Combining Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer

Predesigned chimeric deep inferior epigastric perforator and inguinal lymph node flap for combined breast and lymphedema reconstruction: A comprehensive algorithmic approach

The combined use of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap coupled with vascularized inguinal lymph nodes (VILNs) for simultaneous breast and lymphedema reconstruction has already been well established, and promising results have been reported. However, a standardized approach for the planning and shaping of this combined flap is still lacking. We aimed to propose a comprehensive algorithmic approach for delayed unilateral breast and lymphedema reconstruction using a predesigned abdominal flap associated with inguinal lymph node transfer. We present in detail the preoperative measurements and surgical technique of the chimeric flap, which combines a predesigned DIEP template and a preselected inguinal lymph node flap, based on the preoperative computed tomography angiography and SPEC-CT findings, respectively; four different flap types are described according to the location of the pedicles of the two flap components. Our results of a series of 34 consecutive female patients with unilateral mastectomy and arm lymphedema, who underwent this combined predesigned reconstructive procedure, are retrospectively analyzed and reported. We recorded a high survival rate of the chimeric flaps in our series, with only one case of partial ischemic loss of a DIEP skin island. In the majority of our patients, the pedicles of the combined flaps were located in opposite positions. After a mean 35-month follow-up, we recorded a 47% mean volume difference reduction of the lymphedematous compared to the unaffected arm; no donor-site lymphedema was documented. Self-evaluation questionnaires showed high patient satisfaction rates regarding breast reconstruction. This algorithmic approach provides standardized guidance for accurate design and transfer of the DIEP-VILN chimeric flap while achieving highly satisfactory outcomes for both breast and lymphedema reconstruction.

Orthotopic vascularized lymph node transfer in breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment: Functional and life quality outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic disease that occurs up to 65% of breast cancer survivors. Traditional treatment is conservative, but new surgeries as lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) are at disposal. This study aims to investigate the orthotopic VLNT efficacy in BCRL. Results in terms of limbs' reduction rates and quality of life improvement are compared with the outcomes reported in Literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During patients' selection, inclusion criteria were monolateral ISL stage II or III BCRL with pathologic lymphoscintigraphy imaging and a minimum of previous 6 months of unsuccessful conservative treatment. Bilateral lymphedema, local recurrence or systemic metastasis, acute infection of the limb and deep venous trombosis were exclusion criteria. Surgery consisted in VLNT from the gastroepiploic region to the axilla with axillary scar dissection.

RESULTS

From August 2019 to December 2021, 25 patients were included. At the preoperative scintigraphy exam, mean lymph transport index (TI) was 30 (range; 22.7-29.3). Nine of them (36%) were ISL stage II and 16 (64%) were stage III. Average follow-up was 13.5 months (range; 12-19 months). VLN flaps' survival rate was 100%. One year after surgery, the mean Circumferential Reduction Rate (CRR) resulted 44.62 (range; 27.4-60.3). Infections' rates presented a statistically significant reduction, from an average of 2.4 (range; 1-4) to 0.2 (range; 0-1) episodes per year. Life quality index measured with the LYMQOL questionnaire showed significant improvement after 1 year, from a mean score of 3.28 (range; 2-5) to 8.12 (range; 7-9).

CONCLUSION

When compared with Literature evidence, the results of the current study are in line with both VLN inset ways related to BCRL treatment. An optimal therapeutic choice should consider benefits and drawbacks of each orthotopic and heterotopic VLNT, taking into account surgeon's preference and experience and patients' related factors and expectations.

Concurrent management of lymphedema and breast reconstruction with single-stage omental vascularized lymph node transfer and autologous breast reconstruction: A case series

INTRODUCTION

The omentum has gained recent popularity in vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNT) as well as its novel use as a free flap for autologous breast reconstruction. The omentum has multiple unique advantages. It can be harvested laparoscopically or in an open fashion when utilized with abdominally-based free flaps. Additionally, it can be split into multiple flaps for simultaneous autologous breast reconstruction with VLNT or for multiple sites of VLNT. We present the safe and advantageous use of the omentum for VLNT with simultaneous autologous breast reconstruction in a series of patients.

METHODS

From the years 2019-2022, patients who underwent breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or muscle sparing tram (MS-TRAM) flaps with concurrent omental VLNT through a mini-laparotomy or breast reconstruction with Omental Fat-Augmented Free Flap (O-FAFF) with concurrent laparoscopic harvesting of omental VLNT were studied. Patient demographics included age, gender, comorbidities, prior radiation or chemotherapy, body mass index, complications, hospital length of stay, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of seven patients underwent omental VLNT with breast reconstruction for a total of 12 breasts and eight limbs treated. Three of the patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction using omental free flap. The mean age was 52.3 (range 40-75) years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.3 (range 23-38) kg/m2 . The flap survival rate was 100%. All the patients had successful reduction of extremity circumference and improvement of symptoms. The range of follow-up was 5 to 19 months, with an average follow-up of 14.6 months. There was only one complication among our 7 patients: a patient with a BMI of 38 developed a post-surgical abdominal wound treated with local wound care. Otherwise, post-operative courses were uneventful, and no further complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate here additional evidence to the growing body of literature of the versatility and safety of the omentum to be utilized as an independent tool for surgical treatment of lymphedema as well as its simultaneous use with autologous breast reconstruction.

Surgical management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a narrative review of contemporary practices

Background and Objective

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a colossal burden in terms of health and patient-reported outcomes. Surgical management plays a prominent role in the psychological and physical well-being of women suffering from BCRL. Therefore, we performed a narrative review of the current surgical management of BCRL and analyzed the postoperative results.

Methods

A literature search was conducted across PubMed MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception through January 2, 2023. We included English-written studies evaluating postoperative outcomes of lymphatic surgery for the management of BCRL.

Key Content and Findings

The surgical management of lymphedema can be classified into two approaches: (I) physiologic procedures and (II) debulking or ablative procedures. While ablative procedures are intended to lessen the symptomatic burden of lymphedema via the removal of pathological tissues, physiologic procedures are performed to restore the abnormal lymphatic flow by creating bypasses into the venous or lymphatic circulation, or by creating new lymphatic connections by means of lymphangiogenesis. Physiologic procedures generate better outcomes in the early stages of lymphedema as there is some residual physiologic flow and vessels are less fibrotic, while ablative procedures are regarded to be the best alternative in very advanced lymphedema stages. A combination of physiologic and ablative procedures provides more comprehensive surgical management to BCRL.

Conclusions

Lymphedema is a common complication of breast cancer treatment with an extensive incidence range. Postoperative outcomes of the surgical management of BCRL are heterogeneous despite most studies indicating favorable results after lymphatic surgery.

Narrative review of patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction

Background and Objective

The treatment of breast cancer encompasses both the elimination of malignancy as well as reconstruction after tumor extirpation. Although the patient may have had successful treatment of her breast cancer, the resulting disfigurement and deformity can have a substantial impact on her physical and mental well-being. Breast reconstruction affords these patients the opportunity to correct these deformities and potentially to improve their quality of life. The current literature review evaluates patient-reported outcomes for the various options of breast reconstruction that are most commonly performed.

Methods

A literature review on PubMed with the key words "patient-reported outcomes", "breast reconstruction", and "breast cancer" yielded 738 results, which were screened. Articles that specifically focused on patient-reported outcomes after various types of breast reconstruction were evaluated and included in this literature review.

Key Content and Findings

The main options of alloplastic reconstruction, autologous tissue reconstruction, and oncoplastic reconstruction were reviewed and found to demonstrate high levels of patient satisfaction. Although there is no clear superior option, patient-reported outcomes demonstrate improved well-being compared to no reconstruction.

Conclusions

Breast reconstruction provides the opportunity to correct the deformities after breast cancer treatment making it a crucial component of comprehensive cancer care. A variety of reconstructive options are available which can be tailored to each individual patient to achieve the optimal results for that particular patient. Therefore patient-reported outcomes are paramount to gauge the true success of not only breast cancer treatment but also reconstructive aspects after treatment.

The breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach: Algorithm for conservative and multimodal surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Multiple surgical alternatives are available to treat breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) providing a variable spectrum of outcomes. This study aimed to present the breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach (B-LYMA) to systematically treat BCRL.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients presenting with BCRL between 2017 and 2021 were included. The average age and BMI were 49.4 ± 7.8 years and 28.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2 , respectively. Forty patients had lymphedema ISL stage II (51.3%) and 38 had stage III (48.7%). The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. Treatment was selected according to the B-LYMA algorithm, which aims to combine physiologic and excisional procedures according to the preoperative evaluation of patients. All patients had pre- and postoperative complex decongestive therapy (CDT).

RESULTS

Stage II patients were treated with lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) (n = 18), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) (n = 12), and combined DIEP flap and VLNT (n = 10). Stage III patients underwent combined suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and LVA (n = 36) or combined SAL and VLNT (n = 2). Circumferential reduction rates (CRR) were comparable between patients treated with LVA (56.5 ± 8.4%), VLNT (54.4 ± 10.2%), and combined VLNT-DIEP flap (56.5 ± 3.9%) (p > .05). In comparison to LVA, VLNT, and combined VLNT-DIEP flap, combined SAL-LVA exhibited higher CRRs (85 ± 10.5%, p < .001). The CRR for combined SAL-VLNT was 75 ± 8.5%. One VLNT failed and minor complications occurred in the combined DIEP-VLNT group.

CONCLUSION

The B-LYMA protocol directs the treatment of BCRL according to the lymphatic system's condition. In advanced stages where a single physiologic procedure is not sufficient, additional excisional surgery is implemented. Preoperative and postoperative CDT is mandatory to improve the outcomes.

A comparative study between deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction and DIEP flap breast reconstruction coupled with vascularized lymph node transfer: Improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer related lymphedema without affecting donor site outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite simultaneous microvascular breast reconstruction (MBR) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) gaining wide popularity as a potential treatment for breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL), there is a lack of evidence supporting the procedure. There are few reports in the literature, and no study has compared simple deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) to simultaneous DIEP flap and VLNT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our series of DIEP flaps was conducted. Patients presenting with BCRL who had delayed MBR and simultaneous VLNT were selected. Thirty-two patients were included and compared with a control group of delayed MBR with DIEP flap alone. Clinical evaluation, circumference reduction rate, and LYMQOL questionnaire were used to compare preoperative and postoperative findings in the study group. A digital version of BREAST Q questionnaire was administered to all patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study group, with a mean follow-up of 42.5 ± 25.7 months and mean age of 54.1 ± 7.8 years. The mean circumference reduction rate was 46.1 ± 52.3, 39 ± 42.3, 47.5 ± 53.5, 39.2 ± 52.4, 33.6 ± 50.1 at the deltoid insertion, above the elbow, below the elbow, at the mid-forearm and wrist respectively. Postoperative LYMQOL scores significantly improved (function 1.21, appearance 1.15, symptoms 1.34, mood 1.33, overall QOLscore 8.6) from preoperative baseline (p < .001). There was no significant difference in term of outcomes and complications rate of the donor site between the study and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous DIEPandVLNT improves the HRQOL of patients with lymphedema. Coupling VLNT with abdominal flap does not increase the morbidity of donor site.

Health Disparities in Patients Seeking Physiological Surgical Treatment for Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated racial disparities in breast cancer treatment and secondary lymphedema. However, no studies have yet examined the effects of race and socioeconomic status on physiological surgical treatment for lymphedema. The authors aimed to evaluate whether disparities exist within patients seeking physiological surgical lymphedema treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting for physiological surgical treatment of lymphedema from 2013 to 2019. Data on demographics, medical history, socioeconomic factors, lymphedema, and treatments were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 789 patients (712 women and 77 men) seeking physiological surgical treatment of lymphedema were selected. Their mean age was 54.4 ± 13.4 years. A total of 620 patients (78.5%) self-reported as White, 120 (15.2%) as Black, 17 (2.2%) as Asian, five (0.6%) as Hispanic, and eight (2.4%) as multiracial. A total of 566 patients (71.7%) met criteria for surgical candidacy. White race was associated with increased rates of surgical candidacy compared with Black race (46.6% versus 77.2%; P < 0.0001). Compared with White patients, Black patients presented with a longer symptom duration (11.07 versus 6.99 years; P < 0.001), had a higher body mass index (mean, 34.5 versus 28.1; P < 1 × 10 -10 ), had a higher International Society of Lymphology stage ( P < 0.05), and were less likely to have maximized medical treatment for lymphedema (30.8% versus 55.4%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates racial disparities in patients seeking physiological surgical treatment for lymphedema. Black patients present later with more severe disease, receive less nonsurgical treatment before consultation, and are less likely to meet criteria for physiological surgery. Improved patient and provider education on lymphedema and appropriate diagnosis and nonsurgical treatment is of primary importance to address this disparity.

Lymphedema in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients Following Trimodal Treatment

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating sequela of breast cancer treatment and is becoming a greater concern in light of improved long-term survival. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which systemic therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy remain the standard of care, thereby making IBC patients highly susceptible to developing BCRL. This study evaluated BCRL in IBC following trimodal therapy.

METHODS

IBC patients treated from 2016 to 2019 were identified from an institutional database. Patients were excluded if they presented with recurrent disease, underwent bilateral axillary surgery, did not complete trimodal therapy, or were lost to follow-up. Demographic, clinicopathologic factors, oncologic outcomes, and perometer measurements were recorded. BCRL was defined by clinician diagnosis and/or objective perometer measurements when available. Time to development of BCRL and treatment received were captured.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included. Median follow-up was 33 months. The incidence of BCRL was 50.6% (n = 42). Mean time to BCRL from surgery was 13 (range 2-24) months. Demographic and clinicopathologic features were similar between patients with and without BCRL with exception of higher proportion receiving delayed reconstruction in the BCRL group (38.1% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.03). Forty patients (95.2%) underwent BCRL treatment, which included physical therapy (n = 39), compression (n = 38), therapeutic lymphovenous bypass (n = 13), and/or vascularized lymph node transfer (n = 12).

CONCLUSIONS

IBC patients are at high-risk for BCRL after treatment, impacting 51% of patients in this cohort. Strategies to reduce or prevent BCRL and improve real-time diagnosis should be implemented to better direct early management in this patient population.

Lymphedema prevention and immediate breast reconstruction with simultaneous gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node transfer and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: A case report

Breast cancer-related lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been documented in 6%-55% of patients, mostly occurring within the next 3 years after radiation or surgery. We present a case of a 53-year-old patient with hormone positive, stage IB, left breast invasive ductal carcinoma treated with immediate lymphatic and microvascular breast reconstruction (MBR) using vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) for lymphedema prevention. A deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (18.3 × 11.2-cm) and simultaneous prophylactic gastroepiploic-VLNT (7 × 3-cm), orthotopically inset in the axilla, were used for reconstruction following mastectomy and radical ALND. The procedure was uneventful. The patient did not display increased postoperative arm circumferences. ICG lymphography did not show any changes at 2- and 3-years after surgery. Preventive lymphatic reconstruction with GE-VLNT and immediate MBR using the DIEP flap offers a new possibility for the primary prevention of lymphedema and simultaneous immediate autologous breast reconstruction without the risk of iatrogenic lymphedema. Further studies will be directed to unveil the external validity of these findings and the risk reduction rate of this approach.

Optimizing Treatment of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Using Combined DIEP Flap and Lymphedema Surgery

Patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer who undergo an axillary dissection and require adjuvant therapies such as radiation and chemotherapy are at high risk of developing lymphedema of the associated extremity. Historically, patients with lymphedema were treated with ablative procedures aimed simply to remove excess fluid and adiposity; however, the field of lymphatic surgery employing super-microsurgery techniques has witnessed tremendous advances in a relatively short period of time. Advancements in surgical instruments, microscope magnification and optics, imaging technology, and surgeon experience have ushered in a new era of hope to treat patients suffering from breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL). Here we aim to present the available options for patients suffering from BCRL, and the pinnacle in reconstruction and restoration for these patients.

[Multidisciplinary approach in the lymphedema patient: From rehabilitation to microsurgery]

Lymphedema is a chronic disease with a high incidence in our society. In this paper, we present a review with the latest advances in imaging techniques and surgical reconstructive treatment of lymphedema (lymphovenous anastomosis, vascularized lymph node transfer, and prophylactic lymphedema surgery). In addition, a protocol is established based on a multidisciplinary team (composed of physiatrists, plastic surgeons, radiologists and nuclear medicine radiologists) to optimize the treatment of these patients.

Microsurgical techniques in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review of efficacy and patient outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Secondary lymphedema is the abnormal collection of lymphatic fluid within subcutaneous structures. Patients with lymphedema suffer a low quality of life. In our study, we aim to provide a systematic review of the current data on patient outcomes regarding breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), and the most prevalent reconstructive techniques.

METHODS

A PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus literature search was performed in September 2020. Studies were screened based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), and it was reported in line with the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

RESULTS

The search yielded 254 papers from 2010 to 2020. 67 were included in our study. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA)-a minimally invasive procedure diverting the lymph into the dermal venous drainage system-combined with postoperative bandaging and compression garments yields superior results with minimal donor site lymphedema morbidity. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT)-another microsurgical technique, often combined with autologous free flap breast reconstruction-improves lymphedema and brachial plexus neuropathies, and reduces the risk of cellulitis. The combination of LVA and VLNT or with other methods maximizes their effectiveness. Vascularized lymph vessel transfer (VLVT) consists of harvesting certain lymph vessels, sparing the donor site's lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Together with integrated lymphedema therapy, proper staging, and appropriate selection of procedure, safe and efficient surgical techniques can be beneficial to many patients with BCRL.

Latest Advancements in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the available donor sites for autologous breast reconstruction. 2. Describe the advantages and limitations of each donor site. 3. Provide a rational, algorithmic preoperative evaluation and approach for patients seeking autologous breast reconstruction. 4. Develop an effective postoperative monitoring system to minimize complications and maximize salvage of microvascular thromboses.

SUMMARY

Breast reconstruction remains at the heart of the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and it is continuously evolving. Tremendous advances in breast implant technology and supplemental products, particularly acellular dermal matrices, have revolutionized breast reconstruction in the modern era. However, microvascular free flap breast reconstruction has also witnessed profound advancements with exceptionally high success rates, with the ability to provide the most durable and natural breast reconstruction. Although the pendulum oscillates between prosthesis-based reconstruction and autologous tissue, the present synopsis will focus on autologous free flap breast reconstruction from an historical perspective, recent advancements in microsurgery, and the future of autologous breast reconstruction.

Combined deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap with vascularized groin lymph node transplant for treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema

For survivors of breast cancer lymphedema is their greatest survivorship burden. Modern surgical techniques to treat lymphedema are effective at reducing limb volume, symptoms of lymphedema, episodes of cellulitis, and improving patient quality of life. Physiologic procedures, including lymphovenous bypass (LVB) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), restore physiological lymphatic function within the affected extremity. In patients with post-mastectomy breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema that desire breast reconstruction, microvascular abdominal flap breast reconstruction can be combined with superficial inguinal (groin) VLNT to provide breast reconstruction and treatment of lymphedema in a single operation. This article reviews the indications, preoperative assessment, surgical technique, outcomes, and tips and pearls for performing this procedure.

Decreasing donor site morbidity after groin vascularized lymph node transfer with lessons learned from a 12-year experience and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Donor site morbidity related to vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) remains a cause of worry among surgeons. As such, our study explores donor site morbidity after VLNT with or without concomitant deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Furthermore, we evaluate our surgical approach to ascertain whether it reduces the morbidity rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of donor site complications and surgical techniques was performed from 2006 to 2018. The patients' medical histories and demographic data were analyzed for risk factors. Patients were contacted by telephone for a long-term follow-up questionnaire. A literature review was implemented to evaluate the reported donor site complications and surgical strategies in literature. Complications were evaluated with and without concomitant autologous breast reconstruction (DIEP flap).

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included in our case series. Sixty-five cases (73%) were combined with DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Seroma rate diminished from 60% in the first 39 cases to 18% in the last five years (50 cases) (p < 0,001). Lymphedema of the afferent lower limb is described in the literature but did not occur in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

Seroma formation is the most common donor site morbidity after groin VLNT flap harvest, particularly when combined with DIEP flap breast reconstruction. This paper contains the largest reported series of combined VLNT + DIEP flaps and describes surgical strategies on how to decrease seroma formation and avoid iatrogenic lymphedema of the lower limb.

Comprehensive Overview of Available Donor Sites for Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer

The field of lymphedema surgery has grown tremendously in recent years. In particular, the diversity of available donor sites for vascularized lymph node transfer has increased, and new donor sites are emerging. Researchers have explored a number of different donor sites, and their reports have demonstrated promising results with each site. Unfortunately, there are limited studies providing a comprehensive analysis of the available donor sites focusing on both the technical aspects of the harvest, including complications and donor site morbidity, and the efficacy and outcomes following transfer. The present review aims to present a comprehensive analysis of the available donor sites for vascularized lymph node transfer and a summary of the experience from a single center of excellence.

Evolution in Surgical Management of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

Lymphedema is a lifelong, debilitating condition that plagues a large portion of patients who have undergone multimodality therapy for breast cancer. With the increasing experience in supermicrosurgical treatment of lymphedema, reconstructive surgeons have made a tremendous impact in improving the quality of life of patients suffering from breast cancer related lymphedema.

Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Can Potentially Reduce the Burden of Ongoing Conservative Management

Background: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) microsurgery is conducted in selected specialist lymphatic programs as a surgical treatment option for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) with variation in treatment outcomes. Methods and Results: Ten patients with BCRL underwent VLNT from 2012 to 2015. Donor sites were the inguinal (n = 6) or supraclavicular fossa/neck (n = 4) regions and recipient sites were the axilla (n = 6) or elbow regions (n = 4). Outcomes included changes in limb volume and extracellular fluid ratios, postoperative garment use, number of cellulitis episodes, and self-reported symptom improvement. At a mean follow-up of 46 months from surgery (range: 28-66 months), the excess volume in the affected arm had reduced (n = 4) or remained stable (n = 1) for 5 of 10 patients (50%) (mean change: -106.4 mL, range: -515.5 to +69.6 mL). Four of these five patients had also reduced (n = 3) or discontinued (n = 1) wearing compression garments and three reported a reduction in episodes of cellulitis. The remaining five patients had an increase of over 100 mL in postoperative excess volume (mean change: 295.8 mL, range: 142.1-382.8 mL). Three of these five patients reported noncompliance with compression garments. Despite the increase in limb volume, some patients reported softness in swelling (n = 3) and better response to conservative treatment (n = 1). Conclusion: Our results warrant continuation of VLNT as a surgical treatment option for patients with BCRL and show that the burden of conservative management such as wearing garments can be reduced over time for some patients. Longer term follow-up with standardized measures across all centers is required to further investigate VLNT.

A Systematic Review of Outcomes After Genital Lymphedema Surgery: Microsurgical Reconstruction Versus Excisional Procedures

INTRODUCTION

Genital lymphedema (GL) surgery can be either palliative or functional. Palliative procedures involve excision of the affected tissue and reconstruction by either local flaps or skin grafts. Reconstructive procedures aim to restore lymphatic flow through microsurgical lymphaticovenous anastomoses (LVAs). This systematic analysis of outcomes and complication rates aims to compare outcomes between these surgical treatment options for GL.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database was performed with the following search algorithm: (lymphorrhea or lymphedema) and (genital or scrotal or vulvar) and (microsurgery or "surgical treatment"), evaluating outcomes, and complications after surgical treatment of GL.

RESULTS

Twenty studies published between 1980 and 2016 met the inclusion criteria (total, 151 patients). Three main surgical treatments for GL were identified. Surgical resection and primary closure or skin graft was the most common procedure (46.4%) with a total complication rate of 10%. Surgical resection and flap reconstruction accounted for 39.1% of the procedures with an overall complication rate of 54.2%. Lympho venous shunt (LVA) procedures (14.5%) had a total complication rate of 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates a lack of consensus in both the preoperative assessment and surgical management of GL. Patients receiving excisional procedures tended to be later stage lymphedema. Patients in the excision and flap reconstruction group seemed to have the highest complication rates. Microsurgical LVAs may represent an alternative approach to GL, either alone or in combination with traditional procedures.