Schleimer K, Barbati ME, Grommes J, Hoeft K, Toonder IM, Wittens CHA, Jalaie H. Update on diagnosis and treatment strategies in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome due to chronic venous obstruction and role of endovenous recanalization.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019;
7:592-600. [PMID:
31068275 DOI:
10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.01.062]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
After a first episode of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) develops in 20% to 50% of patients despite adequate anticoagulation. Symptoms of PTS can vary from leg swelling to venous ulceration with disabling venous claudication. It significantly affects the patient's quality of life and has considerable socioeconomic consequences. This review gives an update on diagnosis and current treatment strategies in patients with PTS due to chronic venous obstruction, in particular regarding the role of endovenous procedures.
METHODS
This review article is based on a selective literature search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The terms "postthrombotic syndrome," "post-thrombotic syndrome," "chronic venous obstruction," "venous outflow obstruction," and "venous stent" were used as keywords. Selected publications addressed the diagnosis of and therapy for PTS. Acute deep venous thrombosis, thrombolysis, case reports, complications as a result of caval vein filters, animal experiments, PTS of the upper extremity, and PTS in children were excluded.
RESULTS
In addition to conservative treatment of PTS, the following invasive procedures are also available: open surgical reconstructions, hybrid procedures, and endovenous recanalization of the occluded iliocaval venous tract with stent angioplasty. Since introduction of dedicated venous stents in 2012, technical success, patency rates, and improvement in quality of life have been at least as good as results of open surgical reconstruction if not better.
CONCLUSIONS
First-line treatment should be conservative therapy. In case of therapy-resistant PTS with poor quality of life, the possibility of an invasive treatment should be evaluated. All invasive procedures are recommended with low levels of evidence. Therefore, deciding on an invasive treatment and type of procedure should be made individually. Because PTS is rarely a threat to life or limb, a minimally invasive treatment is preferred. Therefore, endovenous recanalization appears to be appropriate as the therapy of choice. In patients with involvement of the femoral confluence, endophlebectomy of the common femoral vein in addition to venous recanalization is inevitable to ensure an adequate inflow into the recanalized venous tract. It also secures a sufficient drainage of blood from the peripheral venous system. Because this hybrid procedure is burdened with a significantly higher risk of complications, strict criteria must be fulfilled to legitimize the indication for this procedure. For the best possible results to be achieved, the following perioperative and postoperative management must be considered: therapeutic anticoagulation, early mobilization, compression therapy, and systematic follow-up with duplex ultrasound.
Collapse