Student ultrasound education - current views and controversies

Pioneering point-of-care obstetric ultrasound integration in midwifery education - the MEPOCUS study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound technology is indispensable in perinatal care due to its non-invasive and painless nature, offering vital insights into foetal development and childbirth. With the academisation of midwifery in Germany, there is a growing necessity to incorporate ultrasound training into midwifery education. This paper discusses the development and implementation of an introductory obstetric ultrasound curriculum tailored for midwifery students, focusing on fundamental ultrasound techniques in obstetrics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used Kern's six-step approach of curricular development comprising [1] problem identification and general needs assessment [2], needs assessment of the targeted learners [3], goals and objectives [4], educational strategies [5], implementation, and [6] evaluation and feedback. The individual components of the curriculum were meticulously designed based on comprehensive literature reviews, thorough consultations with experienced ultrasound experts and evaluated needs of participants prior to the course instruction.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven ultrasound-naive midwifery students participated in the newly developed obstetric ultrasound course. Structured as a modular and integrated framework, the course aimed to provide theoretical and practical instruction in basic obstetric ultrasound, with intrapartum sonography and focused assessment with abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) as key supplementary specialisations. The results demonstrated a significant increase in the students' overall knowledge and practical skills, as evidenced by the median post-course total score rising from 20 to 60 out of 75 (p < 0.001) in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and from 9 to 19 out of 20 (p = 0.001) in the knowledge test. Additionally, students reported high satisfaction with the course and noted substantial personal benefits.

CONCLUSION

The integration of basic obstetric ultrasound training within the midwifery curriculum is feasible and effective to teach fundamental knowledge and skills of obstetric ultrasound examinations to midwifery students. Expansion, standardisation and regulatory structures are critical components for a continued improvement and realistic integration into midwifery educational frameworks and thus the further development of the midwifery profession.

Student Ultrasound Education, Current Views and Controversies; Who Should be Teaching?

Acquiring diagnostic ultrasound competencies and skills is crucial in modern health care, and achieving the practical experience is vital in developing the necessary anatomy interpretation and scan acquisition skills. However, traditional teaching methods may not be sufficient to provide hands-on practice, which is essential for this skill acquisition. This paper explores various modalities and instructors involved in ultrasound education to identify the most effective approaches. The field of ultrasound instruction is enriched by the diverse roles of physicians, anatomists, peer tutors, and sonographers. All these healthcare professionals can inspire and empower the next generation of ultrasound practitioners with continuous training and support. Physicians bring their clinical expertise to the table, while anatomists enhance the understanding of anatomical knowledge through ultrasound integration. Peer tutors, often medical students, provide a layer of social congruence and motivation to the learning process. Sonographers provide intensive practical experience and structured learning plans to students. By combining different instructors and teaching methods, success can be achieved in ultrasound education. An ultrasound curriculum organized by experts in the field can lead to more efficient use of resources and better learning outcomes. Empowering students through peer-assisted learning can also ease the burden on faculty. Every instructor must receive comprehensive didactic training to ensure high-quality education in diagnostic ultrasound.

Student ultrasound education, current view and controversies. Role of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality and telemedicine

The digitization of medicine will play an increasingly significant role in future years. In particular, telemedicine, Virtual Reality (VR) and innovative Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems offer tremendous potential in imaging diagnostics and are expected to shape ultrasound diagnostics and teaching significantly. However, it is crucial to consider the advantages and disadvantages of employing these new technologies and how best to teach and manage their use. This paper provides an overview of telemedicine, VR and AI in student ultrasound education, presenting current perspectives and controversies.

Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography

BACKGROUND

The HHUS market is very complex due to a multitude of equipment variants and several different device manufacturers. Only a few studies have compared different HHUS devices under clinical conditions. We conducted a comprehensive prospective observer study with a direct comparison of nine different HHUS devices in terms of B-scan quality, device handling, and software features under abdominal imaging conditions.

METHODS

Nine different HHUS devices (Butterfly iQ+, Clarius C3HD3, D5CL Microvue, Philips Lumify, SonoEye Chison, SonoSite iViz, Mindray TE Air, GE Vscan Air, and Youkey Q7) were used in a prospective setting by a total of 12 experienced examiners on the same subjects in each case and then assessed using a detailed questionnaire regarding B-scan quality, handling, and usability of the software. The evaluation was carried out using a point scale (5 points: very good; 1 point: insufficient).

RESULTS

In the overall evaluation, Vscan Air and SonoEye Chison achieved the best ratings. They achieved nominal ratings between "good" (4 points) and "very good" (5 points). Both devices differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the other seven devices tested. Among the HHUS devices, Clarius C3HD3 and Vscan Air achieved the best results for B-mode quality, D5CL Microvue achieved the best results for device handling, and SonoEye Chison and Vscan Air achieved the best results for software.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive study to directly compare different HHUS devices in a head-to-head manner. While the majority of the tested devices demonstrated satisfactory performance, notable discrepancies were observed between them. In particular, the B-scan quality exhibited considerable variation, which may have implications for the clinical application of HHUS. The findings of this study can assist in the selection of an appropriate HHUS device for specific applications, considering the clinical objectives and acknowledging the inherent limitations.