Bindal S, El Ahmadieh TY, Plitt A, Aoun SG, Neeley OJ, El Tecle NE, Barnett S, Gluf W. Hypoglossal schwannomas: A systematic review of the literature.
J Clin Neurosci 2018;
62:162-173. [PMID:
30472335 DOI:
10.1016/j.jocn.2018.11.037]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Schwannomas of the hypoglossal nerve are rare and account for a very small percentage of non-vestibular schwannomas.
OBJECTIVES
In this systematic review of the literature, we examined the epidemiology, symptomatology, management, and outcomes of patients with hypoglossal schwannomas.
METHODS
The electronic database Pubmed was searched for all reports of hypoglossal schwannomas with descriptions of symptoms, management, and outcome characteristics. Data was extracted from each study and compiled in a spreadsheet. Continuous variables were reported as means and medians. Categorical variables were reported as proportions. Additional analysis was not done due to inconsistent reporting of outcomes and small sample sizes.
RESULTS
A total of 59 studies (94 total individual cases) were included. 64% of patients were female with mean age of 44.6 years. The majority were intracranial/extracranial (50%). The most common symptoms were tongue deviation or speech disturbance (38%) and headaches (33%). Hypoglossal nerve dysfunction was present in 80% of patients. Surgical excision was performed in 93%, with a 15% complication rate. Evidence of residual mass after surgery was noted in 29%. Permanent hypoglossal nerve deficits occurred in 67%. Recurrence of tumor burden was reported in 6 studies, with median time to recurrence of 16.5 months.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence suggests overall favorable outcomes with surgical resection of hypoglossal schwannomas, with a large percentage of patients experiencing mild and usually well-tolerated neurologic deficit. Limitations of this study include the use of retrospective data taken from case reports/series with highly selected patients, selective reporting, and absence of control groups.
Collapse