1
|
Ziegler P, Hartkopf AD, Wallwiener M, Häberle L, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Müller V, Michel LL, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Huebner H, Uhrig S, Wurmthaler LA, Hack CC, Mundhenke C, Kurbacher C, Fasching PA, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Janni W, Taran FA, Lux MP, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Goossens C. The impact of physical activity on progression-free and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer based on molecular subtype. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:1284. [PMID: 39415149 PMCID: PMC11481816 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13038-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although adequate physical activity has been shown to be beneficial in early breast cancer, evidence in metastatic breast cancer is sparse and contradictory, which could be related to distinct effects of physical activity on the different molecular cancer subtypes. Therefore, we here evaluated the effect of physical activity on progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) in metastatic breast cancer, specifically looking at molecular subtypes. METHODS International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) questionnaires, filled out by patients enrolled in the prospective PRAEGNANT registry (NCT02338167; n = 1,270) were used to calculate metabolic equivalent task (MET) minutes, which were subsequently categorized into low (n = 138), moderate (n = 995) or high IPAQ categories (n = 137). Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of IPAQ categories and its interaction with molecular subtypes on PFS and OS. RESULTS Patient and tumor characteristics were equally distributed across IPAQ categories. HER2pos, HRpos and TNBC were present in 23.1%, 65.7% and 11.2% of patients, respectively. IPAQ scores did not have an impact on PFS and OS in addition to established prognostic factors, either overall or in particular molecular subtypes (PFS: p = 0.33 and OS: p = 0.08, likelihood ratio test). Exploratory analyses showed higher overall survival rates for high IPAQ categories compared to low/moderate IPAQ categories in luminal B-like breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported physical activity using the IPAQ questionnaire did not significantly affect PFS or OS in patients suffering from metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, some hypothesis-generating differences between molecular subtypes could be observed, which may be interesting to evaluate further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Ziegler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Cancer Center Kempten/ Allgäu (CCKA), Klinikum Kempten, Kempten, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Immanuel Campus Rüdersdorf, Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Rüdersdorf Bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura L Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Lena A Wurmthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinik Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Christian Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. LouiseSt. Josefs-KrankenhausVincenz Kliniken Salzkotten + Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chloë Goossens
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstraße 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fasching PA, Hu C, Hart SN, Ruebner M, Polley EC, Gnanaolivu RD, Hartkopf AD, Huebner H, Janni W, Hadji P, Tesch H, Uhrig S, Ettl J, Lux MP, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Wurmthaler LA, Goossens C, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Anetsberger D, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Untch M, Ekici AB, Kolberg HC, Hartmann A, Taran FA, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Häberle L, Couch FJ. Susceptibility gene mutations in germline and tumors of patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:57. [PMID: 39003306 PMCID: PMC11246424 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00667-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2) are required for a PARP inhibitor therapy in patients with HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of gBRCA1/2 mutations in aBC patients treated with chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the frequencies and prognosis of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in HER2- aBC patients receiving the first chemotherapy in the advanced setting. Patients receiving their first chemotherapy for HER2- aBC were retrospectively selected from the prospective PRAEGNANT registry (NCT02338167). Genotyping of 26 cancer predisposition genes was performed with germline DNA of 471 patients and somatic tumor DNA of 94 patients. Mutation frequencies, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) according to germline mutation status were assessed. gBRCA1/2 mutations were present in 23 patients (4.9%), and 33 patients (7.0%) had mutations in other cancer risk genes. Patients with a gBRCA1/2 mutation had a better OS compared to non-mutation carriers (HR: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.17-0.86). PFS comparison was not statistically significant. Mutations in other risk genes did not affect prognosis. Two somatic BRCA2 mutations were found in 94 patients without gBRCA1/2 mutations. Most frequently somatic mutated genes were TP53 (44.7%), CDH1 (10.6%) and PTEN (6.4%). In conclusion, aBC patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations had a more favorable prognosis under chemotherapy compared to non-mutation carriers. The mutation frequency of ~5% with gBRCA1/2 mutations together with improved outcome indicates that germline genotyping of all metastatic patients for whom a PARP inhibitor therapy is indicated should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Chunling Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eric C Polley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rohan D Gnanaolivu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; St. Vincenz Kliniken Salzkotten + Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Buckow, Germany
| | | | - Lena A Wurmthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Chloë Goossens
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Anetsberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden Germany and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hartkopf AD, Walter CB, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Fasching PA, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Huebner H, Uhrig S, Goossens C, Link T, Hielscher C, Mundhenke C, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Janni W, Taran FA, Michel LL, Lux MP, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Häberle L, Schneeweiss A. Attrition in the First Three Therapy Lines in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in the German Real-World PRAEGNANT Registry. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2024; 84:459-469. [PMID: 38817595 PMCID: PMC11136529 DOI: 10.1055/a-2286-5372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background With more effective therapies for patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), therapy sequences are becoming increasingly important. However, some patients might drop out of the treatment sequence due to deterioration of their life status. Since little is known about attrition in the real-world setting, this study assessed attrition in the first three therapy lines using a real-world registry. Methods Patients with information available on the first three therapy lines were selected from the German PRAEGNANT registry (NCT02338167). Attrition was determined for each therapy line using competing risk analyses, with the start of the next therapy line or death as endpoints. Additionally, a simple attrition rate was calculated based on the proportion of patients who completed therapy but did not start the next therapy line. Results Competitive risk analyses were performed on 3988 1st line, 2651 2nd line and 1866 3rd line patients. The probabilities of not starting the next therapy line within 5 years after initiation of 1st, 2nd and 3rd line therapy were 30%, 24% and 24% respectively. Patients with HER2-positive disease had the highest risk for attrition, while patients with HRpos/HER2neg disease had the lowest risk. Attrition rates remained similar across molecular subgroups in the different therapy lines. Conclusion Attrition affects a large proportion of patients with aBC, which should be considered when planning novel therapy concepts that specifically address the sequencing of therapies. Taking attrition into account could help understand treatment effects resulting from sequential therapies and might help develop treatment strategies that specifically aim at maintaining quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Dept of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina B. Walter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Cancer Center Kempten/Allgäu (CCKA), Klinikum Kempten, Kempten Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Immanuel Campus Rüdersdorf, Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Germany
- Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Chloë Goossens
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Hielscher
- Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum – Onkologisches Zentrum Stralsund, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinik Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Christian Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Dept of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Laura L. Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; St. Vincenz Kliniken Salzkotten + Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Center for integrated oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dannehl D, von Au A, Engler T, Volmer LL, Gutsfeld R, Englisch JF, Hahn M, Hawighorst-Knapstein S, Chaudhuri A, Bauer A, Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Wallwiener S, Hartkopf AD, Dijkstra TMH. Implementation and Evaluation of a Breast Cancer Disease Model Using Real-World Claims Data in Germany from 2010 to 2020. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1490. [PMID: 38672572 PMCID: PMC11049278 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in Germany and worldwide. This retrospective claims data analysis utilizing data from AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, a major statutory German health insurance provider, aimed to construct and assess a real-world data breast cancer disease model. The study included 27,869 female breast cancer patients and 55,738 age-matched controls, analyzing data from 2010 to 2020. Three distinct breast cancer stages were analyzed: Stage A (early breast cancer without lymph node involvement), Stage B (early breast cancer with lymph node involvement), and Stage C (primary distant metastatic breast cancer). Tumor subtypes were estimated based on the prescription of antihormonal or HER2-targeted therapy. The study established that 77.9% of patients had HR+ breast cancer and 9.8% HER2+; HR+/HER2- was the most common subtype (70.9%). Overall survival (OS) analysis demonstrated significantly lower survival rates for stages B and C than for controls, with 5-year OS rates ranging from 79.3% for stage B to 35.4% for stage C. OS rates were further stratified by tumor subtype and stage, revealing varying prognoses. Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) analysis showed higher recurrence rates in stage B than in stage A, with HR-/HER2- displaying the worst DRFS. This study, the first to model breast cancer subtypes, stages, and outcomes using German claims data, provides valuable insights into real-world breast cancer epidemiology and demonstrates that this breast cancer disease model has the potential to be representative of treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Dannehl
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Alexandra von Au
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Tobias Engler
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Léa Louise Volmer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Raphael Gutsfeld
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Johannes Felix Englisch
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | | | - Ariane Chaudhuri
- AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, 70188 Stuttgart, Germany; (S.H.-K.); (A.C.)
| | - Armin Bauer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | | | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Freiburg University, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany;
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Sara Yvonne Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Stephanie Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, Halle University, 06120 Halle, Germany;
| | - Andreas Daniel Hartkopf
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
| | - Tjeerd Maarten Hein Dijkstra
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (T.E.); (R.G.); (J.F.E.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.); (T.M.H.D.)
- Institute for Translational Bioinformatics, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers for Suppressing Tumorigenesis and Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Transcriptome Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050965. [PMID: 36900109 PMCID: PMC10001411 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases developed through tumorigenesis and could be fatal if it reaches the metastatic phase. The novelty of the present investigation is to explore the prognostic biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that could develop glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) due to metastasis. The analysis was conducted using RNA-seq datasets for both HCC (PRJNA494560 and PRJNA347513) and GBM (PRJNA494560 and PRJNA414787) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). This study identified 13 hub genes found to be overexpressed in both GBM and HCC. A promoter methylation study showed these genes to be hypomethylated. Validation through genetic alteration and missense mutations resulted in chromosomal instability, leading to improper chromosome segregation, causing aneuploidy. A 13-gene predictive model was obtained and validated using a KM plot. These hub genes could be prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets, inhibition of which could suppress tumorigenesis and metastasis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Müller C, Kiver V, Solomayer EF, Wagenpfeil G, Neeb C, Blohmer JU, Abramian AV, Maass N, Schütz F, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Ralser DJ, Rambow AC. CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Advanced HR+/HER2 - Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Data Analysis. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:31-41. [PMID: 36876172 PMCID: PMC9982335 DOI: 10.1159/000527917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy are considered standard-of-care for first-line therapy of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC). Superiority of combination therapy over endocrine monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in phase III and IV. However, RCTs reflect clinical reality only to a limited extent, as narrow inclusion criteria lead to a selected patient collective. Here, we present real-world data (RWD) on CDK4/6i treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC at four certified German university breast cancer centers. Methods Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated in clinical routine with CDK4/6i between November 2016 and December 2020 at four certified German university breast cancer centers (Saarland University Medical Center, University Medical Center Charité Berlin, University Medical Center Bonn, and University Medical Center Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel) were identified and enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were recorded with particular emphasis on CDK4/6i therapy course [progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation, toxicity, dose reduction, therapy discontinuation, prior and subsequent therapy line]. Results Data from n = 448 patients were evaluated. The mean patient age was 63 (±12) years. Of these patients, n = 165 (36.8%) were primarily metastasized, and n = 283 (63.2%) had secondary metastatic disease. N = 319 patients (71.3%) received palbociclib, n = 114 patients (25.4%) received ribociclib, and n = 15 patients (3.3%) received abemaciclib, respectively. Dose reduction was performed in n = 132 cases (29.5%). N = 57 patients (12.7%) discontinued the treatment with CDK4/6i due to side effects. N = 196 patients (43.8%) experienced disease progression under CDK4/6i treatment. The median PFS was 17 months. Presence of hepatic metastases and prior therapy lines were associated with shorter PFS, whereas estrogen positivity and dose reduction due to toxicity were positively associated with PFS. Presence of bone and lung metastases, progesterone positivity, Ki67 index, grading, BRCA1/2 and PIK3CA mutation status, adjuvant endocrine resistance, and age did not significantly impact on PFS. Conclusion Our RWD analysis on CDK4/6i treatment in Germany supports data from RCTs regarding both treatment efficacy and safety of CDK4/6i for treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. In comparison to data from the pivotal RCTs, median PFS was lower but within the expected range for RWD, which could result from inclusion of patients with more advanced diseases (i.e., higher therapy lines) to our dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Verena Kiver
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Gudrun Wagenpfeil
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics (IMBEI), Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Neeb
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Valik Abramian
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna-Christina Rambow
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tarighati E, Keivan H, Mahani H. A review of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:1-16. [PMID: 35031885 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-021-00781-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a common cancer all over the world that affects women. BC is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in women, which today has decreased with the advancement of technology and new diagnostic and therapeutic methods. BCs are histologically divided into in situ and invasive carcinoma, and both of them can be divided into ductal and lobular. The main function after the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer is which patient should use chemotherapy, which patient should receive adjuvant therapy, and which should not. If the decision is for adjuvant therapy, the next challenge is to identify the most appropriate treatment or combination of treatments for a particular patient. Addressing the first challenge can be helped by prognostic biomarkers, while addressing the second challenge can be done by predictive biomarkers. Among the molecular markers related to BC, ER, PR, HER2, and the Mib1/Ki-67 proliferation index are the most significant ones and are tightly confirmed in the standard care of all primary, recurrent, and metastatic BC patients. CEA and CA-15-3 antigens are the most valuable markers of serum tumors in BC patients. Determining the series of these markers helps monitor response to the treatment and early detection of recurrence or metastasis. miRNAs have been demonstrated to be intricate in mammary gland growth, proliferation, and formation of BC known to be incriminated in BC biology. By combining established prognostic factors with valid prognostic/predicted biomarkers, we can start the journey to personalized treatment for every recently diagnosed BC patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaheh Tarighati
- Department of Medical Physics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Keivan
- School of Paramedicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
| | - Hojjat Mahani
- Radiation Applications Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, P.O. Box: 14395-836, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huebner H, Ruebner M, Kurbacher C, Hadji P, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Huober J, Uhrig S, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Häberle L, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Belleville E, Untch M, Janni W, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Fasching PA, Michel LL. Return of individual genomic research results within the PRAEGNANT multicenter registry study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 197:355-368. [PMID: 36409394 PMCID: PMC9822879 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06795-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The PRAEGNANT study is a registry study for metastatic breast cancer patients, focusing on biomarker detection. Recently, within this study, genetic alterations in 37 breast cancer predisposition genes were analyzed and genetic findings were detected for 396 participants. The aim of this project was to return genetic results to the physicians and to analyze actions taken (e.g., disclosure of results to patients, validation of results, clinical impact, and impact on the patient's quality of life) using a questionnaire. METHODS 235 questionnaires were sent out to the study centers, with each questionnaire representing one patient with a genetic finding. The questionnaire consisted of twelve questions in the German language, referring to the disclosure of results, validation of test results, and their impact on treatment decisions and on the patient's quality of life. RESULTS 135 (57.5%) questionnaires were completed. Of these, 46 (34.1%) stated that results were returned to the patients. In 80.0% (N = 36) of cases where results were returned, the patient had not been aware of the finding previously. For 27 patients (64.3%), genetic findings had not been validated beforehand. All validation procedures (N = 15) were covered by the patients' health insurance. For 11 (25.0%) patients, physicians reported that the research results influenced current or future decision-making on treatment, and for 37.8% (N = 17) the results influenced whether family members will be genetically tested. CONCLUSION This study provides novel insights into the return of research results and into clinical and personal benefits of disclosure of genetic findings within a German registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medizinisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, 60313 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik Für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Frauenklinik St. Louise, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany ,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany ,Immanuel Campus Rüdersdorf/Medical University of Brandenburg, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura L. Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Engler T, Fasching PA, Lüftner D, Hartkopf AD, Müller V, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Wallwiener M, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Belleville E, Uhrig S, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Kurbacher CM, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Taran FA, Enzinger HM, Krabisch P, Welslau M, Maasberg M, Hempel D, Lux MP, Michel LL, Janni W, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A. Implementation of CDK4/6 Inhibitors and its Influence on the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients - Data from the Real-World Registry PRAEGNANT. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1055-1067. [PMID: 36186151 PMCID: PMC9525148 DOI: 10.1055/a-1880-0087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Comprehensive data from prospective clinical trials have led to a high level of evidence establishing CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine treatment (CDK4/6i + ET) as a standard for the treatment of HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HER2- HR+) breast cancer patients in the first-line advanced therapy setting. Data on patient populations that have been treated in the real-world setting may provide an insight into changes of patient characteristics and prognosis over time. Methods The data were extracted from the prospective real-world registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167). Patients had to have HER2- HR+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting. The chosen therapies were described as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to the given therapies and time periods during which they were indicated. Results CDK4/6 inhibitors have been rapidly implemented since their introduction in November 2016. In recent years (2018 - 2022), about 70 - 80% of the patient population have been treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, while endocrine monotherapy was given to about 10% and chemotherapy to about 15% of all patients. The prognosis was worst in patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, mainly patients with a good prognosis are being treated with endocrine monotherapy, and patients who are treated with chemotherapy have an unfavorable prognosis. The PFS and OS of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET have remained similar over time despite changes in patient characteristics. Conclusion A treatment with CDK4/6i + ET has rapidly become the therapy standard for patients in the first-line advanced breast cancer setting. After the implementation of CDK4/6i + ET, endocrine monotherapy is only given to patients with a very favorable prognosis, while chemotherapy is provided to patients with a rather unfavorable prognosis. These changes in patient characteristics did not seem to influence the prognosis of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Engler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Philips-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University
Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Hielscher
- Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum – Onkologisches Zentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany
| | - Christian M. Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Martin Enzinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Bamberg, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Petra Krabisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | | | | | - Dirk Hempel
- Onkologiezentrum Donauwörth, Donauwörth, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, Germany; Frauenklinik St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum
Paderborn, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Laura L. Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Müller V, Hein A, Hartkopf AD, Fasching PA, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Beckmann MW, Schneeweiss A, Belleville E, Uhrig S, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Meyer J, Wurmthaler LA, Kurbacher CM, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Janni W, Taran FA, Lux MP, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Michel LL. Occurrence and characteristics of patients with de novo advanced breast cancer according to patient and tumor characteristics - A retrospective analysis of a real world registry. Eur J Cancer 2022; 172:13-21. [PMID: 35728342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) may have different clinical and pathological characteristics. In studies concerned with first-line metastatic patients, the proportion of these patients without secondary resistance mechanisms may have a large influence ont the study results. The aim of this study was to identify patient and tumor characteristics that are associated with dnMBC vs. recurrent MBC (rMBC). METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected in the PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167). Firs line treated patients were eligible. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared with common disease and tumor characteristics relative to de novo metastatic status, as well as early and late recurrences after primary disease without metastases. RESULTS Among the 947 patients identified, 355 were included with de novo metastatic disease (37.5%). Older age and HER2-positive disease were significantly associated with a higher frequency of dnMBC. Patients younger than 50, 50-69, or 70 years or older had dnMBC frequencies of 22.7%, 44.0%, and 57.6%, respectively. HER2-positive patients had dnMBC at initial presentation in 49.1% of cases, in comparison with 21.9%, 35.5%, and 37.6% in patients with triple-negative, luminal A-like and luminal B-like breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION Age and breast cancer subtype are associated with the frequency of first-line MBC patients. Inclusion criteria concerning age or breast cancer subtype can influence the frequency of these patients in a selected patient population and can therefore modify the number of patients with secondary resistance to specific therapies in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Ühilips-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Julia Meyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lena A Wurmthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Christian M Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Laura L Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abou-Fadel J, Bhalli M, Grajeda B, Zhang J. CmP Signaling Network Leads to Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Caucasian Women. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2022; 26:198-219. [PMID: 35481969 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2021.0221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes ∼15% of all diagnosed invasive breast cancer cases with limited options for treatment since immunotherapies that target ER, PR, and HER2 receptors are ineffective. Progesterone (PRG) can induce its effects through either classic, nonclassic, or combined responses by binding to classic nuclear PRG receptors (nPRs) or nonclassic membrane PRG receptors (mPRs). Under PRG-induced actions, we previously demonstrated that the CCM signaling complex (CSC) can couple both nPRs and mPRs into a CmPn signaling network, which plays an important role during nPR(+) breast cancer tumorigenesis. We recently defined the novel CmP signaling network in African American women (AAW)-derived TNBC cells, which overlapped with our previously defined CmPn network in nPR(+) breast cancer cells. Methods: Under mPR-specific steroid actions, we measured alterations to key tumorigenic pathways in Caucasian American women (CAW)- derived TNBC cells, with RNAseq/proteomic and systems biology approaches. Exemption from ethics approval from IRB: This study only utilized cultured NBC cell lines with publicly available TNBC clinical data sets. Results: Our results demonstrated that TNBCs in CAW share similar altered signaling pathways, as TNBCs in AAW, under mPR-specific steroid actions, demonstrating the overall aggressive nature of TNBCs, regardless of racial differences. Furthermore, in this report, we have deconvoluted the CmP signalosome, using systems biology approaches and CAW-TNBC clinical data, to identify 21 new CAW-TNBC-specific prognostic biomarkers that reinforce the definitive role of CSC and mPR signaling during CAW-TNBC tumorigenesis. Conclusion: This new set of potential prognostic biomarkers may revolutionize molecular mechanisms and currently known concepts of tumorigenesis in CAW-TNBCs, leading to hopeful new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan Abou-Fadel
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Muaz Bhalli
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Brian Grajeda
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abou-Fadel J, Grajeda B, Jiang X, Cailing-De La O AMD, Flores E, Padarti A, Bhalli M, Le A, Zhang J. CmP signaling network unveils novel biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Biomark 2022; 34:607-636. [DOI: 10.3233/cbm-210351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer worldwide and remains the second leading cause of cancer death. While breast cancer mortality has steadily declined over the past decades through medical advances, an alarming disparity in breast cancer mortality has emerged between African American women (AAW) and Caucasian American women (CAW). New evidence suggests more aggressive behavior of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in AAW may contribute to racial differences in tumor biology and mortality. Progesterone (PRG) can exert its cellular effects through either its classic, non-classic, or combined responses through binding to either classic nuclear PRG receptors (nPRs) or non-classic membrane PRG receptors (mPRs), warranting both pathways equally important in PRG-mediated signaling. In our previous report, we demonstrated that the CCM signaling complex (CSC) consisting of CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3 can couple both nPRs and mPRs signaling cascades to form a CSC-mPRs-PRG-nPRs (CmPn) signaling network in nPR positive(+) breast cancer cells. In this report, we furthered our research by establishing the CSC-mPRs-PRG (CmP) signaling network in nPR(-) breast cancer cells, demonstrating that a common core mechanism exists, regardless of nPR(+/-) status. This is the first report stating that inducible expression patterns exist between CCMs and major mPRs in TNBC cells. Furthermore, we firstly show mPRs in TNBC cells are localized in the nucleus and participate in nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in a coordinately synchronized fashion with CCMs under steroid actions, following the same cellular distribution as other well-defined steroid hormone receptors. Finally, for the first time, we deconvoluted the CmP signalosome by using systems biology and TNBC clinical data, which helped us understand key factors within the CmP network and identify 6 specific biomarkers with potential clinical applications associated with AAW-TNBC tumorigenesis. These novel biomarkers could have immediate clinical implications to dramatically improve health disparities among AAW-TNBCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan Abou-Fadel
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Brian Grajeda
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Xiaoting Jiang
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Alyssa-Marie D. Cailing-De La O
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Esmeralda Flores
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Akhil Padarti
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Muaz Bhalli
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Alexander Le
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (MTM), Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Feasibility of Adjuvant Treatment with Abemaciclib—Real-World Data from a Large German Breast Center. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12030382. [PMID: 35330381 PMCID: PMC8951288 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Abemaciclib significantly improves invasive disease-free survival when combined with endocrine therapy in clinical high-risk patients with HR+/Her2− early breast cancer (eBC). The objective of the following study was to model how many patients with eBC would be available for adjuvant treatment with abemaciclib in a real-world setting. Patients that underwent complete surgical treatment for eBC between January 2018 and December 2020 in a large single-center university hospital in Germany were eligible. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patient population that could benefit from abemaciclib according to the inclusion criteria of monarchE. Of 1474 patients with eBC, 1121 (76.1%) had a HR+/Her2− subtype. Of these, 217 (19.4%) fulfilled the monarchE inclusion criteria. Within patients that fulfilled the monarchE inclusion criteria, 48.9% received no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, in a real-world situation, fewer patients will be pretreated with chemotherapy than was the case in monarchE. Breast care units are facing a significant patient burden, since the 2-year abemaciclib therapy requires regular monitoring of toxicities. Specific care concepts to strengthen therapy adherence as well as further studies to deescalate adjuvant systemic treatment and individualize CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy are therefore needed.
Collapse
|
14
|
Long non-coding RNA VIM-AS1 is upregulated in high-grade invasive ductal breast tumors and promotes breast cancer metastasis via inducing EMT. GENE REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
15
|
Li R, Chen J, Gao X, Jiang G. Transcription factor KLF2 enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to cisplatin by suppressing kinase WEE1. Cancer Biol Ther 2021; 22:465-477. [PMID: 34486497 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2021.1949228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Cisplatin is an effective chemotherapeutic agent in facilitating the inhibition of proliferation, migration, and invasion in cancerous cells. However, the detailed mechanism of the regulation by cisplatin of human breast cancer cells is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) transcription factor in cisplatin therapy for breast cancer. RT-qPCR was performed to quantify the expression of KLF2 and WEE1 in clinical tissue samples from breast cancer patients and in MDA-MB-231 cells. ChIP assay and dual-luciferase reporter assay were used to analyze the potential-binding sites of KLF2 and WEE1 promoter. Gain- or loss-of-function approaches were used to manipulate KLF2 and WEE1 in cisplatin-treated MDA-MB-231 cells, and the mechanism of KLF2 in breast cancer was evaluated both via CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry, Transwell assay, and Western blot. Further validation of the KLF2 was performed on nude mouse models. Breast cancer tissues and cells showed a relative decline of KLF2 expression and abundant WEE1 expression. Cisplatin inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells. Overexpression of KLF2 enhanced the inhibitory effect of cisplatin on the malignant characteristics of MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro. KLF2 targeted WEE1 and negatively regulated its expression, thus enhancing the sensitivity to cisplatin of breast cancer cells as well as tumor-bearing mice. Overall, these results suggest that KLF2 can potentially inhibit WEE1 expression and sensitize breast cancer cells to cisplatin, thus presenting a promising adjunct treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiqing Li
- Department of Throat and Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow P.R. China
| | - Jiejing Chen
- Department of Throat and Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou P.R. China
| | - Xiaokang Gao
- Department of Throat and Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou P.R. China
| | - Guoqin Jiang
- Department of Throat and Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hein A, Hartkopf AD, Emons J, Lux MP, Volz B, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wurmthaler LA, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Kurbacher CM, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Kolberg HC. Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status. Eur J Cancer 2021; 155:1-12. [PMID: 34311211 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assessment of HER2 overexpression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) for the detection of HER2 amplifications is standard to identify patients for established HER2-directed treatments. Patients with lower HER2 expression levels have recently also become candidates for novel therapies targeting HER2. This study aimed to assess tumour and patient characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), relative to low HER2 expression levels. METHODS PRAEGNANT is a prospective aBC registry (NCT02338167), focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis includes patients with conventionally HER2-negative aBC. Clinical outcome was compared in the groups with no (IHC score 0) or with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH negative). RESULTS Low HER2 expression levels in triple-negative aBC patients did not influence progression-free survival. Overall survival appeared poorer in patients with IHC 2+ compared with patients with no HER2 expression in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1.12-4.47). However, this effect was not maintained in the adjusted analysis. In HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive patients, low HER2 expression appeared to have no effect on prognosis, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS We could not demonstrate that HER2 expression at a low level and assessed in clinical routine can differentiate patients into prognostic groups. However, the prevalence of patients with a low expression makes this population interesting for clinical trials with potentially active treatments using HER2 as a target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, Ansbach, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center of Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena A Wurmthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Christian M Kurbacher
- Gynäkologie I (Gynäkologische Onkologie), Gynäkologisches Zentrum Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinic Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tarasiuk A, Mackiewicz T, Małecka-Panas E, Fichna J. Biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic cancer - miRNAs as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic tool? Cancer Biol Ther 2021; 22:347-356. [PMID: 34224317 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2021.1941584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest malignancies, with poor prognosis resulting mostly from late diagnosis. Surgery remains the most effective treatment and early detection significantly increases the overall survival. Biomarkers used for diagnosis and to monitor the response to treatment, such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), are not adequate as early detection markers of PDAC, partly due to low sensitivity/specificity. Therefore, new biomarkers for PDAC are critically needed. This review aims at recent advancements in the identification and characterization of new biomarkers, microRNAs, which might prove useful in the early detection of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Tarasiuk
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Tomasz Mackiewicz
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Ewa Małecka-Panas
- Department of Digestive Tract Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Jakub Fichna
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Autenshlyus A, Arkhipov S, Mikhaylova E, Marinkin I, Arkhipova V, Varaksin N, Vavilin V, Lyahovich V. Analyzing the relationship between the cytokine profile of invasive breast carcinoma, its histopathological characteristics and metastasis to regional lymph nodes. Sci Rep 2021; 11:11359. [PMID: 34059727 PMCID: PMC8166970 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90930-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was aimed at analyzing the relations of metastasis to regional lymph nodes (RLNs) with histopathological indicators of invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IC-NST) and its cytokine profile. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed to determine concentrations of IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-18, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF, VEGF-A, and MCP-1 in the culture supernatant of IC-NST samples from 48 female patients. Histopathological indicators (degree of tumor cell differentiation, mitoses, and others) and ER, PR, Her2/neu, Ki-67, and CD34 expression levels were determined. By means of three types of neural network models, it was shown that for different parameters of the output layer, different groups of parameters are involved that have predictive value regarding metastasis to RLNs. As a result of multi-dimensional cluster analysis, three clusters were formed with different cytokines profiles of IC-NST. Different correlations between indicators of cytokine production by IC-NST and its histopathological parameters were revealed in groups with different cytokine profiles. It was shown that at simultaneous evaluation of the production of even two cytokines, the importance of which relationship with metastasis was revealed by neural network modeling, can increase the probability of determining the presence of metastasis in the RLNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Autenshlyus
- Department of Scientific Work, Central Research Laboratory, Laboratory of Immunohistochemistry Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Krasny Prospect 52, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russian Federation.,Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics - subdivision of FRC FTM, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Sergey Arkhipov
- Department of Scientific Work, Central Research Laboratory, Laboratory of Immunohistochemistry Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Krasny Prospect 52, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russian Federation. .,Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics - subdivision of FRC FTM, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | - Elena Mikhaylova
- Department of Scientific Work, Central Research Laboratory, Laboratory of Immunohistochemistry Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Krasny Prospect 52, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russian Federation.,Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics - subdivision of FRC FTM, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Igor Marinkin
- Department of Scientific Work, Central Research Laboratory, Laboratory of Immunohistochemistry Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Krasny Prospect 52, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russian Federation
| | - Valentina Arkhipova
- Department of Scientific Work, Central Research Laboratory, Laboratory of Immunohistochemistry Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Krasny Prospect 52, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russian Federation
| | | | - Valentin Vavilin
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics - subdivision of FRC FTM, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Vyacheslav Lyahovich
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics - subdivision of FRC FTM, Novosibirsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fasching PA, Yadav S, Hu C, Wunderle M, Häberle L, Hart SN, Rübner M, Polley EC, Lee KY, Gnanaolivu RD, Hadji P, Hübner H, Tesch H, Ettl J, Overkamp F, Lux MP, Ekici AB, Volz B, Uhrig S, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Belleville E, Untch M, Kolberg HC, Beckmann MW, Reis A, Hartmann A, Janni W, Wimberger P, Taran FA, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Hartkopf AD, Couch FJ. Mutations in BRCA1/2 and Other Panel Genes in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer -Association With Patient and Disease Characteristics and Effect on Prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1619-1630. [PMID: 33780288 PMCID: PMC8274805 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Among patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), the frequency of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes and the clinical relevance of these mutations are unclear. In this study, a prospective cohort of patients with mBC was used to determine mutation rates for breast cancer (BC) predisposition genes, to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with mutations, and to assess the influence of mutations on patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Germline DNA from 2,595 patients with mBC enrolled in the prospective PRAEGNANT registry was evaluated for mutations in cancer predisposition genes. The frequencies of mutations in known BC predisposition genes were compared with results from a prospective registry of patients with nonmetastatic BC sequenced using the same QIAseq method and with public reference controls. Associations between mutation status and tumor characteristics, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS Germline mutations in 12 established BC predisposition genes (including BRCA1 and BRCA2) were detected in 271 (10.4%) patients. A mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was seen in 129 patients (5.0%). BRCA1 mutation carriers had a higher proportion of brain metastasis (27.1%) compared with nonmutation carriers (12.8%). Mutations were significantly enriched in PRAEGNANT patients with mBC compared with patients with nonmetastatic BC (10.4% v 6.6%, P < .01). Mutations did not significantly modify progression-free survival or overall survival for patients with mBC. CONCLUSION Multigene panel testing may be considered in all patients with mBC because of the high frequency of germline mutations in BRCA1/2 and other BC predisposition genes. Although the prognosis of mutation carriers and nonmutation carriers with mBC was similar, differences observed in tumor characteristics have implications for treatment and for future studies of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Chunling Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steven N. Hart
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthias Rübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eric C. Polley
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kun Y. Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center of Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hanna Hübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Frauenklinik St Louise, Paderborn, St Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Arif B. Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, Ansbach, Germany
| | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - André Reis
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lüftner D, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Titzmann A, Pöschke P, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Janni W, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Ettl J, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Brucker SY, Fasching PA. Challenges and Opportunities for Real-World Evidence in Metastatic Luminal Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:108-114. [PMID: 34007260 DOI: 10.1159/000515701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The therapeutic armamentarium for patients with metastatic breast cancer is becoming more and more specific. Recommendations from clinical trials are not available for all treatment situations and patient subgroups, and it is therefore important to collect real-world data. Summary To develop recommendations for up-to-date treatments and participation in clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer, the Prospective Academic Translational Research PRAEGNANT Network was established to optimize the quality of oncological care in the advanced therapeutic setting. The main aim of PRAEGNANT is to systematically record medical care for patients with metastatic breast cancer in the real-life setting, including the outcome and side effects of different treatment strategies, to monitor quality-of-life changes during therapy, to identify patients eligible for participation in clinical studies, and to allow targeted therapies based on the molecular structures of breast carcinomas. Key Messages This article describes the PRAEGNANT network and sheds light on the question of whether the various end points from clinical trials can be transferred to the real-world treatment situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany.,Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | | | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Adriana Titzmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Patrik Pöschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
[What's new liquid biopsy-PIK3CA testing in breast cancer]. DER PATHOLOGE 2020; 41:138-142. [PMID: 33263809 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-020-00868-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The impact of liquid biopsies on the analysis of molecular alterations of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently increased. PIK3CA is one of the most frequently mutated genes in breast cancer and the expected approval of targeted PIK3CA therapy based on the results of the SOLAR1 trial is likely to lead to the use of liquid biopsies as another promising testing strategy in breast cancer patients who can benefit from a targeted therapy.Choosing an appropriate method for the detection of activating PIK3CA mutations should include factors like sensitivity, specificity, and limit of detection. The test should at least meet the parameters of the assay used in the drug approval study.If carefully used, PIK3CA mutation detection with liquid biopsies can then be a useful addition to standard tissue diagnostics.
Collapse
|
22
|
Huebner H, Kurbacher CM, Kuesters G, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Huober J, Volz B, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Häberle L, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Ruebner M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J. Heregulin (HRG) assessment for clinical trial eligibility testing in a molecular registry (PRAEGNANT) in Germany. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1091. [PMID: 33176725 PMCID: PMC7656772 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07546-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eligibility criteria are a critical part of clinical trials, as they define the patient population under investigation. Besides certain patient characteristics, clinical trials often include biomarker testing for eligibility. However, patient-identification mostly relies on the trial site itself and is often a time-consuming procedure, which could result in missing out on potentially eligible patients. Pre-selection of those patients using a registry could facilitate the process of eligibility testing and increase the number of identified patients. One aim with the PRAEGNANT registry (NCT02338167) is to identify patients for therapies based on clinical and molecular data. Here, we report eligibility testing for the SHERBOC trial using the German PRAEGNANT registry. METHODS Heregulin (HRG) has been reported to identify patients with better responses to therapy with the anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody seribantumab (MM-121). The SHERBOC trial investigated adding seribantumab (MM-121) to standard therapy in patients with advanced HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer and HRG overexpression. The PRAEGNANT registry was used for identification and tumor testing, helping to link potential HRG positive patients to the trial. Patients enrolled in PRAEGNANT have invasive and metastatic or locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer. Patients eligible for SHERBOC were identified by using the registry. Study aims were to describe the HRG positivity rate, screening procedures, and patient characteristics associated with inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS Among 2769 unselected advanced breast cancer patients, 650 were HER2-negative, HR-positive and currently receiving first- or second-line treatment, thus potentially eligible for SHERBOC at the end of current treatment; 125 patients also met further clinical eligibility criteria (e.g. menopausal status, ECOG). In the first/second treatment lines, patients selected for SHERBOC based on further eligibility criteria had a more favorable prognosis than those not selected. HRG status was tested in 38 patients, 14 of whom (36.8%) proved to be HRG-positive. CONCLUSION Using a real-world breast cancer registry allowed identification of potentially eligible patients for SHERBOC focusing on patients with HER3 overexpressing, HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This approach may provide insights into differences between patients eligible or non-eligible for clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials, NCT02338167 , Registered 14 January 2015 - retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Christian M Kurbacher
- Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Kooperatives Brustzentrum, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, Ansbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tesch H, Müller V, Wöckel A, Ettl J, Belleville E, Schütz F, Hartkopf A, Thill M, Huober J, Fasching PA, Kolberg HC, Schulmeyer CE, Welslau M, Overkamp F, Fehm TN, Lux MP, Schneeweiss A, Lüftner D, Janni W. Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 4 - Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:1115-1122. [PMID: 33173239 PMCID: PMC7647717 DOI: 10.1055/a-1270-7481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Substances with good effectiveness that intervene in specific signalling pathways have been used increasingly in recent years in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer, and new therapies and approaches have now been added, which actually relate to quite specific changes, such as the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2 tumours with a PIK3CA mutation. The treatment of patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has also been improved by the introduction of PARP inhibitors. Attempts are now being made increasingly to extend treatment indications based on molecular patterns, to identify other patients who could benefit from a treatment and to integrate the newly established treatment methods in existing therapy sequences. This review articles summarises the latest information in this connection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Laakmann E, Emons J, Taran FA, Janni W, Uhrig S, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Schulmeyer C, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Volz B, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Lux MP, Hartkopf AD. Treatment Landscape and Prognosis After Treatment with Trastuzumab Emtansine. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:1134-1142. [PMID: 33173241 PMCID: PMC7647719 DOI: 10.1055/a-1286-2917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pertuzumab and T-DM1 are two efficient anti-HER2 treatments for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. While pertuzumab is usually given in first-line treatment and T-DM1 in second-line treatment, standard therapy options seem to be exhausted up to now after the treatment of patients with these two therapy options. Therefore, it is important to have data that describes the therapy situation and prognosis after T-DM1 treatment. Methods The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for breast cancer patients with a focus on molecular biomarkers. Patients of all therapy lines with any kind of treatment are eligible. Collected data comprises therapies, adverse events, quality of life and other patient reported outcomes. Here we report on the patient characteristics and descriptive prognostic data for HER2-positive patients who have completed a treatment with T-DM1. Therapy patterns after T-DM1 and progression-free survival are reported as well as overall survival. Results A total of 85 patients were identified for the study who were prospectively observed during therapy after the termination of T-DM1. The main reason for T-DM1 termination was progress. Following T-DM1, lapatinib, trastuzumab and chemotherapy were the main therapy choices. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.2 - 6.3) and median overall survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.5 - 21.3). Conclusions Therapy options after T-DM1 in a real-world setting seem to exhibit a relevant clinical efficacy, supporting the concept of continuous anti-HER2 treatments in the advanced therapy setting for breast cancer patients. Novel therapies are needed to improve the rather short median progression-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Laakmann
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center of Bone Health Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carla Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsten Hielscher
- g.SUND Center for Gynecologic Oncology Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany
| | - Christian Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, Ansbach, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn,
Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
O'Shaughnessy J, Brezden-Masley C, Cazzaniga M, Dalvi T, Walker G, Bennett J, Ohsumi S. Prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: global results from the real-world, observational BREAKOUT study. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:114. [PMID: 33109210 PMCID: PMC7590609 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global observational BREAKOUT study investigated germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm) prevalence in a population of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Eligible patients had initiated first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy for HER2-negative MBC within 90 days prior to enrollment. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients had experienced disease progression on or after prior endocrine therapy, or endocrine therapy was considered unsuitable. gBRCAm status was determined using baseline blood samples or prior germline test results. For patients with a negative gBRCAm test, archival tissue was tested for somatic BRCAm and homologous recombination repair mutations (HRRm). Details of first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy were also collected. RESULTS Between March 2017 and April 2018, 384 patients from 14 countries were screened and consented to study enrollment; 341 patients were included in the full analysis set (median [range] age at enrollment: 56 [25-89] years; 256 (75.3%) postmenopausal). Overall, 33 patients (9.7%) had a gBRCAm (16 [4.7%] in gBRCA1 only, 12 [3.5%] in gBRCA2 only, and 5 [1.5%] in both gBRCA1 and gBRCA2). gBRCAm prevalence was similar in HR-positive and HR-negative patients. gBRCAm prevalence was 9.0% in European patients and 10.6% in Asian patients and was higher in patients aged ≤ 50 years at initial breast cancer (BC) diagnosis (12.9%) than patients aged > 50 years (5.4%). In patients with any risk factor for having a gBRCAm (family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer, aged ≤ 50 years at initial BC diagnosis, or triple-negative BC), prevalence was 10.4%, versus 5.8% in patients without these risk factors. HRRm prevalence was 14.1% (n = 9/64) in patients with germline BRCA wildtype. CONCLUSIONS Patient demographic and disease characteristics supported the association of a gBRCAm with younger age at initial BC diagnosis and family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer. gBRCAm prevalence in this cohort, not selected on the basis of risk factors for gBRCAm, was slightly higher than previous results suggested. gBRCAm prevalence among patients without a traditional risk factor for harboring a gBRCAm (5.8%) supports current guideline recommendations of routine gBRCAm testing in HER2-negative MBC, as these patients may benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03078036 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology and US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | | | | | - Tapashi Dalvi
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Shozo Ohsumi
- NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama-shi, Ehime-Ken, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Michel LL, Hartkopf AD, Fasching PA, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Volz B, Huebner H, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Mundhenke C, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Overkamp F, Huober J, Janni W, Taran FA, Lux MP, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Fehm TN. Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) after Previous Treatment with Pertuzumab. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3021. [PMID: 33080911 PMCID: PMC7603111 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The approval of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was conducted without pertuzumab as previous therapy. Efficacy data on T-DM1 following pertuzumab treatment are therefore limited. This study explores this issue in a real-world setting. Within the prospective PRAEGNANT (Prospective Academic Translational Research Network for the Optimization of the Oncological Health Care Quality in the Advanced Setting) metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167), patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment were eligible for inclusion. This report describes patient characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients receiving T-DM1 after pertuzumab treatment. Seventy-six patients were identified, 39 of whom received T-DM1 as second-line therapy, 25 as third-line, and 12 as fourth-line therapy or higher. Pertuzumab was mostly administered as a first-line treatment (n = 61; 80.3%). The median PFS in all patients was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.8-7.8); in second-line treatment, 7.7 months (95% CI: 2.8-11.0); in third-line, 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.3-not reached (NR)); and in fourth-line therapy or higher, 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.2-NR). T-DM1 was mainly administered second-line after pertuzumab, but also in more heavily pretreated patients. The PFS in higher therapy lines appears to be shorter than in second-line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L. Michel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.L.M.); (M.W.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (A.D.H.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.)
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.H.); (M.W.B.); (H.H.)
| | - Hans-Christian Kolberg
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Bottrop, 46236 Bottrop, Germany;
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, 60313 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital, 60389 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.H.); (M.W.B.); (H.H.)
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 12203 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.L.M.); (M.W.)
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.H.); (M.W.B.); (H.H.)
| | | | - Bernhard Volz
- Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, 91522 Ansbach, Germany;
| | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.H.); (M.W.B.); (H.H.)
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01328 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinik Hohe Warte, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany;
| | - Christian Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, 53111 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany;
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (J.H.); (W.J.)
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (J.H.); (W.J.)
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology, Zurich University Hospital, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, 33098 Paderborn, Germany;
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (A.D.H.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.)
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (A.D.H.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.)
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wuerfel FM, Huebner H, Häberle L, Gass P, Hein A, Jud SM, Hack CC, Wunderle M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Erber R, Hartmann A, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Ruebner M. HLA-G and HLA-F protein isoform expression in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15750. [PMID: 32978482 PMCID: PMC7519664 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72837-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The immunosuppressive human leukocyte antigens HLA-G and HLA-F are expressed on trophoblast and malignant cells. Four membrane-bound and three soluble HLA-G protein isoforms have been described, which have different immunosuppressive potentials. HLA-F has three transcript variants, resulting in three different protein isoforms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of HLA-G and HLA-F protein isoform expression patterns in patients with breast cancer. Core biopsies were taken at diagnosis in patients with HER2+ (n = 28), luminal B-like (n = 49) and triple-negative (n = 38) breast cancers who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expression levels of HLA-F and -G were correlated with the pathological complete response (pCR). Protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis, using two antibodies for each HLA, specific for different isoforms. The protein expression of HLA isoforms did not significantly differ between breast cancer subtypes. However, some initial indications were found for an association between the soluble HLA-G6 protein isoform and pCR in HER2+ breast cancer. The study provides preliminary evidence for the evaluation of HLA-G isoform expression, in particular HLA-G6, as a possible new marker for pCR in HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska M Wuerfel
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Walter C, Hartkopf A, Koch A, Klaumünzer M, Schulze M, Grischke EM, Taran FA, Brucker S, Battke F, Biskup S. Sequencing for an interdisciplinary molecular tumor board in patients with advanced breast cancer: experiences from a case series. Oncotarget 2020; 11:3279-3285. [PMID: 32934773 PMCID: PMC7476733 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: High throughput panel sequencing to tailor therapy in precision oncology promises to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, data that clearly show any benefit from such an approach is still pending. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of advanced breast cancer patients that underwent panel sequencing for suggestion of target related drugs. We aimed to (i) determine the frequency of actionable mutations per patient and to (ii) assess the clinical impact of results on treatment options. Results: A total of 52 patients underwent panel sequencing of archived tumor tissue. Every sample showed at least one affected gene, accounting for actionable mutations in 45 of 52 patients (87%). New treatment options that would not have been used as indicated by standard predictive markers (such as hormonal receptor status or HER2-status) were found in 22 of 52 patients (42%). We detected therapeutic relevant pathogenic germline variants in 9,6% (5/52) of the patients. Conclusions: Using a high throughput-panel sequencing approach to identify actionable mutations in patients with metastatic breast cancer, we identified potential target-related treatment options in a large proportion of our patients, some of which would not have been considered without this data. Prospective clinical trials with compounds targeting the identified actionable mutations are needed to determine which treatments can indeed improve survival or quality of life by limiting exposure to ineffective drugs in advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Walter
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andre Koch
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Martin Schulze
- Praxis fuer Humangenetik and CeGaT GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Sara Brucker
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Florian Battke
- Praxis fuer Humangenetik and CeGaT GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Saskia Biskup
- Praxis fuer Humangenetik and CeGaT GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Geberth M, Häberle L, Hadji P, Hartkopf AD, Hielscher C, Huober J, Ruckhäberle E, Janni W, Kolberg HC, Kurbacher CM, Klein E, Lux MP, Müller V, Nabieva N, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Laakmann E, Taran FA, Seitz J, Thomssen C, Untch M, Wimberger P, Wuerstlein R, Volz B, Wallwiener D, Wallwiener M, Brucker SY. Initial experience with CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies compared to antihormone monotherapies in routine clinical use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer - Data from the PRAEGNANT research network for the first 2 years of drug availability in Germany. Breast 2020; 54:88-95. [PMID: 32956934 PMCID: PMC7509062 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i + ET) is a standard for patients with advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR + HER2–) breast cancer (BC). However, real-world data on the implementation of therapy usage, efficacy, and toxicity have not yet been reported. Methods The PRAEGNANT registry was used to identify advanced HR + HER2– BC patients (n = 1136). The use of chemotherapy, ET, everolimus + ET, and CDK4/6i + ET was analyzed for first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also compared between patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy. Also toxicity was assessed. Results CDK4/6i + ET use increased from 38.5% to 62.7% in the first 2 years after CDK4/6i treatment became available (November 2016). Chemotherapy and ET monotherapy use decreased from 2015 to 2018 from 42.2% to 27.2% and from 53% to 9.5%, respectively. In this early analysis no statistically significant differences were found comparing CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy patients with regard to PFS and OS. Leukopenia was was seen in 11.3% of patients under CDK4/6i + ET and 0.5% under ET monotherapy. Conclusions In clinical practice, CDK4/6i + ET has been rapidly implemented. A group of patients with a more unfavorable prognosis was possibly treated in the real-world setting than in the reported randomized clinical trials. The available data suggest that longer follow-up times and a larger sample size are required in order to identify differences in survival outcomes. Studies should be supported that investigate whether chemotherapy can be avoided or delayed in this patient population by using CDK4/6i + ET. CDK4/6i + ET use increased from 39% to 63% after becoming available. Chemotherapy and ET monotherapy use decreased from 42% to 27% and 53%–10%. There was no difference between CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy regarding PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncolo0gy and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Germany
| | | | - Lothar Häberle
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center of Bone Health Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Eugen Ruckhäberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Christian M Kurbacher
- Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynäkologisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Evelyn Klein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Elena Laakmann
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Julia Seitz
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hartkopf AD, Grischke EM, Brucker SY. Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer: Mechanisms and Treatment. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:347-354. [PMID: 32982644 PMCID: PMC7490658 DOI: 10.1159/000508675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endocrine treatment is one of the most effective therapies for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. However, most tumors will develop resistance to endocrine therapy as the cancer progresses. This review focuses on the mechanisms and markers of endocrine-resistant breast cancer. In addition, current and future strategies to overcome endocrine resistance are discussed. SUMMARY Several molecular mechanisms of endocrine resistance have been identified, including alterations in the ESR1 gene or in the PIK3CA/mTOR pathway. Meanwhile, CDK4/6, mTOR, and PI3K inhibition have shown to improve the efficacy of endocrine treatment and new promising approaches are being developed. KEY MESSAGE Overcoming primary or acquired resistance to endocrine treatment remains a major challenge. Since the molecular mechanisms of endocrine resistance are manifold, optimal combination and sequencing strategies will have to be developed in the future.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hartkopf AD, Emons J, Lux MP, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Titzmann A, Pöschke P, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Janni W, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Ettl J, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Brucker SY, Fasching PA. Klinische Endpunkte in Real-World-Register-Studien. DER ONKOLOGE 2020; 26:530-541. [DOI: 10.1007/s00761-020-00766-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
32
|
Hartkopf AD, Müller V, Wöckel A, Lux MP, Janni W, Ettl J, Belleville E, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Kolberg HC, Welslau M, Overkamp F, Taran FA, Brucker SY, Wallwiener M, Tesch H, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Lüftner D. Translational Highlights in Breast and Ovarian Cancer 2019 - Immunotherapy, DNA Repair, PI3K Inhibition and CDK4/6 Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:1309-1319. [PMID: 31875860 PMCID: PMC6924326 DOI: 10.1055/a-1039-4458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the near future, important translational questions of clinical relevance will be adressed by studies currently in progress. On the one hand, the role of PD-L1 expression must be further understood, after it was found to be relevant in the use of atezolizumab in first-line therapy of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No association between efficacy and PD-L1 expression was found in a neoadjuvant study that included pembrolizumab in TNBC. The pathological complete response rate (pCR) was higher in both patient groups with and without PD-L1 expression when pembrolizumab was added to chemotherapy. Another future question is the identification of further patient groups in which efficacy of PARP inhibitors is seen, which are licensed for the pBRCA1/2 germline mutation. These include, for example, patients with mutations in other genes, which are involved in homologous recombination, or patients with tumours that show an abnormality in global tests of homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD tests). The question of whether a PARP inhibitor can be given and with which chemotherapy combination partners is currently being investigated in both breast and ovarian cancer. While the data on improved overall survival are being consolidated for the CDK4/6 inhibitors, knowledge of molecular changes during the therapy and during progression on the therapy is growing. Both the accumulation of PI3K mutations and also PTEN changes might play a part in planning subsequent therapies. This review article summarises these recent developments in breast cancer and in part also in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Erber R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Mackensen A, Kremer A, Reimann H, Hübner H, Hein A, Lux MP, Jud S, Häberle L, Gaß P, Volz B, Schulz-Wendtland R, Rübner M, Fasching PA. [TILGen study-immunological targets in patients with breast cancer : Influence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes]. DER PATHOLOGE 2019; 39:236-240. [PMID: 30406831 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-018-0526-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interaction of our immune system with breast cancer (BC) cells prompted the investigation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and targeted, tumor antigen-specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES Correlation between TILs and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) in HER2+ and triple negative BC and establishment of TSA-specific therapies within the interdisciplinary TILGen study. METHODS Illustration of the TILGen study design. Assessment of TILs and correlation with pCR within this BC study. RESULTS pCR was achieved in 38.4% (56/146) and associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative (ER-/PR-) and HER2+ tumors. Lymphocytic predominant BC (LPBC) was found in 16.4% (24/146), particularly in ER-/PR- (ER-: 27.3% vs. ER+: 9.9%, PR-: 22.3% vs. PR+: 8.2%), large, and poorly differentiated BC. TILs were significantly correlated with pCR in multivariate analysis. In LPBC, pCR was achieved in 66.7%, whereas it was 32.8% in non-LPBC. CONCLUSIONS First results confirm the influence of the human immune system on the response to NACT in HER2+ and triple negative BC. TSA-specific immunotherapy might improve the outcome in BC patients but there is an urgent need for comprehensive studies to further investigate this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Erber
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - A Hartmann
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Mackensen
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Kremer
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Reimann
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Hübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M P Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - S Jud
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - L Häberle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P Gaß
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Volz
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Radiologisches Institut/Gynäkologische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Rübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P A Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Fasching PA, Fremd C, Gluz O, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Loibl S, Lück HJ. Diagnosis and Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) - Recommendations for Daily Routine Practice. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:605-617. [PMID: 31217629 PMCID: PMC6570613 DOI: 10.1055/a-0887-0285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid increase in knowledge in tumour biology and tumour pathogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has resulted in new therapeutic approaches and new therapeutic concepts for treatment. For years, TNBC has been considered to be a difficult-to-treat tumour due to its generally aggressive tumour biology and in view of limited therapeutic options. The risk of recurrence and metastasis is higher than in the case of other breast cancer subtypes of the same stage. In addition to surgery and radiation in the curative situation, systemic chemotherapy with anthracyclines and/or taxanes is still the therapy of choice. New therapeutic approaches are based on the knowledge that TNBC is a molecularly very heterogeneous disease. Research groups are working to classify TNBC better and better on a molecular level and use this molecular subtyping as the basis for new therapeutic strategies. The most promising new approaches and considerations regarding the therapy of TNBCs are shown below. In addition, the current therapeutic strategies are discussed using a fictitious case history, taking the current data and the resultant therapeutic consequence into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Germany.,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carlo Fremd
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum Niederrhein, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Westdeutsche Studiengruppe, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.,Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Lück
- Gynäkologie Onkologie, Gynäkologisch-onkologische Praxis, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lux MP, Emons J, Bani MR, Wunderle M, Sell C, Preuss C, Rauh C, Jud SM, Heindl F, Langemann H, Geyer T, Brandl AL, Hack CC, Adler W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Gass P. Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:41-47. [PMID: 31019442 DOI: 10.1159/000495883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The usefulness of clinical breast examination (CBE) in general and in breast cancer screening programs has been a matter of debate. This study investigated whether adding vision-impaired medical tactile examiners (MTEs) improves the predictiveness of CBE for suspicious lesions and analyzed the feasibility and acceptability of this approach. Methods The prospective study included 104 patients. Physicians and MTEs performed CBEs, and mammography and ultrasound results were used as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and logistic regression models were used to compare the predictive value of CBE by physicians alone, MTEs alone, and physicians and MTEs combined. Results For CBEs by physicians alone, MTEs alone, and both combined, sensitivity was 71, 82, and 89% and specificity was 55, 45, and 35%, respectively. Using adjusted logistic regression models, the validated areas under the curve were 0.685, 0.692, and 0.710 (median bootstrapped p value (DeLong) = 0.381). Conclusion The predictive value for a suspicious breast lesion in CBEs performed by MTEs in patients without prior surgery was similar to that of physician-conducted CBEs. Including MTEs in the CBE procedure in breast units thus appears feasible and could be a way of utilizing their skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Mayada R Bani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Charlotte Sell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Caroline Preuss
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Anna-Lisa Brandl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Werner Adler
- Institute of Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | | | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Janni W, Schneeweiss A, Müller V, Wöckel A, Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Tesch H, Overkamp F, Lüftner D, Belleville E, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Ettl J. Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 2 - Implementation of Novel Diagnostics and Therapeutics in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:268-280. [PMID: 30880825 PMCID: PMC6414305 DOI: 10.1055/a-0842-6661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer has developed further in recent years. In addition to therapeutic progress in the established subgroups (hormone receptor and HER2 status), there are now therapies which are geared to individual molecular characteristics, such as PARP inhibitor therapy in BRCA-mutated patients. In addition to this, tests are being developed which are intended to establish additional markers within subgroups in order to predict the efficacy of a therapy. PI3K mutation testing in HER2-negative, hormone-receptor-positive tumours and PD-L1 testing of immune cells in triple-negative tumours are expected to become established in clinical practice in order to select patients for the respective therapies. With new therapeutic approaches, new adverse effects also appear. The management of these adverse effects, just as those of classical therapy (supportive therapy), is essential with the introduction of new treatments in order to preserve patients' quality of life. Knowledge regarding measures to preserve and improve quality of life has significantly increased in recent years. Lifestyle factors should be taken into account, as should modern therapeutic methods. This review summarises the latest studies and publications and evaluates them in regard to the relevance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hartkopf AD, Müller V, Wöckel A, Lux MP, Janni W, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Belleville E, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Overkamp F, Schneeweiss A, Tesch H. Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 1 - Implementation of Study Results of Novel Study Designs in Clinical Practice in Patients with Early Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:256-267. [PMID: 30880824 PMCID: PMC6414304 DOI: 10.1055/a-0842-6614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
For many years, small but significant advancements have been made time and again in the prevention and treatment of early breast cancer. The so-called panel gene analyses are becoming more and more important in prevention, since the risk due to the tested genes is better understood and as a result, concepts for integration in health care can be developed. In the adjuvant situation, the first study in the so-called post-neoadjuvant situation was able to demonstrate a clear improvement in the prognosis with an absent pathological complete remission following trastuzumab or pertuzumab + trastuzumab. Additional studies with this post-neoadjuvant therapeutic concept are still being conducted at present. The CDK4/6 inhibitors which had shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival in a metastatic situation are currently being tested in the adjuvant situation in large therapeutic studies. These and other new data for the treatment or prevention of primary breast cancer are presented in this review against the backdrop of current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lux MP, Nabieva N, Hartkopf AD, Huober J, Volz B, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Brucker SY. Therapy Landscape in Patients with Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Data from the PRAEGNANT Real-World Breast Cancer Registry. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 11:cancers11010010. [PMID: 30577662 PMCID: PMC6357172 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Revised: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This study presents comprehensive real-world data on the use of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Specifically, it describes therapy patterns with trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab + trastuzumab (PH), lapatinib (L), and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The PRAEGNANT study is a real-time, real-world registry for MBC patients. All therapy lines are documented. This analysis describes the utilization of anti-HER2 therapies as well as therapy sequences. Among 1936 patients in PRAEGNANT, 451 were HER2-positive (23.3%). In the analysis set (417 patients), 53% of whom were included in PRAEGNANT in the first-line setting, 241 were treated with H, 237 with PH, 85 with L, and 125 with T-DM1 during the course of their therapies. The sequence PH → T-DM1 was administered in 51 patients. Higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores, negative hormone receptor status, and visceral or brain metastases were associated with more frequent use of this therapy sequence. Most patients received T-DM1 after treatment with pertuzumab. Both novel therapies (PH and T-DM1) are utilized in a high proportion of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. As most patients receive T-DM1 after PH, real-world data may help to clarify whether the efficacy of this sequence is similar to that in the approval study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen⁻Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21⁻23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen⁻Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21⁻23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, 89070 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen⁻Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21⁻23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | | | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, 60488 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt; 60389 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen⁻Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21⁻23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen⁻Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21⁻23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Dresden University Hospital, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
| | - Carsten Hielscher
- gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, 18435 Stralsund, Germany.
| | - Matthias Geberth
- Gynäkologische Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, 68165 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Abenhardt
- Medizinischen Versorgungszentrum Onkologie, Onkologie im Elisenhof, 80335 Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medizinisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich University Hospital, 80337 Munich, Germany.
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen⁻Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21⁻23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, 89070 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Müller V, Wöckel A, Lux MP, Janni W, Hartkopf AD, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Welslau M, Belleville E, Brucker SY, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Schneeweiss A, Overkamp F. Update Breast Cancer 2018 (Part 4) - Genomics, Individualized Medicine and Immune Therapies - in the Middle of a New Era: Treatment Strategies for Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1119-1128. [PMID: 30498279 PMCID: PMC6255740 DOI: 10.1055/a-0715-2899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
New therapeutic developments aimed at treating women with advanced breast cancer currently focus both on identifying patients eligible for targeted therapeutic concepts and on the continuing development of immune therapies. The data on CDK4/6 inhibitors are now complete and consistent in this class of substances (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib). Further pathways under investigation are PI3K and AKT signalling pathways along with diverse approaches to their inhibition. Initial study results were also presented recently on both mechanisms of action. Insights into the PARP inhibitors, moreover, are increasing; studies in this respect are also examining in which population they can be used most effectively. This review offers a summary of the recent studies and an outline of the latest developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manfred Welslau
- Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämatolo-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis am Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | | | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fasching PA, Hartkopf AD, Gass P, Häberle L, Akpolat-Basci L, Hein A, Volz B, Taran FA, Nabieva N, Pott B, Overkamp F, Einarson H, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Janni W, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Untch M, Pott D, Lux MP, Geyer T, Liedtke C, Seeger H, Wetzig S, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Belleville E, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW, Brucker SY, Kolberg HC. Efficacy of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in addition to chemotherapy and trastuzumab in routine clinical treatment of patients with primary breast cancer: a multicentric analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:319-328. [PMID: 30324275 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5008-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant combination treatment with chemotherapy (CTX), trastuzumab (TZM), and pertuzumab (PTZ) has been shown to result in higher pathological complete response rates (pCR) in comparison with treatment with chemotherapy and trastuzumab (CTX/TZM). This analysis was aimed at real-world validation of these results from prospective randomized trials. METHODS In a retrospective analysis conducted in the PRAEGNANT network, patients were eligible for inclusion if they had either received neoadjuvant therapy with CTX/TZM or chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (CTX/TZM/PTZ) and subsequently underwent surgery for their primary breast cancer. The effect of the two neoadjuvant regimens on pCR in addition to commonly applicable predictors of pCR was analyzed in 300 patients from three study sites, using logistic regression analyses with treatment arm, age, clinical tumor stage, grading, and hormone receptor status as predictors. RESULTS pCR with complete disappearance of all tumor cells was seen in 30.2% (n = 58) of patients treated with CTX/TZM and in 52.8% (n = 57) of those treated with CTX/TZM/PTZ. CTX/TZM/PTZ was positively associated with pCR (adjusted odds ratio 2.44; 95% CI 1.49-4.02). Mastectomy rates were not influenced by the therapy. CONCLUSIONS The results of clinical trials were confirmed in this dataset of patients who were treated outside of clinical trials in everyday routine work. pCR rates can be improved by 20% with pertuzumab in routine clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hanna Einarson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurter Hormon und Osteoporosezentrum Goethestrasse, Goethestr.23, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Pott
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Harald Seeger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Taran FA, Schneeweiss A, Lux MP, Janni W, Hartkopf AD, Nabieva N, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Wöckel A, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Schütz F. Update Breast Cancer 2018 (Part 1) - Primary Breast Cancer and Biomarkers. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:237-245. [PMID: 29576629 PMCID: PMC5862549 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This summary provides an overview of how new therapies or new aspects of established therapies relate to the latest findings. Neoadjuvant therapy, local therapy, new aspects of systemic therapy, and prognostic and predictive factors are presented. In the neoadjuvant setting, the association between pathological complete response (pCR) and prognosis is still of interest as is the identification of new molecular predictors for new therapies such as CDK4/6 inhibitors. As regards surgical treatment, the target is still to reduce the aggressiveness of surgery. To achieve this, a better understanding particularly of ductal carcinoma in situ is required. With regard to systemic therapy, more data on the best combinations and therapy sequences for existing therapies is available. Finally, the use of prognostic and predictive factors may help to avoid overtreatment and ensure that patients only receive therapies which have been shown to be effective for their specific condition and have fewer side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schneeweiss A, Lux MP, Janni W, Hartkopf AD, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Wöckel A, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Fehm TN. Update Breast Cancer 2018 (Part 2) - Advanced Breast Cancer, Quality of Life and Prevention. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:246-259. [PMID: 29576630 PMCID: PMC5862553 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic breast cancer has become more complicated due to increasing numbers of new therapies which need to be tested. Therapies are now being developed to treat special clinical or molecular subgroups. Even though intrinsic molecular subtypes play a major role, more and more new therapies for subgroups and histological subtypes are being developed, such as the use of PARP inhibitors to treat patients with BRCA mutations (breast and ovarian cancer). Supportive therapies are also evolving, allowing problems such as alopecia or nausea and vomiting to be treated more effectively. Treatment-related side effects have a direct impact on the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer, and supportive therapy can improve compliance. Digital tools could be useful to establish better patient management systems. This overview provides an insight into recent trials and how the findings could affect routine treatment. Current aspects of breast cancer prevention are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Würfel F, Erber R, Huebner H, Hein A, Lux MP, Jud S, Kremer A, Kranich H, Mackensen A, Häberle L, Hack CC, Rauh C, Wunderle M, Gaß P, Rabizadeh S, Brandl AL, Langemann H, Volz B, Nabieva N, Schulz-Wendtland R, Dudziak D, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Fasching PA, Rübner M. TILGen: A Program to Investigate Immune Targets in Breast Cancer Patients - First Results on the Influence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:8-14. [PMID: 29950961 PMCID: PMC6016056 DOI: 10.1159/000486949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advancements in the treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer, many patients lack a durable response to these treatments. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-positive breast cancer who do not have a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a very poor prognosis. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been identified as a predictive marker for pCR after NACT in TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer. These patient populations could also be suitable for novel treatment strategies including neoepitope-based therapies. This work analyses the effect of TILs on the pCR in neoadjuvantly treated patients in the TILGen study and presents the procedures aimed at establishing neoepitope-based therapies in this study. METHODS Neoadjuvantly treated HER2-positive and TNBC patients were eligible for the presented analysis concerning the association between TILs and pCR. A total of 146 patients could be identified within the TILGen study. TILs were evaluated as percentage of stromal tumor tissue in core biopsies at primary diagnosis. The phenotype 'lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer' (LPBC) was associated with pCR by logistic regression adjusted for estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, HER2 status, age at diagnosis, and grading. RESULTS LPBC was seen in 24 (16.4%) patients. In this patient group, 66.7% achieved a pCR, while the pCR rate was 32.8% in patients with a low TIL count. The adjusted odds ratio was 6.60 (95% confidence interval 2.02-21.56; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION TILs are a strong predictor of pCR in TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Implications for the use of this information including the effect on prognosis might help to identify patients most likely to benefit from a neoepitope-based therapy approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Würfel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anita Kremer
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hannah Kranich
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Mackensen
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C. Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gaß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Anna-Lisa Brandl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Dudziak
- Department of Dermatology, Laboratory of Dendritic Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Rübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Huebner H, Fasching PA, Gumbrecht W, Jud S, Rauh C, Matzas M, Paulicka P, Friedrich K, Lux MP, Volz B, Gass P, Häberle L, Meier-Stiegen F, Hartkopf A, Neubauer H, Almstedt K, Beckmann MW, Fehm TN, Ruebner M. Filtration based assessment of CTCs and CellSearch® based assessment are both powerful predictors of prognosis for metastatic breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:204. [PMID: 29463222 PMCID: PMC5819661 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4115-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been shown to enable monitoring of treatment response and early detection of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare a well-established CTC detection method based on immunomagnetic isolation with a new, filtration-based platform. Methods In this prospective study, two 7.5 ml blood draws were obtained from 60 MBC patients and CTC enumeration was assessed using both the CellSearch® and the newly developed filtration-based platform. We analyzed the correlation of CTC-positivity between both methods and their ability to predict prognosis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated and Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated with thresholds of ≥1 and ≥5 detected CTCs. Results The CTC positivity rate of the CellSearch® system was 56.7% and of the filtration-based platform 66.7%. There was a high correlation of CTC enumeration obtained with both methods. The OS for patients without detected CTCs, regardless of the method used, was significantly higher compared to patients with one or more CTCs (p < 0.001). The median OS of patients with no CTCs vs. ≥ 1 CTC assessed by CellSearch® was 1.83 years (95% CI: 1.63–2.02) vs. 0.74 years (95% CI: 0.51–1.52). If CTCs were detected by the filtration-based method the median OS times were 1.88 years (95% CI: 1.74–2.03) vs. 0.59 years (95% CI: 0.38–0.80). Conclusions The newly established EpCAM independently filtration-based system is a suitable method to determine CTC counts for MBC patients. Our study confirms CTCs as being strong predictors of prognosis in our population of MBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Walter Gumbrecht
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Günther-Scharowsky-Str.1, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mark Matzas
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Günther-Scharowsky-Str.1, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Paulicka
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Günther-Scharowsky-Str.1, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katja Friedrich
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Günther-Scharowsky-Str.1, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Meier-Stiegen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Hans Neubauer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Katrin Almstedt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hartkopf AD, Huober J, Volz B, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Schwitulla J, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lux MP, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Fersis N, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A. Treatment landscape of advanced breast cancer patients with hormone receptor positive HER2 negative tumors – Data from the German PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry. Breast 2018; 37:42-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
|
46
|
Müller V, Nabieva N, Häberle L, Taran FA, Hartkopf AD, Volz B, Overkamp F, Brandl AL, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lux MP, Lüftner D, Belleville E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Beckmann MW, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Fehm TN, Brucker SY, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Wallwiener M. Impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry. Breast 2018; 37:154-160. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
47
|
Combinational siRNA delivery using hyaluronic acid modified amphiphilic polyplexes against cell cycle and phosphatase proteins to inhibit growth and migration of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Acta Biomater 2018; 66:294-309. [PMID: 29183848 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive form of breast cancer with few therapeutic options if it recurs after adjuvant chemotherapy. RNA interference could be an alternative therapy for metastatic breast cancer, where small interfering RNA (siRNA) can silence the expression of aberrant genes critical for growth and migration of malignant cells. Here, we formulated a siRNA delivery system using lipid-substituted polyethylenimine (PEI) and hyaluronic acid (HA), and characterized the size, ζ-potential and cellular uptake of the nanoparticulate delivery system. Higher cellular uptake of siRNA by the tailored PEI/HA formulation suggested better interaction of complexes with breast cancer cells due to improved physicochemical characteristics of carrier and HA-binding CD44 receptors. The siRNAs against specific phosphatases that inhibited migration of MDA-MB-231 cells were then identified using library screen against 267 protein-tyrosine phosphatases, and siRNAs to inhibit cell migration were further validated. We then assessed the combinational delivery of a siRNA against CDC20 to decrease cell growth and a siRNA against several phosphatases shown to decrease migration of breast cancer cells. Combinational siRNA therapy against CDC20 and identified phosphatases PPP1R7, PTPN1, PTPN22, LHPP, PPP1R12A and DUPD1 successfully inhibited cell growth and migration, respectively, without interfering the functional effect of the co-delivered siRNA. The identified phosphatases could serve as potential targets to inhibit migration of highly aggressive metastatic breast cancer cells. Combinational siRNA delivery against cell cycle and phosphatases could be a promising strategy to inhibit both growth and migration of metastatic breast cancer cells, and potentially other types of metastatic cancer. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The manuscript investigated the efficacy of a tailored polymeric siRNA delivery system formulation as well as combinational siRNA therapy in metastatic breast cancer cells to inhibit malignant cell growth and migration. The siRNA delivery was undertaken by non-viral means with PEI/HA. We identified six phosphatases that could be critical targets to inhibit migration of highly aggressive metastatic breast cancer cells. We further report on specifically targeting cell cycle and phosphatase proteins to decrease both malignant cell growth and migration simultaneously. Clinical gene therapy against metastatic breast cancer with effective and safe delivery systems is urgently needed to realize the potential of molecular medicine in this deadly disease and our studies in this manuscript is intended to facilitate this endeavor.
Collapse
|
48
|
Lux MP, Janni W, Hartkopf AD, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Huober JB, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Fasching PA. Update Breast Cancer 2017 - Implementation of Novel Therapies. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:1281-1290. [PMID: 29269955 PMCID: PMC5734938 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, numerous new therapy options for patients with breast cancer have been developed in clinical studies, with some options already approved for routine treatment. As the speed at which innovations are introduced increases, the importance of conferences also increases, as conferences are where the data underpinning new therapies are usually presented for the first time. This review looks at publications of the ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) and ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology) conferences in 2017, summarizes them and evaluates them in the context of existing data. The focus is on new insights for neoadjuvant therapy and new treatment options in the metastatic setting, such as the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors or PARP inhibitors. The first results of treatments with checkpoint inhibitors are presented. With the patent expiry of trastuzumab, a number of study results for trastuzumab biosimilars have also been published. The digitization of patient care provides the first results on quality of life and prognosis of patients with advanced cancer. Digital communications between patients and physicians are being evaluated in several studies in Germany. As the discussion about patient-relevant endpoints for patients in the metastatic setting continues, overall survival rates from studies of big endocrine-based therapies are urgently needed. Preliminary analyses of small study cohorts offer initial insights. In the context of improving patient care, in the coming years, questions will center on which patients particularly benefit from certain therapies and which patients need particular protection from specific side effects. Questions about these predictors are raised in many scientific projects as attention increasingly focuses on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens B. Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Polasik A, Tzschaschel M, Schochter F, de Gregorio A, Friedl TWP, Rack B, Hartkopf A, Fasching PA, Schneeweiss A, Müller V, Huober J, Janni W, Fehm T. Circulating Tumour Cells, Circulating Tumour DNA and Circulating MicroRNA in Metastatic Breast Carcinoma - What is the Role of Liquid Biopsy in Breast Cancer? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:1291-1298. [PMID: 29269956 PMCID: PMC5734937 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Dissemination of tumour cells and the development of solid metastases occurs via blood vessels and lymphatics. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can be detected in venous blood in patients with early and metastatic breast cancer, and their prognostic relevance has been demonstrated on numerous occasions. Repeated testing for CTCs and ctDNA, or regular so-called "liquid biopsy", can be performed easily at any stage during the course of disease. Additional molecular analysis allows definition of tumour characteristics and heterogeneity that may be associated with treatment resistance. This in turn makes personalised, targeted treatments possible that may achieve both improved overall survival and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arkadius Polasik
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marie Tzschaschel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Fabienne Schochter
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Amelie de Gregorio
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas W. P. Friedl
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wallwiener M, Heindl F, Brucker SY, Taran FA, Hartkopf A, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lux MP, Rauh C, Blum S, Nabieva N, Brodkorb TF, Faschingbauer C, Langemann H, Schulmeyer C, Volz B, Rübner M, Lüftner D, Müller V, Belleville E, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Ganslandt T, Beckmann MW, Schneeweiss A, Fasching PA, Gass P. Implementation and Feasibility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Data Entry in the PRAEGNANT Real-Time Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer Registry. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:870-878. [PMID: 28845051 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been incorporated into clinical trials for many symptoms and medical conditions. A transition from paper-based capture of PROs to electronic PROs (ePROs) has recently started. This study reports on the feasibility of ePRO assessment in a prospective registry including molecular data for patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS As part of the PRAEGNANT network, patients were invited by clinical trial staff, physicians, and nurses to complete three standardized Internet-based questionnaires (EQ 5D 5 L, CES-D and IPAQ). Feasibility was assessed by the staff members who assigned the user accounts by the patients. The completeness of the questionnaires was also assessed. RESULTS Fifteen of 17 patients who were asked agreed to participate to complete the PRO questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L and CES-D). However, the IPAQ (physical activity) questionnaire was only validly completed by 9 patients. Feasibility was ranked better by the physicians and dedicated clinical trial staff than by the nursing staff. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating ePRO questionnaires into an advanced breast cancer registry is feasible, and no major hurdles were reported. Involving stakeholders from the start, the application is tailored to the capacities and abilities of both patients and clinical staff. The patients' compliance was better with some questionnaires, but others may present difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedrich Overkamp
- Outpatient Department of Hematology and Oncology, Recklinghausen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Simon Blum
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Tobias F Brodkorb
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Faschingbauer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Carla Schulmeyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Rübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.,Institut für Frauengesundheit (IFG), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Ganslandt
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|