[Two-year results of a modular short hip stem prosthesis--a prospective study]

Comparative Study for Postoperative Initial Fixation Patterns of Two Different Types of Cementless Short Stem Using Three-Dimensional Templating Software

Background

While cementless short stems have become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA), Metha is a relatively recent development that differs from other short stems in its initial fixation concept of partial collum-sparing metaphyseal anchorage. The purpose of this study was to quantify the contact state between Metha and the femur. Additionally, we investigated the difference in contact points between Meta and Fitmore, which is one of the more popular curved short stems.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 42 hips that underwent THA using Metha and 41 hips using Fitmore. Stem-to-femur contact was evaluated by density mapping using a three-dimensional digital template system to quantify the contact condition according to the modified Gruen zone. The criterion for the stem-to-bone contact boundary was defined as a computed tomography value of 543 Hounsfield.

Results

Quantitative evaluation of Metha according to the modified Gruen zones showed the ratio of surface area with high cortical contact in each zone. The results were 4.6% ± 5.7% in zone 1, 0.9% ± 2.3% in zone 2, 19.1% ± 12.9% in zone 3, 1.4% ± 3.2% in zone 5, 29.6% ± 16.4% in zone 6, and 25.1% ± 17.7% in zones 7. Evaluation of Fitmore for the same zones was as follows: 1.6% ± 2.4%, 18.5% ± 16.9%, 20.8% ± 17.4%, 12.7% ± 12.8%, 3.7% ± 5.8%, and 13.3% ± 10.3%. Comparing the two groups, the contact area was significantly greater for Metha in zones 1, 6 and 7 and Fitmore in zones 2 and 5 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

It is possible for Metha to achieve metaphyseal anchoring by contacting the cortical bone at the proximal femur, thus avoiding proximal offloading. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have quantitatively reported stem-to-cortical bone contact conditions in curved short stems.

[Short hip stem for THA in avascular necrosis of the femoral head]

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head or avascular necrosis of the femoral head (HKN) is a complex disease that, without treatment, leads to infraction of the femoral head in most cases. In these cases, only replacement of the hip joint will help, although there is no clear recommendation of an arthroplasty type. In the last two decades, the treatment of primary and secondary coxarthrosis with short-shaft prostheses with different anchoring philosophies has increased. Since short-shaft fitting is a possible option especially in younger patients, the question arises about possible fittings of advanced HKN with these stem types, especially with metaphyseal anchorage. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the results of short stem prosthesis in HKN and to present the advantages and disadvantages of short stem prosthesis in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review analyzes the existing studies on short stem arthroplasty for HKN.

RESULTS

Only a few studies exist that have analyzed clinical and radiologic outcomes of short stem replacement in HKN.

CONCLUSION

The existing short- and medium-term results show mostly good outcomes. However, it is difficult to draw a general conclusion due to differences in stem design and fixation. Short stems with primary diaphyseal fixation do not show an increased risk of failed osseointegration or loosening. Constructions with primary metaphyseal fixation should undergo MRI to rule out the possibility of necrosis extending beyond the femoral neck.

An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate the fixation of, and bone remodeling around, the Primoris femoral neck-preserving hip implant.

METHODS

Fifty younger patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were managed with the Primoris hip implant. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A region-of-interest (ROI) protocol for 4 ROIs was applied to assess BMD. The association between BMD and migration was evaluated to determine the fixation of the Primoris implant and bone remodeling in the proximal part of the femur. Follow-up evaluation was performed at regular intervals from day 1 (baseline) until 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The major stem migrations were subsidence (Y axis; mean, 0.38 mm) at 6 weeks and varus tilt (rotation) (Z axis; mean, 0.93°) at 6 to 12 months. In ROI4 (the calcar area), a significant gain in bone was found with a mean difference of 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8% to 7.4%; p < 0.02) at 24 months postoperatively. Significant bone loss was found in ROI1 and ROI2, with a mean difference of -4.9% (95% CI, -7.4% to -2.4%; p = 0.0003) and -8.9% (95% CI, -11.5% to -6.2%; p = 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression and multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative association between maximal total point motion and BMD (p = 0.02, R = 15%; and p < 0.05, R = 26%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Primoris component showed satisfactory primary stability with promising results at the 24-month follow-up. DXA scans showed limited stress-shielding with the proximal loading pattern of the Primoris. Better bone quality was associated with less implant migration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bone-preserving total hip arthroplasty in avascular necrosis of the hip-a matched-pairs analysis

PURPOSE

Short-stem hip arthroplasty has the potential advantage of femoral bone stock preservation, especially in view of the expected revisions in the often relatively young patients. Despite short-stem hip prosthesis are increasingly used for total hip arthroplasty, there are no sufficient mid- and long-term results especially for patients with avascular femoral head osteonecrosis. The present study investigates mid-term functional results as well as the revision rate following implantation of a short-stem prosthesis.

METHODS

In the period 06/2005 until 12/2013, a total of 351 short-stem hip prostheses were implanted. The study included 331 complete data sets. A retrospective analysis was performed using the Oxford Hip Score. All revisions were registered.

RESULTS

In a total of 331 prostheses, the Oxford Hip Score was "excellent" in 66.2%, "good" in 12.7%, "fair" in 13.0%, and "poor" in 8.2% with a mean follow-up of 57.4 months (SD ± 29.8; range 24-115). In 26 cases, aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip was the indication (7.9%). The Oxford Hip Score was "excellent" in 66.7%, "good" in 0.0%, "fair" in 20.8%, and "poor" in 12.5%. The cumulated five year survival rate was 96.7%.

CONCLUSION

In mid-term observation, the Metha® short-stem prosthesis shows no disadvantage in functional outcome and in survival time compared to a standard hip stem. Providing a correct indication, the Metha® short stem is a valuable option in total hip arthroplasty for younger patients with avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Evaluation has shown no significant differences between aseptic osteonecrosis and other indications.

Radiographic alterations in short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up study of 216 cases

INTRODUCTION

In recent years a variety of short-stems have been introduced. Stable osteointegration is a key factor for a satisfactory long-term result. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative radiological alterations and subsidence, as a result of using a newly developed device, over a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

216 short-stems were implanted in combination with a cementless cup. Patients were allowed full weight-bearing on the first day postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative x-rays were done using a standardised technique. Radiological alterations, such as bone resorption, radiolucency, osteolysis and cortical hypertrophy were detected and located using modified Gruen zones, and subsidence was measured via a conventional digital technique over a 2-year follow-up. In addition, Harris Hip Score (HHS), rest pain and load pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed respectively.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up 6 stems (2.9%) showed nonprogressive radiolucent lines with a maximum width of 2 mm. Resorption of femoral bone stock was detected in a total of 8 cases (3.9%). Femoral cortical hypertrophy was seen in a total of 9 hips (4.4%). No patient showed osteolysis. A measureable subsidence of at least 2 mm was observed in a total of 15.7% (32 cases) after 6 weeks, corresponding to an initial settlement given full weight-bearing ambulation. Only 1.1% (2 cases) showed further progression at the 6-month follow-up, whereas at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups no further subsidence was observed. After 2 years HHS was 98.1 (65.0-100.0), rest pain on the VAS was 0.2 (0.0-7.0) while load pain was 0.4 (0.0-7.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this radiographic analysis give support to the principle of using metaphyseal anchoring, calcar guided short-stems. The low incidence of bony alterations after a follow-up of 2 years indicates a physiological load distribution. After mild initial subsidence a stable osteointegration can be achieved over time.

[Differences between short stem prostheses]

The short stem designs currently available are significantly different and can be differentiated into neck containing, partial containing and neck resection designs. In this article, the differences in the design features are presented. These include the differences in the technique of implantation, the significant differences in the reproducibility of the given anatomy of the patient and also concerning their osteologic competence.

Short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a locally destructive and complex disorder. Without treatment, infraction of the femoral head is likely. There is also a lack of consensus in the literature about the most appropriate arthroplasty method in patients with progressive ONFH. During the last decade, the number of short-stem prostheses has increased. Some short-stem designs have a metaphyseal anchorage. It is questionable whether ONFH represents a risk factor for failure after implantation of short stems. The aim of this study was to review existing literature regarding the outcome of short-stem arthroplasty in ONFH and to present the pros and cons of short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review summarises existing studies on short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

RESULTS

Few studies have analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of short-stem THA in patients with ONFH. Only a handful of studies present clinical and radiological outcome after implantation of a short-stem arthroplasty in patients with the underlying diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

CONCLUSION

The short- to medium-term results show predominantly good outcomes. However, due to differences in the design of short stems and their fixation, it is hard to draw a general conclusion. Short stems with primary diaphyseal fixation do not reveal a high increased risk of failed osseointegration or loosening. For designs with a primary metaphyseal anchorage, an MRI should be conducted to exclude that the ostenecrosis exceeds the femoral neck.

Comparative 5-year results of short hip total hip arthroplasty with Ti- or CoCr-neck adapters

This prospective study investigated revision after modular short stem implantation. Results are presented for 2 different types of neck adapters (titanium and cobalt-chromium [CoCr]). Eighty-five patients with titanium adapters and 87 patients with CoCr adapters underwent follow-up examination after an average of 5.7 and 5.2 years, respectively. Mean patient age was 57 years in both groups. Indications were primary osteoarthritis (80%), cup dysplasia (14%), and other (6%). Mean Harris Hip Scores were 98 and 99 points (titanium and CoCr groups, respectively). Ninety percent and 96% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied (titanium and CoCr groups, respectively); 3% of patients in both groups were dissatisfied. Pain decreased from visual analog scale score 7 and 6 preoperatively to 0.37 and 0.15 postoperatively for the titanium and CoCr groups, respectively. No joint dislocation occurred. Six patients needed revision within the first year (2 for infection, 1 for via falsa position, and 2 for aseptic loosening in the titanium group, and 1 for aseptic loosening in the CoCr group). Nine revisions occurred due to neck adapter failure (titanium group). Primary standard stems were used in all revisions. Excluding material-related adapter failures in the titanium group, the 5-year survival rate was 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.9-97.6 for titanium) and 99% (95% CI, 93.7-99.8 for CoCr). No radiographic signs of loosening were seen at last follow-up. Fine sclerotic lines were detected in Gruen zones 1 (17.2%) and 2 (14%), hypertrophies in zone 3 (4.3%), and periprosthetic cancellous bone compressions in zone 6 (75.8%). No adapter fractures occurred for CoCr components. The treatment and anchoring system of the short stem studied yielded good results and allowed revision using standard stems in all patients.

Patient selection for shorter femoral stems

The right patient selection with the correct surgical treatment are prerequisite for a positive result in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Short stem implants demand a shorter anchoring length in accordance with the proper indication. Although appropriate indications for short stems have been discussed in the literature, there currently is no clear definition. The lack of an accepted categorization of short hip stems complicates the situation further. This article briefly reviews the literature and highlights the authors' results and experiences in short stem THA in an effort to establish a proper discrimination between indications and contraindications for the Metha short stem. Results presented include a retrospective data collection and follow-up examination of 126 patients who underwent short stem THA with 2- and 4-year results. Anchoring principles of the short stem are reviewed, and a complication and failure analysis based on 7 femoral revisions in 1092 short stem THAs is presented. Selection criteria for short stem THA are patients younger than 70 years with primary osteoarthritis and dysplastic femoral deformities, and indications of avascular head necrosis. Adequate bone quality must be confirmed intraoperatively, assessing whether the bone structure in the area of the femoral neck is strong enough to support the short stem load transmission. Coxa vara and high dysplastic femoral neck antetorsion are contraindications for short stems. Wide and short femoral necks, implant undersizing, and a deep stem position below the femoral osteotomy compromise stability and must be avoided with an appropriate surgical technique. Long-term data are not yet available.

10-year experience with short stem total hip arthroplasty

Since 1998, short stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been performed at the authors' institution. Currently, 30% of THAs are performed with short stems. This article reports on complications that required revision of a short stem THA. Between September 2005 and February 2012, a total of 1953 Metha short stem THAs were performed; of these, 38 required revision due to mechanical complications. In 12 cases, the modular titanium neck adapter failed. In 19 cases, aseptic implant loosening occurred; of these, 11 cases were due to major stem subsidence. In 2 cases, via falsa (cortical penetration) implantation occurred. In 5 cases, periprosthetic fractures led to revision. This corresponds to an aseptic total revision rate of 1.3% for 26 short stems and 1.9% including the cases of all 38 documented revision cases. Thirty-four cases were revised with cementless standard hip stems, 2 cases were revised with short stems, and 2 cases were revised with long revision stems. Undersizing was analyzed in 58% of aseptic revisions. Fifty-four percent of revisions were performed in male patients - 23% with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and 7% with short hip stems positioned in varus in coxa vara deformities. Seventy-two percent of revisions after marked early stem subsidence and position change into valgus were performed in female patients. Dysplastic hips with coxa valga did not show elevated revision rates. No revisions were performed for dislocation or femoral thigh pain. Short stem THA with the Metha implant is a bone-preserving option for various indications in select patient groups.

Medium-term comparison of results in obese patients and non-obese hip prostheses with Metha® short stem

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful orthopedic surgeries in terms of results. However, the prevalence of obesity has nearly doubled between 1980 and 2008. There is limited and controversial data on hip replacement results in obese patients. The Metha® prosthesis, introduced in 2004, is a short stem midway between devices maintaining the femoral neck and metaphyseal implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on clinical and radiological results at medium term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-two patients were retrospectively divided into two cohorts based on their BMI. Mean BMI were, respectively, 35.22 kg/m2 in the obese group [30.02-57.79] and 26.15 [23.25-28.72] in the other cohort. Follow-up were 47.16 [26.10-74.33] and 54.06 [28.17-77.73]. The mean ages at surgery were 55 years [39.8-67.8] and 54 [31.3-70.4]. We used self-assessment questionnaires WOMAC and Oxford; two clinical scores Harris Hip Score and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné. ARA score was used for osseointegration evaluation.

RESULTS

Operative times were comparable. The self-assessment questionnaires and clinical scores showed significant poorer results in the obese cohort. HHS were 87.54 [56-100] and 92.49 [25-100]. However, the clinical improvement obtained between pre- and postoperative was identical in both groups: 52 [19-73] and 52 [-6 to 90]. Radiological ARA scores were good or excellent for 97.56 and 92.68%. Survival analysis was comparable with more than 0.96 at 50 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The Metha® prosthesis can be implanted at the forefront of primary total hip arthroplasty in normal subjects as well as in obese subjects. However, we cannot yet claim we will reach the same durability we experience with standard prostheses.

Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty

➤ Short bone-conserving femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty were designed to preserve proximal bone stock.➤ Given the distinct fixation principles and location of loading among these bone-conserving stems, a classification system is essential to compare clinical outcomes.➤ Due to the low quality of currently available evidence, only a weak recommendation can be provided for clinical usage of certain stem designs, while some other designs cannot be recommended at this time.➤ A high prevalence of stem malalignment, incorrect sizing, subsidence, and intraoperative fractures has been reported in a subset of these short stem designs.➤ Stronger evidence, including prospective multicenter randomized trials comparing standard stems with these newer designs, is necessary before widespread use can be recommended.

Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of short-stem total hip arthroplasty is to preserve proximal bone stock for future revisions, to improve biomechanical reconstruction, and to make minimally invasive approaches easier. It is therefore being increasingly considered to be a sound alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty, especially for young and active patients. However, it is still unknown whether survival rates of short-stem hips match current standards. We made a systematic summary of reported overall survival after short-stem total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of English, French, German, and Dutch literature. 2 assessors independently identified clinical studies on short-stem hip arthroplasty. After recalculating reported revision rates, we determined whether each implant had a projected revision rate of 10% or less at 10 years of follow-up or a revision rate per 100 observed component years of 1 or less. Stems were classified as "collum", "partial collum", or "trochanter-sparing".

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

We found 49 studies, or 51 cohorts, involving 19 different stems. There was a large increase in recent publications. The majority of studies included had a follow-up of less than 5 years. We found a large number of observational studies on "partial collum" and "trochanter-sparing" stems, demonstrating adequate survival rates at medium-term follow-up. Clinical evidence from "collum stem" studies was limited to a small number of studies with a medium-term follow-up period. These studies did not show a satisfactory overall survival rate.

Modular neck femoral stems

Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted.

Micromotions at the taper interface between stem and neck adapter of a bimodular hip prosthesis during activities of daily living

The stem-neck taper interface of bimodular hip endoprostheses bears the risk of micromotions that can result in ongoing corrosion due to removal of the passive layer and ultimately cause implant fracture. We investigated the extent of micromotions at the stem-neck interface and the seating behavior of necks of one design made from different alloys during daily activities. Modular hip prostheses (n = 36, Metha®, Aesculap AG, Germany) with neck adapters (CoCr29Mo6 or Ti6Al4V) were embedded in PMMA (ISO 7206-4) and exposed to cyclic loading with peak loads ranging from walking (Fmax  = 2.3 kN) to stumbling (Fmax  = 5.3 kN). Translational and rotational micromotions at the taper interface and seating characteristics during assembly and loading were determined using four eddy-current sensors. Seating during loading after implant assembly was dependent on load magnitude but not on material coupling. Micromotions in the stem-neck interface correlated positively with load levels (CoCr: 2.6-6.3 µm, Ti: 4.6-13.8 µm; p < 0.001) with Ti neck adapters exhibiting significantly larger micromotions than CoCr (p < 0.001). These findings explain why high body weights and activities related to higher loads could increase the risk of fretting-induced implant failures in clinical application, especially for Ti-Ti combinations. Still, the role of taper seating is not clearly understood.

Five-year results of a cementless short-hip-stem prosthesis

Hip prosthesis stems with a short stem length and proximal fixation geometry support a bone-preserving and muscle-sparing implantation and should also allow for revision surgery with a standard hip stem. We present 250 prospectively documented clinical and radiological results from the Metha Short Hip Stem prosthesis (B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) after an average follow-up of 4.9 years. The average patient age at surgery was 60 years. Indication for total hip replacement was primary osteoarthrosis (OA) (78% of patients), OA based on developmental dysplasia of the hip (16%), and other indications (6%). At the last follow-up, the average Harris Hip Score was 97 points. 85% of patients were very satisfied and 14% were satisfied after surgery, whereas 1% were dissatisfied. Pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale improved from 7.4 (min 1.6, max 9.5) pre-operatively to 0.23 (min 0, max 6.6). No joint dislocations occurred when predominantly using 28 mm and 32 mm prosthesis heads. Nine short-stems were revised: three after bacterial infections, two after primary via valsa with penetration of the femoral cortex two and three months after surgery, and three after early aseptic cases of loosening within the first year. A further nine osseously consolidated short-stems had to be replaced due to breakage of the modular titanium cone adapter after an average of 3.1 years (min 1.9, max 4.4). All surgical revisions were performed using primary standard stems. Without taking the material-related adapter failures into account, a five year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of 96.7% (95% confidence interval 93.4–98.3) was determined for the short-stem prostheses. There were no radiological signs of loosening in any of the short-stem prostheses at the last examination. Fine sclerotic lines were detected in Gruen's AP zones 1 (19%) and 2 (10.5%), individual hypertrophies in zone 3 (3.5%), fine seams in zones 4 (5.5%) and 5 (4%), without pedestal formations in zone 4, clear cancellous bone compressions in zone 6 (97.5%), as well as single fine scleroses (1.5%) and atrophies (2.5%) in zone 7. The mid-term clinical results with periprosthetic bone remodeling and without radiological signs of loosening confirm this metaphyseal short-stem treatment and fixation concept and the possibility of revision surgery using standard hip stems. Long-term results must be further observed on a prospective basis as part of this collective study.

Cementless short stem hip arthroplasty METHA® as an encouraging option in adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

INTRODUCTION

The implantation of a total hip arthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with progressive osteonecrosis. However, there is uncertainty about the type of arthroplasty that provides the best outcome and whether short stem arthroplasty represents a reasonable alternative for young patients in order to have more options in case of revision. This uncertainty exists due to the lack of studies analysing contemporary short stem arthroplasty in osteonecrosis.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of the METHA(®) short stem arthroplasty in patients with progressive osteonecrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated the clinical and radiological short- to midterm results after implantation of the cementless short stem arthroplasty METHA(®). 73 hips in 64 patients with progessive osteonecrosis after implantation of the METHA(®) arthroplasty were investigated by measuring the clinical outcome, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and visual analogue pain scale for the preoperative stage and follow-up. Radiological analyses of X-rays were conducted to assess the bone ingrowth as well as subsidence, osteolysis or fracture.

RESULTS

The pain scale improved from preoperatively 7.8 to postoperatively 1.7, while the HHS increased from 41.4 to 90.6 points 34 months post-surgery. Complications associated with revision of the METHA(®) short stem included two traumatic femoral shaft fracture and one deep infection. The radiological assessment showed good bone ingrowth in all patients despite osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms encouraging results as well as good bone ingrowth of the cementless short stem arthroplasty METHA(®) even in patients with osteonecrosis.

The NANOS short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a mid term follow-up

A number of short stems for total hip arthroplasty have been introduced during the last decade. We describe our experience with the NANOS prosthesis (Smith and Nephew, Marl, Germany). The potential increase of bone mass around a femoral short stem using bone densitometry may be an indicator for secondary ingrowth. We report the outcome of 72 NANOS short stems in 65 patients between March 2003 and October 2007. The mean follow-up was 5.2±0.7 years and the mean age of the patients was 63±8.3 years. Along with demographic data and co-morbidities, the Harris Hip Score, the Merle d'Aubigné mobility score, and a patient-centred questionnaire were evaluated pre-operatively and during follow-up. The Mean Harris Hip Score increased from 47.3±12.2 pre-operatively to 97.6±0.6 at the final follow-up. The Merle d'Aubigné mobility score increased from 7.6±1.4 pre-operatively to 11.8±0.3 at the final follow-up. None of the 72 stems were revised, providing a survival rate of 100%. Radiolucent lines were visible rasiographically in two patients during follow-up. The NANOS short stem demonstrated a satisfactory outcome at mid term follow-up. The clinical and radiological results support to the principle of metaphyseal anchorage of a short stem prosthesis. Long term evaluation will be of interest to determine if these encouraging trends are reflected by prolonged survivorship.

Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem-neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis

Hip prostheses with a modular neck exhibit, compared to monobloc prostheses, an additional interface which bears the risk of fretting as well as corrosion. Failures at the neck adapter of modular prostheses have been observed for a number of different designs. It has been speculated that micromotions at the stem-neck interface were responsible for these implant failures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of material combinations and assembly conditions on the magnitude of micromotions at the stem-neck interface during cyclic loading. Modular (n = 24) and monobloc (n = 3) hip prostheses of a similar design (Metha, Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) were subjected to mechanical testing according to ISO 7206-4 (F(min) = 230N, F(max) = 2300N, f = 1Hz, n = 10,000 cycles). The neck adapters (Ti-6Al-4V or Co-Cr29-Mo alloy) were assembled with a clean or contaminated interface. The micromotion between stem and neck adapter was calculated at five reference points based on the measurements of the three eddy current sensors. The largest micromotions were observed at the lateral edge of the stem-neck taper connection, which is in accordance with the crack location of clinically failed prostheses. Titanium neck adapters showed significantly larger micromotions than cobalt-chromium neck adapters (p = 0.005). Contaminated interfaces also exhibited significantly larger micromotions (p < 0.001). Since excessive micromotions at the stem-neck interface might be involved in the process of implant failure, special care should be taken to clean the interface prior to assembly and titanium neck adapters with titanium stems should generally be used with caution.