Use of 3-d plate in displaced angle fracture of mandible

Assessment of CAD/CAM Customized V Pattern Plate Versus Standard Miniplates Fixation in Mandibular Angle Fracture (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Background

Mandibular angle is the most common site for fractures, accounting for 23-42% of all cases of mandibular fractures. A customized fixation system is designed directly for a specific patient, which reduces the time spent bending and fixing the plate during the operation. This study was designed to assess the effect of CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate versus standard miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture.

Materials and Methods

This prospective randomized clinical trial included 26 patients suffering from mandibular angle fracture. Patients were selected from Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University and Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. Study group (13) needed open reduction and internal fixation by using CAD/CAM V plate with surgical guide, while control group (13) needed open reduction and internal fixation by using standard superior-inferior miniplate fixation. The patients were then followed up for one year postoperatively.

Results

It showed that there was a statistical difference between the study group and the control group regarding postoperative pain, occlusion, and maximal interincisal opening (p value < 0.05%). There was no statistical difference (p value > 0.05%) in the postoperative panoramic radiograph that was taken within the postoperative 1st week in both groups, while the increase in mean bone density was statistically significant (p value < 0.05%) from 6 months to one year postoperatively.

Conclusion

CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate is a suitable plate design because it offers sufficient stability for normal bone healing, the creation of an ideal occlusion, an early return to function, and adequate postoperative radiographic outcomes.

Trial Registration

It was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT03761524. Registration date: 03.12.2018.

Prevalence of surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of surgical site infections (SSI) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures and to determine the effect of potential moderators on it. A systematic literature search (Medline and Scopus databases) was conducted independently by two reviewers. The pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was estimated. Quality assessment as well as outlier and influential analysis were performed. Additionally, subgroup and meta-regression analysis were conducted in order the effect of categorical and continuous variables on the estimated prevalence to be investigated. In total, seventy-five eligible studies (comprising a sum of 5825 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of SSI following ORIF for mandibular fractures was estimated as high as 4.2% (95% CI 3.0-5.6%) with significant heterogeneity between studies. One study was identified to be critically influential. In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence was 4.2% (95% CI 2.2-6.6%) among studies conducted in Europe, 4.3% (95% CI 3.1-5.6%) among studies conducted in Asia and higher among those conducted in America (7.3%) (95% CI 4.7-10.3%). It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of the etiology of these infections, despite the relatively low rate of SSI in these procedures. However, further, well-designed prospective and retrospective studies need to be conducted in order this issue to be fully clarified.

Three-Dimensional Osteosynthesis Plates for the Surgical Treatment of Mandibular Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Mandible fractures can be treated with different plate systems, that is, miniplates or three-dimensional (3D) plates. This systematic review describes the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of 3D plates used in fractures of the mandible and aims to critically evaluate its risks and benefits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted without date but with restriction to articles written in English. Studies in humans, including randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies, were included. The outcome parameters measured were number of patients, fracture classification, results, follow-up period, postoperative complications, and mean age of patients. Major complications were defined as those needing additional surgical intervention, for example, malocclusion, infection or plate fracture. Accordingly, complications not needing additional surgical intervention were defined as minor (ie, dehiscence, trismus).

RESULTS

Guided by the PRISMA statement and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, the authors identified 44 publications with a total of 1790 patients. Among the articles selected for the final review, there were 32 reported prospective studies, 12 reported retrospective studies. Regarding the evaluation of quality, 8 studies showed a low value of the risk of bias, 17 a moderate risk, and 19 a high risk. There were statistically significant advantages for 3D plates in mandibular fractures in terms of postoperative complications, for example, wound dehiscences or plate fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D plate is an effective treatment modality for mandibular fractures, with low incidence of major complications, decreased length of operation time, and increased stability of osteosynthesis.

Management of Angle Mandible Fractures by 3D Rectangular Grid Plate: A Prospective Study

Aim

This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of treatment of mandibular angle fractures using 3D rectangular grid plate.

Materials and Methods

A total of 10 patients with mandibular angle fractures with or without associated facial fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation were included in the study. Fixation was done using 3D rectangular grid plate.

Results

The mean age of the patients in the study is 34.7 years. In all the cases, fracture was adequately reduced (100%) intraoperatively and confirmed through postoperative radiographs. The mean mouth opening by the end of 3 months is 38.60 mm. Four patients had paresthesia of inferior alveolar nerve pre- and postoperatively, and normal sensation was regained by the end of the third month. There were no reported cases of infection and hardware failure during the 9-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

The results of the study suggest that 3D rectangular grid plate is a feasible alternative to conventional miniplate systems with good clinical outcome and fewer complications related to paresthesia, infection and hardware failure.

3-D Miniplates Versus Conventional Miniplates in Treatment of Mandible Fractures

AIM

To study whether the use of 3-D miniplate, when compared with conventional miniplate, gives better clinical outcomes with fewer complications in patients with fracture mandible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Trauma Care Centre, on 40 patients. They were randomly divided into Group-I and Group-II with 20 patients in each group. In Group-I, 3-D miniplate was used and in Group-II, conventional miniplate was used. Parameters such as fracture stability, occlusal status, mouth opening, nerve paresthesia, infection, pain, swelling, and complications were evaluated on 1st, 7th postoperative day, 1st month and 3rd month.

RESULTS

Fracture stability and occlusion were clinically better in Group-I than in Group-II on each follow-up; however, it was not statistically significant. Infection rate was lesser in Group-I than in Group-II (p = 0.003). Mouth opening was more in Group-II than in Group-I on immediate (p = 0.001) and 7th post-op day (p = 0.002). Overall complications were lesser in Group-I than in Group-II (p > 0.005).

CONCLUSION

There is no major difference observed in clinical outcomes between 3-D miniplate and conventional miniplate. Either method of fixation can be used successfully in treatment of mandible fractures with comparable rates of complications.

Unusual Superolateral Dislocation of Bilateral Mandibular Condyles

We describe a case of maxillofacial trauma in a paediatric patient in which the left mandibular condyle was superolaterally displaced into the temporal fossa, medial to the zygomatic arch which was intact and the right condyle was also displaced similarly but the zygomatic arch was also fractured on this side. Also, there was an associated mandibular symphyseal fracture.

Role of fixation in posttraumatic nerve injury recovery in displaced mandibular angle fracture

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of different types of fixation in the enhancement of posttraumatic inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) recovery in displaced mandibular angle fracture and to establish.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients of displaced mandibular angle fracture were treated with preangulated plate and three-dimensional (3D) matrix plate in two groups and were observed during follow-up at 04,06 and 12 weeks along with other parameters.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were treated with preangulated plate and 15 patients with 3D matrix miniplate. There was early nerve recovery in Group A than Group B, with residual paresthesia 20% in Group A and 26.6% in Group B at the end of 12-week follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The displaced mandibular angle fracture with posttraumatic IAN paresthesia treated with preangulated plate has shown evidence of early nerve recovery than those fractures were treated with matrix miniplate. The fracture fragments displaced more than 9 mm have shown poor nerve recovery in both groups.

Management of mandibular angle fractures using a 1.7 mm 3-dimensional strut plate

AIM

We report our experience with the use of 1.7 mm 3-dimentional (3D) strut plate for the management of mandibular angle fractures.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 15 patients in whom mandibular angle fractures were treated with 1.7 mm 3D plate using trans-buccal trochar. Patients were evaluated at 72 h, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks for fracture stability, occlusion, soft-tissue swelling, infection and post-operative inferior alveolar nerve damage. Other complications like wound dehiscence, non-union, mal-union and hardware failure were also assessed.

RESULTS

In the immediate post-operative period, fracture instability was seen in 1 (6.7%) patient which resolved by 2 weeks. Mild occlusal discrepancy was also noted in 1 (6.7%) patient. Wound dehiscence was seen in 5 (33.3%) patients and all resolved by local measures. 1 (6.7%) patient developed post-operative nerve paraesthesia. Immediate post-operative radiographic evaluation demonstrated optimal reduction in all cases with no inferior border gaping. No case of infection, hardware failure, non-union and mal-union was noted.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study, 1.7 mm 3D strut plate was found to be effective for management of non-communited mandibular angle fractures.

Routine removal of the plate after surgical treatment for mandibular angle fracture with a third molar in relation to the fracture line

Purpose:

The purpose was to analyze the clinical course of surgically treated mandibular angle fractures from the viewpoint of routine removal of the plate because these fractures are associated with high rates of complications and plate removal.

Subjects and Methods:

The subjects were 40 patients with unilateral mandibular angle fracture, which was intraorally reduced and principally fixed with a single miniplate on the external oblique ridge. The third molar in relation to the fracture line was extracted in seven patients during the surgery. Clinical course was evaluated in terms of removal of the plate, preservation of the third molar and complications.

Results:

One patient showed a wound infection postoperatively, and two patients developed pericoronitis during the follow-up. These were managed with medication and local irrigation. One patient with a preserved third molar did not make a required visit and was lost from the follow-up. Removal of the plates was performed in 39 patients after confirmation of good fracture healing, mostly within a year. Twenty-four of 32 preserved third molars were simultaneously extracted. These procedures were generally performed under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis, and they did not cause any complications.

Conclusions:

Routine removal of the plate after surgical treatment for mandibular angle fractures, simultaneously with extraction of the third molar if indicated, may be beneficial to avoid complications related to the plate and the third molar later in life.

Clinical outcomes of three different types of hardware for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a comparative retrospective study

A retrospective study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of three different types of hardware that are used in mandibular angle fracture fixation. Thirty patients were selected from the hospital database. The patients were categorized into the following groups: group A, in which a single 2.0-mm locking miniplate was used; group B, in which a single rigid 2.3-mm plate was used; and group C, in which a single lag screw was inserted. All patients were followed for 6 months. With regard to intraoperative variables, significant differences were found among the groups in the duration of surgery and cost. Group C had the shortest surgical time, followed by group A and then group B. Two patients, one in group A and one in group B, suffered an occlusal discrepancy after surgery. Of the group A patients, two exhibited wound dehiscence and one had an infection. One patient in group B had an exposed plate. Sensory nerve involvement was noted in three group C patients and one group B patient. The lag screw was associated with the fewest complications and exhibited all of the advantages of plating systems in the treatment of angle fracture. The lag screw involved the least hardware and a short operating time, however the differences were not significant.

Orbital and facial fractures

This article reviews the importance of particular radiologic findings related to facial trauma and their implications for clinical and surgical management. An emphasis is placed on critical imaging signs that warrant immediate surgical attention.