Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from 16- and rebinned 8-frame gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT

Comparison of software programs for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using 99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT/CT: correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in the Indian population

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb), quantitative gated SPECT (QGS), four-dimensional single photon emission computed tomography (4D-MSPECT) and Myometrix cardiac software programs for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using 99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT/CT [myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS)] and correlate them with the LVEF values derived from equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERNV) in patients with known/suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 109 patients (80 men, 29 women) were recruited into the study. Fifty-five patients had known CAD and 54 were referred with suspicion of CAD. All the patients underwent ERNV and MPS as per the standard protocol. ERNV was processed using the vendor-provided 'EF analysis' and gated MPS was processed using individual software programs.

RESULTS

The mean LVEF on ERNV was 47.9 ± 15.5%. The mean LVEF values for ECTb, QGS, 4D-MSPECT and Myometrix were 51.5 ± 19.6, 51.0 ± 18.6, 57.1 ± 19.3 and 49.7 ± 19%, respectively. On correlation analysis, a very strong positive correlation was observed between LVEF values derived by ERNV and those derived by the MPS software programs: ECTb (r=0.842, P<0.0001), QGS (r=0.835, P<0.0001), 4D-MSPECT (r=0.830, P<0.0001) and Myometrix (r=0.875, P<0.0001). Significant correlation was also seen for LVEFs among the four software programs. Normal cutoff values for ejection fraction on ECTb, QGS, 4D-MSPECT and Myometrix were 56, 52, 54 and 51%, respectively, using a 50% or more cutoff value on ERNV.

CONCLUSION

A strong correlation was observed among ECTb, QGS, 4D-MSPECT and Myometrix software programs when compared with ERNV and also between them for assessment of LVEF. However, there are subtle differences in the objective values of ejection fraction generated by individual software, which must be taken into account for clinical studies.

Gated SPECT offers improved interobserver agreement compared with echocardiography

PURPOSE

Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a powerful predictor of prognosis in coronary artery disease. The purpose of the present study was to measure interobserver differences for gated SPECT (GSPECT) software and echocardiography, and to compare these modalities regarding left ventricular volumes and EF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients scheduled for nuclear imaging underwent a 1-day GSPECT with Tc-99m-tetrofosmin. Images were processed by 2 raters who calculated volumes and EF using Cedar-Sinai quantitative gated-SPECT (QGS), Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECT), and 4D-MSPECT of the University of Michigan. Echocardiographic volumes were measured by 2 raters. Interobserver reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Differences in volumes and EF between echocardiography and GSPECT were compared with t-tests.

RESULTS

ICC was 0.61 for echocardiography, 0.94 for QGS, 0.88 for ECT, and 0.91 for 4D-MSPECT (P < 0.0001 compared with echocardiography). For small ventricles (ESV ≤30 mL), ICC was 0.58 for echocardiography and 0.90 for QGS (P = 0.008 compared with echocardiography); 0.77 and 0.73 for ECT and 4D-MSPECT, respectively (P = ns). End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were significantly larger with GSPECT than with echocardiography, also echocardiographic ejection fraction was significantly different from GSPECT.

CONCLUSIONS

There is better interobserver reliability in GSPECT as compared with echocardiography, and QGS seems more robust in this study especially when it comes to small ventricles.

The consequences of a new software package for the quantification of gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion studies

Purpose

Semiquantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) has reduced inter- and intraobserver variability, and enables researchers to compare parameters in the same patient over time, or between groups of patients. There are several software packages available that are designed to process MPS data and quantify parameters. In this study the performances of two systems, quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) and 4D-MSPECT, in the processing of clinical patient data and phantom data were compared.

Methods

The clinical MPS data of 148 consecutive patients were analysed using QGS and 4D-MSPECT to determine the end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were divided into groups based on gender, body mass index, heart size, stressor type and defect type. The AGATE dynamic heart phantom was used to provide reference values for the left ventricular ejection fraction.

Results

Although the correlations were excellent (correlation coefficients 0.886 to 0.980) for all parameters, significant differences (p < 0.001) were found between the systems. Bland-Altman plots indicated that 4D-MSPECT provided overall higher values of all parameters than QGS. These differences between the systems were not significant in patients with a small heart (end-diastolic volume <70 ml). Other clinical factors had no direct influence on the relationship. Additionally, the phantom data indicated good linear responses of both systems.

Conclusion

The discrepancies between these software packages were clinically relevant, and influenced by heart size. The possibility of such discrepancies should be taken into account when a new quantitative software system is introduced, or when multiple software systems are used in the same institution.