1
|
Muto J, Tateya I, Nakatomi H, Uyama I, Hirose Y. Transoral Robotic-Assisted Neurosurgery for Skull Base and Upper Spine Lesions. Neurospine 2024; 21:106-115. [PMID: 38569637 PMCID: PMC10992650 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448062.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The application of the da Vinci Surgical System in neurosurgery is limited due to technical difficulties requiring precise maneuvers and small instruments. This study details the advantages and disadvantages of robotics in neurosurgery and the reachable range of the transoral approach to lesions of the skull base and upper cervical spine. METHODS In a cadaver study, the da Vinci Xi robot, lacking haptic feedback, was utilized for sagittal and coronal approaches on 5 heads, facilitating dura suturing in 3, with a 30°-angled drill for bone removal. RESULTS Perfect exposure of all the nasopharyngeal sites, clivus, sellar, and choana, including the bilateral eustachian tubes, was achieved without any external incisions using this palatal split approach of transoral robotic surgery. The time required to perform a single stitch, knot, and complete single suture in robotic suturing of deep-seated were significantly less compared to manual suturing via the endonasal approach. CONCLUSION This is the first report to show the feasibility of suturing the dural defect in deep-seated lesions transorally and revealed that the limit of reach in the coronal plane via a transoral approach with incision of the soft palate is the foramen ovale. This preclinical investigation also showed that the transoral robotic approach is feasible for lesions extending from the sellar to the C2 in the sagittal plane. Refinement of robotic instruments for specific anatomic sites and future neurosurgical studies are needed to further demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of this system in treating benign and malignant skull base lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Muto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ichiro Tateya
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | | | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of General Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hirose
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lobo D, Sancibrian R, Mesones A, Llata JR, Williams M, Viera-Artiles J. Feasibility of an Exoskeleton Armrest to Improve Ergonomics during Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgery. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:79-86. [PMID: 37255028 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel exoskeleton system designed to provide ergonomic assistance to surgeons while preserving or improving the quality of endoscopic sinus and skull base surgical procedures. METHODS To evaluate the functionality and ergonomic characteristics of the device, five experiments were conducted in different and increasingly realistic scenarios: silicone model of the nasal cavity, freshly frozen cadavers and finally in a real surgery. Each volunteer's task was recorded and timed. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) rating scale was used to estimate the surgeons' workload while performing the tasks. RESULTS Twenty-five volunteers took part in the experiments. Volunteers perceived more comfort and less fatigue and pain when using the armrest than when not using the device (3.3, SD 1.75 vs. 5.9 SD 1.49; p = 0.02). Participants found the device intuitive, comfortable, and improving accuracy and stability with endoscope use. CONCLUSION A new system that provides ergonomic assistance to surgeons was tested in simulation surgery with acceptable usability. Initial results in terms of pain and fatigue reduction and efficiency were excellent, justifying further research into this technology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA Laryngoscope, 134:79-86, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Lobo
- Otolaryngology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, Santander, Spain
| | - Ramon Sancibrian
- Department of Structural and Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Angela Mesones
- Department of Structural and Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - José Ramón Llata
- Department of Electronic Technology, Systems Engineering and Automatic Control, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Monica Williams
- Anaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Jaime Viera-Artiles
- Otolaryngology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan DZ, Hanrahan JG, Baldeweg SE, Dorward NL, Stoyanov D, Marcus HJ. Current and Future Advances in Surgical Therapy for Pituitary Adenoma. Endocr Rev 2023; 44:947-959. [PMID: 37207359 PMCID: PMC10502574 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnad014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The vital physiological role of the pituitary gland, alongside its proximity to critical neurovascular structures, means that pituitary adenomas can cause significant morbidity or mortality. While enormous advancements have been made in the surgical care of pituitary adenomas, numerous challenges remain, such as treatment failure and recurrence. To meet these clinical challenges, there has been an enormous expansion of novel medical technologies (eg, endoscopy, advanced imaging, artificial intelligence). These innovations have the potential to benefit each step of the patient's journey, and ultimately, drive improved outcomes. Earlier and more accurate diagnosis addresses this in part. Analysis of novel patient data sets, such as automated facial analysis or natural language processing of medical records holds potential in achieving an earlier diagnosis. After diagnosis, treatment decision-making and planning will benefit from radiomics and multimodal machine learning models. Surgical safety and effectiveness will be transformed by smart simulation methods for trainees. Next-generation imaging techniques and augmented reality will enhance surgical planning and intraoperative navigation. Similarly, surgical abilities will be augmented by the future operative armamentarium, including advanced optical devices, smart instruments, and surgical robotics. Intraoperative support to surgical team members will benefit from a data science approach, utilizing machine learning analysis of operative videos to improve patient safety and orientate team members to a common workflow. Postoperatively, neural networks leveraging multimodal datasets will allow early detection of individuals at risk of complications and assist in the prediction of treatment failure, thus supporting patient-specific discharge and monitoring protocols. While these advancements in pituitary surgery hold promise to enhance the quality of care, clinicians must be the gatekeepers of the translation of such technologies, ensuring systematic assessment of risk and benefit prior to clinical implementation. In doing so, the synergy between these innovations can be leveraged to drive improved outcomes for patients of the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danyal Z Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK
| | - John G Hanrahan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK
| | - Stephanie E Baldeweg
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK
- Centre for Obesity and Metabolism, Department of Experimental and Translational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Neil L Dorward
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK
- Digital Surgery Ltd, Medtronic, London WD18 8WW, UK
| | - Hani J Marcus
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamza H, Baez VM, Al-Ansari A, Becker AT, Navkar NV. User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09981-0. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09981-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A variety of human computer interfaces are used by robotic surgical systems to control and actuate camera scopes during minimally invasive surgery. The purpose of this review is to examine the different user interfaces used in both commercial systems and research prototypes.
Methods
A comprehensive scoping review of scientific literature was conducted using PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases to identify user interfaces used in commercial products and research prototypes of robotic surgical systems and robotic scope holders. Papers related to actuated scopes with human–computer interfaces were included. Several aspects of user interfaces for scope manipulation in commercial and research systems were reviewed.
Results
Scope assistance was classified into robotic surgical systems (for multiple port, single port, and natural orifice) and robotic scope holders (for rigid, articulated, and flexible endoscopes). Benefits and drawbacks of control by different user interfaces such as foot, hand, voice, head, eye, and tool tracking were outlined. In the review, it was observed that hand control, with its familiarity and intuitiveness, is the most used interface in commercially available systems. Control by foot, head tracking, and tool tracking are increasingly used to address limitations, such as interruptions to surgical workflow, caused by using a hand interface.
Conclusion
Integrating a combination of different user interfaces for scope manipulation may provide maximum benefit for the surgeons. However, smooth transition between interfaces might pose a challenge while combining controls.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hussain T. Patient Benefit and Quality of Life after Robot-Assisted Head and Neck Surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 2022; 101:S160-S185. [PMID: 35605618 DOI: 10.1055/a-1647-8650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Robotic systems for head and neck surgery are at different stages of technical development and clinical application. Currently, robotic systems are predominantly used for transoral surgery of the pharynx and larynx. Robotic surgery of the neck, the thyroid, and the middle and inner ear is much less common; however, some oncological and functional outcomes have been reported. This article provides an overview of the current state of robot-assisted head and neck surgery with a special emphasis on patient benefit and postoperative quality of life (QoL). The focus is placed on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the resection of oropharyngeal carcinomas. For this application, reported long-term outcomes show functional post-operative advantages for selected oropharyngeal cancer patients after TORS compared to open surgery and primary radiotherapy. Since TORS also plays a significant role in the context of potential therapy de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients, ongoing trials are presented. Regarding the evaluation of the therapeutic benefit and the QoL of cancer patients, special attention has to be paid to the large degree of variability of individual patients' preferences. Influencing factors and tools for a detailed assessment of QoL parameters are therefore detailed at the beginning of this article. Notably, while some robotic systems for ear and skull base surgery are being developed in Europe, TORS systems are mainly used in North America and Asia. In Europe and Germany in particular, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is a well-established technology for transoral tumor resection. Future trials comparing TORS and TLM with detailed investigation of QoL parameters are therefore warranted and might contribute to identifying suitable fields for the application of the different techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timon Hussain
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pangal DJ, Cote DJ, Ruzevick J, Yarovinsky B, Kugener G, Wrobel B, Ference EH, Swanson M, Hung AJ, Donoho DA, Giannotta S, Zada G. Robotic and robot-assisted skull base neurosurgery: systematic review of current applications and future directions. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E15. [PMID: 34973668 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The utility of robotic instrumentation is expanding in neurosurgery. Despite this, successful examples of robotic implementation for endoscopic endonasal or skull base neurosurgery remain limited. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all articles that used robotic systems to access the sella or anterior, middle, or posterior cranial fossae. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE and PubMed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines performed for articles published between January 1, 1990, and August 1, 2021, was conducted to identify all robotic systems (autonomous, semiautonomous, or surgeon-controlled) used for skull base neurosurgical procedures. Cadaveric and human clinical studies were included. Studies with exclusively otorhinolaryngological applications or using robotic microscopes were excluded. RESULTS A total of 561 studies were identified from the initial search, of which 22 were included following full-text review. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) using the da Vinci Surgical System was the most widely reported system (4 studies) utilized for skull base and pituitary fossa procedures; additionally, it has been reported for resection of sellar masses in 4 patients. Seven cadaveric studies used the da Vinci Surgical System to access the skull base using alternative, non-TORS approaches (e.g., transnasal, transmaxillary, and supraorbital). Five cadaveric studies investigated alternative systems to access the skull base. Six studies investigated the use of robotic endoscope holders. Advantages to robotic applications in skull base neurosurgery included improved lighting and 3D visualization, replication of more traditional gesture-based movements, and the ability for dexterous movements ordinarily constrained by small operative corridors. Limitations included the size and angulation capacity of the robot, lack of drilling components preventing fully robotic procedures, and cost. Robotic endoscope holders may have been particularly advantageous when the use of a surgical assistant or second surgeon was limited. CONCLUSIONS Robotic skull base neurosurgery has been growing in popularity and feasibility, but significant limitations remain. While robotic systems seem to have allowed for greater maneuverability and 3D visualization, their size and lack of neurosurgery-specific tools have continued to prevent widespread adoption into current practice. The next generation of robotic technologies should prioritize overcoming these limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhiraj J Pangal
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - David J Cote
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Jacob Ruzevick
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Benjamin Yarovinsky
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Guillaume Kugener
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Bozena Wrobel
- 2USC Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Elisabeth H Ference
- 2USC Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Mark Swanson
- 2USC Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Andrew J Hung
- 3USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Daniel A Donoho
- 4Division of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroscience, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Steven Giannotta
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Gabriel Zada
- 1USC Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Michel G, Salunkhe DH, Bordure P, Chablat D. Literature Review on Endoscopic Robotic Systems in Ear and Sinus Surgery. J Med Device 2021. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4052516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
In otolaryngologic surgery, endoscopy is increasingly used to provide a better view of hard-to-reach areas and to promote minimally invasive surgery. However, the need to manipulate the endoscope limits the surgeon's ability to operate with only one instrument at a time. Currently, several robotic systems are being developed, demonstrating the value of robotic assistance in microsurgery. The aim of this literature review is to present and classify current robotic systems that are used for otological and endonasal applications. For these solutions, an analysis of the functionalities in relation to the surgeon's needs will be carried out to produce a set of specifications for the creation of new robots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Michel
- ENT Department, CHU de Nantes, 1, place A. Ricordeau, Nantes 44093, France
| | - Durgesh Haribhau Salunkhe
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6004, 1 rue de la Noë, Nantes 44321, France
| | - Philippe Bordure
- ENT Department, CHU de Nantes, 1, place A. Ricordeau, Nantes 44093, France
| | - Damien Chablat
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6004, 1 rue de la Noë, Nantes 44321, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Michel G, Salunkhe DH, Bordure P, Chablat D. Geometric Atlas of the Middle Ear and Paranasal Sinuses for Robotic Applications. Surg Innov 2021; 29:329-335. [PMID: 34605327 DOI: 10.1177/15533506211039675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In otolaryngologic surgery, more and more robots are being studied to meet the clinical needs of operating rooms. However, to help design and optimize these robots, the workspace must be precisely defined taking into account patient variability. The aim of this work is to define a geometric atlas of the middle ear and paranasal sinuses for endoscopic robotic applications. Scans of several patients of different ages and sexes were used to determine the average size of these workspaces, which are linked by the similar use of endoscopes in surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Michel
- Service ORL, 545839CHU de Nantes, France.,UMR UMR 6004, 121217Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (LS2N), France
| | | | | | - Damien Chablat
- UMR UMR 6004, 121217Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (LS2N), France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Böhm F, Greve J, Riepl R, Hoffmann TK, Schuler PJ. [Robotics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery]. HNO 2021; 69:765-776. [PMID: 34272572 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01088-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In many surgical specialities, e.g., visceral surgery or urology, the use of robotic assistance is widely regarded as standard for many interventions. By contrast, in European otorhinolaryngology, robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is rarely conducted. This is because currently available robotic systems are not adequately adapted to the restricted space and partially difficult access to surgical fields in the head and neck area. Furthermore, RAS is associated with high costs at present. In some Anglo-American regions, robot-assisted surgery is already used regularly for different indications, particularly in transoral surgery of oropharyngeal tumors. Several feasibility studies demonstrate multiple fields of application for RAS in head and neck surgery. For standard use, the robotic systems and surgical instruments need to be reduced in size and adapted to application in the head and neck area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Böhm
- Universitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland. .,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Konsortium, Ulm, Deutschland.
| | - J Greve
- Universitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Konsortium, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - R Riepl
- Universitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Konsortium, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - T K Hoffmann
- Universitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Konsortium, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - P J Schuler
- Universitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Konsortium, Ulm, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hintschich CA, Fischer R, Seebauer C, Schebesch KM, Bohr C, Kühnel T. A third hand to the surgeon: the use of an endoscope holding arm in endonasal sinus surgery and well beyond. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:1891-1898. [PMID: 34148145 PMCID: PMC8930793 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06935-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended endoscopic endonasal operations of the sinuses and the frontal skull base require a bimanual action of the surgeon in many cases. Thus, typically an assistant guides the endoscope and centers the field of view. In this study, we investigate in which cases an endoscope holding arm can be used alternatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS The electromagnetic system ENDOFIXexo was used in different surgical interventions of the paranasal sinuses and beyond questioning ergonomics and geometrical limitations. The realized degrees of freedom were documented, and a topography of possible applications compiled. RESULTS The presented system is limited by the anatomy of the anterior ethmoid and dynamic working conditions in the sagittal direction. Especially in extended interventions in the posterior ethmoid, in which parts of the nasal septum have been resected and a static position of the endoscope is desired the surgeon can greatly benefit from the robotic arm. Moreover, through the high flexibility of the endoscopic arm surgeries of the pharynx and larynx were performed, questioning the current gold standard of microscope-assisted surgical procedures. CONCLUSION Under the impression of an urging staff shortage and due to its unlimited patience, the ENDOFIXexo arm seems promising. Taking into account the complex anatomy and the limited access, we especially see a favorable field of application in the surgery of the pituitary gland and skull base tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin A Hintschich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - René Fischer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Seebauer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Christopher Bohr
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kühnel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khanwalkar AR, Welch KC. Updates in techniques for improved visualization in sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 29:9-20. [PMID: 33315617 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Adequate visualization during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is one of the most critical aspects of performing well tolerated and successful surgery. The topic of visualization encompasses a broad spectrum of preoperative and intraoperative manoeuvres the surgeon can perform that aid in the understanding of the patient's anatomy and in the delivery of efficient surgical care. RECENT FINDINGS Preoperative considerations to improve visualization include optimization of haemostasis through management of comorbidities (e.g. hypertension, coagulopathies), medication management (e.g. blood thinners) and systemic versus topical corticosteroids. New technologies allow preoperative visual mapping of surgical plans. Advances in knowledge of intraoperative anaesthesia have encouraged a move toward noninhaled anaesthetics to reduce bleeding. High definition cameras, angled endoscopes, 3D endoscopes and more recently augmented reality, image-guided surgery, and robotic surgery, represent the state of the art for high-quality visualization. Topical interventions, such as epinephrine, tranexamic acid and warm isotonic saline, can help to reduce bleeding and improve the operative field. Surgical manoeuvres, such as polyp debulking, septoplasty, carefully controlled tissue manipulation and a consistent repeatable approach remain fundamental to appropriate intraoperative surgical visualization. SUMMARY This chapter delineates medical, technical and technological means - preoperatively and intraoperatively - to achieve optimized visualization of the surgical field in ESS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashoke R Khanwalkar
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Robotic surgery has become more common in otolaryngologic surgery since the introduction of the da Vinci robotic system, but has played a limited role in anterior and central skull base surgery, largely because of technical limitations of existing robots. Current robotic technology has been used in creative ways to access the skull base, but was not designed to navigate these complex anatomic constraints. Novel robots should target many of the limitations of current robotic technology, such as maneuverability, inability to suture, lack of haptic feedback, and absent integration with image guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Heuermann
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, SIU School of Medicine, 720 North Bond Street, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
| | - Alex P Michael
- Division of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Institute, SIU School of Medicine, PO Box 19638, Springfield, IL 62794-9638, USA
| | - Dana L Crosby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, SIU School of Medicine, 720 North Bond Street, Springfield, IL 62702, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boehm F, Friedrich DT, Sommer F, Scheithauer MO, Greve J, Hoffmann TK, Schuler PJ. Nasolacrimal duct stenosis-Surgery with a novel robotic endoscope positioning system. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:1-5. [PMID: 32735040 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distal nasolacrimal duct stenosis is usually treated by head and neck surgeons with transnasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The presented clinical study discusses advantages and drawbacks of a robot-assisted endoscope positioning system, which allows for hands-free visualization of the surgical field. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two patients were treated by surgical DCR. The endoscopic positioning system (Medineering® ) features a mechatronic holding arm with four segments and seven degrees of freedom. It is driven by using a foot pedal. RESULTS Visualization and instrumentation of the surgical field including the relevant anatomical landmarks were feasible. The endoscope position could be controlled with sufficient precision. The surgeon was able to maintain bimanual instrumentation. CONCLUSION The endoscope positioning system allows for two-handed surgery, which facilitates the essential steps of the surgical procedure. If the benefit of the system is sufficient for the use in clinical routine, it has to be evaluated in repeated applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Boehm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Daniel T Friedrich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Augsburg University Medical Center, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Sommer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc-Oliver Scheithauer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jens Greve
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas K Hoffmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Patrick J Schuler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mattheis S, Schlüter A, Stähr K, Holtmann L, Höing B, Hussain T, Kanaan O, Eckstein A, Lang S. First Use of a New Robotic Endoscope Guiding System in Endoscopic Orbital Decompression. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2019; 100:443S-448S. [PMID: 31690110 DOI: 10.1177/0145561319885803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the last years, robot-assisted surgery gained in importance in head and neck surgery. In our study, we used a new robotic endoscope guiding system in patients undergoing endoscopic balanced orbital decompression. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of a robotic arm in endoscopic orbital surgery. METHODS The Medineering Robotic Endoscope Guiding System is a robotic arm designed for holding an endoscope during interventions. An endoscope equipped with a 4K camera was attached at the tip of the robotic arm and placed in the surgical field. The surgeon controlled the movements of the endoscope with foot pedal. Eight patients underwent balanced endoscopic orbital decompression showing typical symptoms of Graves' orbitopathy preoperatively. Balanced decompression was performed via a combined approach transnasally and laterally via a small skin incision. RESULTS Attaching the endoscope to the robotic guiding system and placing it in the nasal cavity were relatively simple procedures. Setup time was less than 10 minutes. Tool motion and control using the foot pedal were comfortable and adequately precise. Movements of the attached endoscope inside the nose were feasible and allowed 2-hand surgery. The patients did not show any adverse events or complications. CONCLUSION The Medineering Robotic Endoscope Guiding System seems to be a safe and effective support in endoscopic skull base surgery especially for orbital decompression, thus allowing 2-hand or even 4-hand settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study describing the successful application of a robotic system in orbital surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Mattheis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Anke Schlüter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Stähr
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Laura Holtmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Höing
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Timon Hussain
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Kanaan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Anja Eckstein
- Department of Ophthalmology, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Lang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 39081University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang P, Su YJ, Jia CY. Current surgical practices of robotic-assisted tissue repair and reconstruction. Chin J Traumatol 2019; 22:88-92. [PMID: 30962128 PMCID: PMC6487454 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper systematically reviewed and analyzed the recent publications of robotic-assisted surgeries in the field of tissue repair and reconstruction. Surgical robots can elevate skin flap more accurately and shorten the time of tissue harvest. In addition, robotic-assisted surgery has the advantage of minimal tissue trauma and thus forms minimal scar. The utilization of surgical robots reduces the occurrence of complications after oral radical tumor resection while achieving cosmetic sutures. Robotic-assisted radical mastectomy could radically remove invasive breast cancer lesions and achieve breast reconstruction in the first stage through the small incisions in the operation areas. Surgical robots enable precise microvascular anastomosis and reduce tissue edema in the surgical field. Robotic-assisted technology can help appropriately locate the target tissues at different angles during sinus and skull base surgeries and accurately place tissues during urethroplasty. The robotic-assisted technology provides a new platform for surgical innovation in the field of tissue repair and reconstruction. However, the uncertainty in the survival rate after tumor radical surgery, the increase of operating time, and the high costs are barriers for its clinical application in tissue repair and reconstructive surgery. Nevertheless, robotic-assisted technology has already demonstrated an impact on the field of tissue repair and reconstruction in a meaningful way.
Collapse
|
16
|
Paraskevopoulos D, Constantini S, Bal J, Roth J. Endoscope Holders in Cranial Neurosurgery: Part 2-An International Survey. World Neurosurg 2018; 111:e632-e643. [PMID: 29305118 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following a previous systematic review of currently available endoscope holders (EHs), we aspired to detect trends, task-specific preferences, and pitfalls of EH in various cranial neuroendoscopic procedures. METHODS A questionnaire was disseminated to members of the International Federation of Neuroendoscopy. The questionnaire evaluated indications and pitfalls of EH in different applications, in particular, differentiating between intraventricular and skull base endoscopy, as well as subcategories of these 2 main fields. Furthermore, interest or involvement in research projects on EH was investigated. RESULTS Fifty-two surgeons responded, with a broad geographic distribution represented. Most (54%) do not routinely use EH. Others use holders mainly for intraventricular rather than skull base procedures. Most surgeons (96%) regularly work with a co-surgeon. Reported weaknesses of EH included crude movements, downward drift, loss of depth perception, lack of flexibility, iatrogenic injury, cost, and bulky construct. There is still a lack of consensus on surgical indications. Tumor resections in intraventricular and skull base regions (not small sellar tumors) seem to stand out as good, widely accepted indications. CONCLUSIONS Although EH have a role in cranial neuroendoscopy, their use seems limited and their technical features are regarded as suboptimal by most neuroendoscopists. Weaknesses and implications were detected in all application categories (skull base and intraventricular) but may vary slightly. Potentially, separate systems with distinct features may be required for skull base versus intraventricular surgery. There is a need for further evolution of EH, which could lead to a future paradigm shift in their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Shlomi Constantini
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jarnail Bal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Roth
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|