Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer

Laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for cancer: how patient selection and complications differ by approach

BACKGROUND

Outcomes between laparoscopic (LAPR) and open abdominoperineal resections (OAPR) are poorly described.

METHODS

After IRB approval, 2005-2008 NSQIP data were used to identify patients undergoing LAPR and OAPR for rectal cancer. Logistic regression identified variables influencing the selection of LAPR vs. OAPR as well as the likelihood of postoperative events. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the incidence of 30-day postoperative events.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred ninety-seven OAPRs and 143 LAPRs were identified. LAPRs were less likely to have a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 (p = 0.04) and were associated with equivalent mean operative times (p = 0.36). LAPRs and OAPRs were found to have similar rates of surgical site infections (p = 0.13), transfusion requirements (p = 0.17), myocardial infarction (p = 0.48), and need for reoperation within 30 days (p = 0.20). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy did not directly increase complication rates in either group. Few factors predicted choice of LAPR but included BMI <25 (OR, 1.54; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Complication rates between LAPR and OAPR were similar despite the greater technical challenge of LAPR. Wound infection rates were equivalent, which may reflect similar rates of perineal wound infections. Few patients are offered LAPR, possibly due to surgeon preferance as opposed to patient factors.

Laparoscopic low anterior resection for early rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Early rectal cancer (ERC) is adenocarcinoma that has invaded into, but not extended beyond, the submucosa. Endoscopic or minimal access surgical procedures, such as laparoscopic resection, have emerged as a useful tool in the surgical treatment of such diseases. The aim of this study is to present and analyze the feasibility, the short- and long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) in patients with ERC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2002 and 4/2011, a total of 164 patients with colorectal cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery (LS). Of these, 7 patients (4.2%) had ERC and underwent laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR). The median follow-up was 41 months.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 2.5 h. None of the laparoscopic procedures was converted to open surgery. Liquids and solid food were started on median postoperative days 1 and 3, respectively. The median length of postoperative stay was 5 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (28.5%), including wound infection in one patient (14.2%) and atelectasis in one patient (14.2%). None of the patients required an urgent re-operation. There was no mortality related to LS.

CONCLUSIONS

LS for ERC can be used as a strategy sited between endoscopic mucosal resection and open anterior resection with beneficial long- and short-term results. It appears as a technically and oncologically safe procedure when performed by surgeons with sufficient experience in laparoscopic techniques.