Diskectomy during Pregnancy: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Microdiscectomy Under Local Anesthesia and Spinal Block in a Pregnant Female

The surgical plan and the anesthetic approach are vital in determining the proper treatment of lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy. The diagnostic tools available, as well as the anesthetic agents and methods of delivery, vary in pregnant patients due to factors such as radiation exposure and hemodynamics in the patient and fetus. The gestational age also plays an important role in determining treatment options. When possible, surgery should be avoided during the first trimester, especially during the period of organogenesis, as general anesthesia can interfere with this process. However, when focal neurological deficits are present, urgent surgical decompression may be necessary. In such cases, the selection of anesthesia must be guided by maternal indications and the nature of the surgery. Maternal safety and avoidance of fetal hypoxia and subsequent preterm labor are crucial when pregnant patients receive anesthesia. As a result, local anesthesia is often preferred when possible due to the decreased risk of systemic toxicity. Decompression surgery in pregnant females with lumbar disc herniation, using a multidisciplinary approach among the surgeon, obstetrician, and anesthesiologist, is an effective and safe procedure for both the mother and the fetus. We present the case of a pregnant female at four weeks of gestation who presented with lower back pain radiating down her right leg. MRI of the lumbar spine showed large L4-5 disc herniation. She underwent a successful right L4-5 microdiscectomy under local anesthesia and spinal block using bupivacaine and was completely awake throughout the procedure. Postoperatively, she experienced immediate improvement of symptoms.

Cauda equina syndrome in an obese pregnant patient secondary to double level lumbar disc herniation - A case report and review of literature

Introduction

Lumbar disc herniation during pregnancy poses a significant challenge to the spine surgeon towards achieving good clinical, maternal, and fetal outcomes. Surgical intervention is warranted in patients with significant neural deficits, and cauda equina syndrome and needs to be performed at the earliest in order to avoid irreversible neurological sequelae.

Case presentation

We report a 29-year-old primigravida in her 21st week of gestational period, who was diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome secondary to two level lumbar disc herniations. The lengthier surgical duration in performing double level disc herniations in an obese patient raises concerns in anesthetic dosing of drugs and surgical positioning which may result in fetal distress. A double level decompression and discectomy in prone position was done under general anesthesia. Despite the surgical challenges, the postoperative period was uneventful resulting in immediate pain relief and complete neurological recovery, followed by the delivery of a 2.7-kg healthy male child.

Discussion

Surgical intervention can be performed in pregnancy, to avoid irreversible neurological deficits, even in an obese individual with double level lumbar pathology. However, it is essential that the surgeon appraises the situation and involves an integrated multidisciplinary team comprising anesthetist, spine surgeon, obstetrician, and psychologist, and inculcates certain precautions in the perioperative management to achieve good surgical and fetal outcomes.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN: REPORT OF TWO CASES AND A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

ABSTRACT Objective: To review the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy. Methods: We systematically reviewed cases of surgical treatment of pregnant patients with lumbar IVD herniations in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We searched on electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, to find relevant articles by keywords. Results: A literature review of 42 cases is presented. Conclusions: The authors’ own data and the literature data demonstrate that decompression surgery in pregnancy is effective and safe for both mother and fetus; however, radical surgery (fusion) can lead to very adverse sequelae for the fetus. Level of Evidence III; Systematic reviewb of Level III studies.