Thoracoumbilical Flap: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications in Upper Limb Reconstruction in the Era of Microvascular Surgery

Upper limb traumatic injuries: A concise overview of reconstructive options

Different options for upper limb reconstruction are described in literature: advancement or rotation flaps, regional flaps and free flaps are the most common. Local and regional flaps can represent the reconstructive options for small defects while large wounds require the use of free flaps or distant pedicled flaps. In case of large wound, the use of free flaps rather than distant pedicle flaps is usually preferred. To choose the best reconstructive option, it is essential for the surgeon to have a general overview about the different methods.

In this review the Authors will refer to the most commonly used methods to cover soft tissues injuries affecting the dorsum and the palm of the hand and the forearm (excluding fingers). The aim is to show all flap reconstructive options so as to support the inexperienced surgeon during the management of traumatic injuries of the upper limb.

•

Reconstruction of traumatic injuries of the upper limbs can be challenging.

•

Small defects can be covered by local and regional flaps while large wounds need the use of free or distant pedicled flaps.

•

The literature shows different opinions whether to use pedicled flaps (regional or distant) or free flaps.

•

Dermal substitutes can be considered in patients who are not suitable for flaps reconstruction.

•

Patient related factors and surgical background can significantly interfere with the surgical reconstructive solution.

Versatility of the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Reconstruction of Upper Limb and Trunk Soft Tissue Defects

Purpose The purpose of the study was to share our indications, technique, outcome, and complications associated with the pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) for reconstructing various upper limb and trunk soft tissue defects. Patients and Methods We reviewed the prospectively collected data of the patients who underwent reconstruction of upper limb/trunk soft tissue defects with pedicled LDMF between January 2016 and March 2019. By analyzing the clinical scenarios, the location of flap inset, the arc of rotation, reach of the flap, and associated complications, we put forward few significant findings from our experience. Results Thirty-four patients were included in the study: 13 of them underwent LDMF for coverage of upper limb defects, 12 of them for postradical mastectomy soft tissue defects, 8 for posterior trunk reconstruction, and 1 for sternal wound infection. LDMF was successfully used to cover the scapula, anterior and posterior arms, axilla, cubital fossa, mid-forearm, breast, sternum, and midline dorsal wounds. When used reversely, the flap could cover the exposed spine in the midline dorsum. Three patients (9%) had major complications (two patients had partial flap necrosis which required additional debridement and skin grafting, and one patient required an additional transpositional flap). Three patients had minor complications (managed nonoperatively). Conclusion Pedicled LDMF is a straightforward and versatile option for reconstruction of the varied upper limb and trunk soft tissue defects with minimal complications. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic, retrospective study.