Applications of Medial Sural Perforator Free Flap for Head and Neck Reconstructions

The chimeric medial sural artery perforator free flap for individualized and three-dimensional reconstruction in hemiglossectomy defects

The objective of this study was to describe the four types of Chimeric Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap (CMSAPFF) in restoring the hemiglossectomy defect. This is a prospective study of patients who underwent hemiglossectomy reconstruction using CMSAPFF between February 2022 and July 2023. Special consideration was given to the distribution of the medial sural artery (MSA) perforators, the design of the chimeric flap, the survival rate, complications and functional outcomes. Flap survival was 94.6%. The CMSAPFF was harvested as the skin paddle and the muscle paddle, with four designs in all flaps. Eighteen CMSAPFFs were reported in this study: Type I (n = 3), Type II (n = 7), Type III (n = 6), and Type IV (n = 2). The number of MSAPs ranged from 1 to 4 (median: 2.0). The MSAP was mostly located between 6 and 13 cm distal to popliteal crease (median: 9.7cm). The skin was used to 3-dimensional reconstruction of the hemiglossectomy defect, whereas the muscle paddle was used either to reconstruct the floor of the mouth (n = 13) or to support the skin paddle (n = 5). The CMSAPFF offers flexibility during flap inset and provides bulk to three-dimensional defect. Furthermore, it provides a good watertight sealing in the floor of the mouth.

Review and algorithmic management of the anatomical variations of the medial sural artery perforator flap

Background

Perforator variations in the calf region can be found during medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap harvest. This article reviews the perforator anatomy of the posterior calf and proposes an algorithmic approach to MSAP flap harvest when there are no favorable perforators, based on the author's experience and literature review.

Material and methods

The PubMed database was searched for anatomic and/or clinical studies describing the perforator anatomy of the posterior calf. Clinical studies reporting the use of alternative flaps for cases in which perforator anatomy was unfavorable were also analyzed. We summarized the study's characteristics and identified the main anatomical challenges faced during flap harvest. We present our algorithm to address these situations, illustrated with three cases in which perforator variations were found intraoperatively and/or difficulties were encountered during MSAP flap harvest.

Results

The anatomical studies from the literature review showed a mean of 3.2 ± 0.8 (1-7) perforators in the posterior calf. The presence of MSAPs and lateral sural artery perforators (LSAPs) have been reported to be 97.2 % and 62.5 % respectively. The mean number of MSAPs was 1.8 ± 0.32 while LSAPs were 1.3 ± 0.3, favoring a medial dominance. Perforators from MSA and LSA were found at a similar distance below the popliteal crease and from the mid-calf. Our clinical experience showed that MSAPs found anterior to the incision can still be used and even as a chimeric flap. Posterior tibial artery perforator flaps can also be harvested from the same anterior incision. Direct septal perforators from the MSA represent a newly identified anatomical variation. An algorithmic approach is presented for managing MSAP intra-operative perforator variations.

Conclusion

The proposed approach of MSAP flap harvest can provide a useful guide for the microsurgeon to raise alternative flaps in the posterior calf region. We advocate an anterior approach that also gives access to perforators of the sural artery itself and posterior tibial artery perforators. These back-up flaps provide similar tissue characteristics and potential for head and neck and extremity composite tissue reconstruction.

Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction at a Modern High-Volume Microsurgery Center

BACKGROUND

 Over the past two decades, with the introduction of the perforator flap concept and advances in flap dissections, lower extremities have emerged as the preferred soft tissue flap donor sites. As a modern and high-volume microsurgical center, and the senior author being one of the pioneers and advocates for the use of lower extremity flap donor sites, we aim to investigate the role of latissimus dorsi (LD) free flap in head and neck reconstruction within our current practice.

METHODS

 All free LD flaps used for head and neck reconstruction performed by a single surgeon between January 2010 and June 2023 were reviewed for their indications and immediate and short-term outcomes.

RESULTS

 A total of 1,586 head and neck free flap reconstructions were performed, and 33 free LD flaps were identified. The patients' median age was 53 (interquartile range [IQR] 48.5-63.5) years. Twenty-nine (87.9%) flaps were used to reconstruct oro-maxillo-facial and four (12.1%) flaps were used to reconstruct scalp defects. Most patients had prior radiation (n = 28, 84.8%), neck dissection (n = 24, 72.7%), and multiple previous head and neck flap reconstructions with a median of 3.0 (IQR 3.0-3.5) previous flaps. Six (18.2%) LD flaps were used to replace failed flaps from other donor sites. No major complications such as total flap failure or takebacks, and no need for vein grafts but three (9.1%) had flap marginal necrosis. Other complications included one flap dehiscence (3.0%), one orocutaneous fistula (3.0%), two wound infections (6.1%), three plate exposures (9.1%), and three patients who developed local recurrence (9.1%). The median patient follow-up time was 16 (IQR 5-27) months.

CONCLUSION

 This retrospective study demonstrates the role of LD free flap in head and neck reconstruction as a reliable and versatile backup soft tissue flap when workhorse flaps from lower extremity donor sites are either unavailable or unsuitable.

Medial sural artery perforator free flap for small- to medium-sized defects in head and neck reconstruction: a suitable replacement for radial forearm free flap

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes and donor site morbidity between medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap and radial forearm free (RFF) flap for soft tissue reconstruction of head and neck.

METHODS

Forty-six patients who underwent free flap reconstruction at the head and neck cancer center from February 2019 to March 2021 were included, of which 25 RFF flaps and 21 MSAP flaps. The patient and flap characteristics (age, sex, flap size, harvest time, etc.) and outcomes (success rate, donor site complications including infection, hematoma, and fistula, donor site morbidity including abnormal sensation, weakness, range of motion, postoperative oral function) were recorded and compared. Patients were followed up for at least 12 months after surgery. The patients were assessed subjective donor-site morbidity and satisfaction with overall functional results using a self-reported questionnaire.

RESULTS

The success rates of RFF flaps and MSAP flaps were 96% and 95.2%. There were no significant differences in age, sex, flap size, pedicle length, postoperative treatment, and postoperative oral function. MSAP flap showed less donor site morbidity and better subjective satisfaction at the donor site than RFF flap did after a 12-month follow-up. A dominant perforator of the medial sural artery emerges constantly near the point which is approximately 15 cm from the popliteal fossa center vertically, and 3 cm from the postor midline of the leg horizontally.

CONCLUSION

Due to less donor site morbidity and higher patient satisfaction, MSAP flap can be used as a replacement for RFF flap for small to medium-sized defects in head and neck reconstruction.

Medial sural artery perforator free flap versus radial forearm free flap in oral cavity reconstruction and donor site morbidity

OBJECTIVE

Radial Forearm Free flap (RFFF) is widely used in head and neck reconstruction, yet its donor site defect remains a significant drawback. The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap (MSAPFF) is considered an alternative flap to RFFF. This study aims to comprehensively analyze their characteristics, outcomes, and their impact on patient quality of life.

METHODS

All patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction using RFFF and MSAPFF between February 2017 and April 2023 were included in this study. Flap characteristics, outcomes and post-operative complications were recorded and compared. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results, and quality of life were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 76 patients: 37 underwent reconstruction with RFFF, and 39 with MSAPFF. There was no significance difference between the RFFF and MSAPFF regarding the success rate (97.2% vs 97.4%), flap size (4.8 × 8.8 cm2 vs 5 × 9.8 cm2), hospital of stay (15.5 days vs 13.5 days) and recipient site complications (P > 0.05). However, MSAPFF showed larger flap thickness (P = 0.001), smaller arterial caliber (P = 0.008), shorter pedicle length (P = 0.001), and longer harvesting time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the pre-and postoperative ranges of wrist and ankle movements or in recipient site complications. MSAPFF showed a significant difference in donor site morbidity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MSAPFF is an excellent alternative to the RFFF for repairing oral cavity defects, with additional advantage of a well-hidden scar on the posterior calf, a larger flap thickness, accepted pedicle length and arterial caliber. However, one should consider the harvesting time and surgical skills required in comparison to the RFFF.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The study highlights the importance of the MSAPFF as an alternative option for RFFF with less donor site morbidity and high success rate in oral cavity reconstruction and improved patient Quality of life after ablative surgery.

A 10-year experience in microsurgical reconstruction of the nose with a lower extremity flap

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, radial forearm free flaps are utilized for nasal lining reconstruction when local flaps cannot provide adequate coverage. However, according to our clinical observation, the skin of the forearm flap is relatively thin and prone to collapse. We present a series of nasal reconstructions using free flaps harvested from the lower extremities to determine if the thick flap could provide more support and decrease the tendency of airway collapse.

METHODS

From March 2011 to July 2021, we identified 15 patients who underwent total or subtotal nasal reconstruction with free flap from the lower extremities (10 anterolateral thigh flap, 4 medial sural artery perforator flap, and 1 profunda artery perforator flap). We included 15 patients who underwent free forearm flap reconstruction as controls. The Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) score was utilized to subjectively evaluate the degree of nasal obstruction symptoms.

RESULTS

The lower extremity group had a lower NOSE score than the forearm group (25.4 vs. 40). It took more time (6.5 vs. 4.2 months) and more surgeries (4.6 vs. 2.6) from the first free flap reconstruction till forehead flap reconstruction in the lower extremity group than in the forearm group, although the total number of surgeries was comparable between the 2 groups (7.2 vs. 8.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing free flaps from the lower extremities in total or subtotal reconstruction of the nasal lining may decrease the tendency of flap collapse and alleviate airway obstruction symptoms and may also allow reconstruction of surrounding defects simultaneously compared with using forearm flaps.

The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap versus Other Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap is a versatile fasciocutaneous flap, and yet is less commonly utilized than other free flaps in microvascular reconstructions of the head and neck. The aim is to conduct a high-quality Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)- and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2)-compliant systematic review comparing the use of the MSAP flap to other microvascular free flaps in the head and neck. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all original comparative studies comparing patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with an MSAP flap to the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) or anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap from inception to February 2021. Outcome studied were the recipient-site and donor-site morbidities as well as speech and swallow function. A total of 473 articles were identified from title and abstract review. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the RFFF and the ALT flaps, the MSAP flap had more recipient-site complications (6.0 vs 10.4%) but less donor-site complications (20.2 vs 7.8%). The MSAP flap demonstrated better overall donor-site appearance and function than the RFFF and ALT flaps ( p  = 0.0006) but no statistical difference in speech and swallowing function following reconstruction ( p  = 0.28). Although higher quality studies reviewing the use of the MSAP flap to other free flaps are needed, the MSAP flap provides a viable and effective reconstructive option and should be strongly considered for reconstruction of head and neck defects.

Comparison of outcomes between single- and multiple-perforator-based free perforator flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perforator-based free perforator flaps have become an important tool for the reconstruction of tissue defects. The effect of the number of perforators on the outcomes of perforator flaps has been widely debated. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of single- and multiple-perforator-based free perforator flaps in free-flap reconstruction.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov between January 2000 and June 2021 to identify studies that reported data on the outcomes of free perforator flaps. Two authors individually extracted data and performed quality assessment. Outcomes, including partial flap loss, total loss, fat necrosis, arterial insufficiency, venous insufficiency, hemorrhage and hematoma, wound dehiscence at recipient sites and donor site complications, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies with 2498 flaps were included in our analysis. No significant difference was found in the rates of partial loss and arterial insufficiency of flaps, hemorrhage and hematoma, wound dehiscence at recipient sites and donor site complications. However, the multiple-perforator group showed significantly lower rates of total loss (relative risk [RR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.79, p = .754), fat necrosis (RR = 1.79, 95% [CI]: 1.36-2.36, p = .000) and venous insufficiency (RR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07-2.79, p = .026) than the single-perforator group.

CONCLUSION

The rates of total loss, fat necrosis and venous insufficiency in the multiple-perforator group were lower than those in the single-perforator group. Hence, we recommend that multiple perforators be included in the free perforator flap when appropriate, to yield better clinical outcomes in reconstruction.

The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap: A Novel, yet Challenging and Versatile Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Background In head and neck reconstruction, especially after cancer ablation, choosing the best flap is critical. Due to its thin, lengthy, and malleable vascular pedicle as well as low donor site morbidity, the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) free flap is gaining popularity among reconstructive surgeons, particularly in oral soft-tissue reconstructions. The goal of this study was to record the clinical use of an MSAP flap in the repair of post-oncologic lesions in the head and neck region. Methodology Patients with oral cancer who came to our center after ablative surgery on the buccal mucosa, tongue, floor of the mouth, and hard palate were repaired utilizing the MSAP flap. Preoperatively, the perforators were discovered using an 8 MHz portable doppler and a computed tomography angiogram. Without the use of a tourniquet, the flaps were delineated and harvested. In all of our patients, a single venous anastomosis was sufficient. Results The MSAP flap was used to positively rebuild 14 cancer patients, with the flap design based on the amount of the resection site or defect. The buccal mucosa (n = 7) and tongue (n = 6) were the most common subsites of the ablative defect. The average flap size was 12 × 6 cm, with a thickness of 5-7 mm. In eight cases, the donor site defect was mostly closed, with the remaining patients receiving split-thickness grafts for subsequent healing. In 12 cases, the best cosmetic and functional results were obtained. One patient developed a postoperative wound infection, and the flap could not be saved. Another patient developed a neck hematoma which had to be debrided on the second postoperative day, with good results. In primary closure cases, patients were mobilized with full weight-bearing on the first postoperative day. Conclusions MSAP flap is an alternative to radial forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh flap in obese patients with medium-sized oral abnormalities. This flap stands out as an outstanding option for head and neck soft-tissue reconstruction due to its unique mix of flap thinness, greater skin region, and superior donor site cosmesis. Despite its importance, just a few case studies and reports have been published. A multicenter trial with a high sample size would demonstrate the use of this flap and its chimeric designs.

Oropharyngeal reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has experienced an evolution in recent years. This technique has proved to be a safe and effective method for extirpation of select oropharyngeal tumors. Advances in technology as well as improved surgeon experience allow for the resection of larger, more complex cancers. Although healing by secondary intention remains the current standard for limited oropharyngeal defects, larger resections demand reconstruction with vascularized tissue to minimize morbidity and optimize functional outcomes. The objective of this review is to evaluate recent literature regarding oropharyngeal reconstruction after TORS.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of reconstructive options to manage oropharyngeal defects exist. Several reconstructive algorithms have been suggested; however, careful consideration must be used to select the most ideal flap type. Locoregional flaps have shown excellent functional outcomes with limited morbidity. An increase in free flap reconstruction has been demonstrated, particularly among patients with larger TORS defects and following chemoradiation therapy. Despite limited data, robotic-assisted flap inset and microvascular anastomosis has recently shown promise.

SUMMARY

Reconstruction and flap selection following TORS should be tailored to the patient and unique oropharyngeal defect. Functional outcomes are promising with low complication rates among these patients.

Current status and evolution of microsurgical tongue reconstructions, part I

Reconstructive surgery in the management of head and neck cancer has evolved to include structure-specific approaches in which organ-specific treatment algorithms help optimize outcomes. Tongue cancer management and reconstruction are surgical challenges for which well-executed reconstructive plans should be completed promptly to avoid delaying any subsequently planned oncologic treatment. Crucial considerations in tongue cancer resection are the significant functional morbidity associated with surgical defects, particularly in terms of speech and swallowing, and the consequent negative impact on patients' quality of life. With the evolution of microsurgical techniques and the development of the perforator flap concept, flap options can be tailored to the characteristics of various tongue defects. This has allowed the implementation of pliable flaps that can help restore tongue mobility and yield subsequent functional outcomes. Using an evolutional framework, we present this series of reviews related to tongue reconstruction. The first part of the review summarizes flap options and flap-related factors, such as volume and tissue characteristics. Related functional aspects are also presented, including tongue mobility, speech, and swallowing, as well as ways to evaluate and optimize these outcomes.

The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: A Historical Trek from Ignominious to “Workhorse”

Rather than just another “review,” this is intended to be an “overview” of the entire subject of the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap as has been presented in the reconstructive literature from its inception in 2001 until the present, with any exceptions not purposefully overlooked. Unfortunately, the pertinent anatomy of the MSAP flap is always anomalous like most other perforator flaps, and perhaps even more variable. No schematic exists to facilitate the identification of a dominant musculocutaneous perforator about which to design the flap, so some adjunctive technology may be highly valuable for this task. However, if a relatively thin free flap is desirable for a small or moderate sized defect that requires a long pedicle with larger caliber vessels, the MSAP flap deserves consideration. Indeed, for many, this has replaced the radial forearm flap such as for partial tongue reconstruction. Most consider the donor site deformity, even if only a conspicuous scar on the calf, to be a contraindication. Yet certainly if used as a local flap for the knee, popliteal fossa, or proximal leg, or as a free flap for the ipsilateral lower extremity where a significant recipient site deformity already exists, can anyone really object that this is not a legitimate indication? As with any perforator flap, advantages and disadvantages exist, which must be carefully perused before a decision to use the MSAP flap is made. Perhaps not a “workhorse” flap for general use throughout the body, the MSAP flap in general may often be a valuable alternative.

The Effect of Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap on Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects: A Meta-Analysis With Multiple Free Soft Flaps

BACKGROUND

With the gradual popularity of relatively novel medial sural artery perforator flap (MSAPF), robust studies are needed to compare the surgical outcomes of MSAPF versus multiple free soft flaps (MFSFs) to verify the advantages and disadvantages of MSAPF.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) until September, 2020, to identify studies that compared surgical outcomes of MSAPF and MFSFs. Two authors followed the PRISMA guidelines, individually extracted the data and performed the quality assessments. Survival rate of flaps, satisfaction degree of patients in recipient and donor site, skin grafting, and morbidity of recipient and donor site were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 441 cases from 7 studies were included in our analysis. No significant differences were found regarding survival rate of flaps, recipient morbidity, and recipient satisfaction degree between the 2 groups. However, MSAPF group was significantly superior to MFSFs group in terms of skin grafting, morbidity, and satisfaction degree of donor site.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that the MSPAF and MFSFs groups were similar in terms of survival rate of flaps, recipient morbidity, and recipient satisfaction degree. Medial sural artery perforator flap group was superior to MFSFs group in terms of morbidity and satisfaction degree of donor site. The results may prove that MSAPF is gaining popularity for a reason and is a good choice for repairing soft tissue defects.

The chimeric medial sural artery perforator flap as the ideal for partial tongue reconstruction: A case series and technical refinements

BACKGROUND

The medial sural artery perforator free flap (MSAP) has gained increasing popularity in head and neck reconstruction. Its slightly bulkier nature than the radial forearm flap, combined with negligible donor site morbidity, makes it an ideal candidate for the reconstruction of partial glossectomy defects. The ability to harvest the MSAP as a chimeric flap with a portion of the medial gastrocnemius muscle gives it greater flexibility in soft tissue reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with partial glossectomy defects reconstructed using the MSAP by a single surgeon was performed. Perioperative data, donor and recipient site characteristics, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. A video is included to show technical points for the harvest of the flap.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were included. The average age was 59.1 years, with a mean of 43.5% of the tongue resected. All flaps survived, with no major complications. At follow-up, the patients had regained an average of 86.5% of original speech, with none requiring NG feeding. The average MSAP skin flap thickness was 7.8 mm, with 6 flaps being harvested as chimeric fasciocutaneous muscle flaps. Five flaps incorporated 2 perforators. Two case examples are presented.

CONCLUSION

The chimeric MSAP perforator allows for more robust partial glossectomy reconstruction with improved postoperative functional outcomes. It should be considered as the workhorse flap for partial tongue reconstruction.

Extensive Facial Reconstruction Using Thickness-controlled Perforator Free Flaps

Background:

Although small and medium facial defects can be reconstructed with local flaps to ensure skin color and texture matching, extensive facial defects require the application of free flaps, including perforator free flaps. We hereby propose a personalized strategy for facial reconstruction to overcome these limitations, based on the use of free flaps accompanied by local flaps and thickness-controlled perforator flap concept, for extensive facial defects.

Methods:

A series of consecutive facial reconstructions were performed from 2006 to 2016 in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of our institution. Only extensive facial defects greater than 40 cm² were included in this study.

Results:

A total of 323 patients underwent reconstruction using free flaps with or without local flaps, from November 2005 to March 2019. Of these, 79 extensive facial surface reconstruction cases were analyzed retrospectively. The size of the defects, their areas (upper, middle, or lower third of the face), and the method of reconstruction were analyzed. This led to the development of a personalized reconstruction procedure for extensive facial defects. These extensive facial reconstruction cases included 24 defects of the upper third of the face, 43 cases of the middle third, and 12 of the lower third. Four cases addressed the middle and lower thirds simultaneously.

Conclusions:

The facial surface reconstruction strategy I suggest in this study is based on the flap selection, thickness-controlled perforator flap elevation, and combination of local and free flaps. We expect this procedure will improve the treatment and resolution of extensive facial defects.

A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator versus Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 For tongue reconstruction, the radial forearm flap (RFF) is commonly used. In the last decade, the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been successfully used with reportedly superior donor-site outcomes. Our study is the first to compare the RFF and MSAP for reconstruction of partial glossectomy defects (<50% of tongue).

METHODS

 We conducted a retrospective review of 20 patients with partial glossectomy defects reconstructed at a tertiary referral center. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Objective measures of speech, swallowing, and subjective patient satisfaction with their donor site were recorded.

RESULTS

 Ten RFF and MSAP were each used, with a mean partial glossectomy defect size of 40.5 and 43.5%, respectively. The MSAP was significantly thicker (7.8 vs. 4.3 mm, p < 0.05) with a longer harvest time (122.5 vs. 75.0 minutes, p < 0.05). There were no cases of free flap failure. Donor-site healing times were comparable, but the MSAP group experienced significantly less donor-site complications (n = 1 vs. n = 7, p < 0.05). Functional outcomes were comparable with 13 patients achieving normal speech and diet after 3 months (MSAP = 6 vs. RFF = 7, p = 1.00). All patients were satisfied with their donor-site outcome with the MSAP group having a marginally higher score.

CONCLUSION

 Both flaps are good options for partial glossectomy reconstruction. Though more challenging to harvest, the MSAP gives comparable functional results and has become our first reconstructive option given its superior donor-site outcomes.

Extended Use of Chimeric Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap for 3-Dimensional Defect Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has become increasingly popular because it is thin and pliable for small to moderate defect soft tissue reconstruction. Furthermore, chimeric MSAP flap, which includes a skin paddle and a separated piece of medial gastrocnemius muscle, allowed more freedom for flap insetting, especially in 3-dimensional defect reconstruction. Here we describe our experience regarding this clinical application.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2016, 14 male patients (average age, 46.9 ± 14.4 years) who received either a free or pedicled chimeric MSAP flap were included. Of these 14 patients, 7 received this flap for reconstruction in the head and neck, 2 in the upper extremities, and 5 in the lower extremities. Demographic data were collected and analyzed, and a literature review was performed.

RESULTS

Ten patients received free chimeric MSAP flap, and 4 received the pedicled type. Thirteen of the 14 flaps (92.6%) survived, and 1 failed 2 days later owing to venous insufficiency. Venous congestion-related partial loss occurred in another case.

CONCLUSIONS

The chimeric MSAP flap is a good alternative for deep space obliteration or reconstruction of adjacent but separate defects in both free and pedicled flap design. Donor site morbidity is limited. However, the perforator needs to be mobilized carefully to prevent postoperative venous compromise.

Popliteal fossa reconstruction with a medial sural artery perforator free flap using the medial sural vessel as the recipient

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the popliteal fossa using a free flap is challenging. Therefore, to facilitate easier free flap reconstruction of the popliteal fossa, we use a medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) free flap with a medial sural vessel as the recipient vessel, as it provides several advantages based on many reports.

METHODS

This report describes the authors' experience and outcomes with this technique. Between October 2010 and January 2015, 10 patients with medium-sized defects in their popliteal fossa underwent MSAP free flap reconstruction using the medial sural vessel as the recipient vessel. The flap size and thickness were evaluated, as well as the pedicle length, for each case.

RESULTS

The skin flap sizes ranged from 60-112 cm². The average flap thickness was 6 mm (range = 4-8 mm), and the average pedicle length was 7.5 cm (range = 6-9 cm). Full flap survival was observed in nine cases, and flap tip necrosis was observed in one case during a mean follow-up of 15 months (range = 3-36 months). MSAP free flap reconstruction was performed for moderate-sized defects in the popliteal fossa, using the medial sural vessel as the recipient vessel.

CONCLUSION

The obvious advantages of this technique included simple vascular anastomosis (minimal size discrepancy), no intraoperative position changes, and good aesthetic outcomes (replacing like with like).

The free medial sural artery perforator flap: Versatile option for soft tissue reconstruction in small-to-moderate size defects of the foot and ankle

BACKGROUND

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap shows advantages for reconstruction in the foot and ankle, where bulk is a liability. We evaluated the versatility of this flap and provide further evidence on its use for covering small-to-moderate size defects by comparing the outcome depending on the region of reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with variable defects of 4 × 4 to 18 × 7 cm underwent MSAP flap reconstruction. Final outcomes of all patients were evaluated 12-months postoperatively using the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot, midfoot and hallux scale for clinical-functional evaluation, and the SF-36 health survey for quality-of-life measurement. The scores were compared in three groups according to the anatomic region of MSAP flap reconstruction.

RESULTS

The flap size ranged between 6 × 4 and 21 × 9 cm. One venous congestion was salvaged by venous thrombectomy and reanastomosis, and one marginal flap necrosis healed by secondary intention. All flaps survived, and all patients returned to ambulation. Patients with reconstruction of the ankle-hindfoot or hallux showed significantly lower AOFAS ankle-hindfoot (P = 0.021) or hallux scores (P = 0.034), whereas reconstruction of the midfoot led to equal AOFAS midfoot scores (P = 0.265) as compared with patients without reconstruction in the respective region. Comparison of SF-36 physical (P = 0.936) and mental (P = 0.855) scores of all three regions remained insignificant.

CONCLUSION

The MSAP flap provides thin soft tissue coverage, enabling good functional recovery after defect reconstruction all around the foot and ankle, with evident advantages in the midfoot. However, the functional outcomes after reconstruction of the ankle-hindfoot or hallux region depend on the preexistent functional impairment.

Medial sural artery perforator flap: a challenging free flap

Background

Oral and extremity defect reconstruction can often require a flap that is thin, and traditionally, the radial forearm free flap has been used, however, this has significant donor site morbidity. Over the last decade, the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has emerged as a possible alternative with lower donor site morbidity. We present our experiences and review the literature regarding this promising but challenging flap.

Methods

The study was a retrospective case series in a university hospital setting. All patients who had a MSAP flap performed at our institution were included until March 2015, and their data was retrieved from electronic patient records.

Results

In total, ten patients were reconstructed with a MSAP flap for floor of mouth (eight) and lower extremity (two) defect reconstruction. The median flap dimensions were as follows: 10 cm (range 7–14 cm), width 5 cm (range 3.5–8 cm), thickness 5 mm (range 4–8 mm), and pedicle length 10 cm (range 8–12 cm). In one case, the procedure was abandoned because of very small perforators and another flap was used. In two cases, late onset of venous congestion occurred which could not be salvaged. There were no donor site complaints.

Conclusions

The MSAP flap is an ideal flap when a thin free flap is needed with lower donor site morbidity than alternative solutions. There seems to be a higher rate of late onset of venous thrombosis compared with more established flaps. Therefore, this flap should be monitored more closely for venous problems and we recommend performing two venous anastomoses when using this flap.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.