Darmann-Finck I, Hülsmann L. [Competency-based learning objectives of primary qualifying nursing studies and intended task profiles].
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2024;
184:80-89. [PMID:
38176979 DOI:
10.1016/j.zefq.2023.10.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Since 2020, it has been possible in Germany to complete a primary qualifying degree in nursing in addition to vocational training in nursing. The study presented here investigates the extent to which the intended competence goals prepare students for the future fields of activity of university-qualified nurses.
METHODS
The research question was answered (1) by means of a content analysis of module manuals for primary qualifying courses, specifically the information on the intended learning outcomes in the university part of the course, and (2) by evaluating the results of the analysis in focus groups with those responsible for the course. The areas of competence were used as evaluation criteria for the analysis of the module manuals. The text elements were coded using the analysis software MAXQDA. In the further course of the analysis, the competence areas were combined into three areas with a view to the task profiles (direct care, indirect care and competence area V/research competence) and the percentage weighting of the competence goals was calculated. Using study results from the project "Investigation of the implementation of the study programs within the framework of university nursing training according to the Nursing Professions Act", the hours spent in these areas and the distribution of presence and self-learning time for direct nursing were determined. The results and the reasons for the curriculum design were then discussed in focus groups with those responsible for the degree program.
RESULTS
The module manuals reveal clear differences in formal design. The analysis of the learning outcomes specified in the module manuals according to the competence areas also shows considerable differences in the distribution of the percentages for the individual competence areas. In relation to direct care, the percentages range between 55% and 71%, the hours vary between 2,022 and 3,622 hours. With indirect care, the range is 246 to 520 hours. A comparatively high number of hours is planned for competence area V/research competence (869 to 1,426 hours). Also, the analysis leads to the conclusion that within the degree program with the lowest number of hours of face-to-face teaching only 690 hours of face-to-face teaching are spent on direct care, while the degree program with the highest number of hours provides 1,968 hours for face-to-face teaching. In the focus group discussions, the persons responsible for the degree program took a critical view of the hours spent on developing skills in indirect care in the primary qualifying degree programs. Those responsible for the degree programs also regard the very small number of face-to-face hours at some university locations as insufficient to develop direct care skills.
DISCUSSION
The results suggest that the primary qualifying courses in some areas and at some study locations do not adequately prepare for the task profiles intended for HQP.
Collapse