Isthmocele: From Risk Factors to Management

Isthmocele‑an iatrogenic pathology: A prospective study in a tertiary unit

Isthmocele, also known as uterine niche, refers to a myometrial defect of the anterior wall of the uterine isthmus, specifically at the site of the previous C-section scar. The prevalence of isthmocele has increased in tandem with the rise in deliveries by caesarean section. Risk factors include aspects related to the surgical procedure. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between various suture types and the development of a niche. The analysis of the present study is based on data collected from the evaluation of 52 patients, 6 weeks post C-section performed in 'Saint Pantelimon' Hospital in Bucharest, Romania. The parameters examined included patient age, the number of previous births by C-section, the type of suture used and uterine anatomy. Out of all the 52 patients, 42.3% developed an isthmocele. The results confirm a significant association between the presence of the niche and the type of suture of the first layer, proving that when non-locking continuous suture was used, the absence of niche was observed in most cases, while using the locking continuous suture was associated with more niches. Using the continuous locking suture for the first layer was associated with severe niches, while no severe niches were observed in patients with the other two types of sutures. There is a statistically significant association between the use of continuous locking sutures for uterine closure in the first layer and the development of a uterine niche. Furthermore, all instances of severe niches were linked to this type of suture, compared with continuous non-locking suture or interrupted suture. Given the escalating rate of C-sections, further research is crucial to identify the suture type that minimizes the risk of isthmocele formation. The present study's limitations revolve around its exclusive focus on a single institution and the relatively small sample size.

Instrumental Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes: Literature Review and Observational Study

Aim

Placenta accreta (PA) is a condition where the placenta is pathologically adherent to the uterus due to a defect in the basal decidua with myometrium invasion by chorionic villi and is classified based on the depth of myometrial invasion by histology. However, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have excellent accuracy. In this study, we investigated clinical benefits of early instrumental diagnosis of PA, especially in reducing maternal-fetal complications and improving perinatal outcomes. We also evaluated diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging on placental invasiveness assessment.

Methods

In this review and observational retrospective study, risk factors of PA were collected, and pregnant women underwent third-trimester ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the degree of infiltration. Imaging results compared to histological findings and surgical evaluation.

Results

A total of 38 patients were diagnosed with at the University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio and Ruggi d'Aragona", Salerno, Italy, by second-trimester ultrasound with high sensitivity (100%) and accuracy (86%). Moreover, 37 of them performed MRI and 60.5% were diagnosed with Accreta, 7.9% increta, 10.5% percreta, and 21.1% not accrue with high sensitivity (100%), specificity (88.9%), and accuracy (97.4%). Histological assay confirmed MRI findings in 96.7% of cases. Risk factors of PA were age >35 years and previous CT scans. In unborn babies, mean 1-min Apgar was 4.3 (range, 3-6), and mean 5-min Apgar was 7.13 (range, 7-9).

Conclusion

MRI could be a not-invasive, specific, sensitive, and accurate diagnostic tool for assessing the degree of infiltration in PA, and could guide clinical decisions, such as delivery plan, thus reducing perioperative and fetal complications.

Investigating the risk factors for isthmocele development after cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery rates are increasing globally, raising concerns about associated complications such as isthmocele. Isthmoceles are pouch-like defects in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a prior cesarean delivery scar.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine isthmocele prevalence, associated symptoms, and risk factors among women with a history of cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study evaluated 297 women with prior cesarean delivery using transvaginal ultrasound to screen for isthmocele. Data on demographics, pregnancy details, comorbidities, and indications for cesarean delivery were collected. Isthmocele was defined sonographically as any niche or defect at the hysterotomy site. Descriptive and comparative analyses identified factors associated with isthmocele.

RESULTS

Isthmocele prevalence was 65.3% (n=194). Abnormal vaginal bleeding was reported in 21.1% of participants, pelvic pain by 4.1% of participants, and both by 4.1% of participants. Compared to women without isthmocele, those with isthmocele were older (35.9 vs 31.6 years), had higher body mass index (26.8 vs 25.5 kg/m2), gravidity (1.8 vs 1.3), and parity (1.7 vs 1.2). Repeat cesarean delivery was more common (30.4% vs 12.6%) and elective cesarean delivery less common (33.5% vs 67.9%) among those with isthmocele.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the women with history of cesarean delivery had an isthmocele. Abnormal bleeding was common. Advanced maternal age, obesity, repeat procedures, and certain comorbidities appear to increase risk. Further research on prevention and treatment is warranted given the high prevalence.

Isthmocele and Infertility

Isthmocele is a gynecological condition characterized by a disruption in the uterine scar, often associated with prior cesarean sections. This anatomical anomaly can be attributed to inadequate or insufficient healing of the uterine wall following a cesarean incision. It appears that isthmocele may impact a woman's quality of life as well as her reproductive capacity. The incidence of isthmocele can range from 20% to 70% in women who have undergone a cesarean section. This review aims to sum up the current knowledge about the effect of isthmocele on fertility and the possible therapeutic strategies to achieve pregnancy. However, currently, there is not sufficiently robust evidence to indicate the need for surgical correction in all asymptomatic patients seeking fertility. In cases where surgical correction of isthmocele is deemed necessary, it is advisable to evaluate residual myometrial thickness (RMT). For patients with RMT >2.5-3 mm, hysteroscopy appears to be the technique of choice. In cases where the residual tissue is lower, recourse to laparotomic, laparoscopic, or vaginal approaches is warranted.

Evaluation of Association Between Adenomyosis and Cesarean Scar Defect

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate and compare quantitative factors of the cesarean scar defect (CSD) in symptomatic patients with and without uterine adenomyosis.

METHOD

This study was conducted as a case-control study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: with adenomyosis (case) and without adenomyosis (control). The demographic data, medical history, and sonohysterography findings were extracted from the patient's documents and archived images.

RESULT

During 2 years, 310 symptomatic women with a history of previous cesarean section underwent sonohysterography. Among them, 204 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common chief complaints were post-menstrual bleeding (34.3%) and prolonged bleeding (27%). Cesarean scar depth and width significantly differed between these two groups, and patients with underlying adenomyosis had significantly larger defects (P-value of .009 and .005, respectively). Mean RMT/AMT ratio was 31.83% in the case group and 42.88% in the control group. In our study, RMT/AMT ratios were significantly lower in the case group (P-value of .001). In addition, we performed analysis on a subgroup of patients with one prior cesarean section. Similar results were achieved with a lower RMT/AMT ratio in case group (mean of 31.20% in case group and 46.47% in control group; P-value of .000).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a strong association between the presence of adenomyosis and larger clinically more significant CSDs. To establish a causative relationship, we suggest a prospective cohort study to follow up the patients and compare the evolution of CSD in patients with and without adenomyosis.

Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy as a Single Therapeutic Approach: A Case Series

A standardized consensus for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is lacking. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcomes of the laparoscopic management of CSP as a single therapeutic surgical approach without being preceded by vascular pretreatment or vasoconstrictors injection. This is a retrospective bi-centric study, a case series. Eight patients with a future desire to conceive underwent the laparoscopic treatment of unruptured CSPs. Surgery consisted of "en bloc" excision of the deficient uterine scar with the adherent tissue of conception, followed by immediate uterine repair. The data collected for each patient was age, gestity, parity, number of previous c-sections, pre-pregnancy isthmocele-related symptoms, gestational age, fetal cardiac activity, initial β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion, operative time and the postoperative complications, evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. The CSP was successfully removed in all patients by laparoscopy. The surgical outcomes were favorable. All patients with histories of isthmocele-related symptoms reported postoperative resolution of symptoms. The median residual myometrium thickness increased significantly from 1.2 mm pre-operatively to 8 mm 3 to 6 months after surgery. The laparoscopic management seems to be an appropriate treatment of CSP when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. It can be safely proposed as a single surgical therapeutic approach. Larger series and further prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation and to affirm the long-term gynecological and obstetrical outcomes of this management.

Assessment of the clinical outcomes and complications of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of symptomatic isthmocele: An observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic or hysteroscopic approaches for isthmoplasty.

METHODS

A total of 99 isthmocele patients with an average age of 38.45 ± 4.72 years were included in the 2 years of this retrospective cohort study. Forty-five underwent laparoscopic and 54 underwent hysteroscopic isthmocele excision and myometrial repair.

RESULTS

Pain scores were significantly higher in the hysteroscopy group before the procedure, but there were no significant pain score differences after the surgery. In 1 year of follow up, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia were higher among hysteroscopy patients. Furthermore, hysteroscopy significantly improved postmenstrual spotting after surgery better than laparoscopy, but in the follow up, there was no significant difference between the two groups in this regard (mean rank for hysteroscopy vs. laparoscopy: 32.30 vs. 37.48, U = 418, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

In patients with a history of infertility, ectopic pregnancy, lower gravidity, lower parity, and a lower number of cesarean sections, laparoscopic isthmoplasty is preferred over the hysteroscopic approach. Both methods have similar effects on midcycle vaginal bleeding, duration of postmenstrual spotting, and pain. However, a higher rate of dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea could be associated with hysteroscopy.

Comparison of classic single-layer uterin suture and double-layer purse-string suture techniques for uterus closure in terms of postoperative short-term uterine isthmocele: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Objective

To compare the short-term results of classic single-layer uterine closure and double-layer purse-string uterine closure (Turan technique) techniques in cesarean section in terms of the incidence of ischiocele formation.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial study. Participants undergoing first-time cesarean delivery were randomized into two groups. Fifty-eight participants were included in the double-layered uterine closure group (study group), while 53 participants were randomized into the classical single-layered uterine closure group (control group). For comparison of isthmocele formation, transvaginal ultrasound examination was planned in all patients 6 weeks after surgery. The operation data,the formation of isthmocele, its dimensions and volume were recorded.

Results

A total of 111 women were included in the study. The incidence of ischiocele at 6 weeks after birth was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.128). Isthmosel was detected in 20.8% of single-layer closures, and this rate was determined as 10.3% in the purse technique. In the Kerr incision made during surgery, the uterine incision size did not differ in either group, but the uterine incision length after suturing was significantly smaller in the purse technique compared with the other group (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The incidence of ischiocele formation after cesarean section and the depth of the ischiocele was independent of the uterotomy closure technique.

A large post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) with amenorrhea, a symptom that was not reported in the medical literature: A rare case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Isthmocele is identified as an iatrogenic defect in the myometrium of the anterior uterine wall at the site of a previous cesarean scar due to defective tissue healing. Patients may have varied symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and pelvic pain. Herein, we report a rare case of a large isthmocele that manifested with secondary amenorrhea; which was not reported in the medical literature previously.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old Syrian woman, G5P5, came to our clinic with a complaint of secondary amenorrhea that began two years ago. She was treated symptomatically with progesterone with no response. She has had five cesarean sections. Ultrasonography findings suggested a large uterine niche. Trans-Abdominal niche repair was the obtained technique, depending on the drainage of the isthmocele, excising the fibrotic tissue from the edges and re-approximating them. On follow-up, menstruation returned to normal.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Isthmocele can be, radiologically, defined as a hypoechoic or anechoic, triangular area at the scar site. Its pathophysiology is still unknown. Although, an isthmocele can be diagnosed using a variety of imaging techniques like ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy; transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is the first method described for assessing it. The goal of isthmocele treatment is to alleviate symptoms.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that health awareness campaigns alert people to the need to see a specialist doctor in the context of a serious complaint. For the uterine niche, many risk factors can be avoided to reduce its probability.

Mucinous Cystadenoma Arising in a Uterine Isthmocele: A Case Report

Isthmocele is a discontinuation of the myometrium at the uterine scar site in a patient with a previous cesarian section (CS). The cause of isthmocele appears to be multifactorial. Poor surgical technique, low incision location, uterine retroflection, obesity, smoking, inadequate healing of scars, and maternal age are possible related factors. Most patients with this condition are asymptomatic. However, women can present with postmenstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, subfertility, dysmenorrhea, infertility, and scar abscess. Brazil has one of the world's highest cesarean section rates. One of the consequences of the rising rate of CS is the isthmocele, an emerging female health problem. Here we report a case of mucinous cystadenoma arising in a uterine isthmocele, a complication, as far as we could investigate, not yet described in the literature.

Impact of Adenomyosis and Endometriosis on Chronic Pelvic Pain after Niche Repair

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is one of the main isthmocele symptoms, together with abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. When patients undergo a laparoscopic niche repair surgery, it is important to determine if they present associated pathologies, such as adenomyosis and/or endometriosis, which are also a cause of CPP. A retrospective study was performed on 31 patients with CPP undergoing a laparoscopic niche repair. The pre-operative ultrasound was analyzed to determine the presence of adenomyosis. Endometriosis was histologically diagnosed. CPP outcome was evaluated at early (3-6 months) and late (12 months) post-operative follow ups. In our population of 31 women presenting CPP, only six of them (19.4%) did not have any associated pathology. In the group of 25 patients with associated pathology, 10 (40%) had no benefit from the reconstructive surgery in terms of CPP at early follow-up (3-6 months) and 8 (32%) in the post-operative period at 12 months. Patients with CPP who undergo niche repair should be carefully selected as CPP does not seem to be a good indication for uterine scar repair in patients with concomitant adenomyosis and endometriosis.

Postoperative morphologic changes of the isthmocele and clinical impact in patients treated by channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the changes in (1) residual myometrial thickness (RMT), (2) cesarean scar defect (CSD) size, and (3) clinical symptoms, before and after channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of CSD.

METHODS

A single-center, observational, prospective, cohort study was carried out enrolling all symptomatic patients of childbearing age, diagnosed with CSD and routinely scheduled for channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection from July 2020 to July 2021 at the Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. University of Bologna, Italy. The primary outcome was the difference in mean RMT before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the differences before and 4 months after the surgery in: (1) CSD size measured by transvaginal ultrasound, (2) visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the symptoms, and (3) abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) rate. Lastly, patients' satisfaction was assessed by the global impression of improvement (PGI-I) score.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference before and after the procedure in: (1) mean RMT (+2.0 mm; P < 0.001); mean size of the CSD (base: +1.6 mm; height: -2.5 mm; transverse diameter: -3.2 mm; volume: -263.7 mm³ ; P < 0.001); (2) mean VAS score for dyspareunia (-5.84; P < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (-8.94; P < 0.001), pelvic pain (-2.94; P < 0.001); (3) AUB rate (91% vs. 3%; P < 0.001). Lastly, the mean PGI-I score ± SD was 1.7 ± 0.9.

CONCLUSION

Channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of patients with symptomatic CSD may lead to an increase in RMT, decrease in CSD, and improvement of symptoms after the procedure, with high patient satisfaction.

Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review

Background

Cesarean scar defects (CSD) are caused by cesarean sections and cause various symptoms. Although there has been no previous consensus on the name of this condition for a long time, it has been named cesarean scar disorder (CSDi).

Methods

This review summarizes the definition, prevalence, and etiology of CSD, as well as the pathophysiology and treatment of CSDi. We focused on surgical therapy and examined the effects and procedures of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, and transvaginal surgery.

Main findings

The definition of CSD was proposed as an anechoic lesion with a depth of at least 2 mm because of the varied prevalence, owing to the lack of consensus. CSD incidence depends on the number of times, procedure, and situation of cesarean sections. Histopathological findings in CSD are fibrosis and adenomyosis, and chronic inflammation in the uterine and pelvic cavities decreases fertility in women with CSDi. Although the surgical procedures are not standardized, laparoscopic, hysteroscopic, and transvaginal surgeries are effective.

Conclusion

The cause and pathology of CSDi are becoming clear. However, there is variability in the prevalence and treatment strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further studies using the same definitions.

Prediction of the relationship of cesarean section scar niche and postmenstrual spotting: is there any relation?

Background

Postmenstrual spotting has recently been related to a discontinuation of the myometrium at the site of a previous cesarean section called "CS scar niche". There was no consensus regarding the gold standard method for the assessment of the niche. Recently, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown promise in the evaluation of the niche. Our study aims to assess the role of MRI in the evaluation of the CS scar niche characters and its association with post-menstrual spotting.

Results

A total of 65 patients with CS niche were prospectively included in this study and subdivided into two groups, according to presence or absence of postmenstrual spotting (Group A; 34 patients with postmenstrual spotting and Group B; 31 patients without spotting). All patients were examined using a 1.5 T MRI unit. CS scar niche volume was significantly higher among women with post-menstrual spotting (0.57 ± 0.07 vs. 0.07 ± 0.05 (cm3); P < 0.001). Also, women with post-menstrual spotting have significantly higher scar length (9.38 ± 3.06 vs. 5.02 ± 2.10 (mm); P < 0.001), scar depth (6.95 ± 3.16 vs. 3.23 ± 0.99 (mm); P < 0.001), scar width (15.78 ± 3.94 vs. 9.87 ± 1.84 (mm); P < 0.001) in comparison to those without post-menstrual spotting.

Scar depth (> 7.4 mm) had 81% sensitivity and 97% specificity for prediction of post-menstrual spotting with overall accuracy was 88.7%. While scar width (> 12.8 mm) had 71% sensitivity and 97% specificity for prediction of post-menstrual spotting with overall accuracy was 83.3%. Scar volume (> 0.15 cm3) had 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity for prediction of post-menstrual spotting with overall accuracy was 98.4%.

Conclusion

MRI measures (CS scar volume, depth, and width) are predictors for postmenstrual spotting in patients with CS scar niche, and scar volume is the most powerful predictor.

Post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) in Uterine Scar: An Update

Uterine niche is one of the emerging complications of caesarean section. With rising caesarean rates, the caesarean-related iatrogenic complications are also on the rise. These include placenta accreta, scar ectopic pregnancy and uterine niche which is a newer entity being described in the recent literature. Uterine niche, also described as uterine isthmocele, caesarean scar defect and diverticulum, is an iatrogenic defect in the myometrium at the site of previous caesarean scar due to defective tissue healing. Patients may have varied symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, post-menstrual spotting and infertility, though many women may be asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. Diagnosis is made radiologically by transvaginal sonography, saline instillation sonohysterography or magnetic resonance imaging. Occurrence of niche may be prevented by using correct surgical technique during caesarean. Patients may be managed medically; however, subfertility and persistent symptoms may require surgical correction either by hysteroscopic resection or transabdominal or transvaginal repair. This mini-review comprehensively covers the potential risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of this increasingly encountered condition due to rising caesarean rates.

Is Hysteroscopy a Good Option to Manage Severe Cesarean Scar Defect?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of hysteroscopic management in women with a severe or nonsevere symptomatic cesarean scar defect (residual myometrium ≤3-mm vs >3-mm, respectively).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Gynecology department of a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy-one women with an operative hysteroscopy for a symptomatic defect (49 with severe defects and 22 with nonsevere ones).

INTERVENTIONS

Operative hysteroscopy for cesarean scar defect in women with a severe defect (residual myometrium ≤3-mm) and with nonsevere defect (residual myometrium >3-mm).

MEASUREMENTS

The main objective was to compare success rates between the 2 groups. The secondary objectives were the comparisons of (1) the number of women who required more than 1 procedure, (2) the rate of complications, (3) the number of subsequent pregnancies, and (4) the evolution of residual myometrium thickness between the groups.

MAIN RESULTS

The success rates were not significantly different between the groups (73.5% in the severe group and 63.6% in the nonsevere group [p = .40]). The number of women requiring more than 1 procedure was also similar, as were the rate of complications and the mean increase of myometrium thickness. The rate of subsequent pregnancies in women who were infertile was significantly higher in women with a severe defect (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

The hysteroscopic approach seems to be a good way to manage cesarean scar defects even when the residual myometrium is thin. A prospective study is, however, necessary to confirm these findings.

In freeze-all embryo cycles due to endometrial fluid (EF), live birth rates are comparable to those of controls, despite high rates of EF recurrence and cycle cancellation

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) differ between women who have had a freeze-all embryo cycle (FAE) for endometrial fluid (EF) and controls?

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included 83 women who had a FAE cycle due to the presence of EF between 2010 and 2016 at a university-affiliated private IVF center. The controls were 219 women who had FAE for other indications during the same period and were randomly selected. The main outcome measures were CLBRs, EF recurrence, cancellation and pregnancy loss rates.

RESULTS

Population characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The CLBR was not significantly different between the EF and the control group: 39.8 % vs. 47.0 %, respectively, p=0.26. Cancellation rates in the two first FETs were higher in the EF group than the control group: 18.1 % vs. 4.1 % (p<0.001) and 22.9 % vs. 8.5 % (p=0.02). After FAE for EF, we observed a significant risk of EF recurrence (32/177 cycles, 18.1 %), allowing us to identify a poor prognosis subgroup. When EF was detected, the LBR per transfer was 7.1 % (1/14) when the transfer was finally performed (after EF aspiration or EF disappearance), compared to 25 % (32/128) in cycles without EF recurrence (p<0.05). Conversely, in the absence of EF recurrence (145/177, 81.9 %), the LBR was comparable to that of the control group. The type of endometrial preparation does not seem to be associated with EF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher rates of EF recurrence and cycle cancellation, women with FAE for EF ultimately have comparable LBRs to those who have had a FAE for other indications. However, women presenting with at least one EF recurrence during FETs seem to have a lower LBR.