Massive Urinary Protein Excretion Associated with Greater Neonatal Risk in Preeclampsia

Amount of Proteinuria and Duration of Expectant Management in Severe Preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the association between the amount of proteinuria at the time of diagnosis of preeclampsia with severe features (severe preeclampsia [SPE]) and duration of expectant management (EM) and other perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with SPE delivering live, non-anomalous singletons at 230/7 to 342/7 weeks' estimated gestational age (EGA) at a single tertiary center 2016 to 2018. Patients with proteinuria assessment (24-hour total urine protein or urine protein-to-creatinine ratio extrapolation) within 3 days of SPE diagnosis were included. Patients delivered for an indication other than SPE were excluded. Patients were categorized by amount of proteinuria (mg): none (≤300), mild (301-1,000), moderate (1,001-3,000), and massive (≥3,001). The primary outcome was the proportion of potential EM time achieved (%EM), i.e., days of EM divided by days from SPE diagnosis to 34 weeks. Secondary outcomes included delivery EGA, days of EM, and perinatal outcomes. Bivariable and multivariable analyses compared outcomes across groups.

RESULTS

Of 295 patients included, 21% had no proteinuria, 33% mild, 19% moderate, and 27% massive. Groups differed by EGA at diagnosis, age, parity, chronic hypertension, and renal disease. %EM was not significantly different between groups (adjusted β coefficient 4.1 [95% CI -5.3, 13.5] for mild proteinuria vs. none, -4.1 [95% CI -14.9, 6.6] for moderate proteinuria vs. none, and -5.6 [95% CI -16.0, 4.7] for massive proteinuria vs. none). Increasing proteinuria was associated with earlier delivery EGA but only days of EM in the mild versus no proteinuria groups. There was no significant association between proteinuria and maternal composite morbidity, but patients with mild and massive proteinuria had higher odds of neonatal composite morbidities compared with no proteinuria.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with SPE, proteinuria level was not consistently associated with duration of EM. However, patients with the greatest amounts of proteinuria may have worse neonatal and selected maternal outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· Amount of proteinuria was not associated with the duration of expectant management.. · Greater proteinuria was associated with earlier delivery in severe preeclampsia.. · Massive proteinuria in preeclampsia was associated with select adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes..

[Preeclampsia: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]

OBJECTIVE

To identify strategies to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity related to preeclampsia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE® method with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and recommendations were formulated as a (i) strong, (ii) weak or (iii) no recommendation. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Preeclampsia is defined by the association of gestational hypertension (systolic blood pressure≥140mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure≥90mmHg) and proteinuria≥0.3g/24h or a Proteinuria/Creatininuria ratio≥30mg/mmol occurring after 20 weeks of gestation. Data from the literature do not show any benefit in terms of maternal or perinatal health from implementing a broader definition of preeclampsia. Of the 31 questions, there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 31 (100%). In general population, physical activity during pregnancy should be encouraged to reduce the risk of preeclampsia (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) but an early screening based on algorithms (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) or aspirin administration (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence very low) is not recommended to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity related to preeclampsia. In women with preexisting diabetes or hypertension or renal disease, or multiple pregnancy, the level of evidence is insufficient to determine whether aspirin administration during pregnancy is useful to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity (No recommendation, Quality of the evidence low). In women with a history of vasculo-placental disease, low dose of aspirin (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate) at a dosage of 100-160mg per day (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low), ideally before 16 weeks of gestation and not after 20 weeks of gestation (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) until 36 weeks of gestation (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence very low) is recommended. In a high-risk population, additional administration of low molecular weight heparin is not recommended (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate). In case of preeclampsia (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) or suspicion of preeclampsia (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate, the assessment of PlGF concentration or sFLT-1/PlGF ratio is not routinely recommended) in the only goal to reduce maternal or perinatal morbidity. In women with non-severe preeclampsia antihypertensive agent should be administered orally when the systolic blood pressure is measured between 140 and 159mmHg or diastolic blood pressure is measured between 90 and 109mmHg (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low). In women with non-severe preeclampsia, delivery between 34 and 36+6 weeks of gestation reduces severe maternal hypertension but increases the incidence of moderate prematurity. Taking into account the benefit/risk balance for the mother and the child, it is recommended not to systematically induce birth in women with non-severe preeclampsia between 34 and 36+6 weeks of gestation (Strong recommendation, Quality of evidence high). In women with non-severe preeclampsia diagnosed between 37+0 and 41 weeks of gestation, it is recommended to induce birth to reduce maternal morbidity (Strong recommendation, Low quality of evidence), and to perform a trial of labor in the absence of contraindication (Strong recommendation, Very low quality of evidence). In women with a history of preeclampsia, screening maternal thrombophilia is not recommended (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate). Because women with a history of a preeclampsia have an increased lifelong risk of chronic hypertension and cardiovascular complications, they should be informed of the need for medical follow-up to monitor blood pressure and to manage other possible cardiovascular risk factors (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate).

CONCLUSION

The purpose of these recommendations was to reassess the definition of preeclampsia, and to determine the strategies to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity related to preeclampsia, during pregnancy but also after childbirth. They aim to help health professionals in their daily clinical practice to inform or care for patients who have had or have preeclampsia. Synthetic information documents are also offered for professionals and patients.

Evaluation of Fetal Cardiac Functions in Preeclampsia: Does the Severity or Proteinuria Affect Fetal Cardiac Functions?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the fetal cardiac functions in preeclampsia and control group, and determine whether the severity or amount of proteinuria affects fetal cardiac functions.

METHODS

This prospective case-control study involves 48 pregnant women with preeclampsia and 48 healthy women. Pulsed wave Doppler, M-mode, and tissue Doppler imaging were used to measure the cardiac function between the 32 and 34 gestational weeks in each group. All Doppler indices and cardiac function parameters were also compared in subgroups with mild and severe preeclampsia and between subgroups with proteinuria >3 g/24 hours and <3 g/24 hours.

RESULTS

Decreased diastolic function (decreased E, A, E', and A' values in mitral/tricuspid valves and increased isovolumetric relaxation time) and decreased systolic functions (decreased mitral and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and S' value in mitral/tricuspid valves) were detected in the preeclampsia group. Decreased tricuspid E value in severe preeclampsia compared with mild preeclampsia was shown in the present study.

CONCLUSION

Preeclampsia may cause changes in systolic and diastolic functions in the fetal heart. Subclinical functional changes of these fetuses can be detected earlier and more sensitively with the help of tissue Doppler imaging. Biventricular diastolic functional changes are more prominent in preeclamptic cases with proteinuria >3 g/24 hours.

Accuracy of Spot Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio With Respect to 24-Hour Urine Albumin for the Detection of Proteinuria in Antenatal Women With Preeclampsia: A Descriptive Study

Background Among the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, certain diseases like preeclampsia (PE) and eclampsia have the maximum impact on morbidity and mortality of the mother as well as the newborn. Proteinuria determination is used to assess renal damage in PE. There are several ways to evaluate proteinuria in pregnant women, but the gold standard remains the 24-hour urine albumin (24-h UA) excretion. Spot urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) can be used for rapid diagnosis of PE which is fast, reliable, and easy to use. Hence, our tertiary care center conducted the current study to assess the accuracy of spot UACR with 24-h UA for detecting proteinuria in antenatal women to diagnose PE and to evaluate the obstetric outcome in antenatal women with PE. Methodology A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 98 antenatal women diagnosed with PE. Urine albumin was done by dipstick method and the presence or absence of proteinuria was noted. Both, the 24-h urine sample and a random sample for spot UACR were sent for analysis. Results Spot UACR has more specificity than sensitivity along with a high negative predictive value for the detection of proteinuria. Additionally, significant proteinuria was associated with an increased rate of induced labor, a cesarean section in patients, lower mean gestational age at the time of delivery, lower birth weight, and increased rate of intrauterine fetal death. Conclusion The study concluded that spot UACR has more specificity than sensitivity along with a high negative predictive value for the detection of proteinuria and therefore, can be used for the diagnosis of proteinuria in women with PE. Hence, spot UACR is a reliable, faster, and more accurate method for the detection of proteinuria in PE and can be used for early diagnosis and timely management leading to a decrease in mortality and morbidity of the mother and the fetus.

The association between protein levels in 24-hour urine samples and maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with preeclampsia

Objective

Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy are one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between protein levels in 24-hour urine samples and maternal and perinatal outcomes in preeclamptic patients.

Material and Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted with pregnant women who were diagnosed with preeclampsia (PE) and delivered in our clinic between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into those with a proteinuria value below 300 mg/24 h (non-proteinuria), proteinuria value between 300-2000 mg/24 h (mild proteinuria), proteinuria value between 2000-5000 mg/24 h (severe proteinuria) and proteinuria value >5000 mg/24 h (massive proteinuria) and were compared in terms of maternal and perinatal outcomes. Demographic characteristics (age, body mass index in kg/m2, gravidity), PE-related clinical symptoms (epigastric pain, neurological and respiratory symptoms), laboratory findings (24 h protein level, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, platelet count and creatine levels) were recorded in all patients.

Results

A total of 1,379 patients meeting the study criteria were included. There were 315 (23%) patients in the non-proteinuria group, 704 (51%) in the mild proteinuria group, 234 (17%) patients in the severe group and 126 (9%) patients in the massive proteinuria group. The massive proteinuria group was found to have the highest rates of maternal and prenatal complications. The Apgar score, umbilical cord pH value, birth weight, gestational week at delivery, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal death were significantly higher in the massive proteinuria group.

Conclusion

Our data showed that the degree of proteinuria appears to be associated with maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes among women diagnosed with PE. Women with proteinuria of >5000 mg/24 hours had notably poorer natal outcomes.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Preeclampsia in Pregnancy: A Case Report

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) refers to a clinical autoimmune syndrome characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis and pregnancy morbidities, such as fetal loss after the 10th week of gestation, recurrent miscarriages, or intrauterine growth restriction. This study describes a case of preeclampsia in a 37-year-old primiparous woman in the 30th week of pregnancy with a lack of prior thrombotic history. The birth of a dead neonate and the findings of placenta thrombosis raised the suspicion of APS, which was confirmed by the finding of antibodies. A description of the treatment, which is still under investigation, follows. In our case, tissue sections were stained followed by observation. Various placental changes were detected with the presence of placental intravascular thrombi. The most important finding of this case study is the presence of severe preeclampsia in the setting of APS, with no previous medical history. In conclusion, antiphospholipid syndrome can be directly related to preeclampsia during pregnancy, leading to complications that may be preventable if immediate medical intervention is available.

Diagnosis of proteinuria using a random urine protein-creatinine ratio and its correlation with adverse outcomes in pregnancy with preeclampsia characterized by renal damage

Based on a limited number of studies, a random urine protein‐creatinine ratio (uPCR) value of ≥ 0.3 indicates abnormal proteinuria in preeclampsia with renal damage. However, current guidelines do not recommend a reasonable diagnostic threshold of uPCR for severe preeclampsia with renal damage. Furthermore, the correlation between the uPCR value and clinical adverse outcomes remains poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of uPCR in the diagnosis of significant proteinuria and to assess its correlation with adverse pregnancy outcomes in preeclampsia characterized by renal damage. In all, 1837 women were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Eventually, 961 women were enrolled under the exclusion criteria. First, the authors found that uPCR and 24‐hour proteinuria showed a significant association (r = 0.901). The optimal threshold of uPCR for diagnosing preeclampsia was 0.295, and for diagnosing severe preeclampsia the cut‐off was 0.625. Meanwhile, the adjusted odds ratio per 1 unit increase in ln (uPCR) was 1.679 (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.142–2.469) for severe adverse perinatal outcomes; 1.456 (95% CI: 1.242–1.705) for small for gestational age; 1.380 (95% CI: 1.051–1.811) for severe small for gestational age; 1.672 (95% CI: 1.210–2.310) for very early preterm birth; 1.989 (95% CI 1.726–2.293) for severe hypertension; and 2.279 (95% CI 1.906–2.724) for preterm birth. This study indicated that there was a significant and positive correlation between uPCR and 24‐hour urine protein. For neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes, uPCR is an independent predictor of prognosis.

Proteinuria during pregnancy: definition, pathophysiology, methodology, and clinical significance

Qualitative and quantitative measurement of urine protein excretion is one of the most common tests performed during pregnancy. For more than 100 years, proteinuria was necessary for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, but recent guidelines recommend that proteinuria is sufficient but not necessary for the diagnosis. Still, in clinical practice, most patients with gestational hypertension will be diagnosed as having preeclampsia based on the presence of proteinuria. Although the reference standard for measuring urinary protein excretion is a 24-hour urine collection, spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio is a reasonable "rule-out" test for proteinuria. Urine dipstick screening for proteinuria does not provide any clinical benefit and should not be used to diagnose proteinuria. The classic cutoff cited to define proteinuria during pregnancy is a value of >300 mg/24 hours or a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio of at least 0.3. Using this cutoff, the rate of isolated proteinuria in pregnancy may reach 8%, whereas preeclampsia occurs among 3% to 8% of pregnancies. Although this threshold is widely accepted, its origin is not based on evidence on adverse pregnancy outcomes but rather on expert opinion and results of small studies. After reviewing the available data, the most important factor that influences maternal and neonatal outcome is the severity of blood pressures and presence of end organ damage, rather than the excess protein excretion. Because the management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia without severe features is almost identical in frequency of surveillance and timing of delivery, the separation into 2 disorders is unnecessary. If the management of women with gestational hypertension with a positive assessment of proteinuria will not change, we believe that urine assessment for proteinuria is unnecessary in women who develop new-onset blood pressure at or after 20 weeks' gestation. Furthermore, we do not recommend repeated measurement of proteinuria for women with preeclampsia, the amount of proteinuria does not seem to be related to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, and monitoring proteinuria may lead to unindicated preterm deliveries and related neonatal complications. Our current diagnosis of preeclampsia in women with chronic kidney disease may be based on a change in protein excretion, a baseline protein excretion evaluation is critical in certain conditions such as chronic hypertension, diabetes, and autoimmune or other renal disorders. The current definition of superimposed preeclampsia possesses a diagnostic dilemma, and it is unclear whether a change in the baseline proteinuria reflects another systemic disease such as preeclampsia or whether women with chronic disease such as chronic hypertension or diabetes will experience a different "normal" pattern of protein excretion during pregnancy. Finally, limited data are available regarding angiogenic and other biomarkers in women with chronic kidney disease as a potential aid in distinguishing the worsening of baseline chronic kidney disease and chronic hypertension from superimposed preeclampsia.

Modulation by antenatal therapies of cardiovascular and renal programming in male and female offspring of preeclamptic rats

Morbidity and mortality risks are enhanced in preeclamptic (PE) mothers and their offspring. Here, we asked if sexual dimorphism exists in (i) cardiovascular and renal damage evolved in offspring of PE mothers, and (ii) offspring responsiveness to antenatal therapies. PE was induced by administering N^G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 50 mg/kg/day, oral gavage) to pregnant rats for 7 days starting from gestational day 14. Three therapies were co-administered orally with L-NAME, atrasentan (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist), terutroban (thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, TXA2), or α-methyldopa (α-MD, central sympatholytic drug). Cardiovascular and renal profiles were assessed in 3-month-old offspring. Compared with offspring of non-PE rats, PE offspring exhibited elevated systolic blood pressure and proteinuria and reduced heart rate and creatinine clearance (CrCl). Apart from a greater bradycardia in male offspring, similar PE effects were noted in male and female offspring. While terutroban, atrasentan, or α-MD partially and similarly blunted the PE-evoked changes in CrCl and proteinuria, terutroban was the only drug that virtually abolished PE hypertension. Rises in cardiorenal inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFα) and oxidative (isoprostane) markers were mostly and equally eliminated by all therapies in the two sexes, except for a greater dampening action of atrasentan, compared with α-MD, on tissue TNFα in female offspring only. Histopathologically, antenatal terutroban or atrasentan was more effective than α-MD in rectifying cardiac structural damage, myofiber separation, and cytoplasmic alterations, in PE offspring. The repair by antenatal terutroban or atrasentan of cardiovascular and renal anomalies in PE offspring is mostly sex-independent and surpasses the protection offered by α-MD, the conventional PE therapy.

Proteinuria may be an indicator of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with preeclampsia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is one of the common manifestations of patients with preeclampsia (PE), but whether the severity of proteinuria is related to the pregnancy outcome of patients with preeclampsia remains controversial. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between 24-h proteinuria and adverse outcomes in patients with preeclampsia.

METHODS

The present retrospective study included 329 pregnant women in Chongqing, China. Patients were divided into PE group and non-PE group. PE group was stratified into three subgroups based on the level of 24-h proteinuria. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between biochemical indexes and adverse pregnancy outcome, and Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of adverse pregnancy outcome. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the ability of 24-h urinary protein to distinguish the adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with preeclampsia.

RESULTS

(1) Between PE and non-PE group, cesarean section rate in PE group was significantly higher than that in non-PE group (84.4% vs. 25.9%, p <  0.001). Laboratory findings such as uric acid and creatinine level in PE group were higher than those in non-PE group. (2) Among mild (proteinuria < 0.3 g/24 h), moderate (0.3 g/24 h ≦ proteinuria < 2 g/24 h) and massive (proteinuria ≧ 2 g/24 h) groups, the frequencies of induced labor (p = 0.006) and stillbirth (p = 0.002) increased with the increase of 24-h proteinuria. (3) Adverse outcomes were positively correlated with 24-h proteinuria (adverse maternal outcomes: r = 0.239, p = 0.002; adverse fetal outcomes: r = 0.336, p <  0.001). (4) The best 24-h proteinuria cutoff values to determine stillbirth, premature and fetal distress were 3965.0 mg/24 h, 984.75 mg/24 h and 1503.85 mg/24 h and their odds ratio (95% confidence interval) were 12.46 (3.46-44.88), 2.48 (1.15-5.37) and 10.02 (2.14-46.80), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of 24-h proteinuia may forecast adverse outcomes in women with preeclampsia. We suggest proteinuria should be retained as one of the monitoring indexes in patients with preeclampsia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered. (LTMCMTS202001).

Association between proteinuria and maternal and neonatal outcomes in pre-eclampsia pregnancy: a retrospective observational study

Objectives

To evaluate the association between proteinuria and maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients beyond 20 weeks of gestation diagnosed with pre-eclampsia, who were admitted to Suzhou Municipal Hospital between December 2013 and December 2015. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from clinical records, including age, body mass index, newborn weight and Apgar score. Pre-eclampsia risk factors and perinatal outcomes were analysed.

Results

A total of 407 patients were enrolled, of whom, 402 with pre-eclampsia were included in the final analyses, divided into two groups: patients with proteinuria (n = 364 [90.55%]) and patients without proteinuria (n = 38 [9.45%]). Newborn 5-min Apgar scores were statistically lower in the proteinuria group versus the group without proteinuria (9.77 versus 9.95). Compared with patients without proteinuria, patients with proteinuria had a significantly higher rate of births before 37 weeks of gestation (50.80% versus 31.60%), but the incidence of preterm membrane rupture was significantly lower (3.8% versus 13.2%).

Conclusion

Proteinuria may be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in cases of pre-eclampsia.

Values of serum sFlt-1, PLGF levels, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio in diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of preeclamptic patients

PURPOSE

To explore the values of serum sFlt-1, PLGF levels and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of preeclamptic patients.

METHODS

From March 2017 to October 2018, 60 cases of early onset preeclampsia (E-PE), 116 cases of late onset preeclampsia (L-PE) and 50 cases of gestational hypertension (GH) were selected. Fifty women who had vaginal bleeding or abdominal distention before 34 gestational weeks were selected as an early control group, and 50 pregnant women awaiting delivery were selected as a late control group. Serum sFlt-1 and PLGF levels were measured, and changes of sFlt-1/PLGF ratio were analyzed. Their correlations with neonatal birth weight were analyzed, and ROC curves were plotted for E-PE diagnosis.

RESULTS

The sFlt-1/PLGF ratio of patients with E-PE was significantly higher than those of other groups, and negatively correlated with neonatal birth weight. When the ratio was used as a diagnostic index, AUC was 0.975. The ratio of patients with severe L-PE exceeded that of cases with mild L-PE. In all preeclamptic patients, the ratio was elevated with increasing maternal and neonatal complications.

CONCLUSION

sFlt-1/PLGF ratio is valuable for assessing the severity of preeclampsia and diagnosing E-PE, and can be used to predict neonatal birth weight.

Reappraisal of the relationship between 24-hour proteinuria and preeclampsia in terms of the maternal and perinatal outcomes

Objective: This study evaluated the association between proteinuria levels and maternal, and perinatal outcomes of preeclampsia patients and determined the cutoff values for predicting severe complications.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the records of 412 patients with proteinuric preeclampsia.Results: Median proteinuria levels were significantly higher in patients with severe maternal and adverse perinatal outcomes than in those without such outcomes, except in cases of placental abruption and late preterm delivery.Conclusion: Proteinuria levels may aid in diagnosing preeclampsia and indicating early intervention. The revised guidelines do not suggest that proteinuria encountered during pregnancy is clinically insignificant.

The importance of proteinuria in preeclampsia and its predictive role in maternal and neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate impact of 24-h proteinuria level in preeclampsia on maternal/perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

Singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia delivered after 24 weeks of gestation were included. Patients were divided into mild (0.3 to <2 g) (n=72), severe (2 to <5 g) (n=30), and massive (≥5 g) (n=24) proteinuria groups, and cut-off values of 24-h proteinuria for composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four hour  proteinuria level cut-offs for composite adverse outcomes were 3275 mg (72.2% sensitivity, 85.6% specificity) and 2395 mg (72.7% sensitivity, 78% specificity) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Severe and massive proteinuria were related to poor maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes.