1
|
Marschner CA, Geyer T, Froelich MF, Rübenthaler J, Schwarze V, Clevert DA. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Perfusion. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1593. [PMID: 34573935 PMCID: PMC8472159 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with liver cirrhosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) displays an effective method for treating portal hypertension. Main indications include refractory ascites and secondary prevention of esophageal bleeding. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) plays a leading role in the follow-up management, whereas contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is not routinely considered. We compared the efficacy of CEUS to CDUS and highlighted differences compared to findings of corresponding computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (2) Methods: On a retrospective basis, 106 patients with CEUS examination after TIPS were included. The enrollment period was 12 years (between 2008 and 2020) and the age group ranged from 23.3 to 82.1 years. In addition, 92 CDUS, 43 CT and 58 MRI scans were evaluated for intermodal comparison. (3) Results: Intermodal analysis and comparison revealed a high level of concordance between CDUS, CT and MRI in the vast majority of cases. In comparison to CDUS, the correlation of the relevant findings was 92.5%, 95.3% for CT and 87.9% for MRI. In some cases, however, additional information was provided by CEUS (4) Conclusions: CEUS depicts a safe and effective imaging modality for follow-up after TIPS. In addition to CDUS, CEUS enables specific assessment of stent pathologies and stent dysfunction due to its capacity to dynamically visualize single microbubbles at high spatial and temporal resolution. Due to the low number of adverse events regarding the application of contrast agents, CEUS can be administered to a very broad patient population, thus avoiding additional radiation exposure compared to CT angiography in cases with divergent findings during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin A. Marschner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (T.G.); (J.R.); (V.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (T.G.); (J.R.); (V.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (T.G.); (J.R.); (V.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (T.G.); (J.R.); (V.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (T.G.); (J.R.); (V.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frenzel F, Kubale R, Massmann A, Raczeck P, Jagoda P, Schlueter C, Stroeder J, Buecker A, Minko P. Artifacts in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound during Follow-up after Endovascular Aortic Repair: Impact on Endoleak Detection in Comparison with Computed Tomography Angiography. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2021; 47:488-498. [PMID: 33358051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The study described here systematically analyzed how specific artifacts in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can affect the detection of endoleaks during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Patients undergoing EVAR of atherosclerotic or mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms using various standard and branched stent-graft material for visceral and iliac preservation were enrolled over 5 y and followed up with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CEUS simultaneously. CEUS artifacts were frequently identified after EVAR procedures (59% of examinations) and were caused mainly by contrast agent, different prosthesis or embolization material and postinterventional changes in the aneurysm sac. This article describes how to identify important artifacts and how to avoid false-negative or false-positive interpretations of endoleaks. Despite artifacts, CEUS had higher sensitivity for endoleak detection after EVAR than CTA. CEUS was superior to CTA in the identification of late endoleaks type II and in follow-up examinations after embolization procedures, where beam-hardening artifacts limited CTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Frenzel
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| | - Reinhard Kubale
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Alexander Massmann
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Paul Raczeck
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Philippe Jagoda
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Schlueter
- Clinic for General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Jonas Stroeder
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Arno Buecker
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Peter Minko
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rafailidis V, Huang DY, Yusuf GT, Sidhu PS. General principles and overview of vascular contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Ultrasonography 2019; 39:22-42. [PMID: 31671927 PMCID: PMC6920620 DOI: 10.14366/usg.19022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line modality for the evaluation of vascular pathology. Although well-established for many diseases, US has inherent limitations that can occasionally hinder an accurate diagnosis. The value of US was improved by the introduction of microbubbles as ultrasonographic contrast agents (UCAs) and the emergence of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), following the introduction of second-generation UCAs and the emergence of modern contrast-specific techniques. CEUS offers valuable information about vascular disease, both on a macrovascular and a microvascular level, with well-established applications for carotid disease, post-interventional follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysms, and the assessment of portal vein thrombosis. The purpose of this review is to discuss the principles of CEUS and to present an overview of its vascular applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Rafailidis
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dean Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gibran Timothy Yusuf
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paul S Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kapetanios D, Kontopodis N, Mavridis D, McWilliams RG, Giannoukas AD, Antoniou GA. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the detection of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69:280-294.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Negrão de Figueiredo G, Müller-Peltzer K, Schwarze V, Rübenthaler J, Clevert DA. Ultrasound and contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of acute aortic pathologies. VASA 2018; 48:17-22. [PMID: 30403367 DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Conventional ultrasound is worldwide the first-line imaging modality for the prompt diagnosis in the daily practice because it is a cost-effective and easy to perform technique. The additional application of contrast media has been used to enhance the intravascular contrast and to improve the imaging diagnostic accuracy in the detection, classification and follow-up of vascular pathologies. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has the advantage of being a safe, fast and dynamic non-invasive imaging tool with excellent results in the diagnosis of acute aortic pathologies, especially the detection of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. This review describes the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in the most common vascular pathologies such as aortic dissections, aneurysms and endoleaks. Keywords: Endoleak, contrast media, ultrasonography, aorta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo
- 1 Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Müller-Peltzer
- 1 Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Vincent Schwarze
- 1 Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- 1 Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- 1 Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Partovi S, Trischman T, Rafailidis V, Ganguli S, Rengier F, Goerne H, Rajiah P, Staub D, Patel IJ, Oliveira G, Ghoshhajra B. Multimodality imaging assessment of endoleaks post-endovascular aortic repair. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180013. [PMID: 29658769 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoleaks are a common complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). As a result, patients require lifelong imaging surveillance following EVAR. In current clinical practice, evaluation for endoleaks is predominantly performed with CT angiography (CTA). Due to the significant cumulative radiation burden associated with repetitive CTA imaging, as well as the repeated administration of nephrotoxic contrast agent, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have evolved as potential modalities for lifelong surveillance post-EVAR. In this paper, multimodality imaging, including CTA, CEUS and MRA, for the surveillance of endoleaks is discussed. Further, new CTA techniques for radiation reduction are elaborated. Additionally, imagery for three cases of aortic endoleak detection using CTA and five cases using MRA are presented. Imaging for different types of endoleaks with CTA, MRA and CEUS are presented. For lifelong endoleak surveillance post-EVAR, CTA is still regarded as the imaging modality of choice. However, advancements in CEUS and MRA technique enable partial replacement of CTA in certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasan Partovi
- 1 Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Thomas Trischman
- 1 Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Vasileios Rafailidis
- 2 Department of Radiology, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- 3 Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Fabian Rengier
- 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Harold Goerne
- 5 Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| | - Prabhakar Rajiah
- 5 Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| | - Daniel Staub
- 6 Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland
| | - Indravadan J Patel
- 1 Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - George Oliveira
- 3 Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Brian Ghoshhajra
- 3 Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Vascular diseases account for a significant proportion of abdominal pathology and represent a common referral source for abdominal ultrasonographic examinations. B-mode, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler analyses are well-established in the evaluation of abdominal blood vessels although they may occasionally be limited by lower sensitivity for slow flow visualization or the deeper location of abdominal vascular structures. The introduction of microbubbles as ultrasonographic contrast agents has rendered contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), a valuable complementary ultrasonographic technique, which is capable of addressing clinically significant problems and guiding patient management. The purpose of this pictorial review is to analyze the use of CEUS in the evaluation of abdominal vascular pathology and illustrate such applications by presenting representative images. Pathology discussed includes abdominal aortic aneurysm, post-endovascular treatment aorta, portal vein thrombosis, abdominal vascular trauma, and organ transplantation along with its complications.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rafailidis V, Partovi S, Dikkes A, Nakamoto DA, Azar N, Staub D. Evolving clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the abdominal aorta. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2018; 8:S118-S130. [PMID: 29850424 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.09.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) represents the initial modality in the workup of abdominal aortic pathology based on the plethora of advantages including widespread availability, low cost, safety profile and repeatability. However, US has inherent limitations including limited spatial information of pathologic processes to neighboring structures, lower sensitivity to slow blood flow and aortic luminal irregularities. For evaluation of aortic pathology angiography has long been considered the gold standard. Non-invasive cross-sectional imaging techniques like computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have gradually replaced interventional angiography for the evaluation of aorta, currently being regarded as the diagnostic imaging modalities of choice for diagnosis of virtually every aortic disease. Interventional angiography is currently primarily performed for treatment purposes of aortic pathology. The introduction of microbubbles as ultrasonographic contrast agents has rendered contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) an evolving valuable complementary technique with markedly increased diagnostic accuracy for certain aortic applications. CEUS is characterized by the potential to be performed in patients with impaired renal function. Due to its superior spatial and temporal resolution, ability for prolonged scanning and dynamic and real-time imaging, it provides clinically significant additional information compared to the standard Duplex US. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the currently available literature regarding abdominal aortic applications of CEUS, briefly elaborate on CEUS technique and safety and present cases in order to illustrate the added value in aortic pathologies. Conditions discussed include abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), aneurysm rupture, aneurysm surveillance after endovascular repair, dissection and aortitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Rafailidis
- Department of Radiology, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sasan Partovi
- Department of Radiology, Center for Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alexander Dikkes
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dean A Nakamoto
- Department of Radiology, Center for Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nami Azar
- Department of Radiology, Center for Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel Staub
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hyvelin JM, Gaud E, Costa M, Helbert A, Bussat P, Bettinger T, Frinking P. Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2017; 36:941-953. [PMID: 28240842 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.04059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare physicochemical characteristics and in vitro and in vivo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging performance of 3 commercially available ultrasound contrast agents: SonoVue (Bracco Imaging SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy; also marketed as Lumason in the USA), Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA) and Optison (GE Healthcare AS, Oslo, Norway). METHODS Physicochemical characteristics were measured with a Multisizer Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Two ultrasound systems (Aplio 500; Toshiba Medical Systems Corp, Tochigi-ken, Japan; and Logiq E9; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England) were used with different transducers. Contrast enhancement was measured in vitro by dose-ranging measurements using a custom-built beaker setup; in vivo imaging performances were compared in pigs (heart and liver) and rabbits (liver). Quantitative analyses were performed with VueBox quantification software (Bracco Suisse SA, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland). RESULTS Measured physicochemical characteristics were in agreement with those provided by the manufacturers. In vitro data demonstrated that the performance of SonoVue was similar to or better than that of Definity but superior to Optison (normalized scattered power 2- to 10-fold higher with SonoVue). Similar results were obtained in vivo, although the duration of enhancement in the pig heart was longer for SonoVue compared to Definity, and quantitative analysis revealed higher enhancement for SonoVue (1.5-fold increase). For liver imaging, SonoVue and Definity showed similar contrast enhancement and duration of enhancement, but compared to Optison, both peak enhancement and duration of enhancement were superior for SonoVue (up to 2-fold increase). CONCLUSIONS Imaging performance of SonoVue was similar to or slightly better than that of Definity, but it was superior to Optison for the conditions used in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Marc Hyvelin
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Gaud
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - Maria Costa
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Helbert
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Bussat
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Bettinger
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - Peter Frinking
- Bracco Suisse SA, Global Research and Development, Geneva Research Center and Manufacturing Site, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pfister K, Schierling W, Jung EM, Apfelbeck H, Hennersperger C, Kasprzak PM. Standardized 2D ultrasound versus 3D/4D ultrasound and image fusion for measurement of aortic aneurysm diameter in follow-up after EVAR. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2016; 62:249-60. [PMID: 26484714 DOI: 10.3233/ch-152012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare standardised 2D ultrasound (US) to the novel ultrasonographic imaging techniques 3D/4D US and image fusion (combined real-time display of B mode and CT scan) for routine measurement of aortic diameter in follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHOD AND MATERIALS 300 measurements were performed on 20 patients after EVAR by one experienced sonographer (3rd degree of the German society of ultrasound (DEGUM)) with a high-end ultrasound machine and a convex probe (1-5 MHz). An internally standardized scanning protocol of the aortic aneurysm diameter in B mode used a so called leading-edge method. In summary, five different US methods (2D, 3D free-hand, magnetic field tracked 3D - Curefab™, 4D volume sweep, image fusion), each including contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), were used for measurement of the maximum aortic aneurysm diameter. Standardized 2D sonography was the defined reference standard for statistical analysis. CEUS was used for endoleak detection. RESULTS Technical success was 100%. In augmented transverse imaging the mean aortic anteroposterior (AP) diameter was 4.0±1.3 cm for 2D US, 4.0±1.2 cm for 3D Curefab™, and 3.9±1.3 cm for 4D US and 4.0±1.2 for image fusion. The mean differences were below 1 mm (0.2-0.9 mm). Concerning estimation of aneurysm growth, agreement was found between 2D, 3D and 4D US in 19 of the 20 patients (95%). Definitive decision could always be made by image fusion. CEUS was combined with all methods and detected two out of the 20 patients (10%) with an endoleak type II. In one case, endoleak feeding arteries remained unclear with 2D CEUS but could be clearly localized by 3D CEUS and image fusion. CONCLUSION Standardized 2D US allows adequate routine follow-up of maximum aortic aneurysm diameter after EVAR. Image Fusion enables a definitive statement about aneurysm growth without the need for new CT imaging by combining the postoperative CT scan with real-time B mode in a dual image display. 3D/4D CEUS and image fusion can improve endoleak characterization in selected cases but are not mandatory for routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Pfister
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wilma Schierling
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ernst Michael Jung
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Apfelbeck
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Hennersperger
- Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technische Universitaet Munchen, Garching, Germany
| | - Piotr M Kasprzak
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scaife M, Giannakopoulos T, Al-Khoury GE, Chaer RA, Avgerinos ED. Contemporary Applications of Ultrasound in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Management. Front Surg 2016; 3:29. [PMID: 27303669 PMCID: PMC4882338 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) is a well-established screening tool for detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and is currently recommended not only for those with a relevant family history but also for all men and high-risk women older than 65 years of age. The advent of minimally invasive endovascular techniques in the treatment of AAAs [endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)] has increased the need for repeat imaging, especially in the postoperative period. Nevertheless, preoperative planning, intraoperative execution, and postoperative surveillance all mandate accurate imaging. While computed tomographic angiography and angiography have dominated the field, repeatedly exposing patients to the deleterious effects of cumulative radiation and intravenous nephrotoxic contrast, US technology has significantly evolved over the past decade. In addition to standard color duplex US, 2D, 3D, or 4D contrast-enhanced US modalities are revolutionizing AAA management and postoperative surveillance. This technology can accurately measure AAA diameter and volume, and most importantly, it can detect endoleaks post-EVAR with high sensitivity and specificity. 4D contrast-enhanced US can even provide hemodynamic information about the branch vessels following fenestrated EVARs. The need for experienced US operators and accredited vascular labs is mandatory to guarantee the reliability of the results. This review article presents a comprehensive overview of the literature on the state-of-art US imaging in AAA management, including post-EVAR follow-up, techniques, and diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Scaife
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh, PA , USA
| | | | - Georges E Al-Khoury
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh, PA , USA
| | - Rabih A Chaer
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh, PA , USA
| | - Efthymios D Avgerinos
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh, PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cantisani V, Grazhdani H, Clevert DA, Iezzi R, Aiani L, Martegani A, Fanelli F, Di Marzo L, Wlderk A, Cirelli C, Catalano C, Di Leo N, Di Segni M, Malpassini F, D’Ambrosio F. EVAR: Benefits of CEUS for monitoring stent-graft status. Eur J Radiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
13
|
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with known or suspected atherosclerosis. The administration of a microbubble contrast agent in conjunction with ultrasound results in an improved image quality and provides information that cannot be assessed with standard B-mode ultrasound. CEUS is a high-resolution, noninvasive imaging modality, which is safe and may benefit patients with coronary, carotid, or aortic atherosclerosis. CEUS allows a reliable assessment of endocardial borders, left ventricular function, intracardiac thrombus and myocardial perfusion. CEUS results in an improved detection of carotid atherosclerosis, and allows assessment of high-risk plaque characteristics including intraplaque vascularization, and ulceration. CEUS provides real-time bedside information in patients with a suspected or known abdominal aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection. The absence of ionizing radiation and safety of the contrast agent allow repetitive imaging which is particularly useful in the follow-up of patients after endovascular aneurysm repair. New developments in CEUS-based molecular imaging will improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and may in the future allow to image and directly treat cardiovascular diseases (theragnostic CEUS). Familiarity with the strengths and limitations of CEUS may have a major impact on the management of patients with atherosclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arend F L Schinkel
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mathias Kaspar
- Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Staub
- Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Güntner O, Zeman F, Wohlgemuth WA, Heiss P, Michael Jung E, Wiggermann P, Pfister K, Stroszczynski C, Müller-Wille R. Inferior Mesenteric Arterial Type II Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Are They Predictable? Radiology 2014; 270:910-9. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13130489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
15
|
de Bucourt M, Mühler M, Kröncke T, Hanel M, Weiss A, Hamm B, Hein P. Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Evaluation of a Single-Acquisition CTA Protocol Using a Prebolus. J Endovasc Ther 2011; 18:771-8. [DOI: 10.1583/11-3489.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|