1
|
Filipas DK, Beatrici E, Nolazco JI, Qian Z, Marks P, Labban M, Stone BV, Pierorazio PM, Lipsitz SR, Trinh QD, Chang SL, Cole AP. The national utilization of nonoperative management for small renal masses over 10 years. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad084. [PMID: 37802923 PMCID: PMC10640883 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of small renal masses often involves a nonoperative approach, but there is a paucity of information about the use and associated predictors of such approaches. This study aimed to determine the trends in and predictors of use of nonoperative management of small renal masses. METHODS Using data from the National Cancer Database for localized small renal masses (N0/M0, cT1a) diagnosed between 2010 and 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional study. Nonoperative management was defined as expectant management (active surveillance or watchful waiting) or focal ablation. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Of the 156 734 patients included, 10.5% underwent expectant management, and 13.9% underwent focal ablation. Later year of diagnosis was associated with a higher likelihood of nonoperative management. In 2020, the odds of receiving expectant management and focal ablation were 90% (AOR = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71 to 2.11) and 44% (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.57) higher, respectively, than in 2010. Black patients had increased odds of expectant management (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.39 to 1.55) but decreased odds of focal ablation (AOR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.99). CONCLUSION Over the decade, the use nonoperative management of small renal masses increased, with expectant management more frequently used than focal ablation among Black patients. Possible explanations include race-based differences in physicians' risk assessments and resource allocation. Adjusting for Black race in calculations for glomerular filtration rate could influence the differential uptake of these techniques through deflated glomerular filtration rate calculations. These findings highlight the need for research and policies to ensure equitable use of less invasive treatments in small renal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejan K Filipas
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Edoardo Beatrici
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jose I Nolazco
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zhiyu Qian
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phillip Marks
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin V Stone
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Department of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salagierski M, Wojciechowska A, Zając K, Klatte T, Thompson RH, Cadeddu JA, Kaouk J, Autorino R, Ahrar K, Capitanio U. The Role of Ablation and Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Small Renal Masses. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1:395-402. [PMID: 31158078 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Nephron-sparing approaches are increasingly recommended for incidental small renal masses. Herein, we review the current literature regarding the safety and efficacy of focal therapy, including percutaneous ablation, for small renal masses. OBJECTIVE To summarize the application of ablative therapy in the management of small renal masses. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for findings published since 2000 on focal therapy for small renal masses. After literature review, 64 articles were selected and discussed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy are the most widely used procedures with intermediate-term oncological outcome comparable with surgical series. Cost effectiveness seems excellent and side effects appear acceptable. To date, no randomized trial comparing percutaneous focal therapy with standard surgical approach or active surveillance has been performed. CONCLUSIONS Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy. Percutaneous ablation has fewer complications and a better postoperative profile when compared with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Salagierski
- Urology Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.
| | - Adrianna Wojciechowska
- Urology Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Kinga Zając
- Urology Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth, UK
| | | | | | - Jihad Kaouk
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Kamran Ahrar
- Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klapperich ME, Abel EJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Best S, Lubner MG, Nakada SY, Hinshaw JL, Brace CL, Lee FT, Wells SA. Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Radiology 2017; 284:272-280. [PMID: 28076721 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effects of tumor complexity and technique on early and midterm oncologic efficacy and rate of complications for 100 consecutive biopsy-proved stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) treated with percutaneous microwave ablation. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, single-center retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Ninety-six consecutive patients (68 men, 28 women; mean age, 66 years ± 9.4) with 100 stage T1a N0M0 biopsy-proved RCCs (median diameter, 2.6 cm ± 0.8) underwent percutaneous microwave ablation between March 2011 and June 2015. Patient and procedural data were collected, including body mass index, comorbidities, tumor histologic characteristics and grade, RENAL nephrometry score, number of antennas, generator power, and duration of ablation. Technical success, local tumor progression, and presence of complications were assessed at immediate and follow-up imaging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Results Technical success was achieved for all 100 tumors (100%), including 47 moderately and five highly complex RCCs. Median clinical and imaging follow-up was 17 months (range, 0-48 months) and 15 months (range, 0-44 months), respectively. No change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted after the procedure (P = .49). There were three (3%) procedure-related complications and six (6%) delayed complications, all urinomas. One case of local tumor progression (1%) was identified 25 months after the procedure. Three-year local progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 88% (95% confidence interval: 0.52%, 0.97%), 100% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%, 1.0%), and 91% (95% confidence interval: 0.51%, 0.99%), respectively. Conclusion Percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective and safe treatment option for stage T1a RCC, regardless of tumor complexity. Long-term follow-up is needed to establish durable oncologic efficacy and survival relative to competing ablation modalities and surgery. © RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marki E Klapperich
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - E Jason Abel
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Timothy J Ziemlewicz
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Sara Best
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Meghan G Lubner
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Stephen Y Nakada
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - J Louis Hinshaw
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Christopher L Brace
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Fred T Lee
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| | - Shane A Wells
- From the School of Medicine and Public Health (M.E.K.) and Departments of Urology (E.J.A., S.B., S.Y.N., J.L.H., C.L.B., F.T.L., S.A.W.), Radiology (T.J.Z., M.G.L., J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.B., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vetterlein MW, Jindal T, Becker A, Regier M, Kluth LA, Tilki D, Chun FKH. Small renal masses in the elderly: Contemporary treatment approaches and comparative oncological outcomes of nonsurgical and surgical strategies. Investig Clin Urol 2016; 57:231-9. [PMID: 27437532 PMCID: PMC4949694 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last decades, there has been a significant stage migration in renal cell carcinoma and especially older patients are getting diagnosed more frequently with low stage disease, such as small renal masses ≤4 cm of size. Considering the particular risk profile of an older population, often presenting with a nonnegligible comorbidity profile and progressive renal dysfunction, treatment approaches beyond aggressive radical surgical procedures have come to the fore. We sought to give a contemporary overview of the available different treatment strategies for incidental small renal masses in an elderly population with the focus on comparative oncological outcomes of nonsurgical and surgical modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tarun Jindal
- Department of Urology, SSB Trauma Center, Firozabad, India
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Regier
- Department for Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix K-H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.; Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|