Versatility of Free Cutaneous Flaps for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction

Lower Abdominal vs. Lateral Thigh Perforator Flaps in Microsurgical Sarcoma Reconstruction: The Aesthetics of Donor Site Matters

Introduction: Sarcoma resection often leaves patients with big defects only amenable through microsurgical reconstruction. In such cases, it is hard for the surgeon to uphold low donor-site morbidity with an aesthetic result. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and the patient's perception regarding the donor site in a cohort of patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction with lateral thigh and lower abdominal perforator flaps. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of all patients who underwent sarcoma reconstruction with flaps harvested from the lower abdominal region (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap) or lateral thigh region (anterolateral thigh perforator flap and its variations) was performed. Only patients with defects greater than 100 cm2 were included. Patient demographics and operative variables were recorded, together with complications. Patient satisfaction and quality of life with the donor site were registered using the SCAR-Q questionnaire, which was administered at least six months post-operatively. Results: Eighteen anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flaps and twenty-two deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap procedures were performed. The two groups were homogeneous for major post-operative complications (p > 0.999). Patient satisfaction with the donor site measured using the SCAR-Q questionnaire showed significantly higher scores in the DIEP/SCIP group when compared with the thigh group (p < 0.001), indicating a superiority of the lower abdominal area as an aesthetic donor site. Conclusions: The DIEP and SCIP flaps are a versatile option for reconstructing large soft-tissue defects following sarcoma resection. Therefore, flaps harvested from the lower abdomen yield a higher patient satisfaction with the donor site, which is a feature worth considering when planning a reconstructive procedure.

Repair of multiple hand defects with superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction and repair of multiple defects in the hand is a combination of function, sensation and aesthetics. The reconstruction using the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap has become popular, which overcomes the inherent shortcomings of traditional inguinal flaps by preserving the deep fascia. In this report, we present our experience in the design and clinical application of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap, which we used to repair multiple defects in the hand.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2020, 41 patients received free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap to repair multiple hand defects. All flaps were carefully designed according to the hand defect including 21 single and 20 bilobed flaps. The area of ​​the donor area is 2.5 cm × 3.0cm∼8.0 cm × 6.5 cm. We followed up all patients regularly and completed standardized assessments of outcomes based on post-reconstruction hand function and esthetic scores.

RESULTS

41 cases of flaps survived completely.3 cases of vascular crisis was relieved after surgical exploration, 1 case of mild distal necrosis was healed after dressing change, 1 case of pigmentation happened. There were 41 patients, 27 males and 14 females, with an average age of 40.5 years (4 to 59 years old). The defects included 20 cases opisthenars and 21 cases palms. The wounds were irregular, with exposed or damaged tendons, nerves or bones. All flaps were followed for a mean of 10.5 months (3 to 15 months). The functional and esthetic outcomes were satisfactory for all flaps without complications such as hand spasms, adhesions and scar contractures CONCLUSION: The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap's donor site was concealed, relatively stable perforators, easy dissection. Recipient site condition was good and acceptable for the patients. It is a significant choice for multiple hand defects.

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a narrative review on its various uses in non-breast reconstruction

Background and Objective

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap was first described by Koshima and Soeda in 1989 and is now well-established as the gold standard in breast reconstruction. Lately, this issue has been explored in the context of head and neck reconstruction, highlighting growing interest in the use of the DIEP flap beyond breast reconstruction, but its usage in other anatomical regions appears elusive. Nevertheless, DIEP flap reconstruction may be a viable choice for complex, three-dimensional head and neck deformities while upholding the criteria of minimal donor site morbidity, according to a recent review. To determine whether the DIEP flap may be used successfully in other types of reconstruction, we conducted a review on the use, applications, and outcomes of the DIEP flap in non-breast reconstruction. This is, as far as we are aware, the first comprehensive analysis of all applications of the DIEP flap other than for breast reconstruction.

Methods

A literature review was performed using PubMed to include all relevant articles in English or French published up to February 2022. Keywords included "DIEP flap" and "deep inferior epigastric perforator flap".

Key Contents and Findings

A total of 1,299 articles were identified with 105 on the use of the DIEP flap in non-breast reconstruction. This suggests increasing recognition of the DIEP flap as a feasible option for reconstruction of most anatomical regions, especially in lower limb and head and neck reconstruction, followed by gynecological reconstruction. The DIEP flap was also utilized in the reconstruction of upper limb, thigh and hip defects. Less commonly, it has been used for penoscrotal, groin, sternal, buttock and abdomen reconstruction.

Conclusions

The scientific body of evidence showed the robustness and versatility of the DIEP flap in non-breast reconstruction, with its relative pros and cons at different anatomical regions.

Management of Complex Upper Extremity Trauma with Associated Vascular Injury

Introduction Combined soft tissue and vascular injuries of the upper extremity pose several challenges at once to the plastic surgeon. Many decisions have to be taken urgently that will influence the salvage or amputation of the affected extremity. The aim of this article was to provide an evidence-based outline for the management of such injuries. Learning objectives of this article are as follows: (1) approach to a patient with upper extremity composite tissue and vascular injury presenting to the emergency, (2) decision-making as to when to salvage and when to go for amputation of the traumatized upper extremity, (3) role of imaging in emergency situation, (4) role of fasciotomy, (5) intraoperative sequencing of steps, and (6) options for vascular reconstruction and the flaps used for coverage. After reading this article, the reader should have a clear understanding of the management of vascular injury in a patient with composite defects of upper extremity.

Role, Management, and Outcome of Free Flap Reconstruction for Acute Full-Thickness Burns in Hands

INTRODUCTION

Severe thermal trauma to the hand can result in major impairment and reduced function due to defective healing or even extremity loss. Full-thickness injuries frequently incur exposure of tendons or bone and require an early and stable coverage with soft tissue transplants to allow for rapid induction of exercise and to preserve structures and hand function. Free tissue transfer to the hand after thermal trauma is a rare indication, and safety, management, and outcome of free flap surgery for severe acute burn injuries to the hand remains underreported.

METHODS

Patients with primary reconstructions of full-thickness burn injuries to the hand undergoing microsurgical free tissue transfer surgery were retrospectively assessed in a period from 2013 to 2016. Salvage strategy of the extremity, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and primary reconstructive result were quantified and analyzed. Functional outcome measures (range of motion and grip strength) were assessed during clinical follow-up examinations.

RESULTS

During the investigated period, 13 patients were identified undergoing reconstruction of 14 hands via free flap transplantation after severe burn injury in the acute phase. Nine anteriolateral thigh flaps (64%), 3 latissimus dorsi flaps (18%), 1 serratus anterior flap, and 1 tensor fasciae lata flap (7%) were performed. In all cases, salvage of the affected extremity was achieved, although 1 flap (7%) was lost during the early postoperative period requiring secondary reconstruction via pedicled groin flap. Further complications were venous thrombosis (n = 2; 14%) and hematoma (n = 2; 14%). Mean length of hospital stay was 51 days. Functional outcome during follow-up examination after an average of 9.3 months was inhomogeneous depending on the pattern of injury and ranged from complete recovery to nearly entire loss of hand function.

CONCLUSIONS

Free flap transfer can be a mandatory and valuable tool to cover full-thickness burn injuries of the hand early in the clinical course of thermal trauma and may provide extremity salvage by favorable means of reconstruction to achieve acceptable functional outcomes, in the most severe cases. Although microsurgical failure rates in burn patients are slightly higher than in free flap transfer to the upper extremity in general, it can be performed with reasonable risk-to-benefit ratio.

Concepts in Early Reconstruction of the Burned Hand

BACKGROUND

Early reconstruction of burn sequelae of the hand can be challenging owing to high goals for functional and aesthetic outcome. A variety of reconstructive procedures with ascending levels of complexity exists and warrants careful indication.

METHODS

In this case series, the main reconstructive techniques for reconstruction of burn defects of the hand are described, illustrated, and discussed: split thickness skin grafting (STSG) with fibrin glue, dermal matrices with STSG, distant random pattern (abdominal bridge) flap, distant pedicled flap (superficial circumflex iliac artery flap), and free microvascular tissue transfer (anterolateral thigh flap). An algorithm for decision making in the reconstructive process is proposed.

RESULTS

Split thickness skin grafting provides sufficient coverage for partial thickness defects without exposure of functional structures; fixation with fibrin glue avoids unnecessary stapling. Dermal matrices under STSG provide vascularized granulation tissue on full thickness defects and can be used as salvage procedure on functional structures. Distant random pattern or pedicled flaps provide sufficient coverage of large full thickness defects with exposed functional structures but pose some challenges regarding patient compliance and immobilization. Free tissue transfer allows tailored reconstruction of large full thickness defects with exposed functional structures and can be safely and feasibly performed. Secondary and tertiary procedures are needed with more complex techniques; if applied correctly and consequently, all methods can yield favorable functional and aesthetic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of the burned hand may require a broad armamentarium of surgical techniques with different levels of complexity, versatility, and applicability. Excellent results can be achieved with the right procedure for the right patient.

Soft Tissue Coverage for Severe Infections

Coverage of soft tissue defects in the upper extremity caused by infection and debridement of infected tissue is a challenging problem. Treatment starts with prompt identification and eradication of infection, including antibiotics and extensive debridement. Optimizing the patient's medical and nutritional status can facilitate eradication of infection and wound healing. Coverage of soft tissue defects caused by infection and debridement demands consideration of many factors. Options include healing by primary or secondary intention, skin grafts, local flaps, and distant flaps. Negative pressure wound therapy and acellular dermal matrices can also aid in coverage.

Free flap reconstruction of sarcoma defects in the setting of radiation: a ten-year experience

Neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection for sarcoma patients can often leave devastating wounds necessitating soft-tissue coverage in the form of free flaps. There is still debate as to the optimal flap for reconstruction of defects in irradiated fields. We aim to describe our experiences with free fasciocutaneous and free muscle flaps for sarcoma reconstruction in the setting of radiation therapy. A retrospective chart review was conducted encompassing all patients requiring soft-tissue reconstruction secondary to sarcoma resection from January 2010 to June 2019. Patient characteristics, flap viability and post-operative healing outcomes were all recorded and examined. In total, 49 patients who underwent 51 free-flaps were identified. Of these, 30 flaps were fasciocutaneous, while 21 were muscle-based. Most patients received pre-operative radiotherapy (76.5%), although these rates were not different between groups of flap type, and had no significant association with post-operative outcomes. Complication rates (31.3%) and re-operative rates (21.6%) were also comparable between flap types. Diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with delayed wound healing (p < .016), while the presence of peripheral vascular disease had a significant association with post-operative infection (p < .006). This study shows that free fasciocutaneous and free muscle-based flaps are both viable options for soft-tissue reconstruction demanded by sarcoma resection, even in the setting of radiation. Peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus may confer increased wound complications.

Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons. This study aimed to present the outcomes in using flaps in the subacute reconstruction of complex upper extremity injuries.

METHODS

From July 2013 to December 2016, 35 patients ranging in age from 23 to 69 years with complicated upper extremity traumatic injuries were treated using flap reconstruction in subacute period. The number and causes of injury were 12 machine crush injuries, 18 machine strangulation injuries, two chainsaw accidents, two traffic accidents, and one incident of heavy bruising. Thirty-five patients underwent flap procedures, including 24 anterolateral thigh flaps (68.57%), five latissimus dorsi flaps (14.29%), and six lateral arm flaps (17.14%). Flap sizes ranged from 3 × 4 to 42 × 16 cm². The mean time of flap reconstruction was 14 days (range 5-29). During postoperative follow-up, flap appearance, sensory recovery, scarring and satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall flap survival rate was 94.3%.Two flaps developed partial necrosis, both of which were later treated with skin grafting. Traumatic wound infections occurred in three patients. All upper limb injuries were completely covered. The follow-up periods ranged from 18 to 62 months with an average of 2.9 months. All skin flap textures were soft with varying degrees of pigmentation. Flap sensory recovery was S₁ in three cases, S₂ in eight cases, S₃ in 15 cases, and S₄ in nine cases. There were no donor site complications other than three cases with scar hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The severe upper limb soft tissue defects still achieved satisfactory function and appearance with negligible complications and low amputation rates during the subacute period.

Customized reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defect in the hand and forearm with individual design of chain-linked bilateral anterolateral thigh perforator flaps

BACKGROUND

Complex soft-tissue defects of upper extremities still have a high rate of amputation, as the reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defects is always difficult even with the largest conventional free flap. The anterolateral thigh perforator (ALTP) flap is one of the most popular procedures used for the coverage of complex soft-tissue defects of extremities. However, problems associated with donor-site morbidity and inability to repair complex soft-tissue defects in a one-stage procedure persist. The purpose of this study was to present a novel design of using chain-linked bilateral ALTP flap and its various designs for customized reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defects in the hands and forearms.

METHODS

From June 2009 to June 2017, we retrospectively analyzed 15 patients with complex soft-tissue defects in the hands and forearms. All patients in this series underwent extremity reconstruction using the chain-linked bilateral ALTP flaps. Three different types of chain-linked bilateral ALTP flaps were created in this study based on wound characteristics and the maximum available skin paddle size at all donor sites.

RESULTS

The chain-linked bilateral ALTP flaps were successfully harvested for the reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defects in the hands and forearms. Among them, ten cases were repaired with chain-linked bipaddle ALTP flaps, two cases were treated with chain-linked tripaddle ALTP flaps, and the remaining three cases were used with chain-linked multi-lobed ALTP chimeric flaps. The sizes of the skin paddles ranged from 11 cm × 7 cm to 42 cm × 8 cm. The areas of the total flaps ranged from 245 cm² to 650 cm² (mean 419.6 cm²). Only one case required re-exploration because of the venous congestion. The donor sites were closed directly. The mean follow-up time was 16.4 months. Most cases showed satisfactory contour.

CONCLUSION

The chain-linked bilateral ALTP flap is a reliable option for one-stage reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defects in the hands and forearms with limited donor-site morbidity. It also provides various flap designs, which allow for more individualized treatment approaches.

Thoracoumbilical Flap: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications in Upper Limb Reconstruction in the Era of Microvascular Surgery

Purpose

Microvascular reconstruction is the standard of care for salvage of soft tissue defects in complex upper extremity due to their distinct advantages over the pedicled flaps. However, in the era of microsurgery, pedicled flaps have an acceptable significant role for reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects. The authors aim to demonstrate the versatility of pedicled thoracoumbilical flap (TUF) in selected clinical scenarios.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TUF for upper limb posttraumatic reconstruction was performed between January 2016 and October 2017. The demographic details, etiology, wound parameters, clinical circumstances, and complications were recorded.

Results

Ten patients were included in the retrospective case series. Out of them, nine of the patients had critical issues, which justified a pedicled TUF over free flap. The critical issues were severe comorbid illnesses ( n = 3), the paucity of recipient vessels ( n = 1), salvage of hand replant and revascularization ( n = 2), circumferential degloving injury to the multiple fingers and palm ( n = 1), coverage for metacarpal hand ( n = 1), and extensive scarring at the surgical site ( n = 1). Mean age was 34.4 years (range: 11-70 years), six of them were males, and four were females. Two patients had infections resulting in wound gaping. One of the patients had flap tip necrosis.

Conclusion

Pedicled flaps have a significant acceptable role in this era of microsurgery, and a pedicled TUF is a versatile option for coverage of complex soft tissue defects of the forearm, wrist, hand, and fingers.

Level of Evidence

This is a level IV, therapeutic, and retrospective study.