Reducing Postoperative Abdominal Bulge Following Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction with Onlay Monofilament Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Biosynthetic Mesh

Evaluating mesh use for abdominal donor site closure after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite improvement in abdominal morbidity with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction compared to prior abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction, abdominal bulge, and hernia rates have been cited anywhere from 2% to 33%. As a result, some surgeons utilize mesh or other reinforcement upon donor-site closure, but its benefit in preventing abdominal wall morbidity has not been well-defined for DIEP flaps. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate DIEP donor-site closure techniques and the impact of mesh type and plane on abdominal-wall morbidity including hernia and bulge, relative to primary fascial closure.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMED, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were systematically reviewed for studies evaluating DIEP flap breast reconstruction abdominal-donor site closure, where any mesh reinforcement or primary fascial closure was specified, and postoperative outcomes of hernia and/or abdominal bulge were reported. Analysis was performed in Review Manager (RevMan) evaluating mesh use, type, and plane relative to primary fascial closure, using the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of significance level p < .05, and a random effects model to account for inter-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of the 2791 DIEP patients across 11 studies, 1901 patients underwent primary closure and 890 were repaired with mesh. When hernia and/or bulge were combined into a single complication, the use of any mesh did not significantly reduce its odds compared to primary closure (OR = 0.69, p = .20). Similarly, the use of any mesh did not significantly reduce the odds of bulge alone compared to primary closure (OR = 0.62, p = .43). However, the odds of hernia alone were significantly reduced by 72% with any mesh use (OR = 0.28, p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Mesh use was significantly associated with decreased odds of hernia alone with DIEP flap surgery, but there was no difference in bulge or combined hernia/bulge rates. As bulge is the more common abdominal morbidity after DIEP flap harvest in a patient with no prior abdominal surgery or risk factor for hernia, mesh use is not indicated in abdominal closure of all DIEP patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to characterize the specific indications for mesh use in the setting of DIEP flap surgery.

"Spin" in Observational Studies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is widely used in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the technique relies heavily on nonrandomized observational research, which has been found to have high risk of bias. "Spin" can be used to inappropriately present study findings to exaggerate benefits or minimize harms. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of spin in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of each spin category and strategy.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to November 15, 2022. Spin was assessed in abstracts and full-texts of included studies according to criteria proposed by Lazarus et al.

Results

There were 77 studies included for review. The overall prevalence of spin was 87.0%. Studies used a median of two spin strategies (interquartile range: 1-3). The most common strategies identified were causal language or claims (n = 41/77, 53.2%), inadequate extrapolation to larger population, intervention, or outcome (n = 27/77, 35.1%), inadequate implication for clinical practice (n = 25/77, 32.5%), use of linguistic spin (n = 22/77, 28.6%), and no consideration of the limitations (n = 21/77, 27.3%). There were no significant associations between selected study characteristics and the presence of spin.

Conclusions

The prevalence of spin is high in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. Causal language or claims are the most common strategy. Investigators, reviewers, and readers should familiarize themselves with spin strategies to avoid misinterpretation of research in DIEP reconstruction.

Fully resorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh for soft tissue repair and reconstruction: A scoping review

Background

Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) is a fully resorbable, biologically-produced polymer with a strength and flexibility comparable to permanent synthetic polymers. The objective was to identify/summarize all peer-reviewed publications involving P4HB mesh.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted within PubMed and included articles published through October 2022.

Results

A total of n = 79 studies were identified (n = 12 in vitro/bench; n = 14 preclinical; n = 6 commentaries; n = 50 clinical). Of the clinical studies, n = 40 reported results applicable to hernia and n = 10 to plastic/reconstructive surgery and involved patients of all Centers for Disease Control (CDC) wound classes and Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grades.

Conclusion

P4HB mesh provides long-term hernia repair strength and exhibits promising clinical outcomes beyond its resorption period. Future studies should include randomized controlled trials comparing P4HB to other biomaterials, as well as optimal patient selection, operative technique, long-term outcomes, minimization of potential mesh-related complications, and potential contraindications/complications for P4HB in hernia/abdominal wall reconstruction.

Analysis of 461 Consecutive Patients’ Donor Site Morbidity following Abdominal Tissue-Based Breast Reconstruction without Fascia Reinforcement Graft

Despite the popularity of breast reconstruction with abdominal flap, the integrity of the abdominal wall gets compromised after the operation. To decrease donor site morbidity, researchers have developed various inlay or onlay graft materials. However, the indications of use are unclear and dependent on the subjective decision of the surgeons. In this study, we have investigated donor site morbidities in breast reconstruction with free abdominal flap surgery in which graft materials were not used. We reviewed 461 consecutive cases for the preoperative characteristics of patients, intraoperative details, and postoperative donor site complications from May 2013 to March 2019. While 386 patients underwent deep inferior epigastric perforators (83.7%), muscle sparing type 2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were performed in 75 patients (16.3%). Bilateral dissection of the pedicle was performed in 162 patients, compared to unilateral dissection in 299 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 22.7 months. The overall complication rate in the donor site was 7.2%. The flap height was significantly associated with the overall complication. While majority of them were delayed wound healing ( $n=28$ , 6.1%), there were four cases of hematoma (0.9%). There were two cases of bulging (0.4%), which occurred in patients receiving bipedicle dissection; however, there was no case of hernia. Conclusions. Breast reconstruction with an abdominal free flap can be safely performed without fascia reinforcement graft even with bilateral dissection of the pedicle. With complete preservation of fascia and zigzag fascial incision, a low incidence of abdominal bulging can be obtained even with bilateral harvesting of the flap.

Diastasis recti repair with onlay mesh

INTRODUCTION

Diastasis recti represents a midline contour abnormality of the anterior abdominal wall that is secondary to attenuation of the linea alba. Severe diastasis recti is defined as attenuation of the linea alba as well as the linea semilunaris. Treatment options are variable and include conditioning exercises and surgical repair with or without mesh. This manuscript will review the indications and technique of onlay mesh for correction of severe diastasis recti.

METHODS

Abdominoplasty with diastasis repair has been performed in 63 women from January 2010 to January 2020. Of these, 4 had repair for severe diastasis that included plication and onlay mesh. The mesh was polypropylene in 3 patients and silk in 1 patient. Indications for onlay mesh included severe diastasis as a means of further reinforcing the strength of the anterior rectus sheath.

RESULTS

Of the 4 patients, all tolerated the operation well without morbidity. Natural contour was established in all. There were no infections, seromas, delayed healing or mesh removals. All drains were removed by 7 days.

CONCLUSION

The use of an onlay mesh has demonstrated success and should be considered in select patients for the surgical management of severe diastasis.

The Use of Semi-Absorbable Mesh and its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of semi-absorbable mesh on donor-site morbidity and patient-reported outcomes in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had DIEP flap breast reconstruction in our department from July 2007 to March 2019. Patients were invited to a comparative follow-up visit and grouped according to donor-site closure: primary fascial closure (the no-mesh group) and fascial reinforcement with semi-absorbable mesh in a subfascial position (the mesh group). The primary outcome of interest was donor-site morbidity, including bulging, hernia formation and rectus abdominis muscle strength. We also surveyed, surgical site complications and patient-reported outcomes using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0 and BREAST-Q^© version 2.0.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients had received DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Eighty-five patients (44.5%) with 108 DIEP flaps (53 patients in the mesh group and 32 patients in the no-mesh group) were included in the study. The mean BMI of the patients was significantly higher in the mesh group (mesh group, 26.9 vs. no-mesh group, 25.0, with p = 0.03). The incidence of hernia was significantly reduced in the mesh group (mesh group, 2.8% vs. no-mesh group, 13.5%, with p = 0.03). The incidence of bulging and the extent of rectus abdominis muscle strength were similar for both groups. Operative surgical site complications were reduced in the mesh group (mesh group, 7.5% vs. no-mesh group, 18.8%). There was no difference in patients' physical well-being and satisfaction with the donor site between groups. Patient-reported scar outcome was significantly better in the no-mesh group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our novel method of donor-site closure with semi-absorbable mesh in a subfascial position for reinforcement of the anterior rectus fascia on the DIEP donor site is safe. It has no negative impact on surgical site complications and patient-reported outcomes, while reducing the incidence of hernias on the donor-site in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Polypropylene Mesh Complications in the Sublay Position After Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Les complications des treillis de polypropylène en sous-couche après une reconstruction mammaire par voie abdominale

Introduction

Abdominal wall morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction is an important consideration for patients and surgeons. Previous studies are limited by multiple mesh locations or types. In this study, we evaluate specifically subfascial polypropylene mesh placement to determine a more definitive complication rate and basis for objective comparison.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution by 3 surgeons from 2015 to 2018. All patients with sublay placement of polypropylene mesh were included. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, type of reconstruction, and postoperative abdominal wall complications were recorded.

Results

A total of 114 flaps were performed on 81 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 48 were deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) flaps (42%), 43 were MS-2 TRAM flaps (37.8%), 20 were muscle sparing (MS-1) transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) flaps (17.5%), and 3 were free TRAM flaps (2.6%). Average follow-up was 392 days (range: 29-1191). Average body mass index was 30.7. No patients developed hernias. Two patients (2.5%) complained of post-operative bulges, neither of which required operative treatment. Two patients experienced superficial abdominal wall infection, one of which required admission and intravenous antibiotics. Ten patients (12.3%) had abdominal incision dehiscence, 3 of which required operative intervention. There were no cases of mesh exposure, contamination, or removal.

Conclusion

Polypropylene mesh is safe and effective, with subfascial placement resulting in low morbidity and low rates of bulge/hernia formation after microsurgical breast reconstruction. Consideration should be given to using polypropylene mesh for fascial repairs after microsurgical breast reconstruction, particularly in high-risk populations.

Comparison of Phasix, polypropylene, and primary closure of the abdominal donor site after bilateral free flap breast reconstruction: Long-term evaluation of abdominal hernia and bulge formation

BACKGROUND

Abdominal free flap harvest for breast reconstruction may result in significant morbidity in terms of hernias and bulges. Reinforcement of the donor site with mesh has been recommended to minimize the risk of hernias and bulges, but no studies exist evaluating the optimal type of mesh. Polypropylene has traditionally been used but the development of Phasix restorable mesh may be a reasonable alternative. Here, we compared the use of Phasix to polypropylene and primary closure and hypothesize that the former has lower rates of abdominal morbidity in the long term.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing bilateral free flap breast reconstruction from the abdomen was performed while patients with pedicle flaps or alternative donor sites were excluded. Patient demographics, medical/surgical history, cancer treatments, and flap type were analyzed. All patients were monitored for a minimum of 2 years for early donor site complications as well as hernia/bulges.

RESULTS

Sixty-six consecutive patients were included (40 patients with Phasix, 20 patients with polypropylene, and 6 patients with primary closure). Use of Phasix mesh resulted in higher initial operative costs ($2,750 vs. $72 vs. $0). Two patients with polypropylene mesh and one patient undergoing primary closure developed an abdominal bulge in an average follow-up of 25.2 months (11.5% vs. 0%, p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh placement for abdominal wall reinforcement after bilateral free flap breast reconstruction minimizes the risk of hernias and bulges. Although Phasix results in increased initial costs, abdominal morbidity is significantly decreased after follow-up beyond 2 years.

Spontaneous rupture of abdominal wall after breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap following mastectomy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The demand for breast reconstruction after mastectomy is rising. The use of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in autologous reconstruction is a popular approach. There were some reports about abdominal complications after breast reconstruction. However, there was no report about spontaneous rupture of abdominal wall.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old female patient was diagnosed with left breast cancer. Left mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed, and the breast was reconstructed using DIEP flap simultaneously. She suffered heavy abdominal pain and vomiting at postoperative day 4. Computed tomography showed bowel herniation into the subcutaneous tissue caused by left abdominal wall rupture. The abdominal wall was sutured and repaired using mesh by emergency surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case about spontaneous rupture of abdominal wall after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap to be reported in the English literature. DIEP flap on breast reconstructive surgery may cause spontaneous rupture of abdominal wall.