Orbital floor reconstruction with free flaps after maxillectomy

Necessity of infraorbital wall reconstruction in patients with residual periosteum after total maxillectomy

BACKGROUND

To date, there have been no reports regarding the necessity or methods of reconstruction for cases where the orbital periosteum remains even though the orbital floor bone has been resected in primary reconstruction after total maxillectomy. This study investigated the reconstruction methods for infraorbital wall reconstruction in patients with residual orbital periosteum.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center from June 2010 to June 2019. The following two main cohorts were evaluated: non-reconstruction and reconstruction groups (reconstructed with fascia or costal cartilage) according to whether the orbital floor was reconstructed after total maxillectomy with residual orbital periosteum. The main outcomes were the deviation of the globe evaluated using computed tomography images and subjective signs of diplopia obtained from medical records.

RESULTS

Enophthalmos occurred in all five cases in the non-reconstruction group, and diplopia appeared in four cases. In five out of six cases in the reconstruction group, deviation of the globe was not observed. Exophthalmos occurred in one case reconstructed with costal cartilage. Diplopia was not observed in the reconstruction group. In the statistical assessment, a significant difference was observed in the globe deviation between the two groups (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases where the orbital periosteum remains, it is necessary to actively reconstruct the infraorbital wall. Moreover, we believe that the reconstruction with fascia is convenient and useful because it is less invasive, the surgical procedure is simple, and the fascia can be collected from the same surgical field when the flap is elevated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 (retrospective cohort study).

Imaging After Sinonasal Surgery

Posttreatment imaging evaluation of sinuses encompasses a wide gamut of procedures, ranging from endoscopic procedures for sinonasal inflammatory diseases to markedly radical surgeries for malignant neoplasms (with or without reconstructions), as well as providing access for surgeries involving the anterior and central skull base. Advances in both techniques and devices have expanded the use of endoscopic approaches in managing both benign and malignant lesions, in addition to being the primary surgical method for treating all medically refractive sinonasal inflammatory disorders. Familiarity with the complex anatomy in the sinonasal region and knowledge of the various procedures is indispensable in interpreting these imaging studies.

Reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects using latissimus dorsi-scapular free flaps in a comprehensive cancer center

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for sinonasal malignancies is a large surgical resection followed by radiotherapy. Midfacial defects resulting from maxillectomy require a complex reconstruction procedure. Given their adaptability, chimeric flaps such as latissimus dorsi-scapular (LDS) free flaps appear to be a good option.

MATERIAL & METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients with sinonasal cancers where a LDS free flap was used for reconstruction. We assessed the postoperative complications and the functional, aesthetic and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included. Primary tumors were staged as T4a in 68% of cases; 38.3% of the patients received induction chemotherapy and 82.7% received adjuvant radiotherapy. Based on our classification of midfacial and palatal defects, the majority of the patients (69%) had a type IIa with interruption of the three facial pillars. The orbital floor was removed in 55.9% of cases. The median follow-up was 45 months. Total flap necrosis with no possible revascularization occurred in 5.9% of cases. For the orbital reconstruction, a revision procedure was needed for necrosis and/or infection of the costal cartilage graft in eight cases (17%). More than 90% of the patients had no functional disorders regarding speaking, swallowing and chewing. Soft palate involvement was a prognostic factor of speech (p < 10^-4) and swallowing (p = .005) disorders. Dental rehabilitation was realized in 70.2% of the patients. No severe complications were observed in the donor site, except for one seroma.

CONCLUSION

A LDS free flap is a reliable technique for the reconstruction of complex midfacial defects.

Continuous Validity of Temporalis Muscle Flap in Reconstruction of Postablative Palatomaxillary Defects

INTRODUCTION

Postablative palatomaxillary defects (PAPMDs) represent a challenging reconstructive problem. Temporalis muscle flap (TMF) has been widely used for reconstruction of these defects with minimal morbidity and satisfactory outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To presents the authors' experience in the reconstruction of PAPMDs with TMF and to evaluate the validity of TMF in the reconstruction of such defects.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted between July 2011 and July 2016 on selected patients for primary reconstruction of PAPMDs with TMF. Temporalis muscle flaps were assessed during surgery and postoperatively. Patients were followed up to evaluate functional and esthetic outcomes and detect complications.

RESULTS

This study included 32 patients with mean age 48.3 years. The pathology was squamous cell carcinoma in 15 patients (46.9%). Twenty-one patients (65.6%) had type II maxillectomy. Mean time of flap harvesting was 43 minutes. Zygomatic arch osteotomy was done in 3 patients while Coronoid osteotomy in 4 patients. Postoperatively, flaps were viable in 31 patients (96.9%) with good healing of recipient site. Flap epithelization completed within 28 to 59 days. Follow-up period was 13 to 55 months. Satisfactory functional and esthetic outcomes were reported in most of patients with no recurrence. Transient temporal nerve palsy occurred in 2 patients, limited mouth opening in 5 patients. One patient had Transient diplopia with enopthalmos and hypophthalmos. Flap failure occurred in another patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporalis muscle flap is still a valid reliable and versatile reconstructive tool in palatomaxillary reconstruction after ablative surgery. It has a good cosmetic and functional outcomes and minimal morbidity.

Reconstruction of an inferior orbital rim and cheek defect with a pedicled osteomyocutaneous submental flap

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to present the feasibility of reconstructing an inferior orbital rim and cheek defect with a pedicled osteomyocutaneous submental flap.

METHOD

A 77-year-old women with a right nasosinusal adenoid cystic carcinoma invading soft tissues and skin of the cheek, the inferior rim of the orbit, the hard palate, and the middle turbinate is presented. A right radical maxillectomy with preservation of the eye was performed. A pedicled osteomyocutaneous submental island flap was used to reconstruct the defect. An inferior marginal mandibular section was incorporated with the flap and used to reconstruct the inferior orbital rim.

RESULTS

Satisfactory cosmetic and functional results were reached by reconstructing the inferior rim of the orbit and the cheek skin using this flap.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case report of an osteomyocutaneous submental flap for reconstruction of an inferior orbital rim defect.

Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies

Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxillary defects is either by using an obturator prosthesis or by a surgical reconstruction. Literature is abundant with a variety of reconstructive methods. The classification systems are also varied, with no universal acceptance of any one of them. The oncologic safety of these procedures is still debated, and conclusive evidence in this regard has not emerged yet. Management of the orbit is also not yet addressed properly. Tissue engineering, that has been hyped to be one of the possible solutions for this vexing reconstructive problem, has not come out with reliable and reproducible results so far. This review article discusses the rationale and oncological safety of the reconstructing the maxillary defects, critically analyzes the classification systems, offers the different reconstructive methods and touches upon the controversies in this subject. The management of the retained and exenterated orbit associated with maxillectomy is reviewed. The surgical morbidity, complications and the recent advances in this field are also looked into. An algorithm, based on our experience, is presented.