Becker L, Dudda M, Schreyer C. [Complications after conservative vs. operative treatment of severe thoracic trauma].
UNFALLCHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024;
127:204-210. [PMID:
38285188 DOI:
10.1007/s00113-024-01411-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Thoracic trauma is a frequent injury in the routine treatment of injured patients. Due to the increasing demographic changes a further increase is to be expected, especially after low-energy trauma.
OBJECTIVE
Expected complications after conservative vs. operative treatment of various injury patterns of thoracic trauma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Evaluation of a selective literature search regarding possible complications after thoracic trauma and formulation of instructions for action as expert recommendations.
CONCLUSION
Both conservative and operative treatment of thoracic trauma have their specific complications, which have to be known to the treating physician. Lung contusions are often underestimated in the initial radiological diagnostics but often lead to relevant problems during the further course of treatment. After conservative treatment of rib fractures persistent pain, functional limitations or even relevant deformities due to secondary dislocation, can remain. There is a significant risk of overlooking or underestimating relevant injuries during the initial diagnostics which then leads to secondary complications. By far the most frequent risk of surgical treatment is an incorrect positioning of chest tubes. Overall, postoperative infections after chest trauma are relatively rare.
Collapse