Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Visually Disturbing Vitreous Floaters in Pseudophacic Eyes

New Terminology and Methodology for the Assessment of the Vitreous, Its Floaters and Opacities, and Their Effect on Vision: Standardized and Kinetic Anatomical and Functional Testing of Vitreous Floaters and Opacities (SK VFO Test)

OBJECTIVE

To introduce VFO and SK VFO Test: new, more representative terminology for symptoms of vitreous floaters/opacities (VFO) and new standardized kinetic (SK) anatomical-functional assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight eyes underwent before-after limited vitrectomy (LV): best-corrected visual acuity, low-luminance visual acuity, Minnesota Low Vision Reading Chart near visual acuity in logMAR, contrast sensitivity function (CV1000E), and straylight measurements (SM) (HDA/LDA/C-Quant). SK infrared confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SK IRcSLO) and swept-source widefield optical coherence tomography (SS-WF-OCT) identified VFO and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). SK IRcSLO was performed with gaze directed towards the extreme superior, inferior, and lateral directions.

RESULTS

Anatomical-functional results after LV improved in 7 eyes (87.5%): objective scatter index (27.34%), disturbance index (47.97%) and C-Quant Log units (2.26%). Pre-LV SK IRcSLO and SS-WFOCT imaging identified dynamic well-defined VFO and PVD status (100%). A residual asymptomatic anterior cortical vitreous-induced shadowing ripple effect was detected post-LV.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first objective-standardized test accounting for VFO kinesis and intermittent effect. There is potential for personalizing treatment and establishing best candidates for laser or surgery. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:306-315.].

Small-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Visually Significant Vitreous Floaters

Purpose:

This article evaluates our experience at a retina-only private practice with small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for visually significant vitreous floaters. We review the surgical outcomes, complication rates, and percentage of second-eye surgery for the same indication.

Methods:

A retrospective, interventional case series was conducted of consecutive patients undergoing PPV for significant vitreous floaters from September 2014 to December 2018 at a high-volume vitreoretinal surgery practice. Preoperative visual acuity (VA), complication rates, and visual outcome following surgery were evaluated.

Results:

A total of 104 eyes in 81 patients underwent PPV for visually significant floaters; 35 (43.2%) patients had PPV in both eyes. Mean preoperative VA was 0.16 ± 0.17 logMAR (∼20/29 Snellen equivalent) and improved to 0.12 ± 0.15 logMAR (∼20/26 Snellen; Wilcoxon test, P = .008) at the last follow-up after PPV. All patients had improvement in VA at the final postoperative visit, with a VA of 20/40 or better achieved in 93.3% of cases. The complication rate of vitreous hemorrhage postoperatively was 0.96%. There were no cases of postoperative retinal tears, breaks, or endophthalmitis.

Conclusions:

Small-gauge PPV in the carefully selected patient is an effective and safe procedure to eliminate symptoms. VA following PPV for vitreous floaters significantly improved. Nearly half of the patients studied (43.2%) underwent PPV in the other eye.

[Classification of floater patients : Evaluation of a study database on the relationship between characteristics and impairment]

Subjective impairment of floater patients can only be partially quantified using ophthalmological test methods. In order to classify floater patients, patient-related characteristics associated with higher level of impairment should be identified. A data set of a prospective, multicenter single-arm primary study of 64 floater patients who underwent vitrectomy includes patient-related characteristics and information on subjective preoperative and postoperative (3 months after vitrectomy) impairment. Data on impairment were collected with a floater-specific questionnaire and condensed into self-rated impairment indices (SRI). Medians of the SRI were calculated for the manifestation of sociodemographic and ophthalmological parameters as well as for the classification of floaters on the study and second eye and tested for significance. Higher preoperative SRI were associated with professional activity, young age, reduced preoperative visual acuity, retinal alterations and higher refractive errors as well as floaters on the second eye. Higher postoperative SRI were found in combination with cataract and younger age. The SRI differences were only occasionally significant. Classification of floaters as documented by the surgeon and by SRI were significantly correlated only for patients without other visual comorbidities besides floaters. The primary study reported high preoperative subjective impairment and a significant decrease in SRI after vitrectomy for almost all patients. The current study showed that some individual patient-related characteristics tended to be associated with greater preoperative impairment and greater benefit from vitrectomy.

To Treat or Not to Treat: Management Options for Symptomatic Vitreous Floaters

Vitreous floaters are a common cause for presentation to ophthalmologists, and may significantly affect visual function. In the absence of some more serious underlying pathology such as uveitis, many patients may not experience significant persistent visual impairment from floaters. For some patients, the symptomatic effects of floaters may persist. For these patients, treatment options are available, of which the most commonly reported is vitrectomy. Other treatment modalities have also become more common, notably YAG vitreolysis. Selection of appropriate patients for surgery is often difficult, in part due to the relative lack of objective outcomes with which to measure both visual impairment and improvement post-procedure. Although well-tolerated, vitrectomy does carry with it risks, including iatrogenic retinal breaks, retinal detachment, and in phakic patients, subsequent cataract formation. Techniques such as small gauge vitrectomy, intraoperative examination and treatment of breaks or other worrying lesions, and careful consideration of the need for posterior vitreous detachment induction may help limit the incidence of these adverse events. For other treatment options such as YAG vitreolysis, research and clinical experience remain more limited, and as such the long-term efficacy and risks of these therapies are still unclear. Here, we review the evidence surrounding the role of vitrectomy and YAG vitreolysis in the treatment of vitreous floaters and potential means to minimize therapeutic complications.

Vitrectomy for primary symptomatic vitreous opacities: an evidence-based review

Floaters are a common ocular condition which form as a consequence of aging changes in the vitreous. Although in most patients the symptoms are minimal, they can cause significant impairment in vision-related quality of life in a small population of patients. Recently there has been an increase in awareness of the visual disability caused by floaters, and the evidence-base for treatment of this condition using small-gauge vitrectomy has increased. In this review, we define the term 'floaters' as symptomatic vitreous opacities (SVO). We suggest a classification dependent on the presence or absence of posterior vitreous detachment and discuss their pathogenesis and natural history. We review their impact on patients' quality of life related to visual function. We review the psychological factors that may have a role in some patients who appear to be affected by SVO to the extent that they pursue all options including surgery with all its attendant risks. We summarise the available evidence-base of treatment options available for SVO with special emphasis on the safety and efficacy of vitrectomy for this condition.

Effect of vitreous opacities on straylight measurements

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of vitreous floaters on intraocular straylight.

METHODS

Records of bilaterally phakic patients with unilateral complaint of floaters as the main symptom were identified from an electronic database. Patients who underwent straylight measurements on both affected and unaffected eyes using a C-Quant straylight meter were selected. Data were collected on age, sex, visual acuity, straylight measurements, and optical coherence tomography. The unaffected eye served as a control.

RESULTS

Fifteen cases were included (7 women and 8 men; mean age, 54.3 years; age range, 24-71 years). Visual acuity was not correlated with the complaint of floaters. Average straylight value in eyes with floaters was 1.426 log(s) (±0.23 SD) with a median value of 1.52 log(s). The mean value for fellow eyes was 1.275 (±0.23 SD) with a median of 1.25 log(s). The differences between both groups using a Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test was statistically significant at P = 0.0009. On optical coherence tomography, most patients had a confirmed or probable posterior vitreous detachment. However, in four patients, a posterior vitreous detachment was absent in the affected eyes. Vitreous floaters were inconsistently imaged by optical coherence tomography, with only a few patients presenting appreciable condensations close to the retinal surface. These were present in both affected and unaffected eyes.

CONCLUSION

Intraocular straylight is significantly increased in eyes affected by floaters. No correlation was seen with vision or optical coherence tomography appearance. Straylight is an independent objective measure of visual perception that seems to be closely correlated to complaints expressed by patients experiencing floaters.

Vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: analysis of the benefits and risks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the pros and cons of small-gauge vitrectomy for symptomatic floaters.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current treatment options for floaters include Nd:YAG vitreolysis and pars plana vitrectomy. There are risks and benefits associated with vitrectomy for floaters. However, small-gauge vitrectomy is a minimally invasive way of removing the floaters. The current literature demonstrates vitrectomy has some risk, but is highly effective at improving vision, symptoms, contrast sensitivity, and quality of life.

SUMMARY

Small-gauge vitrectomy for floaters is a well tolerated and effective procedure to remove the symptomatic floaters. Symptomatic patients are willing to take some risk to have their troublesome vitreous floaters removed, often resulting in an improvement in their vision and quality of life.

Vitrectomy for floaters: prospective efficacy analyses and retrospective safety profile

PURPOSE

Floaters impact vision but the mechanism is unknown. We hypothesize that floaters reduce contrast sensitivity function, which can be normalized by vitrectomy, and that minimally invasive vitrectomy will have lower incidences of retinal tears (reported at 30%) and cataracts (50-76%).

METHODS

Seventy-six eyes (34 phakic) with floaters were evaluated in 2 separate studies. Floater etiologies were primarily posterior vitreous detachment in 61 of 76 eyes (80%) and myopic vitreopathy in 24 of 76 eyes (32%). Minimally invasive 25G vitrectomy was performed without posterior vitreous detachment induction, leaving anterior vitreous, and using nonhollow probes for cannula extraction. Efficacy was studied prospectively (up to 9 months) in 16 floater cases with Freiburg Acuity Contrast Testing (Weber index [%W] reproducibility = 92.1%) and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Safety was separately evaluated in 60 other cases followed up on an average of 17.5 months (range, 3-51 months).

RESULTS

Floater eyes had 67% contrast sensitivity function attenuation (4.0 ± 2.3 %W; control subjects = 2.4 ± 0.9 %W, P < 0.013). After vitrectomy, contrast sensitivity function normalized in each case at 1 week (2.0 ± 1.4 %W, P < 0.01) and remained normal at 1 month (2.0 ± 1.0 %W, P < 0.003) and 3 months to 9 months (2.2 ± 1.5 %W, P < 0.018). Visual Function Questionnaire was 28.3% lower in floater patients (73.2 ± 15.6, N = 16) than in age-matched control subjects (93.9 ± 8.0, N = 12, P < 0.001), and postoperatively improved by 29.2% (P < 0.001). In the safety study of 60 floater cases treated with vitrectomy, none developed retinal breaks, infection, or glaucoma after a mean follow-up of 17.5 months. Only 8 of 34 cases (23.5%) required cataract surgery (none younger than 53 years) at an average of 15 months postvitrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Floaters lower contrast sensitivity function, which normalizes after vitrectomy. Visual Function Questionnaire quantified improvement in satisfaction. Not inducing posterior vitreous detachment reduced retinal tear incidence from 30% to 0% (P < 0.007). Postvitrectomy cataract incidence was reduced from 50% to 23.5% (P < 0.02). This approach thus seems effective and safe in alleviating the visual dysfunction induced by floaters.

Pars plana vitrectomy for disturbing primary vitreous floaters: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Primary vitreous floaters can be highly bothersome in some patients. In the case of persistently bothersome floaters, pars plana vitrectomy may be the most effective treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of complications, and patient satisfaction, after pars plana vitrectomy for disabling primary vitreous opacities.

METHODS

We included a total of 110 eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy between February 1998 and August 2010. Fifty-seven eyes (51.8%) underwent 20-gauge vitrectomy, whereas 53 eyes (48.2%) underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy. In a retrospective manner, we assessed intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was a considerable range of time between surgery and questionnaire (range: 4-136 months). Patient satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire based on a modified NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A retinal detachment occurred in 10.9% of cases, and the incidence did not differ significantly between the 20-gauge and 23-gauge vitrectomy groups. In 4.5% of the eyes, a retinal detachment developed within the first 3 months, and 6.4% occurred later in the postoperative period. Cystoid macular edema occurred in 5.5%, and an epiretinal membrane was seen postoperatively in 3.6% of cases. Development of glaucoma requiring glaucoma surgery, a macular hole, and postoperative scotoma, each occurred in 0.9% of cases. No cases of endophthalmitis occurred. Eighty-five percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the results of the vitrectomy. Eighty-four percent of all patients were completely cured from their troublesome vitreous floaters, and an additional 9.3% of patients were less troubled by vitreous floaters. Ten patients (9.3%) were dissatisfied, and six of these patients (5.6%) had a serious complication that resulted in permanent visual loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Pars plana vitrectomy is an effective approach to treat primary vitreous floaters, resulting in a high rate of patient satisfaction. Postoperative complications may be more frequent than previously reported, so patients should be well-informed about the complication rate before reaching informed consent about this surgical intervention. Additional preventive measures should be considered to reduce this complication rate.