[Arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint: results with the Ilizarov external fixator]

One-Stage Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Severe Septic Destruction of the Ankle Joint Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Severe septic destruction of the ankle joint poses a therapeutic challenge but lacks a consensus optimal treatment. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is considered as a valuable salvage procedure, but the literature remains scarce. Conventional treatment approaches, including 2-stage procedures, have been associated with prolonged recovery times and varying success rates. Many authors prefer classical external fixation in these scenarios, citing concerns that internal implants might pose a risk for recurrent infection. To date, no study has investigated the outcomes of 1-stage surgery using a retrograde intramedullary (IM) nail. The main purpose was to assess the rate of recurrent infection at 2 years following 1-stage TTCA using a retrograde IM nail in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint. Fusion rates and functional outcomes were evaluated as secondary purposes.

METHODS

The clinical and radiologic data of patients who underwent 1-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail following severe septic destruction of the ankle joint with a minimal follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Reinfection rate, fusion rate, functional outcomes, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 42 months (24-92 months). The mean age was 55 ± 18 years old. At the last follow-up, reinfection occurred in 6 patients (24%) and fusion was obtained in 19 patients (83%). Eight patients (32%) required revision surgery. The mean postoperative modified American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were respectively 53 ± 19.5, 35.5 ± 11.4, and 46.7 ± 13.5 points.

CONCLUSION

One-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail appears to be an acceptable alternative in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint, with a high eradication rate of infection and ankle fusion.

Comparative results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis vs. open arthrodesis in patients with diabetes-associated Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Several studies demonstrated a considerable complication rate for open ankle or TTC arthrodesis in patients with diabetes, revision surgery and ulceration. Extensive approaches in combination with multimorbide patients have been suggested as the rationale behind the increased complication rate.

METHODS

Single-centre, prospective case-control study compared arthroscopic vs. open ankle arthrodesis in patients with Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy of the foot. 18 patients with septic Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy Sanders III-IV received an arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with TSF (Taylor Spatial Frame®) fixation combined with different additional procedures required for infect treatment and hindfoot realignment. The ankle arthrodesis was required for the realignment of the hindfoot in Sanders IV patients, arthritis or in case of infection. 12 patients were treated with open ankle arthrodesis and TSF fixation combined with various additional procedures.

RESULTS

A significant improvement has been shown in radiological data in both groups. A significant lower complication rate has been registered in arthroscopic group. A significant correlation was seen between major complications and therapeutic anticoagulation as well as smoking.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk patients with diabetes and plantar ulceration excellent results could be demonstrated in arthroscopically performed ankle arthrodesis with midfoot osteotomy using TSF as fixation devise.

Tibiotarsal Arthrodesis with Retrograde Intramedullary Nail and RIA Graft: A Salvage Technique

Ankle arthrodesis is a commonly used salvage procedure in the management of post-traumatic ankle fractures, which often result in severe disability and may require the amputation of the distal third of the leg. Successful ankle arthrodesis relies on a thorough assessment of local and systemic risk factors to ensure optimal results. Failure to accurately assess these factors may lead to unsatisfactory results. High-energy trauma causing bone defects and soft tissue necrosis often results in osteomyelitis, a condition that poses a significant threat to the success of the arthrodesis procedure. It is important to apply a standardised surgical protocol to minimise the possibility of superficial and deep infection and limit damage to the neighbouring soft tissues. Therefore, it is critical to undertake surgical lavage and debridement and administer systemic and local antibiotic therapy, along with the use of a spacer, to eradicate infection prior to performing arthrodesis. In this study, we present our experience in the recovery of limbs with post-traumatic complications via tibio-astragalic or tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail technique. The approach involves a multi-step procedure using a previous antibiotic spacer implant and an autologous bone graft (RIA). This study spanned a period from January 2014 to December 2021 and included 35 patients (12 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 47.8 ± 20.08 years (range: 22-85 years). Among the patients, 18 had osteomyelitis following AO 43 C3 fractures, and 9 of them had previous exposure and bone loss at the time of injury. The remaining cases included 10 patients with AO 44 C fracture outcomes and 7 patients with AO 44 B fracture outcomes. Our results emphasise the importance of the meticulous management of local and systemic risk factors in ankle arthrodesis procedures. The successful eradication of infection and subsequent arthrodesis can be achieved via the implementation of surgical lavage, debridement, and systemic and local antibiotic therapy using spacers. This surgical protocol implemented by us has yielded excellent results, saving affected limbs from post-traumatic complications and avoiding the need for amputation. Our study contributes to the existing knowledge supporting the use of retrograde arthrodesis with intramedullary nails in severe cases where limb salvage is the primary goal. However, further research and long-term follow-up studies are needed to validate these results and evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in a larger patient population.

Induced membrane technique combined with a retrograde intramedullary nail for the treatment of infected bone defects of the ankle

In this study, we treated infected ankle bone defects with the induced membrane two-stage technique. The ankle was fused with a retrograde intramedullary nail in the second stage, and the aim of this study was to observe the clinical effect. We retrospectively enrolled patients with infected bone defects of the ankle admitted to our hospital between July 2016 and July 2018. In the first stage, the ankle was temporarily stabilized with a locking plate, and antibiotic bone cement was used to fill the defects after debridement. In the second stage, the plate and cement were removed, the ankle was stabilized with a retrograde nail, and tibiotalar-calcaneal fusion was performed. Then, autologous bone was used to rebuild the defects. The infection control rate, fusion success rate and complications were observed. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study with an average follow-up of 30 months. Among them, there were 11 males and 4 females. The average bone defect length after debridement was 5.3 cm (2.1-8.7 cm). Finally, 13 patients (86.6%) achieved bone union without recurrence of infection, and 2 patients experienced recurrence after bone grafting. The average ankle-hindfoot function score (AOFAS) increased from 29.75 ± 4.37 to 81.06 ± 4.72 at the last follow-up. The induced membrane technique combined with a retrograde intramedullary nail for the treatment of infected bone defects of the ankle after thorough debridement is an effective treatment method.

Is Ankle Arthrodesis With an Ilizarov External Fixator an Effective Treatment for Septic Ankle Arthritis? A Study With a Minimum of 6 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Septic ankle arthritis is a devastating clinical problem with a high potential for permanent disability and amputation. Successful treatment of septic ankle arthritis remains a challenge for the surgeon and patient. Ankle arthrodesis combined with radical debridement may be an effective option to eradicate infection and salvage the limb. Although numerous fusion methods have been proposed, there is controversy about the most effective technique.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

At a minimum follow-up of 6 years after ankle arthrodesis performed using an Ilizarov external fixator, we asked, (1) In what proportion of patients was bony fusion achieved? (2) What complications were observed, and what reoperations were performed in these patients? (3) How much did patient-reported outcomes improve from before surgery to the most recent follow-up in this group?

METHODS

Between April 2010 to March 2015, we treated 59 patients for septic ankle arthritis. Of those, we considered patients who were at least 18 years of age with irreversible destruction of the joint as potentially eligible. During that time period, all patients met the prespecified criteria and were treated with ankle arthrodesis using an Ilizarov external fixator. Two percent (one of 59) of patients were excluded because they died in the second year after surgery for reasons unrelated to the procedure, and another 7% (four of 59) of patients were excluded because they were lost before the minimum study follow-up interval of 6 years. Finally, 92% (54 of 59) of patients were analyzed at a mean follow-up time of 9 ± 1 years. A total of 61% (33 of 54) were men, and they had a mean age of 48 ± 12 years. Forty-six percent (25 of 54) of patients were smokers, and 13% (seven of 54) of patients had Type 2 diabetes mellitus. All patients received radical debridement and primary arthrodesis with an Ilizarov external fixator, followed by antibiotic therapy. Postoperatively, patients were instructed to perform lower extremity functional exercises and external fixator care; weightbearing ambulation as tolerated was encouraged as early as possible. Fusion was assessed with a radiographic review that was performed by an individual who was not involved in the surgical care of these patients. We defined bony fusion as continuous trabeculae and complete cortical bridging in the fusion interface achieved before 9 months; delayed union was defined as fusion achieved by 9 to 12 months; and nonunion was defined as patients in whom fusion was not achieved by 12 months. Complications and reoperations were tallied through a record review that was performed by an individual who was not involved in the surgical care of these patients. We defined complications as any deviation from the expected postoperative course. We used the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the VAS active pain score, and the SF-12 questionnaire (including the physical component summary [PCS] score and mental component summary [MCS] score) to assess patient-reported outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the AOFAS score was 30 points of 100, the MCID for the VAS active pain score was 2 points of 10, and the MCID of PCS and MCS scores was 7 points and 9 points, respectively.

RESULTS

Primary bony fusion was achieved in 94% (51 of 54) of patients. Delayed union was found in 2% (one of 54) of patients. Nonunion was found in 6% (three of 54); one of these patients underwent autologous bone grafting during revision, and bony fusion was ultimately achieved. Final bony fusion was achieved in 96% (52 of 54) of patients. Recurrent infection was found in 2% (one of 54). The median (range) AOFAS score improved from 28 points (8 to 59) before surgery to 80 points (52 to 86) at the most recent follow-up (median difference 52; p < 0.001). The median (range) VAS active pain score decreased from 8 points (6 to 9) before surgery to 2 points (0 to 5) at the most recent follow-up (median difference -6; p < 0.001). For the Short Form 12-item score, the median (range) PCS score improved from 0 points (0 to 30) before surgery to 70 points (40 to 95) at the most recent follow-up (median difference 70; p < 0.001), and the median (range) MCS score improved from 46 points (21 to 75) before surgery to 75 points (50 to 92) at the most recent follow-up (median difference 29; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixation might eradicate an infection and restore foot function in patients with septic ankle arthritis. However, patients should be fully informed of the complications related to the external fixator, such as pin-tract infections, recurrent infection, and nonunion. Standardized and professional pin care is important. Additionally, because Ilizarov external fixators can be inconvenient to the patients' daily lives, future studies should explore how psychologic support affects patients who undergo ankle arthrodesis with these devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Rate of progressive healing with a carbon-fiber orthosis in cases of partial union and nonunion after ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator

BACKGROUND

The Ilizarov fixator is a popular device for treating arthrodesis of the ankle joint in complex situations. However, the therapy can fail, with nonunion or partial union that might not be load stable. There is the possibility of follow-up surgery or extended wearing of the fixator. Full weight bearing with a carbon orthosis remains another treatment option, which has not yet been investigated.The aim of the study was to determine the rate of progress that can be obtained with a carbon orthosis in cases of partial union or nonunion after fixator removal.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study thirty-three patients received a carbon orthosis after fixator removal due to nonunion or partial union. All patients were allowed to walk with the orthosis under full load. The consolidation rate was determined radiologically and compared with the imaging data obtained during the last follow-up. In addition to demographic data, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and pain using a numeric rating scale were determined. Nine patients had to be excluded due to insufficient follow-up, and finally n = 24 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

The average duration of fixator use was 21 weeks (range 15-40 weeks), and the total average follow-up after removal of the fixator was 16 months (range 4- 56). For 14 (58.33%) patients, there was a further increase in consolidation with the orthosis after the fixator was removed.

CONCLUSION

The results show that if there is only partial union or nonunion, further consolidations can be achieved after the application of a carbon orthosis. In a difficult patient population, using an orthosis should therefore be attempted to avoid unnecessary revision operations.

Complex Ankle Fusion With Circular Frames: Factors Influencing Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Circular frames for ankle fusion are reserved for complex clinical scenarios. The literature is heterogenous and conflicting. We aim to present the indications and outcomes of this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiologic and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiologic and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

47 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20-40). The median age at time of surgery was 63.5 years (IQR 58-71). Patients had a median of 2 previous surgeries (IQR 1-3). The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days (IQR 166-280). Simultaneous limb lengthening (median 3.3 cm, IQR 1.9-3.5) was performed in 11 patients, increasing the EFT by a mean of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7%, respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. In addition, 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and reoperations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT.

CONCLUSION

Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes, however time in frame may be prolonged with a high rate of adverse events. Identified risk factors for poorer outcomes should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic.

Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov fixator in compromised hosts: an analysis of 19 patients

INTRODUCTION

Salvage of joint destruction of the tibiotalar and subtalar joint with necrosis or infection of the talus in compromised hosts is a challenging problem. In these cases, tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator represents a possible alternative to amputation. This retrospective study presents the results and complications of this salvage procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2015, 19 patients were treated with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator. Ten patients received tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis due to an acute or chronic infection with joint destruction. The other nine patients presented posttraumatic necrosis of the talus or Charcot arthropathy. In addition to demographic data, the time spent in the fixator, the major and minor complications and the endpoint of the consolidation were evaluated retrospectively. Furthermore, clinical outcomes were measured using the modified American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score.

RESULTS

The average time spent in the fixator was 22 (range 14-34) weeks. The average follow-up in 17 patients was 116 (range 4-542) weeks. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Complete osseous consolidation was achieved in 14 out of 19 patients. One patient presented partial consolidation, and in four patients, pseudarthrosis could be detected. The mean modified AOFAS score at the final follow-up was 53 out of 86 possible points.

CONCLUSION

Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov fixator is a possible salvage procedure even in compromised hosts. However, the healing rates are below the rates reported in the literature for tibiotalar arthrodesis in comparable clinical situations.

Analysis of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis as a limb salvage procedure for the treatment of septic pilon fracture nonunion

Septic nonunion of the pilon region with ankle joint infection is challenging for orthopedic surgeons to treat and is associated with a high risk of limb loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis in salvaging the limp after septic ankle destruction of the pilon region. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including 21 patients treated for septic pilon nonunion with accompanying septic ankle destruction via Ilizarov bone transport between 2004 and 2018. In all cases, the complete excision of the nonunion and the resection of the ankle joint were carried out, followed by treating the bone and joint defect with a bone transport into the ankle arthrodesis. In 12/21 patients an additional flap transfer was required due to an accompanying soft tissue lesion. The overall healing and failure rate, final alignment and complications were recorded by the patients’ medical files. The bone-related and functional results were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and a modified American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale. After a mean follow-up of 30.9 ± 15.7 months (range 12–63 months), complete bone and soft tissue healing occurred in 18/21 patients (85.7%). The patients had excellent (5), good (7), fair (4), and poor (3) results based on the ASAMI functional score. Regarding bone stock, 6 patients had excellent, 7 good, and 6 fair results. The modified AOFAS score reached 60.6 ± 18 points (range, 29–86). In total, 33 minor complications and 28 major complications occurred during the study period. In 2 cases, a proximal lower leg amputation was performed due to a persistent infection and free flap necrosis with a large soft tissue defect, whereas in one case, persistent nonunion on the docking side was treated with a carbon orthosis because the patient refused to undergo an additional surgery. Bone transport for ankle arthrodesis offers the possibility of limb salvage after septic ankle destruction of the pilon region, with acceptable bony and functional results. However, a high number of complications and surgical revisions are associated with the treatment of this severe complication after pilon fracture.

Simultaneous septic arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints with the Ilizarov external fixator-an analysis of 13 patients

Purpose

Treatment of joint destruction of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints caused by acute or chronic infections in compromised hosts is a challenging problem. In these cases, simultaneous septic arthrodesis with the use of the Ilizarov external fixator represents a possible alternative to amputation. This case series presents the results and complications of patients with acute or chronic infection of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2015, 13 patients with acute or chronic infections were treated by simultaneous single-stage debridement/arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. In seven patients, there was a florid infection with fistula formation and soft tissue defects, and in six patients, there was chronic osteomyelitis with closed soft tissue. In addition to the demographic data, the time spent in the fixator, the major and minor complications and the endpoint of consolidation were reviewed.

Results

The mean time spent in the fixator was 18 (min 15, max 26) weeks. The mean follow-up time for nine patients was 100 (min 3, max 341) weeks. Complete osseous consolidation of both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints was achieved in 10 patients (77%). In three (23%) patients, there was complete consolidation of one of the joints and partial consolidation of the other joint.

Conclusion

The Ilizarov external fixator allows for simultaneous arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints in septic joint destruction. However, the healing rates are below the rates reported in the literature for isolated tibiotalar or tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis in comparable clinical situations.

Clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis for advanced ankle arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ankle fusion is the primary treatment for advanced ankle arthritis. With the advancement of arthroscopy technology, ankle arthroscopy fusion has shown many advantages over traditional surgery. However, there are few related studies globally, and evidence-based medicine is needed to verify the reliability and feasibility of ankle arthroscopy fusion.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis and open ankle arthrodesis.

METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], Wanfang Database, and VIP Database for published prospective or retrospective controlled studies of arthroscopic-assisted ankle fusion in the treatment of advanced ankle arthritis. The dates were limited from the construction of the library to June 30, 2019. Literature was included based on the principles and methods of evidence-based medicine. Literature retrieval, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers using the Cochrane 5.1 risk bias assessment tool. The methodological bias of the literature was evaluated, and a meta-analysis was using by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies and 1102 patients were included in the study, including 551 in the arthroscopic surgery group and 551 in the open surgery group. Arthroscopy-assisted surgery for advanced ankle arthritis was more effective than open surgery in terms of fusion rate (odd ratio[OR] = 3.32, 95% confidence interval[CI]:2.16, 5.10), fusion time (mean difference[MD] = -2.31, 95% CI:-4.63, -2.21), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -43.37, 95%CI: -48.49, -38.25), hospital stay (MD = -1.80, 95%CI: -2.28, -1.33), and visual analog scale score (MD = -1.75, 95%CI: -2.04, -1.46). In addition, rate of complications (OR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.52) was superior to open ankle fusion (P < .00001).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has more advantages than open ankle arthrodesis in improving the fusion rate and reducing complications, which is worthy of clinical application.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020195727.

External versus internal fixation for arthrodesis of chronic ankle joint infections - A comparative retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the ankle is a salvage procedure in case of chronic ankle joint infection. External fixation still is the gold standard. We compared the outcome of external fixator versus intramedullary nailing for arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint.

METHODS

All patients with ankle joint infection who received arthrodesis with either external fixator or intramedullary nail between 08/2009 and 09/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the successful control of infection, osseous fusion, and mobilization with full weightbearing.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were included. Nineteen patients (27%) suffered reinfection. Patients with intramedullary nailing showed significantly fewer reinfections (p=0.019), achieved full weightbearing significantly more often (p=0.042) and faster and developed significantly fewer complications (p<0.001). Forty-three patients showed bone fusion without significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing appears to be a successful alternative to the established procedure of external fixation in cases of chronic ankle joint infection.

Staged Treatment of Infected Tibiotalar Fusion Using a Combination Antibiotic Spacer and Antibiotic-Coated Intramedullary Nail

Pilon fractures are notoriously difficult injuries to treat. The current published data on salvage procedures after failed pilon fractures includes both total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and tibiotalar fusion, each with its own specific indications. However, no acceptable treatment algorithm addressing the complications of these limb salvage procedures is available. We present the case of a 23-year-old patient, who sustained a complex pilon fracture after a motor vehicle accident. The patient was referred to our institution after an initial fixation attempt, followed by subsequent failed TAA, which was complicated by an infected fusion attempt. We describe a staged treatment approach to clearing the infection and obtaining the final fusion goals.

Arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle: risk factors and complications

INTRODUCTION

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis is a good therapeutic option in cases of infection after trauma or orthopedic surgical procedures. Many different procedures have been described, but external fixation seems to be standard. Aim of this study is to identify risk factors for complications in septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who received septic ankle joint arthrodesis between January 2008 and December 2012 were included in this study. Patients were evaluated clinically and with radiographs or CT scans.

RESULTS

Follow-up of 74 of 79 patients with an external AO frame fixator could be evaluated; follow-up was 411 days (105-991). The mean age at surgery was 57.7 years (19-87). At this time, complications occurred in 41 patients (52 %) with wound healing problems (17 patients, 22 %) and non-union (12 patients, 15 %), and some needed surgical revision. In our collective, men had a significant higher non-union rate (p = 0.031), age or BMI showed no difference. Patients with diabetes and alcohol consumption showed a higher risk for complications (p = 0.049 and p = 0.031, respectively). 62 % of primary arthrodesis showed union, whereas in the case of revision, arthrodesis only 39 % showed union.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator is a probable tool to achieve union. This study showed that there is a high complication rate and some risk factors for complications could be identified. A blinded and prospective study is needed to compare intramedullary nailing and external fixation to evaluate the possible advantage of intramedullary devices in septic ankle arthrodesis.

End-stage hindfoot arthrosis: outcomes of tibiocalcaneal fusion using internal and Ilizarov fixation

End-stage post-traumatic pantalar arthrosis from ankle, pilon, and talus fractures has often been complicated by infection, bone loss, and a soft tissue deficit. Patients can present with neuropathy, diabetes, tobacco use, and previously failed arthrodesis. Fusion in this population has been challenging, with nonunion rates up to 30%, often leading to amputation. We reviewed the results of a standardized protocol that combined simultaneous internal fixation with the Ilizarov technique to achieve fusion in high-risk patients. With institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of the patients treated with simultaneous internal fixation and an Ilizarov frame was undertaken. The records and radiographs allowed identification of the comorbidities and the presence or absence of successful fusion. Complications were acknowledged and treated. Fifteen patients had undergone the procedure. The mean follow-up period was 27.9 (range 9 to 67) months. Thirteen patients (86.67%) had had previous fusion failure. Twelve patients (80%) had developed post-traumatic arthrosis, 5 (33.33%) of whom had open injuries. All patients had 1 comorbidity, and 10 (66.67%) had multiple, including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes (types 1 and 2), and smoking. Four patients (26.67%) presented with deep infection and bone loss. Union was achieved in 11 (73.33%), with 12 (80%) patients experiencing profound pain relief. Seven patients (46.67%) required symptomatic hardware removal. Three patients (20%) eventually underwent below-the-knee amputation for recalcitrant nonunion. Statistically significant correlations were found between smoking and wound infection and revision and between nonunion and amputation. Our results have indicated that combined internal fixation with Ilizarov application can provide a strong surgical option for the management of end-stage, pantalar arthritis. More studies are needed to compare the cohort outcomes and gait analysis in these patients with those who have chosen below-the-knee amputation.

Tibiotalar arthrodesis in posttraumatic arthritis using the tension band technique

BACKGROUND

Although a variety of surgical techniques are available for the treatment of ankle degenerative disease, arthrodesis is a common treatment especially for unilateral posttraumatic arthritis in young patients. A clear trend toward internal fixation for ankle arthrodesis is evident, but fusion site compression is known to play an integral role in primary bone healing.

METHODS

Between September 2001 and October 2009, 17 adults with painful end-stage posttraumatic ankle arthritis were treated with the tension band technique to achieve tibiotalar arthrodesis.

RESULTS

Tibiotalar fusion was obtained in all patients at a mean of 16.6 (range, 13 to 28) weeks. No patient had pain at the last postoperative follow-up examination. AOFAS and Mazur scores were preoperatively 29 and 23.1, respectively, and postoperatively 71.1 and 70.7, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Arthrodesis with a tension band was a safe and effective surgical treatment option for posttraumatic ankle arthritis in patients without infection and good bone density, as it was simple, less invasive, and inexpensive and allowed early full weight-bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Ilizarov external frame technique for pirogoff amputations with ankle disarticulation and tibiocalcaneal fusion

BACKGROUND

The high rates of wound failure, persisting infection, and nonunion of the tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis are the main reasons why the Pirogoff ankle disarticulation is rarely used for limb salvage. Use of the Ilizarov external frame has increased our fusion rate. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with the use of the Ilizarov external frame as a technique for Pirogoff amputations with ankle disarticulation and tibiocalcaneal fusion.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (median age, 57.4 years; range, 29-76 years) underwent a Pirogoff amputation with Ilizarov external frame use between January 2004 and June 2011. The most common indications were gangrene with uncontrollable infection due to Charcot arthropathy or chronic osteomyelitis. Four patients had sustained crush injuries of the foot. All patients were clinically and radiographically followed for a minimum of 12 months. Additionally, 15 patients were evaluated using the Taniguchi rating scale for Pirogoff amputations after a mean follow-up of 44.9 months (range, 12-86 months).

RESULTS

In 21 patients (87.5%), a well-healed Pirogoff stump was achieved after a mean external fixation time of 18.1 weeks (range, 12.7-26.6 weeks). Impaired vascular perfusion was found to be the limiting factor for successful wound healing and an overall successful Pirogoff amputation. According to the Taniguchi scale, 67% of the patients achieved good or excellent functional results. Fair (27%) and poor (6%) results were observed only in the diabetic patients.

CONCLUSION

Using the Ilizarov external frame allowed safe fixation and a high success rate, even in neuropathic feet. The frame allowed for immediate weight-bearing and soft tissue control; however, frame-associated complications were common and could result in revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

[Hindfoot arthrodesis for post-infectious ankle destruction using an intramedullary retrograde hindfoot nail]

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage after operations with deep infections of the ankle is often successful using arthrodesis of the hindfoot. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail following post-infectious ankle destruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2010 a total of 44 patients were treated with tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis and 14 patients with tibiocalcaneal (TC) arthrodesis using a retrograde hindfoot nail after quieting of infection. Evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the short-form 12-item (SF-12) scores.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients 49 (35 male and 14 female) could be followed-up. The average time of follow-up was 18 months and the mean age was 58 years. In 85.7 % bony union could be achieved and 10.2 % suffered from reinfections. The mean results achieved in the different scores were AOFAS 56 and SF-12 39.1 (physical health summary scale) and 46.1 (mental health summary scale). Statistical analysis showed a significantly higher rate of bony fusion for TTC arthrodesis. Bony non-union showed a significant correlation to patients with reinfection and to diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hindfoot arthrodesis for treatment of septic arthritis after infections is possible by using an intramedullary nail. The results show a high rate of fusion with an acceptable reinfection rate and good patient acceptance.

Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthrodesis may be achieved using the Ilizarov method. Comorbidities, such as diabetes, Charcot neuroarthropathy, osteomyelitis, leg length discrepancy, and smoking, can make an ankle fusion complex and may be associated with lower rates of healing.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked if (1) smoking and other comorbidities led to lower fusion rates, (2) time wearing the frame affected outcome, and (3) simultaneous tibial lengthening improved fusion rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 101 patients who underwent complex ankle fusion using the Ilizarov technique. The median time wearing the frame was 25 weeks (range, 10-65 weeks). Twenty-four patients had simultaneous tibial lengthening. The minimum followup for 91 of the 101 patients was 27 months (median, 65 months; range, 27-134 months).

RESULTS

Fusion was achieved in 76 of 91 patients. Smoking was associated with a 54% rate of nonunion. Fifteen of 19 patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy achieved union but had a high rate of subsequent subtalar joint failure. Time wearing the frame did not affect union rates. Tibial lengthening did not improve ankle fusion rates.

CONCLUSION

Smokers should be warned of the high risk of nonunion and we recommend they quit smoking. We also recommend surgeons recognize the higher nonunion rate in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. We believe tibial lengthening should not be performed to enhance healing at the fusion site.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.