Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following O-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study

Comparison of intraoperative CT- and cone beam CT-based spinal navigation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Due to the complexity of neurovascular structures in the atlantoaxial region, spinal navigation for posterior C1-C2 instrumentation is nowadays a helpful tool to increase accuracy of surgery and safety of patients. Many available intraoperative navigation devices have proven their reliability in this part of the spine. Two main imaging techniques are used: intraoperative CT (iCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

PURPOSE

Comparison of iCT- and CBCT-based technologies for navigated posterior instrumentation in C1-C2 instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 81 consecutive patients from July 2014 to April 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Screw accuracy and operating time.

METHODS

Patients with C1-C2 instability received posterior instrumentation using C2 pedicle screws, C1 lateral mass or pedicle screws. All screws were inserted using intraoperative imaging either using iCT or CBCT systems and spinal navigation with autoregistration technology. Following navigated screw insertion, a second intraoperative scan was performed to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Accuracy was defined as the percentage of correctly placed screws or with minor cortical breach (<2 mm) as graded by an independent observer compared to misplaced screws.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with C1-C2 instability were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 34 patients were operated with the use of iCT and 47 with CBCT. No significant demographic difference was found between groups. In the iCT group, 97.7% of the C1-C2 screws were correctly inserted; 2.3% showed a minor cortical breach (<2 mm); no misplacement (>2 mm). In the CBCT group, 98.9% of screws were correctly inserted; no minor pedicle breach; 1.1% showed misplacement >2 mm. Accuracy of screw placement demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Both technologies allowed sufficient identification of screw misplacement intraoperatively leading to two screw revisions in the iCT and three in the CBCT group. Median time of surgery was significantly shorter using CBCT technology (166.5 minutes [iCT] vs 122 minutes [CBCT]; p<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal navigation using either iCT- or CBCT-based systems with autoregistration allows safe and reliable screw placement and intraoperative assessment of screw positioning. Using the herein presented procedural protocols, CBCT systems allow shorter operating time.

Novelties for increased safety in cranio-vertebral surgery: a review

The cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) was formerly considered a surgical "no man's land" due to its complex anatomical and biomechanical features. Surgical approaches and hardware instrumentation have had to be tailored in order to achieve successful outcomes. Nowadays, thanks to the ongoing development of new technologies and surgical techniques, CVJ surgery has come to be widely performed in many spine centers. Accordingly, there is a drive to explore novel solutions and technological nuances that make CVJ surgery safer, faster, and more precise. Improved outcome in CVJ surgery has been achieved thanks to increased safety allowing for reduction in complication rates. The Authors present the latest technological advancements in CVJ surgery in terms of imaging, biomaterials, navigation, robotics, customized implants, 3D-printed technology, video-assisted approaches and neuromonitoring.

Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion With C1-2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation in Pediatric Patients With Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio a Syndrome): A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of posterior atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) with C1-2 pedicle screw fixation for atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) in pediatric patients with mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (MPS IVA).

METHODS

This study included 21 pediatric patients with MPS IVA who underwent posterior AAF with C1-2 pedicle screw fixation. Anatomical parameters of the C1 and C2 pedicle were measured on preoperative computed tomography (CT). The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale was used to evaluate the neurological status. The fusion and accuracy of pedicle screw was assessed on postoperative CT. Demographic, radiation dose, bone density, surgical, and clinical data were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients reviewed included 21 patients younger than 16 years with an average age of 7.4 ± 4.2 years and an average of 20.9 ± 7.7 months follow-up. Fixation of 83 C1 and C2 pedicle screws was performed successfully and 96.3% of them were identified as being safe. One patient developed postoperative transient disturbance of consciousness and one developed fetal airway obstruction and died about 1 month after the surgery. Out of the remaining20 patients, fusion was achieved, symptoms were improved, and no other serious surgical complications were observed at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior AAF with C1-2 pedicle screw fixation is effective and safe for AAD in pediatric patients with MPS IVA. However, the procedure is technically demanding and should be performed by experienced surgeons with strict multidisciplinary consultations.

Single-Stage Posterior Approach for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With K-line (-) Using Thick Cervical Pedicle Screw System: A Technical Note and Preliminary Results

STUDY DESIGN

Technical note, retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

The optimal surgical strategy for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with a negative kyphosis line (K-line (-)) remains controversial. We present a novel single-stage posterior approach that converts the K-line from negative to positive in patients with multilevel cervical OPLL, using a posterior thick cervical pedicle screw (CPS) system and report the procedure's outcomes and feasibility.

METHODS

Twelve consecutive patients with multilevel cervical OPLL and K-line (-) underwent single-stage posterior thick CPS fixation, with laminectomy and foraminal decompression. A pre-bent rod was installed to convert the K-line from negative to positive. Radiographic parameters, including the extent and occupying ratio of OPLL and the C2-C7 angle, were examined. CPS accuracy was assessed using computed tomography. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were analyzed. Quality of life was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The mean OPLL extent was 5 vertebral body levels, and posterior decompression was performed on 4.2 segments.

RESULTS

The average C2-C7 angle and the occupying ratio of OPLL improved from -9.0° to 14.3° and from 63% to 33%, respectively. The preoperative JOA, VAS, and NDI scores significantly improved from 8.4 to 13.3, from 7.1 to 2.2, and from 21.9 to 9.3, respectively. The K-line was converted from negative to positive in all cases. No severe complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage posterior surgery with a thick CPS system may be a reliable and effective treatment for multilevel cervical OPLL and K-line (-).

Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients Using C1/C2 Instrumented Fusion Supplemented With Bilateral Atlantoaxial Joint Spacers: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Spinal fractures are among the most common traumatic injuries in elderly patients, with the odontoid process being frequently affected. As this patient group usually has high rates of comorbidity and chronic diseases, a nonoperative approach may offer a reasonable solution for a favorable fracture pattern.

OBJECTIVE

We modified the procedure by implanting a bilateral atlantoaxial joint spacer (model DTRAX) into the joint space and review our experience utilizing this technique for the treatment of patients with a fracture of the odontoid process.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was performed on patients treated surgically for unstable traumatic fractures of the odontoid process. The stabilization was performed using a dorsal rod and screw instrumentation of the lateral mass of the atlas and the pars interarticularis of the axis. The procedure was further modified by implanting a bilateral atlantoaxial joint spacer (DTRAX) into the joint space bilaterally after the removal of the articular cartilage. Patients older than 70 years with a traumatic fracture of the odontoid process were included. Pain was assessed pre- and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). To verify fusion during follow-up, either x-ray imaging of the cervical spine or magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 5 patients were included in our study. Four patients had an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 3 and 1 had a score of 4. The average duration of surgery was 187 ± 38.1 minutes. The average blood loss during the procedure was 340 ± 270 mL. The average radiological follow-up period was 21.2 ± 17.5 months. Preoperatively, the average VAS pain score was 2.3 ± 3.3. Postoperatively, the mean VAS decreased to 0.6 ± 0.9. The average follow-up period for pain was 27.2 ± 19 months. No patient showed neurological deficits before or after surgery. Follow-up demonstrated solid fusion in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The fusion of the atlantoaxial joint with bilateral atlantoaxial joint spacers represents a suitable and feasible option for achieving high fusion rates in elderly patients with odontoid fractures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A significant percentage of patients who are treated non-operatively will experience nonunion, which may cause instability of the atlantoaxial joint. Posterior fixation with screws and rods is a treatment option, but it leaves the cartilaginous joint surface in place, which can be an impediment to the fusion process. In other cases, degenerative collapse of the C1/C2 joint can cause compression of the C2 nerve root.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Comparison of Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based 3-Dimensional Navigation and Fluoroscopy in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a highly successful procedure to treat spinal cord or nerve root compression; however, complications can still occur. With advancements in imaging, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction allows real-time instrument tracking in a surgical field relative to the patient's anatomy. Here, we compare plate positioning and short-term outcomes when using 3D navigation to fluoroscopy in ACDF for degenerative spine disease.

METHODS

All ACDFs for cervical spondylosis performed by 6 surgeons at a single center between 2010 and 2018 were included. ACDFs were divided into those performed using 3D navigation or fluoroscopy. Records were assessed for patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology score, number of operated interspaces, operative time, length of stay, perioperative complications, and 90-day readmissions. Postoperative images were reviewed for lateral and angular plate deviations.

RESULTS

A total of 193 ACDFs performed with 3D navigation and 728 performed with fluoroscopy were included. After controlling for demographics and surgical characteristics, using 3D navigation was associated with less lateral plate deviation (P = 0.048) and longer operative times per interspace (P < 0.001) but was not associated with angular plate deviation (P = 0.724), length of stay (P = 0.393), perioperative complications (P = 0.844), and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.539).

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3D navigation in ACDF for degenerative disease is associated with slightly more midline plate positioning and comparable short-term outcomes as using fluoroscopy and can be a suitable alternative. Advantages of using this technology, such as improved visualization of anatomy, should be weighed against disadvantages, such as increased operative time, on a per-patient basis.

Transpedicular Screw Placement Accuracy Using the O-Arm Versus Freehand Technique at a Single Institution

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the O-arm as an intraoperative imaging tool by comparing accuracy of pedicle screw placement to freehand technique.

METHODS

The study comprised a total of 1161 screws placed within the cervical (n = 187) thoracic (n = 657), or lumbar (n = 317) spinal level. A pedicle breach was determined by any measurable displacement of the screw outside of the pedicle cortex in any plane on postoperative images. Each pedicle screw was subsequently classified by its placement relative to the targeted pedicle. Statistical analysis was then performed to determine the frequency and type of pedicle screw mispositioning that occurred using the O-arm versus freehand technique.

RESULTS

A total of 155 cases (O-arm 84, freehand 71) involved the placement of 454 pedicle screws in the O-arm group and 707 pedicle screws in the freehand group. A pedicle breach occurred in 89 (12.6%) screws in the freehand group and 55 (12.1%) in the O-arm group (P = .811). Spinal level operated upon did not influence pedicle screw accuracy between groups (P > .05). Three screws required revision surgery between the 2 groups (O-arm 1, freehand 2, P > .05). The most frequent breach type was a lateral pedicle breach (O-arm 22/454, 4.8%; freehand 54/707, 7.6%), without a significant difference between groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the O-arm coupled with navigation does not assure improved transpedicular screw placement accuracy when compared with the freehand technique.

Atlantoaxial posterior screw fixation using intra-operative spinal navigation with three-dimensional isocentric C-arm fluoroscopy

PURPOSE

Intra-operative image acquisition coupled with navigation aims to increase screw placement accuracy, and it is particularly helpful in complex spinal procedures. The aim of this study is to analyze the accuracy and reliability of posterior atlanto-axial fixation using spinal navigation combined with intra-operative 3D isocentric C-arm.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients presenting with C1-C2 instability and treated by posterior atlanto-axial fixation in our center between December 2016 and September 2018. Screw positioning was guided by intra-operative navigation, registered with surface matching procedure on a previously obtained CT scan and controlled by intra-operative 3D isocentric C-arm. Age, sex, pre- and post-operative neurological status, duration of surgery, presence/absence of vertebral artery injury, and screw placement were retrospectively collected from patients' records. All patients underwent clinical and radiological follow-up at three months after surgery. Radiological assessment of screw positioning was performed by an independent radiologist using the Gertzbein and Robbins grading.

RESULTS

N = 11 (7F, 4 M) consecutive patients were included, with a mean age of 72 years (range from 51 to 85). N = 44 navigated screws were inserted and controlled with intra-operative 3D fluoroscopy at the end of the procedure. An acceptable screw positioning (Gertzbein-Robbins grade A and B) was obtained in all cases (100%). No vertebral artery injury was observed. Mean operating time was 123 minutes. At three months, no screw loosening or displacement was observed.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, spinal navigation coupled with intra-operative 3D fluoroscopy proved to be reliable and safe for C1-C2 screw placement.

O-Arm Assisted Cervicothoracic Spine Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy Is Higher Than C-Arm Fluoroscopy

OBJECTIVE

We compared the accuracy of C-arm fluoroscopy versus O-arm-assisted pedicle screw (PS) placement in the cervicothoracic spinal junction (CTSJ).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PS placement in the CTSJ (C7-T4) at our hospital were included in this study. Of 37 patients who underwent PS placement in the CTSJ, 20 underwent intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy-assisted surgery (C Group) and 17 underwent intraoperative O-arm-assisted surgery (O Group). In total, 159 PSs were placed-73 in the C Group and 86 in the O Group. The accuracy of PS placement was compared between the C Group and O Group using the classification proposed by Gertzbein and Robbins to analyze pedicle violation.

RESULTS

PS accuracy was higher in the O Group than C Group; PS placement evaluated as grade A, representing no perforation, was 95.3% (82/86) for the O Group, whereas it was 78.1% (57/73) for the C Group. There was a clear statistically significant difference in accuracy of PS placement between the groups (P = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

O-arm-assisted surgery improved the accuracy of PS placement in the CTSJ.

Utility of O-arm navigation for atlantoaxial fusion with Bow Hunter's syndrome

Background:

In spinal instrumentation surgery, safe and accurate placement of implants such as lateral mass screws and pedicle screws should be a top priority. In particular, C2 stabilization can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the upper cervical spine. Here, we present a case of Bow Hunter’s syndrome (BHS) successfully treated by an O-arm-navigated atlantoaxial fusion.

Case Description:

A 53-year-old male presented with a 10-year history of repeated episodes of transient loss of consciousness following neck rotation to the right. Although the unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed no pathological findings, the MR angiogram with dynamic digital subtraction angiography revealed a dominant left vertebral artery (VA) and hypoplasia of the right VA. The latter study further demonstrated significant flow reduction in the left VA at the C1-C2 level when the head was rotated toward the right. With these findings of BHS, a C1-C2 decompression/posterior fusion using the Goel-Harms technique with O-arm navigation was performed. The postoperative cervical X-rays showed adequate decompression/fixation, and symptoms resolved without sequelae.

Conclusion:

C1-C2 posterior decompression/fusion effectively treats BHS, and is more safely/effectively performed utilizing O-arm navigation for C1-C2 screw placement.

First reported use of real-time intraoperative computed tomography angiography image registration using the Machine-vision Image Guided Surgery system: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Vertebral artery injury is a devastating potential complication of C1–2 posterior fusion. Intraoperative navigation can reduce the risk of neurovascular complications and improve screw placement accuracy. However, the use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) increases radiation exposure and operative time, and it is unable to image vascular structures. The Machine-vision Image Guided Surgery (MvIGS) system uses optical topographic imaging and machine vision software to rapidly register using preoperative imaging. The authors presented the first report of intraoperative navigation with MvIGS registered using a preoperative CT angiogram (CTA) during C1–2 posterior fusion.

OBSERVATIONS

MvIGS can register in seconds, minimizing operative time with no additional radiation exposure. Furthermore, surgeons can better adjust for abnormal vertebral artery anatomy and increase procedure safety.

LESSONS

CTA-guided navigation generated a three-dimensional reconstruction of cervical spine anatomy that assisted surgeons during the procedure. Although further study is needed, the use of intraoperative MvIGS may reduce the risk of vertebral artery injury during C1–2 posterior fusion.

Combined 3-dimensional printing model and 3-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation to assist C2 pedicle screw insertion: A case report

RATIONALE

The misplaced cervical screw can cause catastrophic surgical complications, such as nerve root damage, vertebral artery compromise, spinal cord injury, and even paraplegia. Thus, the present study aims to describe a novel technique of 3-dimensional printing model (3DPM) combined with 3-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation (3DFN) to facilitate C2 pedicle screw insertion.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 56-year-old male patient presented hypoesthesia of the trunk and extremities, accompanied by a walking disorder.

DIAGNOSES

Congenital atlantoaxial malformation with atlantoaxial dislocation.

INTERVENTIONS

He underwent an occipital cervical fusion. We used 3DPM and 3DFN technology to guide C2 pedicle screws insertion.

OUTCOMES

We inserted 2 pedicle screws and 4 lateral mass screws using the combined 3DPM and 3DFN technology. All screws were classified as excellent position postoperatively. The surgical duration, total fluoroscopic time, and the bleeding volume were 258 minutes, 3.9 minutes, and 237 mL, respectively. No surgical complications, such as neurological compromise, nonunion, dysphagia, infection, polypnea, fixation failure, pseudarthrosis formation, or revision surgery, were observed. The follow-up duration lasted 30 months.

LESSONS

The combination of 3DPM and 3DFN to promote C2 pedicle screws implantation is a safe, accurate, reliable, and useful technology, which can achieve an excellent therapeutic effect and avoid surgical complications. However, using the 3DPM and 3DFN technology may increase the financial burden of patients.

C2 medial pedicle screw: a novel "in-out-in" technique as an alternative option for posterior C2 fixation in cases with a narrow C2 isthmus

OBJECTIVE

The authors describe a novel "in-out-in" technique as an alternative option for posterior C2 screw fixation in cases that involve narrow C2 isthmus. Here, they report the preliminary radiological and clinical outcomes in 12 patients who had a minimum 12-month follow-up period.

METHODS

Twelve patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation underwent atlantoaxial reduction and fixation. All patients had unilateral hypoplasia of the C2 isthmus that prohibited insertion of pedicle screws. A new method, the C2 medial pedicle screw (C2MPS) fixation, was used as an alternative. In this technique, the inner cortex of the narrow C2 isthmus was drilled to obtain space for screw insertion, such that the lateral cortex could be well preserved and the risk of vertebral artery injury could be largely reduced. The C2MPS traveled along the drilled inner cortex into the anterior vertebral body, achieving a 3-column fixation of the axis with multicortical purchase.

RESULTS

Satisfactory C2MPS placement and reduction were achieved in all 12 patients. No instance of C2MPS related vertebral artery injury or dural laceration was observed. There were no cases of implant failure, and solid fusion was demonstrated in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel in-out-in technique can provide 3-column rigid fixation of the axis with multicortical purchase. Excellent clinical outcomes with low complication rates were achieved with this technique. When placement of a C2 pedicle screw is not possible due to anatomical constraints, the C2MPS can be considered as an efficient alternative.

Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and accuracy of the C2 pedicle versus C2 pars screws placement and free-hand technique versus navigation for upper cervical fusion patients.

Methods

Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify all papers published up to April 2020 that have evaluated C2 pedicle/pars screws placement accuracy. Two authors individually screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The accuracy rates associated with C2 pedicle/pars were extracted. The pooled accuracy rate estimated was performed by the CMA software. A funnel plot based on accuracy rate estimate was used to evaluate publication bias.

Results

From 1123 potentially relevant studies, 142 full-text publications were screened. We analyzed data from 79 studies involving 4431 patients with 6026 C2 pedicle or pars screw placement. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Overall, funnel plot and Begg’s test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the accuracy rates were 93.8% for C2 pedicle screw free-hand, 93.7% for pars screw free-hand, 92.2% for navigated C2 pedicle screw, and 86.2% for navigated C2 pars screw (all, P value < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the accuracy of placement C2 pedicle versus C2 pars screws with the free-hand technique and the free-hand C2 pedicle group versus the navigated C2 pedicle group (all, P value > 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, there was no difference in the safety and accuracy between the free-hand and navigated techniques. Further well-conducted studies with detailed stratification are needed to complement our findings.

Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion Using O-Arm-Based 3D Navigation: Technical Advancement to Improve Accuracy of Screws

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report the technical advancement to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using O-arm-based 3D navigation.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients who underwent CPS using O-arm in the spine level of C2 to C7 between June 2013 and February 2020 were involved. In the first phase, a reference frame was placed onto the spinous process of the cranial vertebrae and used it at a maximum of 3 vertebral levels. The navigation guide sleeve was used to drill a screw hole. In the second phase, a reference frame that can hold 3 vertebrae was introduced. In the third phase, a drill guide sleeve to minimize bending of the drill tip was developed. In the fourth phase, navigated surgical drill was introduced. Screw accuracy was assessed using Neo classification: grade (G) 0, no perforation; G1, perforation <2 mm; G2, perforation 2-4 mm; and G3, perforation >4 mm.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 67 (19-88) years. A total of 317 CPSs were inserted. In total, 83 screws were inserted in the first phase, 60 in the second phase, 87 in the third phase, and 87 in the fourth phase. The total proportion of malpositioning was 3.8% (12/317 screws) and all were G1; 6.0% (5/83 screws) in the first phase, 8.3% (5/60 screws) in the second phase, 1.2% (1/87 screws) in the third phase, and 1.2% (1/87 screws) in the fourth phase (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

O-arm use improved CPS placement accuracy with the advancement of techniques and instruments.

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes of C1-2 Fusion Spine Surgery between Intraoperative Computed Tomography Image Based Navigation-Guided Operation and Fluoroscopy-Guided Operation

OBJECTIVE

Fixation of the C1-2 segment is challenging because of the complex anatomy in the region and the need for a high degree of accuracy to avoid complications. Preoperative 3D-computed tomography (CT) scans can help reduce the risk of complications in the vertebral artery, spinal cord, and nerve roots. However, the patient may be susceptible to injury if the patient's anatomy does not match the preoperative CT scans. The intraoperative 3D image-based navigation systems have reduced complications in instrument-assisted techniques due to greater accuracy. This study aimed to compare the radiologic outcomes of C1-2 fusion surgery between intraoperative CT image-guided operation and fluoroscopy-guided operation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the radiologic images of 34 patients who underwent C1-2 fusion spine surgery from January 2009 to November 2018 at our hospital. We assessed 17 cases each of degenerative cervical disease and trauma in a study population of 18 males and 16 females. The mean age was 54.8 years. A total of 139 screws were used and the surgical procedures included 68 screws in the C1 lateral mass, 58 screws in C2 pedicle, nine screws in C2 lamina and C2 pars screws, four lateral mass screws in sub-axial level. Of the 34 patients, 19 patients underwent screw insertion using intraoperative mobile CT. Other patients underwent atlantoaxial fusion with a standard fluoroscopy-guided device.

RESULTS

A total of 139 screws were correctly positioned. We analyzed the positions of 135 screws except for the four screws that performed the lateral mass screws in C3 vertebra. Minor screw penetration was observed in seven cases (5.2%), and major pedicle screw penetration was observed in three cases (2.2%). In one case, the malposition of a C2 pedicle screw was confirmed, which was subsequently corrected. There were no complications regarding vertebral artery injury or onset of new neurologic deficits. The screw malposition rate was lower (5.3%) in patients who underwent intraoperative CT-based navigation than that for fluoroscopy-guided cases (10.2%). And we confirmed that the operation time can be significantly reduced by surgery using intraoperative O-arm device.

CONCLUSION

Spinal navigation using intraoperative cone-beam CT scans is reliable for posterior fixation in unstable C1-2 pathologies and can be reduced the operative time.

Efficacy and Safety of Atlantoaxial Fluoroscopy-guided Pedicle Screw Fixation in Patients Younger Than 12 Years: A Radiographic and Clinical Assessment

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-guided atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation in patients younger than 12 years.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation is a widely accepted treatment method for atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). However, data regarding its use for atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) in children are limited.

METHODS

Thirty-six consecutive patients younger than 12 years underwent C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation for AAD between 2007 and 2017. Anatomical parameters of the C1 pedicle were measured on preoperative computed tomography (CT). Accuracy of pedicle screw fixation was assessed on postoperative CT using the following definitions: Type I, screw threads completely within the bone; Type II, less than half the diameter of the screw violating the surrounding cortex; and Type III, clear violation of the transverse foramen or spinal canal. Demographic, surgical, radiation dose, and clinical data were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients underwent 144 screw fixations (67 C1 pedicle screws, 68 C2 pedicle screws, 5 C1 lateral mass screws, and 4 C-2 laminar screws) for a variety of pediatric AADs, with 36.5 ± 8.5 months of follow-up. Among the 135 pedicle screws, 96.3% were deemed "safe" (Type I or II) and 80.7% (109/135) of the screws were rated as being ideal (Type I); five screws (3.7%) were identified as unacceptable (Type III). Average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 92 mL, and the average total radiation exposure during the operation was 6.2 mGy (in the final 26 cases). There were no neurovascular injuries. All patients showed radiographic stability and symptom resolution.

CONCLUSION

C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation under fluoroscopy is safe and effective for the treatment of AAD in children younger than 12 years. However, it may be technically challenging owing to the special anatomical features of children and should be performed by experienced surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Optical Topographic Imaging for Spinal Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Navigation in the Cervical Spine: Initial Preclinical and Clinical Feasibility

OF BACKGROUND DATA

Computer-assisted 3-dimensional navigation may guide spinal instrumentation. Optical topographic imaging (OTI) is a novel navigation technique offering comparable accuracy and significantly faster registration workflow relative to current navigation systems. It has previously been validated in open posterior thoracolumbar exposures.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the utility and accuracy of OTI in the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective preclinical cadaveric and clinical cohort study.

METHODS

Standard midline open posterior cervical exposures were performed, with segmental OTI registration at each vertebral level. In cadaveric testing, OTI navigation guidance was used to track a drill guide for cannulating screw tracts in the lateral mass at C1, pars at C2, lateral mass at C3-6, and pedicle at C7. In clinical testing, translaminar screws at C2 were also analyzed in addition. Planned navigation trajectories were compared with screw positions on postoperative computed tomographic imaging, and quantitative navigation accuracies, in the form of absolute translational and angular deviations, were computed.

RESULTS

In cadaveric testing (mean±SD) axial and sagittal translational navigation errors were (1.66±1.18 mm) and (2.08±2.21 mm), whereas axial and sagittal angular errors were (4.11±3.79 degrees) and (6.96±5.40 degrees), respectively.In clinical validation (mean±SD) axial and sagittal translational errors were (1.92±1.37 mm) and (1.27±0.97 mm), whereas axial and sagittal angular errors were (3.68±2.59 degrees) and (3.47±2.93 degrees), respectively. These results are comparable to those achieved with OTI in open thoracolumbar approaches, as well as using current spinal neuronavigation systems in similar applications. There was no radiographic facet, canal or foraminal violations, nor any neurovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

OTI is a novel navigation technique allowing efficient initial and repeat registration. Accuracy even in the more mobile cervical spine is comparable to current spinal neuronavigation systems.

Intraoperative imaging and navigation for C1-C2 posterior fusion

Background:

Cervical axial spine fusion is challenging as the anatomy is extremely variable, and screw misplacement can lead to severe complications. C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pedicle screws are routinely placed under either fluoroscopic guidance or imaging-assisted navigation. Here, we compared the two for axial screw placement.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated patients’ treated from 2011–2016 utilizing the Harm’s procedure for C1-C2 screw fixation performed under either fluoroscopic guidance (nine patients) or image-assisted O-arm navigation (five patients). The groups had similar demographic and risk factors. Variables studied included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), accuracy of screw placement, screw reposition rates, and reoperation rates.

Results:

The mean EBL was 555CC and 260CC, respectively (not a significant difference) utilizing fluoroscopic versus O-arm navigation. Of interest, the mean surgical duration was 27 min longer in the O-arm versus fluoroscopy group (P = 0.03). Ten C2 pedicle screws were performed using O-arm navigation. Alternatively, as 9 of 18 C2 pedicles were considered “risky” for the placement of fluoroscopic-guided pedicle screws, laminar screws were utilized. Although the accuracy rate of C1 and C2 screw placement was higher for the navigated group, this finding was not significant. Similarly, despite complications involving two unacceptably placed screws from the fluoroscopic guidance group, there were no neurological sequelae.

Conclusion:

Axial cervical spine instrumentation is challenging. Utilization of Imaging-assisted navigation increases the accuracy and safety of screw placement.

Mini-open excision of osteoid osteoma using intraoperative O-arm/Stealth navigation

BACKGROUND

Although osteoid osteomas have traditionally been treated by surgical excision, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has gained favor as a less invasive procedure. However, RFA is contraindicated for osteoid osteomas close to the skin or crucial neurovascular structures, and is not covered by national health insurance in Japan. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of surgical excision of osteoid osteomas using intraoperative navigation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of five patients with osteoid osteoma who underwent a mini-open excision using O-arm/Stealth navigation at our institution. The osteoid osteomas were excised using a cannulated cutter or curetted out with the assistance of navigation.

RESULTS

Complete excision was achieved in all patients, which was confirmed by pathological examination. The mean skin incision was 2.1 cm (range, 1.5 to 3.0 cm) and the mean duration required for setup three-dimensional image was 15 min (range, 12 to 20 min). Although the mean visual analog scale score was 7 (range, 4 to 8) before surgery, all patients experienced relief from their characteristic pain immediately after surgery, with the mean scores of 2.2 (range, 1 to 3) and 0 at 2 days and 4 weeks after surgery, respectively. There was no intra-operative complication related to the navigation and no recurrence was observed during the mean follow-up period of 25 months (range, 13 to 33 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-open excision using intraoperative O-arm/Stealth navigation is a safe and accurate procedure for patients with osteoid osteoma, which could cover the limitation of RFA.

Intraoperative O-arm-navigated resection in musculoskeletal tumors

BACKGROUND

Although emerging evidence has suggested that computer-assisted navigation allows surgeons to plan the optimal level of resection without compromising the surgical margins, the precise accuracy of the procedures has been unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and safety of the musculoskeletal tumor resection using O-arm/Stealth intraoperative navigation assistance.

METHODS

A retrospective study of six patients with bone and soft tissue tumors who underwent surgical resection using O-arm/Stealth navigation system was performed. The histological diagnosis was osteosarcoma, metastatic bone tumor, leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma, respectively. Tumor resection was performed according to planned osteotomy planes determined on O-arm/Stealth three-dimensional intraoperative images. The resection accuracy, length of time for the procedures, surgical margins, and perioperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The distances between the entry and exit points for the planned and actual cuts were 1.5 ± 0.3 mm and 2.3 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, and the mean discrepancy of the osteotomy angle was 2.8 ± 1.2°. The mean length of time required for navigation was 14 min. A histological examination revealed clear margins in all patients. There were no complications related to navigation, and no patients developed local recurrence during a mean follow-up of 30.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The O-arm/Stealth intraoperative CT navigation system provides safe and accurate osteotomy in musculoskeletal tumor resections. However, surgeons should keep in mind and be careful of minimal errors during osteotomy, which are around 2 mm from the planned line.

Three-Dimensional Printed Model-Assisted Screw Installation in Treating Posterior Atlantoaxial Internal Fixation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a life-size 3-dimensional printing assisted posterior internal fixation. We performed a retrospective review of 138 patients who received posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation from October 2009 to March 2015 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Group A included 76 patients who received the conventional free-hand technique. Group B included 62 patients who were treated with internal fixation assisted by 3D printing. The placement accuracy of the screw was evaluated in the computed tomography images according to the methods of Hojo and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score, and the Neck Disability Index score. There were no significant differences in the clinical results at any of the follow-up time points regarding the JOA, VAS, or NDI scores between two group. However, compared to Group A, Group B had better results for screw installation (P = 0.003), shorter surgery time (P = 0.001), and less blood loss (P = 0.037). Compared to the conventional free-hand technique, 3D printed model–assisted is helpful to screw placement in atlantoaxial internal fixation, which can be used as a common tool to provides important guidance for upper cervical surgery.

Safety and accuracy of spinal instrumentation surgery in a hybrid operating room with an intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography

Although spinal instrumentation technique has undergone revolutionary progress over the past few decades, it may still carry significant surgery-related risks. The purpose of the present study was to assess the radiological accuracy of spinal screw instrumentation using a hybrid operating room (OR) and quantify the related radiation exposure. This retrospective study included 33 cases of complex spine fusion surgeries that were conducted using a hybrid OR with a flat panel detector (FPD) angiography system. Twelve cases (36.4%) were cervical, and 21 (63.6%) were thoracolumbar. The average number of spine fusion levels was 3 and 4.8, respectively, at the cervical and thoracolumbar spine levels. A FPD angiography system was used for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to obtain multi-slice spine images. All operations were conducted under optimized radiation shielding. Entrance surface doses (ESDs) and exposure times were recorded in all cases. A total of 313 screws were placed. Satisfactory screw insertion could be achieved in all cases with safe screw placement in 97.4% and acceptable placement in 2.6%. None of the cases showed any significant anatomical violation by the screws. The radiation exposure to the patients was absolutely consistent with the desired ESD value, and that to the surgeons, under the annual dose limit. These results suggest that the hybrid OR with a FPD angiography system is helpful to achieve safe and precise spinal fusion surgery, especially in complex cases.

Intraoperative Navigation Is Associated with Reduced Blood Loss During C1-C2 Posterior Cervical Fixation

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic injuries, degenerative/rheumatologic conditions, tumors, or infections of the upper cervical spine may in certain circumstances require surgical stabilization. C1 lateral mass screws (Harms technique) in combination with C2 instrumentation (pars, pedicle, translaminar screws) have become a mainstay of surgical treatment. The surgical anatomy of the C1 lateral mass can be challenging especially with the robust venous plexus that often causes significant bleeding with exposure of the C1-C2 articular complex. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the use of navigation reduced intraoperative blood loss during atlantoaxial fixation.

METHODS

We reviewed our institutional experience with atlantoaxial instrumentation with and without navigation from 2007 to 2016. We limited our cases to those requiring C1-C2 stabilization in traumatic and degenerative cases and not as part of more extensive surgical stabilizations. We identified 45 consecutive patients and compared intraoperative blood loss, need for transfusion, and time of procedure with and without the use of navigation.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the navigated (n = 20) versus non-navigated cases (n = 25). In addition, although the navigated cases initially were longer, currently there is no significant difference in the length of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, surgical navigation significantly reduced blood loss compared with non-navigated cases without increasing surgical time or risk of complication. Furthermore, navigation has the potential to reduce operative times due to a reduction in blood loss.

Spinal navigation for posterior instrumentation of C1-2 instability using a mobile intraoperative CT scanner

OBJECTIVE Spinal navigation techniques for surgical fixation of unstable C1-2 pathologies are challenged by complex osseous and neurovascular anatomy, instability of the pathology, and unreliable preoperative registration techniques. An intraoperative CT scanner with autoregistration of C-1 and C-2 promises sufficient accuracy of spinal navigation without the need for further registration procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and reliability of posterior C1-2 fixation using intraoperative mobile CT scanner-guided navigation. METHODS In the period from July 2014 to February 2016, 10 consecutive patients with instability of C1-2 underwent posterior fixation using C-2 pedicle screws and C-1 lateral mass screws, and 2 patients underwent posterior fixation from C-1 to C-3. Spinal navigation was performed using intraoperative mobile CT. Following navigated screw insertion in C-1 and C-2, intraoperative CT was repeated to check for the accuracy of screw placement. In this study, the accuracy of screw positioning was retrospectively analyzed and graded by an independent observer. RESULTS The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 10 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 80.7 ± 4.95 years (range 42-90 years). Unstable pathologies, which were verified by fracture dislocation or by flexion/extension radiographs, included 8 Anderson Type II fractures, 1 unstable Anderson Type III fracture, 1 hangman fracture Levine Effendi Ia, 1 complex hangman-Anderson Type III fracture, and 1 destructive rheumatoid arthritis of C1-2. In 4 patients, critical anatomy was observed: high-riding vertebral artery (3 patients) and arthritis-induced partial osseous destruction of the C-1 lateral mass (1 patient). A total of 48 navigated screws were placed. Correct screw positioning was observed in 47 screws (97.9%). Minor pedicle breach was observed in 1 screw (2.1%). No screw displacement occurred (accuracy rate 97.9%). CONCLUSION Spinal navigation using intraoperative mobile CT scanning was reliable and safe for posterior fixation in unstable C1-2 pathologies with high accuracy in this patient series.