Comparative Evaluation between Single Noncompression Miniplate and Two Noncompression Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures

Finite Element Analysis of New Modified Three-dimensional Strut Miniplate versus Conventional Plating in Mandibular Symphysis and Angle Fractures - An In vitro Study

Introduction

Mandibular fractures are common injuries during maxillofacial trauma, and currently, open reduction and internal fixation are considered gold-standard treatments. There is a wide discussion about which plates give the best outcomes. Hence, we are conducting a biomechanical comparison of two plates for mandibular symphysis and angle fracture with finite element analysis (FEA). The aim of this study was to do a comparative study of FEA between the conventional and our new modified three-dimensional (3D) strut miniplate in mandibular fractures at symphysis and angle regions.

Materials and Methods

Finite element models of symphyseal and angle fractures of the mandible were developed. Each fracture model was then realigned and fixed by the conventional method 2.0 mm system, and our modified 3D strut plating method 2.0 mm system followed by the analysis of various stresses developed in plates and mandibular fracture area after application of load was observed in the study.

Results

The modified 3D strut plating system with 2.0 mm miniplates is significantly better in preventing displacement of fracture segments by better distribution of forces compared to the conventional plating system. Rest of the parameters were within the permitted limits.

Discussion

Modified 3D strut plating method was reasonably effective and superior in managing force-displacement compared to the conventional method of fixation for comminuted and unfavourable mandibular symphyseal fracture and angle fracture.

New design titanium miniplate versus conventional miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study

Introduction

Mandibular angle fracture (MAF) is the second most common site of all fractures of the mandible with the highest complication rate. Management of MAF has evolved in the past four decades. The purpose of the prospective study was to compare the efficacy of new design titanium miniplate (NDM) with conventional titanium miniplate (CTM) in the treatment of MAF.

Objectives

Mouth opening, occlusion, bite force measurement, and radiographs compared preoperatively and first week, first month and third month postoperatively.

Materials and Method

Fourteen patients diagnosed with MAF were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (seven patients) was treated with NDM and Group B (seven patients) with CTM. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at an interval of one week, one month and three months.

Results

Repeated measures ANOVA and Post hoc Tukey test showed a significant increase in bite force and mouth opening for both groups in first and third postoperative months. Unpaired t-test showed slightly better mouth opening in Group B and slightly higher bite force in Group A.

Discussion

Both miniplates fulfilled all the study objectives and equally satisfactory healing was seen at the end of third month. NDM offers better stability, rigidity, and anatomic reduction of the fracture with a drawback of difficulty in adaptation and increased operative timing compared to CTM. Hence, we would like to conclude that both miniplates are equally efficient in the treatment of non-comminuted angle fractures with the NDM having upper hand in stability.

Masticatory muscles activity in patients with mandibular angle fractures: A literature review on which procedure to use to reverse the best masticatory muscles functionality

Introduction

Mandible is the first or the second most fractured bone of facial skeleton. Fractures of the angle account for 23-43% of all mandibular fractures. Soft and hard tissue are affected in a traumatized mandible. Bite forces are an essential factor in masticatory muscles activity. An improved function is a result of improvement in the bite force.

Aim

The objective of this research was to conduct a systematic review of all available literature regarding the masticatory muscles' activity and bite forces in patients with mandibular angle fractures.

Methods

PubMed, and Google Scholar databases have been searched with the following keywords: "mandibular angle fractures" AND "bite forces "OR "masticatory muscles activity".

Results

This research methodology provided 402 articles. Of which 33 were selected for analysis if they were pertinent to the topic. Then only 10 results have been identified and included in this review.

Conclusions

We can conclude that bite force decreased significantly after trauma, specifically during the first month after injury, and then increases gradually over time. More randomized clinical trial studies and the incorporation of more methods such as electromyography (EMG) for measuring the electrical activity of muscles and bite force recorder could be considered in the future.

One miniplate versus two miniplates in the fixation of mandibular angle fractures. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes after using one miniplate fixation in the external oblique ridge versus two miniplate fixation for mandibular angle fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library database was performed (last search date: 04 February 2022) according to the PRISMA guidelines. The research question was addressed using the PICO criteria. Only comparative studies between the two techniques were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, comprising a total of 1667 patients, 846 undergoing one miniplate fixation and 854 undergoing two miniplate fixation for mandibular angle fractures were identified. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR]= 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.69] - [1.28], p = 0.68, I²=0.00%), post-operative malocclusion (OR= 0.97, 95% CI: [0.53] - [1.18], p = 0.25, I²=0.00%), post-operative neurosensory dysfunction (OR= 0.67, 95% CI: [0.37] - [1.22], p = 0.19, I²=73.93%), pseudoarthrosis formation (OR=0.90, 95% CI: [0.58] - [(1.39], p = 0.63, I²=0.00%). Wound dehiscence was marginally less common in the one miniplate group (OR=0.52, 95% CI: [0.28] - [0.98], p = 0.04, I²=54.34%). The probability of scarring formation (OR=0.13, 95% CI: [0.05] - [0.32], p = 0.00, I²=0.00%) and hardware failure (OR=0.36, 95% CI [0.21] - [0.62], p = 0.00, I²=29.33%) were statistically significantly higher in the two miniplates arm.

CONCLUSION

One miniplate fixation and two miniplates fixation of mandibular angle fractures have similar results regarding post operative infection, malocclusion, neurosensory dysfunction and pseudoarthrosis formation while wound dehiscence, hardware failure and scarring seem to be more common when two miniplates are used as a fixation technique.

Is There a Safe Zone for Lateral Border Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures?

Study Design

Cross-sectional study design.

Objective

There are multiple accepted treatment options for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a safe zone for lateral border fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Methods

One hundred coronal images of facial computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed on patients between the ages of 18 to 48. Measurements were taken in the area of the second and third molar region related to the inferior border to the superior extent of the inferior alveolar canal and apex of the second molar root, along with buccal cortical measurements to the inferior alveolar canal and apical third of the second molar root.

Results

The average measurement of the inferior border in the second molar area to the inferior alveolar canal and apex of the root was 1.12 cm (0.70-1.77) and 1.39 cm (0.91-2.30), respectively. The average measurement of the inferior border of the third molar to the inferior alveolar canal was 1.26 cm (0.78-1.83). The average measurement of the buccal cortex of the second molar to the inferior alveolar canal and apical one-third of the root was 0.64 cm (0.34-1.25) and 0.59 cm (0.33-0.98), respectively. The average measurement of the third molar buccal cortex to the inferior alveolar canal was 0.45 cm (0.18-0.98).

Conclusion

In the area of the second molar region, there is no ubiquitous safe zone for screw placement, cortical bone thickness is more critical than vertical placement of the fixation plate and screws. In the third molar region, cortical bone thickness and vertical orientation may provide a safe zone for screw placement.

Complications after different methods for fixation of mandibular angle fractures: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The aim of this review was to compare mandibular angle fracture fixation methods that were evaluated through randomized clinical trials considering postoperative complications. Additionally, different treatment methods were ranked based on their performance. A systematic review was performed based on the Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. The quality of evidence and network meta-analysis were conducted using the GRADE tool and R software, respectively. Four databases were searched, and the papers were selected based on the PICOS strategy. A total of 3584 papers were found. After screening 15 papers were included. One plate placed on lateral border (tension zone) presented lower risk than one plate placed on superior border (tension zone) for infection [risk ratio (RR): 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33 to 0.71] and plate removal necessity (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.69), with moderate quality of evidence. There were no significant differences among the mandibular angle fracture treatments for malocclusion and paraesthesia outcomes. In conclusion, one plate placed on the lateral border in the tension zone is the best choice regarding postoperative infection and plate removal necessity when fixing mandibular angle fractures. None of the tested fixation methods were associated with a significant risk of malocclusion and paraesthesia events.

The Influence of the Gonial Angle on the Initial Biomechanical Stability of the Plate Osteosynthesis in Polyurethane Mandibles With Angle Fractures

The aim of the present study was to examine the biomechanical stability of the mandibular angle fractures (MAF) fixated with standard titanium miniplates in polyurethane models with different gonial angles (GA). Three custom molds were prepared for 3-dimensional printed mandibles with low, normal and high GA. Twenty polyurethane replicas were cast per group and standard MAFs were created on each sample. Fractures were stabilized with 1 4-hole standard titanium miniplate inserted over the superior alveolar border. Half of the samples were subjected to molar loading and the other half to the incisal loading up until 150 N force magnitude. The load-displacement curves and the horizontal moment arms were recorded and analyzed. The samples with high GA demonstrated greater displacement than those with normal and low GA during molar loading (P < 0.05 for both). After correcting for the effects of the moment arm, the incisal loading also resulted in higher mean displacement in the high GA group than the others (P < 0.05 for both) and the normal GA samples showed higher displacement after 100 N level compared to those in low GA (P < 0.05). Within the limits of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the MAFs of the polyurethane mandibles with high GA fixated with 1 standard monocortical plate are more likely to demonstrate higher displacement values under the effects of the molar and incisal loadings than do the mandibles with normal and low GA.