Component separations

Abdominal wall defect repair with component separation technique for giant omphalocele with previous relaxing incisions on the abdominal skin

BACKGROUND

The repair of large abdominal wall defects that cannot be closed primarily is quite challenging. The component separation technique (CST) is a surgical approach using autologous tissue to close large abdominal wall defects. The CST requires extensive dissection between the abdominal skin and the anterior sheath of the rectus abdominis muscle. Subsequently, incisions are made at both sides of the external oblique aponeurosis, releasing the external oblique muscle from the internal oblique muscle, and then the right and left rectus abdominis muscles are brought together in the midline for defect closure. However, impairment of blood flow in the abdominal wall skin and necrotic changes are recognized as potential complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

The CST was performed in a 4-year-old boy with a large ventral hernia who had undergone skin closure with abdominal wall relaxing incisions for the primary treatment of giant omphalocele in the neonatal period. Given his history of incisions on the abdominal wall, he was speculated to be at high risk for postoperative skin ischemia. Dissection was therefore kept to a minimum to preserve the blood supply from the superior and inferior epigastric arteries and perforating branches of those arteries through the rectus abdominis muscle. In addition, care was taken to adjust the muscle relaxant dosage while monitoring the intravesical pressure, ensuring that it did not exceed 20 mmHg to avoid impaired circulation in the abdominal wall caused by abdominal compartment syndrome. He was discharged 23 days after the surgery without any complications, and neither recurrence of the ventral hernia nor bowel obstruction was observed in 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A giant omphalocele with primary skin closure was treated by applying the CST. The procedure can be performed safely while preserving the blood flow to the abdominal wall, even in patients with a history of relaxing incisions on the abdominal skin. The CST is expected to be effective for repairing the large abdominal wall defects seen in giant omphalocele when primary closure is not possible.

Component Separation: A Case Report of Hybrid and Synthetic Absorbable Mesh Use for Complex Large Ventral Hernia Reparation

Ventral abdominal hernias are a common abdominal wall defect in the United States. We present a 50-year-old Caucasian male with a large (>18 cm) abdominal wall defect. An extensive complex abdominal wall reconstruction with advanced bilateral fascial flaps/component separation and repair of the abdominal wall defect was planned to restore the appropriate abdominal wall anatomic contour. The use of double mesh in large abdominal wall defects is still a relatively new documented technique. Only two case series detail the same technique used on this patient, with no articles on using a hybrid mesh with a synthetic absorbable mesh. This case uses an underlay and onlay mesh technique, with a hybrid mesh, Tela Biologics (Malvern, PA, USA), under the muscle, in this case, intraperitoneal bridging the gap. The anterior rectus sheath was reinforced with intercepted 0-Ethibond sutures (Ethicon/J&J, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) and then reinforced with a synthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix^TM, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The outcome with this patient shows more research should be conducted on considering long-term results with the types of mesh and the question of whether there are additional benefits when using two different types of mesh and their placement in the sandwich technique.

Ventral hernia repair in conjunction with LIPO-ABDOMINOPLASTY in overweight patients: A comprehensive approach

Repair of large midline ventral hernias still represents a challenge for general surgeons. As obesity is a key factor of this type of hernias, usually the patients are presented with abdominal wall laxity, excess skin and subcutaneous fat. Combined procedures has evolved over the last six decades to repair the hernias and to improve the shape of the abdomen, but was associated with high rate of wound complications. The components separation technique for ventral hernia repair was introduced in 1990 by Ramirez et al to avoid mesh repair was associated with a high rate of success. Until recently, the convenience of simultaneously performing ventral hernia repair and abdominal contouring surgery remains controversial. The aim of this study is to present our experience in the integration of the anterior component separation technique for repair of midline wide ventral defects, with the lipoabdominoplasty in selected patients with high body mass index, to achieve a functional abdominal wall repair and to provide a better aesthetic outcome. In this prospective case-control study, 15 adult female multiparous women, all were overweight and obese, presented with midline ventral hernias and abdominal deformity was operated upon where a comprehensive technique in the form of herniorapphy, anterior component separation technique and lipoabdominoplasty were performed. The patients were followed up for 3-6 months period to monitor incidence of complications, hernia recurrence and to assess the aesthetic outcome. All the 15 patients were overweight and obese with BMI ranged between 26.5 and 39.6 kg/m² . The mean operative time was 184 ± 28.8 minutes (range 150-240 minutes). The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 3 days ranging from 1 to 5 days. In addition to the hernia, all the patients suffered from diastasis of recti ranged from 9 to 15 cm in the transverse dimension. No mortality or major complications encountered, no hernia recurrence, only minor complications occurred in four patients (26.8%). Two patients developed seroma which resolved by aspiration, one patient suffered wound infection with partial loss of the umbilicus and one developed superficial skin necrosis at the central area of the flaps which healed uneventfully by secondary intention. All the patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. In conclusion, this comprehensive approach is effective technique for reconstruction of large midline ventral defects and provide a good aesthetic appearance of the anterior and lateral abdomen in appropriately selected obese patients.

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension after giant ventral hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is a classical complication after giant ventral hernia surgery and may lead to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Assessment of risk factors and prevention of IAH/ACS are essential for hernia surgeons.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including 58 giant ventral hernia patients in our center between Jan 1, 2017, and Mar 1, 2022, we recorded age, gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypoproteinemia, body mass index (BMI), the ratio of hernia sac volume to abdominal cavity volume (HSV/ACV), defect width, tension reduction procedure (TRP), positive fluid balance (PFB) and IAH of these patients and analyzed the data using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to screen the risk factors for IAH after surgery.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that HSV/ACV ≥ 25%, hypoproteinemia, and PFB were independent risk factors for the occurrence of IAH after giant ventral hernia repair (P = 0.025, 0.016, 0.017, respectively). We did not find any correlation between postoperative IAH and the patient's age, gender, COPD, CHD, hypertension, T2DM, BMI, defect width, TRP, and PFB.

CONCLUSION

Identifying risk factors is of great significance for the early identification and prevention of IAH/ACS. We found that HSV/ACV ≥ 25%, hypoproteinemia, and PFB were independent risk factors for IAH after giant ventral hernia repair.

Quality of life following two different techniques of an open ventral hernia repair for large hernias: a prospective randomized study

Background

We compare the health-related quality of life (QoL) of patients with incision hernias before and after surgery with two different techniques.

Methods

In this prospective randomized study, the study population consisted of all patients who underwent the first surgical incisional hernias repair during the 1-year study period. Patients who met the criteria for inclusion in the study were randomized into two groups: the first group consisted of patients operated by an open Rives sublay technique, and the second group included patients operated by a segregation component technique. The change in the quality of life before and 6 months after surgery was assessed using two general (Short form of SF-36 questionnaires and European Quality of Life Questionnaire—EQ-5D-3L), and three specific hernia questionnaires (Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey-HerQles, Eura HS Quality of Life Scale—EuraHS QoL, and Carolinas Comfort Scale—CCS).

Results

A total of 93 patients were included in the study. Patients operated on by the Rives technique had a better role physical score before surgery, according to the SF-36 tool, although this was not found after surgery. The postoperative QoL measured with each scale of all questionnaires was significantly better after surgery. Comparing two groups of patients after surgery, only the pain domain of the EuraHS Qol questionnaire was worse in patients operated by a segregation component technique.

Conclusion

Both techniques improve the quality of life after surgery. Generic QoL questionnaires showed no difference in the quality of life compared to repair technique but specific hernia-related questionnaires showed differences.

Simultaneous Complex Incisional Hernia Repair and Bariatric Surgery for Obese Patients: a Case Series of a Single-Center Early Experience

Purpose

Obesity is associated with recurrence of complex incisional hernia repair (CIHR). Bariatric procedure during CIHR can improve recurrence rates without increasing morbidity. This study aimed to describe our results after CIHR in patients with obesity, in which a simultaneous bariatric procedure was performed.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study including patients who underwent surgery between January 2014 and December 2018, with a complex incisional hernia (CIH) according to the Slater classification and body mass index (BMI) ≥35. CIHR was the main indication for surgery. We collected demographic data, comorbidities, CIH classification according to the European Hernia Society, type of bariatric procedure, postoperative morbidity using the Dindo-Clavien classification, and short-term results. Computed tomography (CT) is performed preoperatively.

Results

Ten patients were included in the study (7 women). The mean BMI was 43.63±4.91 kg/m². The size of the abdominal wall defect on CT was 8.86±3.93 cm. According to the European Hernia Society classification, all CIHs were W2 or higher. Prosthetic repair of the CIH was selected. Onlay, sublay, preperitoneal, and inlay mesh placement were performed twice each, as well as one modified component separation technique and one transversus abdominis release. Gastric leak after sleeve gastrectomy was the only major complication. Short-term outcomes included one recurrence, and % total weight loss was 24.04±8.03 after 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

The association of bariatric procedures during CIHR seems to be feasible, safe, and could be an option for surgical treatment in selected patients.

Abdominal Wall Defects-Current Treatments

Gastroschisis and omphalocele reflect the two most common abdominal wall defects in newborns. First postnatal care consists of defect coverage, avoidance of fluid and heat loss, fluid administration and gastric decompression. Definitive treatment is achieved by defect reduction and abdominal wall closure. Different techniques and timings are used depending on type and size of defect, the abdominal domain and comorbidities of the child. The present review aims to provide an overview of current treatments.

Management of complex ventral hernias: results of an international survey

Background

The surgical treatment of patients with complex ventral hernias is challenging. The aim of this study was to present an international overview of expert opinions on current practice.

Methods

A survey questionnaire was designed to investigate preoperative risk management, surgical approach and mesh choice in patients undergoing complex hernias repair, and treatment strategies for infected meshes. Geographical location of practice, experience and annual volumes of the surgeons were compared.

Results

Of 408 surgeons, 234 (57.4 per cent) were practising in the USA, 116 (28.4 per cent) in Europe, and 58 (14.2 per cent) in other countries. Some 412 of 418 surgeons (98.6 per cent) performed open repair and 322 of 416 (77.4 per cent) performed laparoscopic repair. Most recommended preoperative work-up/lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation (319 of 398, 80.2 per cent) and weight loss (254 of 399, 63.7 per cent), but the consequences of these strategies varied. American surgeons and less experienced surgeons were stricter. Antibiotics were given at least 1 h before surgery by 295 of 414 respondents (71.3 per cent). Synthetic and biological meshes were used equally in contaminated primary hernia repair, whereas for recurrent hernia repair synthetic mesh was used in a clean environment and biological or no mesh in a contaminated environment. American surgeons and surgeons with less experience preferred biological mesh in contaminated environments significantly more often. Percutaneous drainage and antibiotics were the first steps recommended in treating mesh infection. In the presence of sepsis, most surgeons favoured synthetic mesh explantation and further repair with biological mesh.

Conclusion

There remains a paucity of good-quality evidence in dealing with these hernias, leading to variations in management. Patient optimization and issues related to mesh choice and infections require well designed prospective studies.

Low-Dose Pre-Operative Botulinum Toxin A Effectively Facilitates Complex Ventral Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Complex ventral hernias following laparotomy present a unique challenge in that repair is hindered by the lateral tension of the abdominal wall. A novel approach to overcome this is the “chemical component separation” technique. Here, botulinum toxin A (BTA) is instilled into the muscles of the abdominal wall. This induces flaccid paralysis and effectively reduces tension in the wall, allowing the muscles to be successfully joined in the midline during surgery. We describe a method where a large incisional hernia was repaired using this technique and review the variations in methodology. Case report: A woman in her mid-40s developed a ventral hernia in the setting of a previous laparotomy for a small bowel perforation. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen demonstrated an 85 (Width) × 95 mm (Length) ventral hernia containing loops of the bowel. Pre-operative botulinum toxin A administration was arranged at the local interventional radiology department. A total of 100 units of BTA were instilled at four sites into the muscular layers of the abdominal wall under CT-fluoroscopic guidance. She underwent an open incisional hernia repair 4 weeks later, where the contents were reduced and the abdominal wall layers were successfully joined in the midline. There was no clinical evidence of hernia recurrence at 3-months follow-up. Conclusion: Low-dose BTA effectively facilitates the surgical management of large ventral incisional hernias. There is, however, significant variation in the dosage, concentration and anatomical landmarks in which BTA is administered as described in the literature. Further studies are needed to assess and optimise these variables.

Reconstruction of a large abdominal wall defect without using mesh: A case report

•

The innovative surgical techniques for reconstruction the abdominal wall defect without using the mesh.

•

Technique to repair abdominal wall defect in the infected area.

•

Nylon darn repair for reconstruction of the abdominal wall defect.

Introduction

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall supplemented by surgery of the abdominal wall infection or the excision of the abdominal wall tumor is one of the most difficult procedures due to the need to avoid incisional hernia and to minimize the spread of infection. The primary purpose of the repair of the abdominal wall is to safeguard the visceral organs and avoid postoperative incisional hernia. Many of the abdominal wall restoration procedures include simple sutures of rectus abdominis aponeurosis, component separation procedure, and open mesh repair. Mesh restoration is currently the gold standard in elective care for most instances of abdominal wall reconstruction.

Presentation of case

A male patient aged 69 years had cutaneous mucormycosis. We agreed to perform a wide excision of the lesion. There was a large abdominal wall defect after the excision. Due to concerns about mesh repair due to contaminated surgical area and loss of skin shielding, we opted to use Nylon Darn for abdominal closure.

Discussion

We documented our technique for abdominal wall reconstruction using adapted Nylon darn.

Conclusion

For closing abdominal wall defects in surgical areas with elevated infection rates, the newly-designed technique proposed in this paper could be an alternative approach.

Risk Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Ventral Hernia Repair With Component Separation

BACKGROUND

Over 350,000 surgeries are performed for ventral hernias (VHs) annually. Abdominal wall component separation has been more frequently used for the management of VHs. The goal of this study is to better understand factors associated with component separation complication rates.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (2005-2014) was used to identify all patients with an International Classification of Diseases ninth Revision diagnosis of VHs who underwent open VH repair with a pedicleor graft advancement flap. All cases included in this study were elective and not associated with additional procedures. Demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics were extracted. Independent predictors of complications and outcomes were determined by multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

Component separation was performed in 4346 patients. Mean age was 56; majority were female (55%) and white (80%). Most patients (73%) underwent surgery in an urban teaching hospital; mesh was used in 80% of cases and 11% were smokers. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (50%), followed by obesity (26%), diabetes mellitus (DM) (23%), coronary artery disease (11%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (8%). Half of the patients (50%) had private insurance, and 35% had Medicare. Patients were distributed equally over household income quartiles. The mortality rate was 0.5%; median length of stay was 5 d. Overall complication rate was 25% (wound 11%, intraoperative 5%, infectious 11%, and pulmonary 8%). Mesh was associated with a lower rate of wound complications (10% versus 15%, P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patients with COPD (odds ratio: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.58-2.59), obesity (1.37; 1.16-1.63), DM (1.3; 1.09-1.55), and those in the lowest income quartile (1.44; 1.06-1.96) had higher overall complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with other studies, patients with COPD, Obesity, DM, and lower income status were associated with increased complications after component separation.

Non-coated versus coated mesh for retrorectus ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC)

PURPOSE

The outcomes of utilizing anti-adhesive barrier-coated mesh in the retrorectus position during open ventral hernia repair are unknown. We compared the wound-related outcomes between non-coated (NCM) and coated mesh (CM) placed in the retrorectus space.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective, open, clean ventral hernia repair with retrorectus mesh were retrospectively identified in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Propensity score matching was performed based on clinically relevant demographic and operative covariates. The primary outcome was wound morbidity, defined as surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), and SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI).

RESULTS

3609 patients were included (3281 NCM, 328 CM). Following 2:1 propensity score matching, rates of myofascial release remained the only statistically different matching parameter; external oblique releases were performed more frequently in the CM group (8% vs. 15%; p = 0.03). Rates of SSI (3% vs. 4%; p = 0.16) were similar between groups. Increased rates of SSO (13% vs. 18%; p = 0.045) and SSOPI (4% vs. 8%; p = 0.038) were observed in the CM group. The CM group had a higher rate of postoperative seroma (3% vs. 7%; p = 0.027) compared to the NCM group.

CONCLUSION

Barrier-coated mesh in the retrorectus position was associated with increased wound morbidity requiring procedural intervention. Due to a lack of clinical benefit, the use of more costly barrier-coated mesh in the retrorectus position is not justified for routine, open ventral hernia repairs at this time.

Long-term results of botulinum toxin type A in complex abdominal wall repair and review of the literature

Administration of botulinum toxin (BTX) is being used in cases of complex ventral hernia for the reconstruction of the linea alba and closure of the abdominal wall. However, there are no published results regarding the long-term effects of BTX and its implication in hernia recurrence. Our purpose is to evaluate the outcomes in hernia recurrence of the administration of BTX in complex ventral hernia repair. 36 patients underwent elective surgery for complex ventral hernia and were evaluated retrospectively. The study included patients with a transverse hernia defect ≥ 100 mm and loss of domain hernias, receiving BTX injections 6 weeks prior to elective surgery. Global results and long-term recurrence were analysed. There were no complications related to BTX administration. The mean transverse hernia defect was 139.44 ± 50.98 mm, the mean abdominal cavity volume (ACV) was 10.19 ± 3.33 dm³, the mean hernia sac volume (HSV) was 1.93 ± 1.79 dm³, presenting a mean volume ratio (VR) of 20.71 ± 19.76%. Primary closure was achieved in 28 patients (77.8%), 21 of whom (75%) needed an anterior component separation technique. Recurrence rate was 11.4% at 2-years follow-up. BTX administration is a safe and feasible method for abdominal wall expansion prior to complex incisional hernia repair, achieving high rates of primary closure. Long-term follow-up shows good results in terms of recurrence in these patients.

Peritoneal flap hernioplasty for reconstruction of transverse incisional hernias

BACKGROUND

Repair of transverse incisional hernias is a surgical challenge with current methods of abdominal wall reconstruction. The peritoneal flap hernioplasty addresses this problem using flaps of hernial sac to bridge the fascial gap and isolate the mesh from both the intraperitoneal contents and the subcutaneous space exploiting the retro-rectus space medially and the avascular plane between the internal and external oblique muscles laterally. The operative technique and long-term results of 80 consecutive cases with transverse incisional hernias undergoing repair with this method are reported.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective peritoneal flap hernioplasty repair for transverse incisional hernias from Jan. 1, 2010 to Dec. 31, 2014 were identified from the Lothian Surgical Audit system, a prospectively-maintained computer database of all surgical procedures in the Edinburgh region of south-east Scotland. Patient demographics and clinical data were obtained from the hospital case-notes. Follow-up data were obtained in May 2019 from hospital records and telephone interview.

RESULTS

80 patients, (n = 53 male, 66%) were identified. Mean follow-up was 83 months (range 55-114 months) and mean postoperative stay was 6.4 days (range 1-23 days). Eleven repairs (14%) were for recurrent hernia. Mean mesh size applied (Optilene Elastic, 48 g/m², BBraun) was 747 cm² (ranged 150-1500 cm²). Redundant skin excision was performed in 54% of cases. Altogether, seven patients (8.8%) presented with postoperative complications: five superficial wound infections (6.3%), one symptomatic seroma (1.3%) and one recurrence (1.3%) within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The peritoneal flap hernioplasty is associated with few complications and a very low recurrence rate. We propose this technique as the method of choice for reconstruction of transverse abdominal incisional hernias when primary fascial apposition is not possible.

Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair With Concomitant Panniculectomy

PURPOSE

Combined ventral hernia repair and panniculectomy (VHR/PAN) is controversial, and the safety profile including anticipated complications has been questioned. We present a retrospective case series review of patients from the University of Maryland Medical Center to help surgeons counsel patients on the risks and benefits of this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective database was collected using current procedural terminology codes for VHR/PAN. The patient-specific variables that were studied include the following: sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis, immunosuppression, length of operation, acute incarcerated hernias, hernia size and location, mesh size and location, pannus weight, concomitant component separation, use of negative-pressure wound therapy, intestinal violation, follow-up duration, ventral hernia working group, history of bariatric surgery, previous hernia repair, skin dehiscence, skin necrosis, chronic wound, surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, fascial dehiscence, hernia recurrence, unplanned return to operating room, and medical complication. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine which factors affected the complication outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 106 patients with an average age and BMI of 53 years and 39, respectively. Fifty-eight patients (54.72%) had at least 1 surgical site occurrence. Twenty-three patients (21.70%) had at least 1 repair failure. Twenty-eight patients (26.42%) had an unplanned trip back to the operating room. Seventeen patients (16.04%) had at least 1 medical complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk factors associated with developing complications are higher BMI, longer operating time, larger mesh size, larger hernia size, component separation, use of biologic mesh, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and intestinal violation. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy decreased complication rates, and patients with a previous hernia repair seemed to benefit the most from having a combined VHR/PAN. However, when compared with previous reports of VHR alone, VHR/PAN does seem to increase wound complications and reoperation rates.

Comparing Surgical Site Infection for Open and Endoscopic Component Separation

In March 2016, we reported the SSI rate at LSU Health for all abdominal wall hernia repairs performed between 2011 and 2013. Among the 263 repairs, the infection rate averaged 6.8 per cent. Given the diversity of repairs, this global percentage lacks relevance, but looking at subsets provides meaningful insights. For example, SSI was 1.8 per cent among 55/263 laparoscopic repairs and 8.2 per cent among 206/263 open repairs. The infection rate of 26.3 per cent among the 19 open component separation cases was especially noteworthy and bothersome. Even though there was no mortality in any subset, the vast majority of the morbidity and costs involved repairs with open component separations. A meta-analysis published in 2016 revealed a likely SSI benefit for the endoscopic component separation technique (ECST) over the open CST. Since that report, we have focused our quality improvement efforts on this subset of challenging cases and have replaced CST with ECST. Our data now include results from 33 hernia repairs with either CSTor ECST that were performed between November 2011 and April 2018. Twenty-four of 33 patients had CSTwith an SSI rate of 37.5 per cent (9 of 24). Nine of 33 had ECST with 0 per cent SSI (P value = 0.039). These results mirror the findings reported in the meta-analysis.

Anterior versus Posterior Component Separation: Which Is Better?

In the field of hernia surgery, there have been many advances in techniques that have provided the surgeon with a variety of options to repair the difficult abdominal wall hernia. Regardless of the technique, the ultimate goal was to provide a tension-free repair, which attempts to approximate the midline while returning abdominal wall musculature to its normal anatomic position, thus providing the patient with both a cosmetic and durable result with or without the use of a prosthetic reinforcement. Component separation techniques have been widely popularized as techniques to repair complex hernias and are frequently categorized based upon the anatomic location of the myofascial release. CSTs are generally categorized as either an anterior component separation or posterior component separation based upon the surgical approach to the abdominal wall musculature. This report objectively outlines the various techniques of component separation and specifically compares the outcomes among techniques to facilitate decision making in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Complex Ventral Hernia Repair in the Class III Morbidly Obese Patient

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing complex ventral hernia repair (VHR) often present with significant medical comorbidities, the most prevalent of which is obesity. Although recent advancements in abdominal wall reconstruction techniques have provided the general hernia patient population with markedly improved recurrence and postoperative complication rates, many patients have been precluded from these procedures owing to excessive body mass index (BMI). In this study, we investigate the viability of complex ventral hernia repair with epigastric artery perforator sparing skin incisions, component separation, and wide-spanning retrorectus mesh reinforcement for patients with BMI of greater than or equal to 40 kg/m(2) (class III obesity).

METHODS

A single surgeon retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was performed. We restricted this data to class III morbidly obese patients undergoing open VHR with component muscle separation and wide-spanning mesh reinforcement.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2017, 131 patients met the inclusion criteria for our study. The mean patient BMI was 46.7 kg/m(2). Operative wounds were categorized according to the National Healthcare Safety Network Wound Class Definitions. There was no statistically significant association between wound class and postoperative complication rates. After our implementation of epigastric artery perforator sparing skin incisions in 2013, significantly less wound breakdown was observed (26.3%) as opposed to before (49.0%) (P < 0.01). Furthermore, significantly less cases required return to the operating room after this technique was implemented (31.3%) as compared with before (60.8%) (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, 28 patients developed an infection requiring antibiotic treatment (21.4%), and the overall hernia recurrence rate was 5.3%. Three patients expired.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex VHR with abdominal wall reconstruction may be a viable option for class III morbidly obese patients. Preliminary data suggest that implementation of epigastric artery perforator sparing skin incisions may reduce the risk of postoperative wound complications, and we have demonstrated hernia recurrence and wound complications comparable with those seen in the general population.

Minimally invasive techniques and indocyanine angiography in anterior abdominal wall reconstruction after multiple laparotomies

Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction surgery in patients who have undergone multiple laparotomies is associated with a high risk of complications. For this reason, minimally invasive surgery techniques are used to avoid abdominal compartment syndrome, to enhance wound healing and to reduce postoperative pain and blood loss. This paper presents a case of a patient who was admitted to the Department of General Surgery in Puck Hospital as a result of extensive anterior abdominal wall deformation with an end descending colostomy. A single-stage procedure was performed: specifically, digestive tract reconstruction followed by anterior abdominal wall reconstruction using intraoperative angiography of indocyanine green in infrared light.

What Do We Know About Component Separation Techniques for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair?

Introduction

The component separation technique (CST) was introduced to abdominal wall reconstruction to treat large, complex hernias. It is very difficult to compare the published findings because of the vast number of technical modifications to CST as well as the heterogeneity of the patient population operated on with this technique.

Material and Methods

The main focus of the literature search conducted up to August 2017 in Medline and PubMed was on publications reporting comparative findings as well as on systematic reviews in order to formulate statements regarding the various CSTs.

Results

CST without mesh should no longer be performed because of too high recurrence rates. Open anterior CST has too high a surgical site occurrence rate and henceforth should only be conducted as endoscopic and perforator sparing anterior CST. Open posterior CST and posterior CST with transversus abdominis release (TAR) produce better results than open anterior CST. To date, no significant differences have been found between endoscopic anterior, perforator sparing anterior CST and posterior CST with transversus abdominis release. Robot-assisted posterior CST with TAR is the latest, very promising alternative. The systematic use of biologic meshes cannot be recommended for CST.

Conclusion

CST should always be performed with mesh as endoscopic or perforator sparing anterior or posterior CST. Robot-assisted posterior CST with TAR is the latest development.

Surgical Dynamometer to Simultaneously Measure the Tension Forces and the Distance between Wound Edges during the Closure of a Laparotomy

The closure of the abdominal wall after making a laparotomy is a major challenge for surgeons, since a significant percentage of closures fail and incisional hernias rise. The suture has to withstand the forces required to close the incision, while not hindering the adequate wound healing progression. Currently, there is no surgical measuring device that could be used to determine the required closing forces, which can be very different depending on the patient. This paper presents a dynamometer to measure the tension forces to be applied while closing a surgical incision, and it simultaneously measures the distance between wound edges. It is a compass-like instrument. A mechanism between the two legs incorporates a load cell, whose signal is read by an electronic device that computes the values of the tension forces between wound edges. An angular position sensor at the pin joint between legs provides the distance between both sides of the incision. Measuring capabilities of the instrument prototype were verified at the laboratory. Thereafter, its functionality was demonstrated in experimental surgery tests. Therefore, the instrument could be very useful in clinical applications, assisting personalized surgical techniques.

Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of human decellularized matrix as a hernia repair device

Recently, interest has been increasing for human decellularized matrices, due to their ability to reduce numerous side effects related to hernia repair. To date, only animal studies investigated the biological interaction post-implant of human decellularized matrices for soft tissue repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the morphological response one year post implant of human decellularized matrix, through morphological analysis of human biopsies. The histological and ultrastructural results revealed a perfect cellular repopulation and neoangiogenesis, with minimal inflammatory response and a well-organized collagen matrix. The results have indicated that this scaffold can be an effective treatment for hernia.

Measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in large incisional hernia repair to prevent abdominal compartmental syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The repair of large incisional hernias may occasionally lead to a substantial increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and rarely to abdominal compartmental syndrome (ACS) with subsequent respiratory, vascular, and visceral complications. Measurement of the IAP has recently become a common practice in monitoring critical patients, even though such measurements were obtained in the early 1900s.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study involving 54 patients undergoing elective abdominal wall gap repair (mean length, 17.4 cm) with a tension-free technique after incisional hernia was conducted. The purpose of the study was to determine whether or not urinary pressure for indirect IAP measurement is a reliable method for the early identification of patients with a higher risk of developing ACS. IAP measurements were performed using a Foley catheter connected to a HOLTECH® medical manometer. IAP values were determined preoperatively, after anesthetic induction, upon patient awakening, upon patient arrival in the ward after surgery, and 24 h after surgery before removing the catheter. All patients were treated by the same surgical team using a prosthetic composite mesh (PARIETEX®).

RESULTS

Incisional hernia repair caused an increase in the mean IAP score of 2.68 mmHg in 47 of 54 patients (87.04%); the IAP was decreased in two patients (3.7%) and remained equal in five patients before and 24 h after surgery (9.26%). FEV-1, measured 24 h after surgery, increased in 50 patients (92.6%), remained stable in two patients (3.7%), and decreased in two patients (3.7%). The mean increase in FEV-1 was 0.0676 L (maximum increase = 0.42 L and minimum increase = 0.01 L) in any patient who developed ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of urinary bladder pressure has been shown to be easy to perform and free of complications. Measurement of urinary bladder pressure can also be a useful tool to identify patients with a higher risk of developing ACS.