Rumination und Ablenkung: Ausgewählte Befunde zur Response Styles Theorie

Study protocol for a feasibility study of microinterventions in smartphone-based assessments to reduce depressive rumination

INTRODUCTION

Depression as well as suicidal ideation and behaviours share several precipitating and maintaining factors and are subject to the influence of overlapping constructs. One of these transdiagnostic constructs is rumination. For the treatment of rumination, a variety of interventions are already available. However, not everyone with a need receives psychotherapeutic treatment. And even if they do: implementing learnt strategies alone at home can be challenging for patients. Therefore, this study aims to test the feasibility of delivering microinterventions for the reduction of rumination in a smartphone-based setting with the goal to make these interventions accessible to a larger number of people and support their use in everyday life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study's design is an uncontrolled-within-group design. Participants with at least mild depressive symptoms and reported rumination will be included and recruited via outpatient clinics as well as in the general population. The aim is to recruit at least N=70 participants. Participants first undergo a short telephone screening, a baseline assessment, a 7-day smartphone-based assessment including microinterventions in case participants report rumination and a postassessment. For feasibility purposes, primary outcomes relate to participants' compliance, their evaluation of the smartphone-based assessment as well as the microinterventions delivered during the assessment. As a secondary goal, clinical utility will be examined. Clinical outcomes (eg, depressive symptoms, rumination) will be measured at baseline and postassessment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ethics committee of the institute of psychology of the university of Duisburg-Essen and University of Leipzig has approved the study. Study results will be disseminated to healthcare communities, in peer-reviewed science journals and at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00031743.

Perseverative negative thinking predicts depression in people with acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Depression is common in people who have experienced recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), and predicts worse medical outcomes. Mechanisms underpinning the development of depression and its association with poor medical outcomes are unclear however. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of perseverative negative thinking (e.g. worry and rumination) in predicting depression in people with recent ACS.

METHODS

Adults attending specialist inpatient and outpatient cardiology services who had recently experienced ACS were invited to participate in this observational prospective cohort study. Questionnaire assessments were completed within 6months of index ACS (baseline), then 2months and 6months later.

RESULTS

169 participants (131 male (78%), median age 68 (±16) years) completed baseline questionnaires, and 111 completed follow-ups. After controlling for the effects of key covariates, baseline rumination was a significant predictor of depression at 6months, accounting for 2% of the variance in depression. This association was partially mediated by poor problem-solving ability and lack of social support. Neither worry nor rumination at baseline were significant predictors of quality of life at 6months.

CONCLUSIONS

Rumination is a significant independent predictor of depression, and this association may be partially explained by deficits in problem-solving ability and reduced social support. Both rumination and problem solving may provide useful targets for the development of evidence-based interventions to reduce depression among people with coronary heart disease.

[Depressed, biased, forgetful: The interaction of emotional and cognitive dysfunctions in depression]

Major depressive disorder is characterized by changes in the emotional state, e. g. the diminished experience of positive emotions, as well as cognitive impairments such as concentration and memory difficulties. These emotional and cognitive dysfunctions are closely interrelated and play a key role for the development and maintenance of depressive symptoms. For instance, patients with depression show negatively biased information processing that affects attention and memory as well as their reaction to feedback. In addition, there is an increased motivation to avoid negatively evaluated conditions and at the same time a reduced motivation to approach positive goals. Furthermore, depressed patients often show a specific style of thinking, called rumination, which involves repeated, intensive thinking about the causes, consequences and symptoms of one's own negative feelings. In this review, the different relationships between emotional, motivational and cognitive symptoms of depressive patients will be presented and the influence of their interaction on cognitive performance will be discussed. The highlighted clinical relevance of emotional-cognitive dysfunctions should be considered more often in therapeutic interventions for depressed patients.

The association of perseverative negative thinking with depression, anxiety and emotional distress in people with long term conditions: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Depression is common in people with long term conditions, and is associated with worse medical outcomes. Previous research shows perseverative negative thinking (e.g. worry, rumination) predicts subsequent depression and worse medical outcomes, suggesting interventions targeting perseverative negative thinking could improve depression and medical outcomes. Previous studies recruited healthy individuals, however. This review aimed to determine the temporal relationship and strength of prospective association of perseverative negative thinking with depression, anxiety and emotional distress in people with long term conditions.

METHOD

Four electronic databases were searched for studies including standardised measures of perseverative negative thinking and depression, anxiety or emotional distress, and which presented prospective associations. Findings were narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were identified in a range of long term conditions. Perseverative negative thinking and subsequent depression, anxiety or emotional distress were significantly correlated in the majority of studies (bivariate r=0.23 to r=0.73). 25 studies controlled for confounders, and in 15 perseverative negative thinking predicted subsequent depression, anxiety or emotional distress. Results varied according to condition and study quality. Six of 7 studies found bivariate associations between depression, anxiety or emotional distress and subsequent perseverative negative thinking, though 2 studies controlling for key covariates found no association. Few studies assessed the impact of perseverative negative thinking on medical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Strongest evidence supported perseverative negative thinking predicting subsequent depression, anxiety and emotional distress in people with long term conditions. Further prospective research is warranted to clarify the association of perseverative negative thinking with subsequent poor medical outcomes.

Response style and severity and chronicity of depressive disorders in primary health care

BACKGROUND

Response styles theory of depression postulates that rumination is a central factor in occurrence, severity and maintaining of depression. High neuroticism has been associated with tendency to ruminate. We investigated associations of response styles and neuroticism with severity and chronicity of depression in a primary care cohort study.

METHODS

In the Vantaa Primary Care Depression Study, a stratified random sample of 1119 adult patients was screened for depression using the Prime-MD. Depressive and comorbid psychiatric disorders were diagnosed using SCID-I/P and SCID-II interviews. Of the 137 patients with depressive disorders, 82% completed the prospective five-year follow-up with a graphic life chart enabling evaluation of the longitudinal course of episodes. Neuroticism was measured with the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI-Q). Response styles were investigated at five years using the Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ-43).

RESULTS

At five years, rumination correlated significantly with scores of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (r=0.54), Beck Depression Inventory (r=0.61), Beck Anxiety Inventory (r=0.50), Beck Hopelessness Scale (r=0.51) and Neuroticism (r=0.58). Rumination correlated also with proportion of follow-up time spent depressed (r=0.38). In multivariate regression, high rumination was significantly predicted by current depressive symptoms and neuroticism, but not by anxiety symptoms or preceding duration of depressive episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among primary care patients with depression, rumination correlated with current severity of depressive symptoms, but the association with preceding episode duration remained uncertain. The association between neuroticism and rumination was strong. The findings are consistent with rumination as a state-related phenomenon, which is also strongly intertwined with traits predisposing to depression.

Die Ruminationsfacetten Brooding und Reflection

Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Brooding und Reflection gelten als unterschiedlich adaptive Ruminationsfacetten, die mit einer international häufig verwendeten 10-Item-Version des Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ) erfasst werden. Fragestellung: Ziel war die psychometrische Evaluation der deutschsprachigen Version dieses Kurzfragebogens (RSQ-10D). Methode: Anhand zweier Stichproben junger Erwachsener (n1 = 166, n2 = 172) wurden konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen durchgeführt. Weitere Analysen erfolgten zusätzlich bei akut Depressiven (n = 53). Ergebnisse: Das Brooding-Reflection-Modell erreichte nach Modellierung zweier Paare kovariierender Fehlerterme einen akzeptablen Modellfit. Beide Skalen zeigten akzeptable interne Konsistenzen und Retestreliabilitäten. Korrelationen mit konstruktnahen Skalen waren plausibel und legen eine geringere Dysfunktionalität von Reflection nahe. Schlussfolgerungen: Trotz überwiegend akzeptabler Gütekriterien erachten wir eine weitere Validierung der Brooding-Reflection Differenzierung für wünschenswert.