Effektivität einer Augmentationstherapie mit Antipsychotika bei therapieresistenten Zwangsstörungen – eine Metaanalyse doppelblinder, randomisierter, placebokontrollierter Studien

Ondansetron Augmentation for Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Serotonin and dopamine are involved in the development of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Approximately 40% of OCD patients do not respond to the first-line therapy of treatment using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Reportedly, the response to the treatment is increased by enhancing dopamine blockers. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and immunogenicity of ondansetron as a booster in the treatment of OCD patients. Methods: The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted on 40 patients (16 males and 24 females) aged 18 to 60 years who met the DSM-V-TR-based OCD diagnostic criteria and had a minimum score of 16 on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). The patients were randomized to receive standard treatment and ondansetron (8 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. They were examined using Y-BOCS and side-effect checklist at baseline, fourth, eighth, and twelfth weeks. Results: The patients in both groups were homogeneous and comparable in terms of age, marital sex status, type of obsession, anxiety, depression, age at the onset of disease, and the duration of disease. The Y-BOCS scores in the intervention and placebo groups were 27.15 ± 3.94 vs. 26.15 ± 4.94 at baseline, 25.40 ± 3.75 vs. 25.00 ± 4.79 in the fourth week, 20.85 ± 3.69 vs. 24.05 ± 4.97 (P = 0.026) in the eighth week, and 17.95 ± 3.43 vs. 21.65 ± 4.85 (P = 0.008) in the twelfth week, respectively. Significant changes occurred between the two groups at weeks 8 and 12; the difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.015), whereas no significant difference was observed between the two groups before week 8. Conclusions: This 12-week, double-blind, and randomized clinical trial showed that ondansetron was a booster agent with a significant effect on patients with moderate to severe OCD. This study also showed that ondansetron is generally well tolerated by OCD patients. The response to the treatment also increased from the eighth week of treatment onwards. The severity of the disease was decreased at the end of the ondansetron intervention. The adjunct ondansetron treatment was recommended for OCD patients

Induced Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms (OCS) in schizophrenia patients under Atypical 2 Antipsychotics (AAPs): review and hypotheses

The prevalence of OCS and OCD is higher in schizophrenic patients than in the general population. These disorders are sometimes induced by AAPs. There is higher frequency of OCS and greater severity in patients treated with antipsychotics with predominant anti-serotoninergic profiles opposed to those with predominant dopaminergic blockade. Induced OCS may be due to complex neuromodulation involving many serotonin, dopamine and glutamate receptors and several subtypes. Concerning connectivity, AAPs differentially influence the BOLD signal, depending on the intensity of D2 receptor blockade. The OFC could play a significant role, on account of its involvement in inhibitory control. There is a paradox: AAPs are efficient as augmentation to SSRI in treatment resistant OCD, some of them such as risperidone or aripiprazole have favourable effects in schizoptypic OCD, but AAPs cause induced OCS in schizophrenic patients. When prescribing AAPs, we should inform patients about this potential side effect and assess systematically OCS with Y-BOCS assessment after 1 month of treatment. Afterwards there are different strategies: Aripiprazole in combination can reduce OCS induced by clozapine, SSRI are slightly effective and CBT shows a few encouraging results. OCS are sometimes dose-dependent, so we also recommend prescribing the minimum effective dose and gradual introduction.

Aripiprazole versus quetiapine in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Around 40-60% of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) remain unimproved by serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). Goal of this study was to compare the efficiency and safety of aripiprazole versus quetiapine, in patients with OCD, who did not respond effectively to fluvoxamine.

METHOD

A total of 44 female inpatients with OCD, who did not respond successfully to fluvoxamine at maximum dose (300 mg/day) and duration (12 weeks), were assigned randomly, in a double-blind trial, to receive aripiprazole (n = 22) or quetiapine (n = 22), in addition to their SRI, for 12 weeks. Treatment response was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), as primary outcome measure, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale (CGI-S), as a secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 27.27% of the cases in the aripiprazole group (n = 6) and 54.54% of them in the quetiapine cluster (n = 12) responded moderately to the aforesaid augmentation. The mean ± SD baseline YBOCS score of 33.27 ± 3.90 dropped to a mean of 30.72 ± 4.67 (p = 0.06) in the aripiprazole group, and from 31.18 ± 4.93 to 27.97 ± 3.71 (p = 0.01) in the quetiapine group, at the end of the evaluation. There was no significant change with respect to CGI-S in either of the aforesaid groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that treatment-resistant OCD patients may benefit more from addition of quetiapine in comparison with aripiprazole, to their ongoing SRI therapy.

Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Insight into Pathomechanisms Facilitates Treatment

Insight into the biological pathomechanism of a clinical syndrome facilitates the development of effective interventions. This paper applies this perspective to the important clinical problem of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) occurring during the lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia. Up to 25% of schizophrenia patients suffer from OCS and about 12% fulfil the diagnostic criteria of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This is accompanied by marked subjective burden of disease, high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidality, increased neurocognitive impairment, less favourable levels of social and vocational functioning, and greater service utilization. Comorbid patients can be assigned to heterogeneous subgroups. It is assumed that second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), most importantly clozapine, might aggravate or even induce second-onset OCS. Several epidemiological and pharmacological arguments support this assumption. Specific genetic risk factors seem to dispose patients with schizophrenia to develop OCS and risk-conferring polymorphisms has been defined in SLC1A1, BDNF, DLGAP3, and GRIN2B and in interactions between these individual genes. Further research is needed with detailed characterization of large samples. In particular interactions between genetic risk constellations, pharmacological and psychosocial factors should be analysed. Results will further define homogeneous subgroups, which are in need for differential causative interventions. In clinical practise, schizophrenia patients should be carefully monitored for OCS, starting with at-risk mental states of psychosis and longitudinal follow-ups, hopefully leading to the development of multimodal therapeutic interventions.

Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a revision of the 2005 guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

This revision of the 2005 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines for the evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders provides an update on key steps in diagnosis and clinical management, including recognition, acute treatment, longer-term treatment, combination treatment, and further approaches for patients who have not responded to first-line interventions. A consensus meeting involving international experts in anxiety disorders reviewed the main subject areas and considered the strength of supporting evidence and its clinical implications. The guidelines are based on available evidence, were constructed after extensive feedback from participants, and are presented as recommendations to aid clinical decision-making in primary, secondary and tertiary medical care. They may also serve as a source of information for patients, their carers, and medicines management and formulary committees.

Comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: contributions of pharmacological and genetic factors

A large subgroup of around 25% of schizophrenia patients suffers from obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) and about 12% fulfill the diagnostic criteria of an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The additional occurrence of OCS is associated with high subjective burden of disease, additional neurocognitive impairment, poorer social and vocational functioning, greater service utilization and high levels of anxiety and depression. Comorbid patients can be assigned to heterogeneous subgroups. One hypothesis assumes that second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), most importantly clozapine, might aggravate or even induce second-onset OCS. Several arguments support this assumption, most importantly the observed chronological order of first psychotic manifestation, start of treatment with clozapine and onset of OCS. In addition, correlations between OCS-severity and dose and serum levels and duration of clozapine treatment hint toward a dose-dependent side effect. It has been hypothesized that genetic risk-factors dispose patients with schizophrenia to develop OCS. One study in a South Korean sample reported associations with polymorphisms in the gene SLC1A1 (solute carrier family 1A1) and SGA-induced OCS. However, this finding could not be replicated in European patients. Preliminary results also suggest an involvement of polymorphisms in the BDNF gene (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and an interaction between markers of SLC1A1 and the gene DLGAP3 (disc large associated protein 3) as well as GRIN2B (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2B). Further research of well-defined samples, in particular studies investigating possible interactions of genetic risk-constellations and pharmacodynamic properties, are needed to clarify the assumed development of SGA-induced OCS. Results might improve pathogenic concepts and facilitate the definition of at risk populations, early detection and monitoring of OCS as well as multimodal therapeutic interventions.

Differential effects of antipsychotic agents on obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: a longitudinal study

Indirect evidence supports the assumption that antiserotonergic second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) induce and aggravate obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in schizophrenia. However, multimodal studies assessing the long-term interaction of pharmacotherapy and psychopathology are missing. Over 12 months, we followed-up 75 schizophrenia patients who were classified into two groups according to antipsychotic treatment: clozapine or olanzapine (group I) versus aripiprazole or amisulpride (group II). We applied the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and investigated between-group changes over time as the primary endpoint. Group I showed markedly higher YBOCS scores at both time points. Repeated measure analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed significant interaction effects of group and time (per protocol sample (PP): p=0.006). This was due to persistently high OCS severity within group I, and decreasing YBOCS scores within group II. OCS severity correlated significantly with the negative and general psychopathology subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), as well as with depressive symptoms. The progressive differences in OCS severity between our groups support the assumption of differential pharmacodynamic effects on comorbid OCS in schizophrenia. Further studies should address the pathogenetic mechanism, define patients at risk and facilitate early detection as well as therapeutic interventions.

Antipsychotic augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials

Because of the high number of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) not responding satisfactorily to initial monotherapy with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), the evaluation of additional treatment options is highly relevant. To examine efficacy of add-on pharmacotherapy with antipsychotics, a systematic literature search was applied to identify all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (DB-PC-RCTs) determining the efficacy of antipsychotic augmentation of SRIs in treatment-resistant OCD. The primary outcome of the pooled meta-analytic data analysis was response to the adjunctive antipsychotic treatment measured by both the rates of participants achieving response [defined as ≥ 35% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)] and mean changes in YBOCS total score. Twelve DB-PC-RCTs investigating quetiapine (N = 5), risperidone (N = 3), olanzapine (N = 2), aripiprazole (N = 1) and haloperidol (N = 1) with a total of 394 subjects were included. Significantly more patients responded to augmentation with antipsychotics than with placebo [relative risk = 2.10, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.16-3.80]. Additionally, the mean reduction of the YBOCS total score revealed an efficacy in favour of the antipsychotic medication [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.54, 95% CI 0.15-0.93]. Significant efficacy was identifiable only for risperidone, but not for quetiapine and olanzapine. The results regarding aripiprazole and haloperidol were inconsistent. Overall, about one-third of SRI-resistant OCD patients benefited from an augmentation strategy with antipsychotics. Based on the favourable risk:benefit ratio, risperidone can be considered as the agent of first choice and should be preferred to quetiapine and olanzapine. Further trials, mainly with higher antipsychotic doses, are required to optimize pharmacological treatment recommendations for SRI-refractory OCD.

Metabolic and toxicological considerations for obsessive-compulsive disorder drug therapy

INTRODUCTION

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects the daily life of the patients. Chronic nature of this disease and the need for long-term high-dose drug therapy for its maintenance increase the risk of metabolic and toxicological complications.

AREAS COVERED

In this concise article, the metabolic and toxicological aspects of major medication categories prescribed in OCD, such as serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressant (clomipramine), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and atypical antipsychotics indicated in OCD (both Food and Drug Administration-approved and off-label) are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The most critical point in pharmacotherapy of OCD is the need for the high-dose and long-term use of drugs. In OCD, generally the higher doses of applicable drugs than those used in depression are required, often exceeding the recommended maximum dose. Moreover, such high doses should be given for at least 10 - 12 weeks to ensure the adequate treatment duration for the clinical effects to emerge. This long-term high-dose maintenance therapy increases the risk of drug toxicity and adverse effects. Physicians should take extra care in periodical assessment of signs and symptoms of metabolic and toxicological complications in patients. Subjective symptoms reported by patients should be carefully assessed and not attributed to obsessive nature of the patients.

Clozapine-induced obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: a critical review

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is rarely associated with schizophrenia, whereas 20 to 30% of schizophrenic patients, suffer from comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). So far no single pathogenetic theory convincingly explained this fact suggesting heterogeneous subgroups. Based on long-term case observations, one hypothesis assumes that second-onset OCS in the course of schizophrenia might be a side effect of second generation antipsychotics (SGA), most importantly clozapine (CLZ). This review summarizes the supporting epidemiological and pharmacological evidence: Estimations on prevalence of OCS increase in more recent cross-sectional studies and in later disease stages. Longitudinal observations report the de novo-onset of OCS under clozapine treatment. This association has not been reported with first generation antipsychotics (FGA) or SGAs with mainly dopaminergic mode of action. Finally, significant correlations of OCS-severity with duration of treatment, dose and serum levels suggest clozapine-induced OCS. However, supposed causal interactions need further verifications. It is also unclear, which neurobiological mechanisms might underlie the pathogenetic process. Detailed genotypic and phenotypic characterizations of schizophrenics with comorbid OCS regarding neurocognitive functioning and activation in sensitive tasks of functional magnetic imaging are needed. Multimodal large-scaled prospective studies are necessary to define patients at risk for second-onset OCS and to improve early detection and therapeutic interventions.

A 2012 evidence-based algorithm for the pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

There is a need to synthesize the growing body of literature on the pharmacotherapeutic management of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder for clinicians working at a primary care level. We have aimed to generate a simple, easy-to-follow algorithm for the primary care practitioner. This seven-step algorithm addresses diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder, initiation of pharmacotherapy, monitoring and maintenance treatment, and guidelines for the management of patients who are resistant to initial therapy. In creating this algorithm, we have drawn on the body of published evidence, as well as on expert opinion.