Anatomy and classification of gastrorenal and gastrocaval shunts

Assessment of hemodynamic changes in gastric varices using CT findings before and after vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) and evaluation of treatment outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess the treatment outcomes of vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) for gastric varices based on hemodynamic changes observed in pre- and post-procedural CT scans.

METHODS

This single-center study included 43 patients with gastric varices who underwent PARTO between June 2017 and December 2023. Peri-procedural CT and endoscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed to analyze the afferent and draining veins of gastric varices, identify any residual varices or afferent veins after treatment, assess the technical and clinical successes, and determine statistically significant variables associated with clinical success.

RESULTS

In the pre-procedural CT, the most common dominant afferent vein was the posterior gastric vein (81.4%), followed by the short gastric vein (46.5%) and the left gastric vein (37.2%). Post-procedural CT scans were available for 34 patients (34/43), revealing residual varices and afferent veins in 10 patients (10/34). Seven patients had unknown clinical outcomes due to insufficient follow-up data. The technical and clinical success rates were 93.0% (40/43) and 77.8% (28/36), respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the dominant left gastric vein observed in the pre-procedural CT was a significant negative predictor of clinical success (odds ratio, 0.007; P = 0.027). The sum of the diameters of all afferent veins was also a significant negative predictor (odds ratio, 0.708; P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

A dominant left gastric vein and a larger sum of the diameters of all afferent veins observed in the pre-procedural CT may be associated with an increased risk of clinical failure of PARTO. Therefore, pretherapeutic CT evaluation of the hemodynamics of gastric varices, particularly the type, dominance, and diameter of the afferent veins, could be beneficial for achieving successful PARTO.

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with cyanoacrylate injection versus conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in the treatment of gastric varices with spontaneous portosystemic shunts

Background

Gastric varices (GV) with spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) pose considerable risks and challenges for administering endoscopic cyanoacrylate (CYA) injection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection compared to conventional endoscopic CYA injection for managing GV with SPSS.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included patients with SPSS treated with either EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection or conventional CYA injection for gastric variceal bleeding at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital (Zhejiang, China) between January 2018 and March 2023. Patient demographics, procedural details, and follow-up results were reviewed.

Results

The study evaluated 57 patients: 21 in the combined treatment group undergoing EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection and 36 in the conventional group receiving conventional endoscopic CYA injection. Both cohorts achieved a 100% technical success rate. The mean volume of CYA used was significantly lower in the combined group (1.64 ± 0.67 mL) than in the conventional group (2.38 ± 0.72 mL; P < 0.001). Early GV rebleeding rates did not differ significantly between the groups; in contrast, the combined treatment group exhibited a considerably lower incidence of late GV rebleeding than the conventional group (4.8% vs 27.8%, P = 0.041).

Conclusions

EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection demonstrated superiority over conventional endoscopic CYA injection in reducing late GV rebleeding in treating GV with SPSS.

Gastric varices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastric varices are a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. There have been significantly advances within endoscopic ultrasound for treatment of gastric varices over the past 5 years in addition to the conventional endoscopic and endovascular therapies. In this review, we will review the latest literature on gastric varices with emphasis on changes to the conventional classification systems and comparisons among the different treatment options for gastric varices in terms of efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been new guidelines proposed by the American Gastrointestinal Association on a simpler classification system compared to the conventional Sarin classification. In addition, endoscopic ultrasound guided coil embolization, a novel treatment pioneered over the past 5 years for gastric varices, has shown increased efficacy and reduced adverse event profile compared to cyanoacrylate glue, the more traditional therapy for gastric variceal bleeding. Options for endovascular therapy overall have not significantly changed over the recent years.

SUMMARY

Based on our literature review, we recommend a step-up approach with initial medical and endoscopic management with consideration of endovascular therapies when initial therapies fail.

Aberrant Collaterals in Cirrhosis and Challenges in its Management

Portosystemic collateral formation in cirrhotic patients plays an essential role in the natural history of patients. A thorough understanding of collateral anatomy and hemodynamics in cirrhosis, it is important to envisage diagnosis and outcomes of portal hypertension. The understanding of the patterns of aberrant portosystemic collateral channels has important implications both for the clinician and the interventionist. In this case report, our patient presented to us with the formation of aberrant collaterals at the site of subcostal hernia for which he underwent a mesh repair eight years back. The technical challenges in the management of shunt closure of these aberrant collaterals were discussed.

Computed tomography predictors of gastroesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: the added value of portosystemic collaterals

Background

Detection of ‘spontaneous’ portosystemic collateral veins (PSCV) serves as an important tool in diagnosing portal hypertension (PTHN) and predicting prognosis. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging is noninvasive and allows accurate assessment of variceal site and size. So, this study was conducted to assess the role of MDCT in predicting, detecting and grading gastroesophageal varices in correlation with endoscopy in cirrhotic patients in relation to other portosystemic collaterals.

Methods

Analytical cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on 100 cirrhotic patients. All patients were subjected to history taking, upper gastrointestinal endoscopic assessment, and triphasic CT or contrast-enhanced CT assessment of abdomen and pelvis.

Results

Patients who had esophageal varices in MDCT show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.016) with its endoscopic grading. There was good agreement between endoscopy and MDCT in diagnosing grade of esophageal varices as k = 0.882. The presence of ascites, splenic size, and esophageal vein diameter serve as clinically significant predictors of esophageal varices. Splenic size showed a significant difference according to endoscopic grades of EV (esophageal varices) as p = 0.031 as patients with no varices had splenic size of (15.9 ± 1.4) cm, patients with grade I had a mean splenic size of (15.2 ± 8.7) cm, patients with grade II had mean splenic size of (16.9 ± 1.8) cm and patients with grade III had mean splenic size of (18 ± 4.2) cm, while other veins diameters showed increase with advanced grades of EV but with statistically insignificant differences as p > 0.05.

Conclusions

Multidetector CT features of the presence of PSCVs, splenic size, and ascites are accurate predictors of PTHN in either EVs presence or absence. MDCT can be an excellent alternative for patients who are contraindicated for endoscopy. Moreover, it can be potential screening tool for early detection of esophageal varices in very early stage of chronic liver disease and in the early care of patient with varices. MDCT remains the most applicable noninvasive diagnostic tool for patients with portosystemic collaterals.

A comprehensive review of transvenous obliteration techniques in the management of gastric varices

Bleeding gastric varices (GVs) is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension, with higher morbidity and mortality rates compared with bleeding esophageal varices (EVs). The endovascular techniques for the management of GVs are mainly transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and transvenous obliteration of the GVs. Transvenous obliteration techniques can be an alternative or an adjunct to TIPS for treatment of GVs, depending on the clinical scenario, and are less invasive than TIPS. However, these procedures are associated with increased portal pressure and related complications, mainly worsening of the EVs. In this article, the different techniques of transvenous obliteration of GVs, their indications, contraindications, and outcomes are discussed.

Portal Hypertension in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in the Era of Non-invasive Assessment

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the emerging global health problems due to an increase of burden worldwide. It has been known that NAFLD is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome. The progression of NAFLD is a complex and multifactorial mechanism. Portal hypertension is still the main key in liver disease progression management. In NAFLD, portal hypertension might occur in the non-cirrhotic condition. Hepatic vein pressure gradient measurement has been considered as the gold standard for portal pressure assessment; however, due to its invasiveness and the need for a high-expertise centre, it is considered a non-practical measurement tool in clinical practice. Many other non-invasive parameters have been developed to replace the invasive measurement; however, there are still some limitations with regard to the technical issue, patient’s condition, and its accuracy in the different stages of the disease. Therefore, the authors review portal hypertension related to the clinical course of NAFLD, and the development of portal pressure evaluation in patients with NAFLD.

Transcatheter Embolization of Renal-Splenic Shunt to Treat Hematemesis

Although sequelae of chronic liver disease are the most common causes of altered pressure dynamics in the portal and splanchnic circulations, there are other mechanisms resulting in increased venous pressures with subsequent development of splenic and gastric varices. We report a case of a patient without portal hypertension, but with bleeding gastric varices with a presumed splenorenal shunt (SRS) on CT. Venography revealed flow reversal through the shunt (directed from the renal vein, into the splenic vein and out the portal vein; a renal-splent shunt (RSR)) and thus an anatomically similar but functionally distinct systemic to mesenteric variant. While being anatomically similar to the well-known SRS, the different flow dynamics necessitate a different approach for treatment and important considerations for the use of any liquid embolic.

Mimics, pitfalls, and misdiagnoses of adrenal masses on CT and MRI

Due to the widespread use of imaging, incidental adrenal masses are commonly encountered. A number of pitfalls can result in misdiagnosis of these lesions, including inappropriate choice of imaging technique, presence of pseudolesions, and overlap of imaging features of different adrenal lesions. This article explores the potential pitfalls in imaging of the adrenal glands, on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, that can lead to misinterpretation. Clues to correct diagnoses are provided to evade potential misinterpretation.

Spectrum of hepatofugal collateral pathways in portal hypertension: an illustrated radiological review

The purpose of this article is to describe the various portosystemic collateral pathways pertinent to portal hypertension on multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) and their clinical relevance, with special emphasis on the uncommon ones. The knowledge and understanding of the various patterns of portosystemic collateral channels has important implications both for the clinician and the interventionist. MDCT with its advanced post processing capabilities can exquisitely demonstrate these vascular pathways to help in therapeutic decision making.

Teaching points

• Portosystemic collaterals are an important cause of bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy.

• Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings to effectively identify them.

• Pre-operative knowledge of portosystemic collaterals is essential to avoid inadvertent vascular injury.