Plastic-Reconstructive Treatment Algorithm for Dead Space Management Following Septic Total Hip Arthroplasty Removal: AV Loop and Two-Stage Free Myocutaneous Latissimus Dorsi Flap

One vs. two-stage arteriovenous loops in lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps: Systematic review and metanalysis

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous loops are one of the main therapeutic alternatives to address the absence of recipient vessels in lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction. However, there is no consensus on whether to perform them in one or two surgical stages. The objective of this work is to determine whether the outcome of lower limb free flaps anastomosed to vascular loops depends on the number of surgical stages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines, on vascular loops and free flaps in lower limb. Survival rate, as well as major and minor complications were studied. A forest plot and Pearson's chi-square were used for statistical analysis. Study quality was assessed in duplicate using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. This study was registered on PROSPERO.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles using free flaps anastomosed to vascular loops in lower limb, either one or two-stage, were selected. A total of 296 flaps were included, 52% (n = 154) in one and 48% (n = 142) in two surgical times. No statistically significant differences were found in the survival rate (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.62; 5.47, p = .09 and p = .344) or major complications (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.31; 1.57, p = .56 and p = .92) of flaps between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available evidence, the outcome of free flaps anastomosed to vascular loops in the lower limb does not depend on the number of surgical stages they undergo. Although there is some heterogeneity in the groups studied, the decision on the number of procedures to be performed should be determined by the surgeon, concerning the clinical situation of the patient, as well as to the vascular, bone and soft tissue status of the extremity.

Key aspects of soft tissue management in fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group

A judicious, well-planned bone and soft tissue debridement remains one of the cornerstones of state-of-the-art treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI). Meticulous surgical excision of all non-viable tissue can, however, lead to the creation of large soft tissue defects. The management of these defects is complex and numerous factors need to be considered when selecting the most appropriate approach. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence with respect to soft tissue management in patients diagnosed with FRI. Specifically we discuss the optimal timing for tissue closure following debridement in cases of FRI, the need for negative microbiological culture results from the surgical site as a prerequisite for definitive wound closure, the optimal type of flap in case of large soft tissue defects caused by FRI and the role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in FRI. Finally, recommendations are made with regard to soft tissue management in FRI that should be useful for clinicians in daily clinical practice.Level of evidence Level V.

Individualized design of thoracodorsal artery perforator chimeric flap for customized reconstruction of complex three-dimensional defects in the extremities

BACKGROUND

It was always challenging to accurately and effectively reconstruct the complicated defects with three-dimensional tissue deficits in the extremities. Muscle-chimeric perforator flap is an excellent choice for repairing those complicated wound. However, problems like donor-site morbidity and time-consuming intramuscular dissection still exist. This purpose of this study was to present a novel design of the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) chimeric flap for the customized reconstruction of complex three-dimensional tissue defects in the extremities.

METHODS

From January 2012 to June 2020, 17 patients with complex three-dimensional deficits in the extremities were retrospectively analyzed. All patients in this series underwent extremity reconstruction using latissimus dorsi (LD)-chimeric TDAP flap. Three different types of LD-chimeric TDAP flaps were performed.

RESULTS

A total of seventeen TDAP chimeric flaps were successfully harvested for the reconstruction of those complex three-dimensional defects in extremities. Among them, Design Type A flaps were used in 6 cases, Design Type B flaps were performed in 7 cases, and Design Type C flaps were used in the remaining 4 cases. The sizes of the skin paddles ranged from 6 cm × 3 cm to 24 cm × 11 cm. Meanwhile, the sizes of the muscle segments ranged from 3 cm × 4 cm to 33 cm × 4 cm. All the flaps survived. Nevertheless, one case required re-exploration owing to venous congestion. Moreover, the primary closure of the donor site was successfully achieved in all patients, and the mean follow-up time was 15.8 months. Most of the cases displayed satisfactory contour.

CONCLUSION

The LD-chimeric TDAP flap is available for the reconstruction of complicated defects with three-dimensional tissue deficits in the extremities. It provided a flexible design for customized coverage of complex soft tissue defects with limited donor site morbidity.