention and a 17-month post-intervention period. The primary end point was difference in PSPDR between intervention and control arms (intention to treat) using mixed effect logistic regression modeling, with time (pre-intervention/post-intervention) and interaction between time and arm (intervention/control) as fixed effects, and endoscopists as random effects. RESULTS 116 endoscopists (57 intervention, 59 controls) were included, and performed 27494 and 33888 colonoscopies, respectively. Median PSPDR pre-intervention was 13.6% (95%CI 13.0-14.1) in the intervention arm and 13.8% (95%CI 13.3-14.3) in controls. Post-intervention PSPDR was significantly higher over time in the intervention arm than in controls (17.1% vs. 15.4%, P=0.01). CONCLUSION In an era of increased awareness and increasing PSPDRs, endoscopists who undertook a one-time e-learning course significantly accelerated the increase in PSPDR compared with endoscopists who did not undertake the e-learning. Widespread implementation might reduce PCCRC incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arne G C Bleijenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne Depla
- Department of Gastroenterology, DC Klinieken, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nahid S M Montazeri
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anderson JC, Butterly LF. Assessing Risk of Index Serrated Polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:958-960. [PMID: 37924854 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderson JC, Rex DK, Mackenzie TA, Hisey W, Robinson CM, Butterly LF. Endoscopist adenomas-per-colonoscopy detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:787-795. [PMID: 37993057 PMCID: PMC11039365 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) may be a better measure of colonoscopy quality than adenoma detection rate (ADR) because it credits endoscopists for each detected adenoma. There are few data examining the association between APC and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence. We used data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry to examine APC and PCCRC risk. METHODS We included New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry patients with an index examination and at least 1 follow-up event, either a colonoscopy or a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. Our outcome was PCCRC defined as any CRC diagnosed ≥6 months after an index examination. The exposure variable was endoscopist-specific APC quintiles of .25, .40, .50, and .70. Cox regression was used to model the hazard of PCCRC on APC, controlled for age, sex, year of index examination, index findings, bowel preparation, and having more than 1 surveillance examination. RESULTS In 32,535 patients, a lower hazard for PCCRC (n = 178) was observed for higher APCs as compared to APCs of <.25 (reference): .25 to <.40: hazard ratio (HR), .35; 95% confidence interval (CI), .22-.56; .40 to <.50: HR, .31; 95% CI, .20-.49; .50 to <.70: HR, .20; 95% CI, .11-.36; and ≥.70: HR, .19; 95% CI, .09-.37. When examining endoscopists with an ADR of at least 25%, an APC of <.50 was associated with a significantly higher hazard than an APC of ≥.50 (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.06-2.56). A large proportion of endoscopists-one-fifth (32 of 152; 21.1%)-had an ADR of ≥25% but an APC of <.50. CONCLUSIONS Our novel data demonstrating lower PCCRC risk in examinations performed by endoscopists with higher APCs suggest that APC could be a useful quality measure. Quality improvement programs may identify important deficiencies in endoscopist detection performance by measuring APC for endoscopists with an ADR of ≥25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction VT
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - William Hisey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Christina M Robinson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tan C, Qin G, Wang QQ, Zhou YC, Yao SK. Clinicopathologic and endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas: a large inpatient population-based study in China. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1337035. [PMID: 38638861 PMCID: PMC11024220 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1337035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursors of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) and have distinct characteristics compared with conventional adenomas (CAs). Several lifestyle and environmental factors may play critical roles in the development of advanced lesions. Our aim is to describe the features of SSLs and CAs and further explore risk factors for advanced lesions. Methods This is an observational study that collected demographic, endoscopic, and histological data from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital among the inpatient population with pathologically reported as SSL or CA between 2015 and 2022. We analyzed the clinicopathology and endoscopic differences between SSL alone, CA alone, and synchronous SSL+CA groups, and identified risk factors using multiple regression analysis. Results A total of 9236 polyps from 6598 patients were included in the cohort. Patients with SSL+CA were more likely to be older (p=0.008), while individuals with SSL alone had a higher proportion of early-onset polyps (p<0.001), and SSLs were more common in advanced polyps than CAs (p<0.001). A greater proportion of advanced polyps in the SSL and CA groups were diagnosed as Yamada III, Yamada IV, and laterally spreading tumor (p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively), and multiple SSLs and CAs were more represented in nonadvanced polyps than in advanced polyps. In multiple regression analysis, older patients were more likely to develop advanced SSLs (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p=0.005). Conclusion SSLs and CAs have diverse demographic, endoscopic, and histological characteristics, and their advanced lesions share different risk factors, which advances the understanding of the etiology and progression of SSLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Tan
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Geng Qin
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qian-Qian Wang
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan-Chen Zhou
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Kun Yao
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Penz D, Pammer D, Waldmann E, Asaturi A, Szymanska A, Trauner M, Ferlitsch M. Association between endoscopist adenoma detection rate and serrated polyp detection: Retrospective analysis of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E488-E497. [PMID: 38585017 PMCID: PMC10997427 DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-1929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Serrated lesions have been identified as precursor lesions for 20% to 35% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and may contribute to a significant proportion of interval-cancer. Sessile-serrated-lesions (SSLs), in particular, tend to be flat and located in the proximal colon, making their detection challenging and requiring expertise. It remains unclear whether the detection rate for serrated polyps should be considered as a quality indicator in addition to the adenoma detection rate (ADR). This study sought to assess whether the ADR has an effect on the detection rate for serrated polyps. atients and methods In this retrospective analysis, prospectively collected data from 212,668 screening colonoscopies performed between 2012 and September 2018 were included. Spearman correlation and Whitney-Mann U-test were used to assess the association of ADR and the detection rate of SSLs with (SDR) and without hyperplastic polyps (SPADRs), the sessile serrated detection rate (SSLDR) as well as the clinically relevant serrated detection rate (CRSDR), including all SSLs and traditional serrated adenoma, hyperplastic polyps (HPs) >10 mm anywhere in the colon or HPs > 5 mm proximal to the sigmoid. Results The overall mean ADR was 21.78% (standard deviation [SD] 9.27), SDR 21.08% (SD 11.44), SPADR 2.19% (SD 2.49), and CRSDR was 3.81% (3.40). Significant correlations were found between the ADR and the SDR, SPADR, SSLDR, and CRSDR (rho=0.73 vs. rho=0.51 vs. rho=0.51 vs. rho=0.63; all P <0.001). Endoscopists with a mean ADR ≥25% had significantly higher SDR, SPADR, and CRSDR than endoscopists with a mean ADR <25% (all P <0.001; Mann-Whitney U-Test). Conclusions This study shows that endoscopists with higher ADR detect significantly more serrated lesions than those with a lower ADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Penz
- Internal Medicine I, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Daniel Pammer
- Internal Medicine I, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Waldmann
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
- Working Group for Quality Assurance, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OEGGH), Vienna, Austria
| | - Arno Asaturi
- Working Group for Quality Assurance, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OEGGH), Vienna, Austria
| | - Aleksrandra Szymanska
- Working Group for Quality Assurance, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OEGGH), Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Trauner
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
- Working Group for Quality Assurance, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OEGGH), Vienna, Austria
| | - Monika Ferlitsch
- Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Denis B, Bertolaso A, Gendre I, Perrin P, Hammas K. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: A population-based cohort study of fecal occult blood test-positive colonoscopies. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2024; 48:102285. [PMID: 38246488 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) after fecal occult blood test (FOBT)-positive colonoscopies is scarce (guaiac-based (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)). AIMS Evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of PCCRCs in the French gFOBT CRC screening program. METHODS Retrospective population-based cohort study of all gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed among individuals aged 50-74 between 2003 and 2014 within the CRC screening program organized in the Haut-Rhin (Alsace, France). The main outcome was PCCRC-3y rate. Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) calculated on gFOBT-positive colonoscopies were compared to those calculated on FIT-positive colonoscopies performed by the same gastroenterologists. RESULTS Overall, 9106 gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed by 36 gastroenterologists were included. Sixteen PCCRC-3y and 31 PCCRC-5y were diagnosed (68.8 % and 58.1 % were true interval PCCRCs respectively). The unadjusted PCCRC-3y rate was 2.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.4 %-3.9 %]. The risk for PCCRC-5y was significantly higher when the gastroenterologist's ADR was <35 % compared to ≥35 % (HR 2.17 [95 %CI 1.19-3.93]). The mean absolute difference for ADR between gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies was 16.3 % in favor of FIT-positive colonoscopies. CONCLUSION PCCRC-3y prevalence was low, estimated at 2.4 %. We suggest that the minimum standard for ADR in gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies should be set at 35 % and 50 % to 55 % respectively, in the French screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Denis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pasteur Hospital, 39 avenue de la Liberté, Colmar 68024, France; ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France.
| | - Alice Bertolaso
- Haut-Rhin Cancer Registry, GHRMSA, 87 avenue d'Altkirch, Mulhouse, France
| | - Isabelle Gendre
- ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France; CRCDC Grand Est, Site de Colmar, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - Philippe Perrin
- ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France; CRCDC Grand Est, Site de Colmar, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - Karima Hammas
- Haut-Rhin Cancer Registry, GHRMSA, 87 avenue d'Altkirch, Mulhouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anderson JC, Rex DK, Mackenzie TA, Hisey W, Robinson CM, Butterly LF. Higher Serrated Polyp Detection Rates Are Associated With Lower Risk of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1927-1930. [PMID: 37417792 PMCID: PMC10841069 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We used New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to examine the association between postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and sessile serrated detection rates (SSLDRs). METHODS We included patients with either a colonoscopy or a CRC diagnosis in the NH State Cancer Registry. PCCRC was any CRC diagnosed ≥ 6 months after index examination. RESULTS Of 26,901 patients, 162 were diagnosed with PCCRC. The hazard ratio for PCCRC was lowest for patients whose endoscopists had the highest SSLDR quintile (≥6%) (hazard ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.50). DISCUSSION Endoscopists with higher SSLDRs had lower risks of PCCRC. These data validate SSLDR as a clinically relevant quality measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction VT
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - William Hisey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Christina M Robinson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Artificial Intelligence-Aided Endoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Screening. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13061102. [PMID: 36980409 PMCID: PMC10047293 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, with the highest incidence reported in high-income countries. However, because of the slow progression of neoplastic precursors, along with the opportunity for their endoscopic detection and resection, a well-designed endoscopic screening program is expected to strongly decrease colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. In this regard, quality of colonoscopy has been clearly related with the risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Recently, the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the medical field has been growing in interest. Through machine learning processes, and, more recently, deep learning, if a very high numbers of learning samples are available, AI systems may automatically extract specific features from endoscopic images/videos without human intervention, helping the endoscopists in different aspects of their daily practice. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on AI-aided endoscopy, and to outline its potential role in colorectal cancer prevention.
Collapse
|
11
|
IJspeert JEG. Proximal serrated polyp detection rate and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: the missing link. Endoscopy 2023; 55:442-443. [PMID: 36702129 DOI: 10.1055/a-2003-1068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|