Characteristics and Outcomes of Long-Stay Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Pediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes in lower and medium complexity care units: A Delphi study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of pediatric care is made more challenging to analyze by the need for specialist nursing and by the specific characteristics of pediatric patients, as opposed to adult patients, such as ongoing rapid growth and development, and different physical, cognitive, and emotional demands. Previous research has identified "Pediatric Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes" (PNSOs) in intensive care unit settings, though pediatric intensive care beds only represent a very limited percentage of hospital beds. To improve care quality and safety for a larger population of patients, this study aims to identify PNSOs in lower and medium-complexity care units (LMCCUs).

METHODS

This study uses the Delphi method to gather expert opinion on priority PNSOs in LMCCUs, with a 75 % consensus pass threshold. A preliminary list of PNSOs was identified from a literature review and used as inputs for two Delphi rounds conducted between January and March 2023.

RESULTS

27 panelists were recruited and passed 17 PNSOs: pressure injury; failure to rescue; patient/family experiences; central line-associated bloodstream infections; surgical site infections; healthcare-associated infections; medication errors; hospitalization breastfeeding continuity; peripheral intravenous infiltrate or extravasation; pediatric falls; pain assessment and management; vital sign monitoring; nutrition; discharge planning; family-centered care practice; healthcare environment; nurse voluntary turnover.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to research on PNSOs and builds consensus on priorities for LMCCUs. Future research should clinically evaluate these PNSOs and their association with organizational and professional variables often investigated in an adult but not a pediatric setting.

A national survey of current practice on patients with long term and additional needs in paediatric intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Patients with long term and additional needs (LEAP) in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are a growing and heterogenous cohort that provide unique challenges to clinicians. Currently no standard approach to define and manage this cohort exists.

AIM

To analyse bed occupancy, examine current practice, and explore ideas to improve PICU care of patients with long term and additional needs.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with LEAP were defined as meeting two or more of the following criteria: length of stay >14 days; life limiting condition; ≥2 failed extubations; hospital stay >1 month prior to PICU admission; likely to require long-term ventilation. An electronic survey was then sent to all UK PICUs, via the UK Paediatric Critical Care Society, to collect quantitative and qualitative data relating to bed occupancy, length of stay, multidisciplinary and family involvement, and areas of possible improvement. Data collection were occurred between 8 February 2022 and 14 March 2022. Quantitative data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 365 and SPSS Statistics version 28.0. Raw data and descriptive statistics were reported, including percentages and median with interquartile range for non-parametric data. Qualitative raw data were examined using thematic analysis. Analysis was undertaken independently by two authors and results assessed for concordance.

RESULTS

70.1% (17/24) PICUs responded. 25% (67/259) of PICU beds were occupied by patients with long term and additional needs. 29% (5/17) of responding units have tailored management plans to this cohort of patient. A further 11% (2/17) have guidelines for children with generic chronic illness. 12% (2/16) of responding units had a designated area and 81% (13/16) of responding units had designated professionals. The majority (68% and 62%) of responding units engaged families and community professionals in multidisciplinary meetings. When asked how the care of long term and additional needs patients might be improved five themes were identified: consistent, streamlined care pathways; designated transitional care units; designated funding and hospital-to-home commissioning; development of roles to facilitate collaboration between hospital and community teams; proactive discharge planning and parallel planning.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides a snapshot of UK practice for a cohort of patients that occupies a considerable proportion (29%) of PICU beds. While only a minority of responding PICUs offer specifically tailored management plans, the majority of units have designated professionals.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Opportunities exist to improve PICU care in LEAP patients in areas such as: streamlined care pathways, designated clinical areas, designated funding, and development of defined collaborative roles. Next steps may involve working group convention to develop a consensus definition and share good practice examples.

A Snapshot of Chronic Critical Illness in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

Children with chronic critical illness (CCI) represent the sickest subgroup of children with medical complexity. In this article, we applied a proposed definition of pediatric CCI to assess point prevalence in medical, cardiovascular, and combined pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), screening all patients admitted to six academic medical centers in the United States on May 17, 2017, for pediatric CCI (PCCI) eligibility. We gathered descriptive data to understand medical complexity and resource needs of children with PCCI in PICUs including data regarding hospitalization characteristics, previous admissions, medical technology, and chronic multiorgan dysfunction. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population and hospital data. The study cohort was divided between PICU-prolonged (stay > 14 days) and PICU-exposed (any time in PICU); comparative analyses were conducted. On the study day, 185 children met inclusion criteria, 66 (36%) PICU-prolonged and 119 (64%) PICU-exposed. Nearly all had home medical technology and most ( n  = 152; 82%) required mechanical ventilation in the PICU. The PICU-exposed cohort mirrored the PICU-prolonged with a few exceptions as follows: they were older, had fewer procedures and surgeries, and had more recurrent hospitalizations. Most ( n  = 44; 66%) of the PICU-prolonged cohort had never been discharged home. Children with PCCI were a sizable proportion of the unit census on the study day. We found that children with PCCI are a prevalent population in PICUs. Dividing the cohorts between PICU-prolonged and PICU-exposed helps to better understand the care needs of the PCCI population. Identifying and studying PCCI, including variables relevant to PICU-prolonged and PICU-exposed, could inform changes to PICU care models and training programs to better enable PICUs to meet their unique needs.

Distress and the Long-Stay Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Longitudinal Study of Parents and the Medical Team

Prolonged critical illness in children has emotional consequences for both parents and providers. In this observational cohort study, we longitudinally surveyed anxiety and depression in parents and moral distress in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) providers (attendings, fellows, and bedside registered nurses) and explored their trajectories and relationships. Anxiety/depression and provider moral distress were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Moral Distress Thermometer, respectively. The relationships of parental and provider distress were evaluated using Spearman's correlations, and their trajectories and potentially associated variables were explored using quadratic random slope and intercept models. Predetermined associated factors included demographic and clinical factors, including parent psychosocial risk and intubation status. We found parental anxiety and depression decreased over their child's admission, and parental psychosocial risk was significantly associated with anxiety (coefficient = 4.43, p  < 0.001). Clinicians in different roles had different mean levels and trajectories of moral distress, with fellows reporting greater distress early in admissions and nurses later in admissions. Parental anxiety/depression and provider distress were significantly, though moderately, correlated. We conclude that anxiety and depression in parents of children with prolonged PICU admissions and the moral distress of their clinicians correlate and vary over time and by provider role.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and healthcare resource use of pediatric chronic and non-chronic critically ill patients in intensive care units: a retrospective national registry study

Introduction

Chronic critically ill patients (CCI) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are at risk of negative health outcomes, and account for a considerable amount of ICU resources. This study aimed to (a) describe the prevalence of CCI children, (b) compare their clinical characteristics and ICU resources use with non-CCI children, and (c) identify associated risk factors of CCI.

Methods

A retrospective national registry study including 2015-2017 data from the eight Swiss PICUs of five tertiary and three regional hospitals, admitting a broad case-mix of medical and surgical patients, including pre- and full-term infants. CCI patients were identified using an adapted definition: PICU length of stay (LOS) ≥8 days and dependence on ≥1 PICU technology.

Results

Out of the 12,375 PICU admissions, 982 (8%) were CCI children and compared to non-CCI children, they were younger (2.8 vs. 6.7 months), had more cardiac conditions (24% vs. 12%), and higher mortality rate (7% vs. 2%) (p < 0.001). Nursing workload was higher in the CCI compared to the non-CCI group (22 [17-27]; 21 [16-26] respectively p < 0.001). Factors associated with CCI were cardiac (aOR = 2.241) and neurological diagnosis (aOR = 2.062), surgery (aORs between 1.662 and 2.391), ventilation support (aOR = 2.278), high mortality risk (aOR = 1.074) and agitation (aOR = 1.867).

Conclusion

the results confirm the clinical vulnerability and the complexity of care of CCI children as they were defined in our study. Early identification and adequate staffing is required to provide appropriate and good quality care.

A Focused Review of Long-Stay Patients and the Ethical Imperative to Provide Inpatient Continuity

Long-stay patients are an impactful, vulnerable, growing group of inpatients in today's (and tomorrow's) tertiary hospitals. They can outlast dozens of clinicians that necessarily rotate on and off clinical service. Yet, care from such rotating clinicians can result in fragmented care due to a lack of continuity that insufficiently meets the needs of these patients and their families. Using long-stay PICU patients as an example, this focused review discusses the impact of prolonged admissions and how our fragmented care can compound this impact. It also argues that it is an ethical imperative to provide a level of continuity of care beyond what is considered standard of care and offers a number of strategies that can provide such continuity.

Defining Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Children with chronic critical illness (CCI) are hypothesized to be a high-risk patient population with persistent multiple organ dysfunction and functional morbidities resulting in recurrent or prolonged critical care; however, it is unclear how CCI should be defined. The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the existing literature for case definitions of pediatric CCI and case definitions of prolonged PICU admission and to explore the methodologies used to derive these definitions.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science) from inception to March 3, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that provided a specific case definition for CCI or prolonged PICU admission. Crowdsourcing was used to screen citations independently and in duplicate. A machine-learning algorithm was developed and validated using 6,284 citations assessed in duplicate by trained crowd reviewers. A hybrid of crowdsourcing and machine-learning methods was used to complete the remaining citation screening.

DATA EXTRACTION

We extracted details of case definitions, study demographics, participant characteristics, and outcomes assessed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixty-seven studies were included. Twelve studies (18%) provided a definition for CCI that included concepts of PICU length of stay (n = 12), medical complexity or chronic conditions (n = 9), recurrent admissions (n = 9), technology dependence (n = 5), and uncertain prognosis (n = 1). Definitions were commonly referenced from another source (n = 6) or opinion-based (n = 5). The remaining 55 studies (82%) provided a definition for prolonged PICU admission, most frequently greater than or equal to 14 (n = 11) or greater than or equal to 28 days (n = 10). Most of these definitions were derived by investigator opinion (n = 24) or statistical method (n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric CCI has been variably defined with regard to the concepts of patient complexity and chronicity of critical illness. A consensus definition is needed to advance this emerging and important area of pediatric critical care research.

Parent and Provider Perspectives on Primary Continuity Intensivists and Nurses for Long-Stay Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients

Rationale: Primary continuity intensivists and nurses for long-stay patients (LSPs) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are understudied strategies used to mitigate the fragmented care of typical rotating care models. Objectives: To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of primary continuity intensivists and nurses for LSPs as perceived by their parents and PICU providers. Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional mixed-methods study of the perspectives of parents whose children were admitted to a PICU for >10 days and had one or more complex chronic conditions regarding the care provided by their PICU intensivists and nurses. As part of a trial, patients had been randomized to care provided by a rotating on-service intensivist who changed weekly and by PICU nurses who changed every 12 hours (usual care group) or to care provided by the same on-service intensivist plus a primary continuity intensivist and primary nurses (primary group). In addition, PICU providers (intensivists, fellows, and nurses) were queried for their perspectives on primary intensivists and nurses. Novel questionnaires, assessed for content and face validity and for readability, were used. The parental questionnaire involved indicating their degree of agreement with 16 statements about their children's care. The provider questionnaire involved rating potential advantages of primary continuity intensivists and nurses and estimating the frequency of disadvantages. Descriptive statistics and divergent stack bar charts were used; parents' and providers' responses were compared, stratified by their children's group (usual care or primary) and provider role, respectively. Results: The parental response rate was 71% (120 completed questionnaires). For 10 of 16 statements, parents whose children had primary continuity intensivists and nurses indicated significantly more positive perceptions of care (e.g., communication, listening, decision making, problems due to changing providers). The provider response rate was 61% (117 completed questionnaires); more than 80% believed that primary intensivists and nurses were highly or very highly beneficial for LSPs. Providers perceived more benefits for patients/families (e.g., informational continuity, facilitating and expediting decision making) than for staff/institutions (e.g., staff satisfaction). Providers reported associated stress, expenditure of time and effort, and decreased staffing flexibility with primary practices. Conclusions: Perceived benefits of primary continuity intensivists and nurses by both parents and providers support more widespread adoption and study of these continuity strategies.

Outcomes for critical illness in children with cancer: Analysis of risk factors for adverse outcome and resource utilization from a specialized center in Mexico

Introduction

Children with cancer have a higher risk of adverse outcomes during critical illness than general pediatric populations. In Low- and middle-income countries, lack of resources can further negatively impact outcomes in critically ill children with cancer.

Methods

In this study, we describe the outcomes of a large cohort of children with cancer including mortality and resource utilization. We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to our PICU between December 12th, 2013 and December 31st, 2019. Outcomes were defined as recovery or death and resource utilization was described via use of critical care interventions, Length of stay as well as PICU- and Mechanical Ventilation- free days.

Results

Overall mortality was 6.9% while mortality in the unplanned admissions was 9.1%. This remained lower than expected mortality based on PIM2 scoring. Type of PICU admission, Neurological Deterioration as a cause of PICU admission, and PIM2 were significant as risk factors in univariate analysis, but only PIM2 remained significant in the multivariate analysis.

Discussion

Our Study shows that high survival rates are achievable for children with cancer with critical illness in resource-limited settings with provision of high-quality critical care. Organizational and clinical practice facilitating quality improvement and early identification and management of critical illness may attenuate the impact of known risk factors for mortality in this population.

A Single-Centered Randomized Controlled Trial of Primary Pediatric Intensivists and Nurses

Background: For long-stay patients (LSP) in pediatric intensive care units (PICU), frequently rotating providers can lead to ineffective information sharing and retention, varying goals and timelines, and delayed decisions, likely contributing to prolonged admissions. Primary intensivists (one physician serves as a consistent resource for the patient/family and PICU providers) and primary nurses (a small team of PICU nurses provide consistent bedside care) seek to augment usual transitory PICU care, by enhancing continuity and, potentially, decreasing length of stay (LOS). Methods: A single-centered, partially blinded randomized controlled trial of primary intensivists and nurses versus usual care. PICU patients admitted for or expected to be admitted for >10 days and who had ≥1 complex chronic condition were eligible. A block randomization with 1:1 allocation was used. The primary outcome was PICU LOS. Multiple secondary outcomes were explored. Results: Two hundred LSPs were randomized-half to receive primaries and half to usual care. The two groups were not significantly different in their baseline and admission characteristics. LSPs randomized to receive primaries had a shorter, but non-significant, mean LOS than those randomized to usual care (32.5 vs. 37.1 days, respectively, p = .19). Compared to LSPs in the usual care group, LSPs in the primary group had fewer unplanned intubations. Among LSPs that died, DNR orders were more prevalent in the primary group. Other secondary outcome and balance metrics were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Primary intensivists and nurses may be an effective strategy to counteract transitory PICU care and serve the distinctive needs of LSPs. However, additional studies are needed to determine the ways and to what extent they may accomplish this.

Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes among Patients Cared for in Paediatric Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review

Measuring the effectiveness of nursing interventions in intensive care units has been established as a priority. However, little is reported about the paediatric population. The aims of this study were (a) to map the state of the art of the science in the field of nursing-sensitive outcomes (NSOs) in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and (b) to identify all reported NSOs documented to date in PICUs by also describing their metrics. A scoping review was conducted by following the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. Fifty-eight articles were included. Publications were mainly authored in the United States and Canada (n = 28, 48.3%), and the majority (n = 30, 51.7%) had an observational design. A total of 46 NSOs were documented. The most reported were related to the clinical (n = 83), followed by safety (n = 41) and functional (n = 18) domains. Regarding their metrics, the majority of NSOs were measured in their occurrence using quantitative single measures, and a few validated tools were used to a lesser extent. No NSOs were reported in the perceptual domain. Nursing care of critically ill children encompasses three levels: improvement in clinical performance, as measured by clinical outcomes; assurance of patient care safety, as measured by safety outcomes; and promotion of fundamental care needs, as measured by functional outcomes. Perceptual outcomes deserve to be explored.

Clinical Analysis and Management of Long-Stay Patients

Background

Worldwide, a certain proportion of patients stay for long periods. Reduction of length of stay is a critical intervention to optimize in-hospital resource utilization. Length of stay itself is a reliable quality index for healthcare systems. Interventions to reduce long hospital stays require understanding organizational and individual factors that affect the length of stay. The purposes of this study are to attempt to reduce long stays (defined as >30 days) by identifying the causes and preventing such situations.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study of patients who stayed in the hospital for long periods (>30 days) between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. We identified subgroups of patients with long stays, evaluated their associations with baseline variables, relevant discharge departments, and causes of long stays. We proposed improvement plans.

Results

There were 446 long-stay patients (mean age 66.7 years; 37.7% females), including 158 undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation, 109 with diseases requiring hospitalization, 93 due to nosocomial infection, 31 with delayed discharge, 20 with iatrogenic complications, and 35 patients with long stays for various causes. There were 9331 hospital days associated with 158 patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. The number of hospital days for those undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation was significantly different from that of patients who did not undergo prolonged mechanical ventilation. Depending on the causes of long stay, we could reduce the length of stay in 188 (42.1%) of patients using an aggressive management strategy.

Conclusions

Setting a ventilator weaned unit for prolonged mechanical ventilation patients in a tertiary-level hospital is essential to reduce long stay of intensive care unit. Aggressive management strategies can reduce long stays.

Acute kidney injury: epidemiology and course in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. The aim of this paper was to describe the prevalence and course of AKI in critically ill children and to compare different AKI classification criteria.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study in our multi-disciplinary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from January 2015 to December 2018. All patients from birth to 16 years of age who were admitted to the pediatric ICU were included. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition was considered as the reference standard. We compared the incidence data assessed by KDIGO, pediatric risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end- stage renal disease (pRIFLE) and pediatric reference change value optimised for AKI (pROCK).

RESULTS

Out of 7505 patients, 9.2% developed AKI by KDIGO criteria. The majority (59.8%) presented with stage 1 AKI. Recovery from AKI was observed in 70.4% of patients within 7 days from diagnosis. Both pRIFLE and pROCK were less sensitive compared to KDIGO criteria for the classification of AKI. Patients who met all three-KDIGO, pRIFLE and pROCK criteria had a high mortality rate (35.0%).

CONCLUSION

Close to one in ten patients admitted to the pediatric ICU met AKI criteria according to KDIGO. In about 30% of patients, AKI persisted beyond 7 days. Follow-up of patients with persistent kidney function reduction at hospital discharge is needed to reveal the long-term morbidity due to AKI in the pediatric ICU.

Evaluation of the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of pediatric chronic critical illness

Our aim was to determine characteristics of children with chronic critical illness (CCI) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care children's hospital in Turkey. The current study was a multicenter retrospective cohort study that was done from 2014 to 2017. It involved three university hospitals PICUs in which multiple criteria were set to identify pediatric CCIs. Pediatric patients staying in the ICU for at least 14 days and having at least one additional criterion, including prolonged mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, sepsis, severe wound (burn) or trauma, encephalopathy, traumatic brain injury, status epilepticus, being postoperative, and neuromuscular disease, was accepted as CCI. In order to identify the newborn as a chronic critical patient, a stay in the intensive care unit for at least 30 days in addition to prematurity was required. Eight hundred eighty seven (11.14%) of the patients who were admitted to the PICU met the definition of CCI and 775 of them (87.3%) were discharged to their home. Of CCI patients, 289 (32.6%) were premature and 678 (76.4%) had prolonged mechanical ventilation. The total cost values for 2017 were statistically higher than the other years. As the length of ICU stay increased, the costs also increased. Interestingly, high incidence rates were observed for PCCI in our hospitals and these patients occupied 38.01% of the intensive care bed capacity. In conclusion, we observed that prematurity and prolonged mechanical ventilation increase the length of ICU stay, which also increased the costs. More work is needed to better understand PCCI.

The impact of eligibility for primary attendings and nurses on PICU length of stay

PURPOSE

To examine whether primary attendings and/or nurses impact pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) length of stay (LOS) in long-stay patients (LSP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational cross-sectional study from 2012 to 2016 of 29,170 LSP (LOS ≥ 10 days) admitted to 64 PICUs that participated in the Virtual Pediatric Systems, LLC. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the association between being eligible for primary practices and LOS. Secondary outcomes of proportions of limitations and withdrawal of aggressive, life-sustaining interventions were also explored.

RESULTS

After controlling for several factors, being eligible for primary nurses and for primary attendings and nurses were associated with significantly lower mean LOS (8.9% and 9.7% lower, respectively), compared to not being eligible for any primary practice. Being eligible for primary attendings was associated with significantly higher mean LOS (9.6% higher). When the primary attendings were used for larger proportions of LSP, the practice was associated with significantly lower mean LOS. Limitations and withdrawal of aggressive interventions were more common in LSPs cared for in PICUs that utilized primary attendings.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of lower LOS in LSP who were eligible for primary practices should induce more rigorous research on the impact of these primary practices.

Association Between Resilience and Psychological Morbidity in Parents of Critically Ill Children

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether parental resilience, measured at ICU admission, is associated with parent-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and satisfaction with ICU care 3-5 weeks following ICU discharge.

DESIGN

Planned prospective, observational study nested in a randomized comparative trial.

SETTING

PICUs and cardiac ICUs in two, free-standing metropolitan area children's hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

English- and Spanish-speaking parents whose children were younger than 18 years old and had anticipated ICU stay of greater than 24 hours or Pediatric Index of Mortality score of greater than or equal to 4 at the time of consent. All ICU admissions were screened for inclusion. Of 4,251 admissions reviewed, 1,360 were eligible. Five hundred families were approached and 382 enrolled. Two hundred thirty-two parents from 210 families with complete data were included in analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

All participating parents completed the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale at the time of consent and outcome measures 3-5 weeks after ICU discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All parents completed the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Short Forms 8a for Depression and Anxiety, Impact of Event Scale-Revised for posttraumatic stress, and Pediatric Family Satisfaction-ICU 24 for parental satisfaction 3-5 weeks after ICU discharge. Higher parental resilience was associated with fewer symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress in the final model (all p < 0.0001). Shorter length of stay, early mechanical ventilation, Latino ethnicity, and lower illness severity (both objective and parental perceptions) were associated with less morbidity in some or all measured mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher parental resilience is associated with fewer reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress 3-5 weeks after ICU discharge. Parental resilience may impact parental post-ICU psychological morbidity. Measuring parental resilience could be one approach to identify parents at risk for post-ICU psychological morbidity. Future research into the impact of interventions designed to boost parental resilience is warranted.