Intervening in the Acute Phase of Postradiation Carotid Blowout Syndrome

Management of post-radiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication that can occur in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), especially with a history of radiotherapy. This study aimed to review and initially compare managements for post-radiation CBS in patients with HNC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of published studies was performed. Information including management, survival, and complication were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 39 articles and 917 cases were included in the systematic review. The interval between radiation therapy and CBS ranged from 1.2 years to 17.8 years. The managements of CBS included embolization, stent, bypass surgery, surgical ligation, electrocoagulation, flap coverage, arterial repair, and nasopharyngeal packing. The cumulative 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival rates were 85.2 %, 48.9 %, and 37.0 %, respectively, with a median survival time of 11.3 months. Disease progression and rebleeding were the most common death causes. The lowest rebleeding rate and neurologic complications rate were presented in cases receiving bypass surgery at 1.4 % and 10.8 %, respectively. The highest rebleeding rate of 35.6 % was showed in cases underwent stent, and the highest neurologic complications rate of 32.0 % was showed in cases underwent ligation.

CONCLUSION

Post-radiation CBS in patients with HNC had a low survival rate and high complication rate. Rebleeding and neurologic complication were common complications. Endovascular embolization and stent were the mainstream management, and bypass surgery presented a promising outcome in survival and complication for selected patients.

Surgical treatment of carotid blowout syndrome after radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors: a single-center experience

To explore the treatments for and manifestations of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) and to further explore the critical role of high-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation. The clinical data of nine patients with radiotherapy-related CBS who were admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Relevant literature was reviewed. From March 2020 to March 2023, nine CBS patients were admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, including eight males and one female. Digital subtraction angiography was performed for all the patients; all the pseudoaneurysms were located at the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery. A balloon occlusion test was performed on four patients, which was tolerated by all patients. CT and MRI scans showed seven cases of osteonecrosis combined with infection and two cases of tumor recurrence. Emergency permanent parent artery occlusion was performed on six patients, aneurysm embolization was completed in one case, covered stent implantation was performed in one patient, and three cases were treated by cerebral bypass surgery (including two patients with failed interventional treatment). Rebleeding was found in two patients, and no rebleeding was found in the bypass group. Paralysis was found in three patients, and asymptomatic cerebral infarction without permanent neurologic impairment was found in three patients. Two patients died due to tumor progression. Emergency occlusion surgery is lifesaving in the acute phase of CBS. Endovascular therapy cannot prevent the progression of pseudoaneurysms or lower the recurrence rate of bleeding events. High-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation is a safe and effective method that may facilitate further surgical treatment. Further research is warranted.

Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Management of Patients At Risk for CBS

OBJECTIVES

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an acute, rare life-threatening hemorrhage that occurs in patients with a history of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. The primary objective of this review was to identify risk factors and assess treatment and survival outcomes following CBS.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature was performed. Information including risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of CBS were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 49 articles and 2220 patients were included in the systematic review. Risk factors for developing CBS included a history of radiation therapy, wound complications, and advanced tumor stage. The initial management of CBS included establishing a stable airway, gaining hemostasis, and repletion of blood loss. Endovascular and surgical procedures treat CBS with infrequent rates of rebleeding and periprocedural complications. Short-term survival following treatment of CBS shows high survival rates when considering CBS-related complications and underlying disease, however, long-term survival related to the underlying disease demonstrated high mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying patients at risk for CBS enables practitioners to counsel patients on life-saving interventions and expected outcomes following treatment of CBS. Treatment of CBS is associated with high short-term survival, although long-term survival related to underlying disease is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 133:576-587, 2023.

Carotid blowout syndrome caused by chronic infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) refers to rupture of the extracranial carotid artery and its branches; as a severe complication, it usually occurs after surgery or radiotherapy for malignant tumours of the head and neck. We present a case of CBS caused by chronic infection of the external carotid artery (ECA). In this case, we did not find any evidence of head and neck tumours.

CASE SUMMARY

A 42-year-old man was referred to the Emergency Department with a complaint of a lump found on the left side of his neck with pain and fever for 4 d. We diagnosed the condition as neck infection with abscess formation based on physical examination, routine blood examination, ultrasound examination and plain computed tomography (CT) and decided to perform emergency surgery. During the operation, 30 mL of grey and smelly pus was drained from the deep surface of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The second day after the operation, the patient suddenly exhibited a large amount of haemoptysis and incision bleeding. The enhanced CT showed distal occlusion of the left ECA and irregular thickening of the broken ends of the artery encased in an uneven enhancement of soft tissue density. Infected ECA occlusion and rupture were considered. The patient was transferred to a vascular unit for transcatheter ECA embolization and recovered well.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons need to pay attention to vascular lesions caused by chronic infection that may develop into acute CBS.

Treatment of a patient with carotid blowout syndrome with a new deconstructive embolization technique

Carotid blowout syndrome is a rare clinical conditions with a high mortality rate, especially in patients with head and neck tumors who have received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We present our patient who had hemangioendothelioma of the neck for 5 years and therefore received radiotherapy, fistulized to the skin on the neck and active bleeding out of the fistula area. In the radiological imaging of the patient, vessel wall irregularities in the common carotid artery (CCA) and accompanying pseudoaneurysm with a diameter of 3 cm were detected, and endovascular treatment was performed. After the patient passed the balloon occlusion test, first the proximal internal carotid artery was closed with coils. Then, the balloon was inflated proximal to the CCA and a 10% diluted glue-lipiodol mixture was injected into the entire diseased CCA bed. Closure of the distal with coil and proximal with balloon prevented the risk of off-target embolization of the glue.

Retrospective analysis of massive epistaxis and pseudoaneurysms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Epistaxis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common clinical critical illness, which often leads to death of patients. This article focuses on the relationship between massive epistaxis and pseudoaneurysm after radiotherapy in patients with NPC and discusses clinically relevant treatment strategies.

METHODS

A review was performed in 21 patients with massive epistaxis after radiotherapy for NPC from January 2011 to December 2019, and all of the patients were examined by computed tomography angiography (CTA). We also reviewed the English literature over the past 10 years to analyze the characteristics and related causes of pseudoaneurysms in terms of the clinical stage of NPC, course of radiotherapy, and affected artery. An analysis was performed on the methods of endovascular interventional treatment of such pseudoaneurysms.

RESULTS

Among the 21 patients, 19 cases had bone destruction of the skull base; 13 cases were also found to have tumor recurrence; 15 cases were in stage III or IV of NPC; pseudoaneurysms were observed in 14 cases, of which nine cases had pseudoaneurysms in the internal carotid artery (ICA), and the rest had pseudoaneurysms in the external carotid artery (ECA). These data were consistent with the results of the literature review. Analysis with imaging revealed that the petrous ICA was the common predilection site. There were 11 out of 14 cases of pseudoaneurysms with sentinel hemorrhage in the initial phase. All 14 pseudoaneurysm patients underwent endovascular interventional therapy, but one died from hemorrhagic shock during the procedure. No rebleeding was observed among the other patients during 72 h after intravascular treatment. Nevertheless, regrettably two patients died on the 10th and 17th days after intervention.

CONCLUSION

Pseudoaneurysm, which was a serious complication after radiotherapy in patients with NPC, could cause massive epistaxis with high mortality. The formation of a pseudoaneurysm was closely associated with a high carcinoma stage, re-radiotherapy, and local bone destruction and infection. Most cases had sentinel epistaxis, which was considered the bleeding characteristic. The imaging material prompted that pseudoaneurysm had a predisposition to the petrous part of the ICA, while the preferred therapy was endovascular embolization treatment.

Embolization for Carotid Blowout in Head and Neck Cancer: Case Report of Five Patients

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is defined as a rupture of common carotid artery or its branches. Endovascular intervention has been advocated as first line of treatment for CBS. This Case Report describes 5 patients with prior history of head and neck cancer who presented with CBS. Two patients presented as acute, 2 as impending, and one as threatened CBS. The lesions found were pseudoaneurysm and focal vascular irregularities involving the common carotid artery, cervical internal carotid artery and lingual artery. Embolization and occlusion with detachable coils of the artery was used in all patients. Technical success and immediate hemostasis were achieved in all patients. One patient presented transient cranial nerve palsy. No recurrent CBS was reported during the follow-up. In our experience, coil embolization, if possible, is a safe and efficient technique in treatment of CBS secondary to head and neck cancers.

Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Internal Carotid Artery Blowout Syndrome Caused by Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome caused by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a case series was performed.

SETTING

Carotid blowout syndrome is a catastrophic complication caused by malignant tumor of the skull base.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis based on 69 patients with internal carotid artery blowout syndrome admitted to our center between April 2018 and January 2020 was performed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an EBBA (internal carotid artery embolization + bypass based on American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology [ASITN/SIR]) group and an embolization/stent group. The follow-up time was 6 to 9 months.

RESULTS

In the EBBA group, 41 patients (41/49, 83.7%) survived. Forty patients had a satisfactory quality of life after 3 months. No death occurred within 3 months. Nonoperative death occurred in 8 cases (8/49, 16.3%). The rate of mortality and disability was 18.4% (9/49). In the embolization/stent group, 16 patients (16/20, 80%) survived. Nonoperative death occurred in 4 cases (4/20, 20%), 3 of which occurred within 1 to 3 months. Four cases reported Modified Rankin Scale ≥2 after 3 months. The rate of mortality and disability was 40% (8/20).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive revascularization strategy for internal carotid artery (ICA) embolization and intracranial and extracranial bypass grafting based on ASITN/SIR score for ICA blowout syndrome patients not only can prolong the patient survival but also greatly improve the survival probability and quality of life as well as reduce their rate of mortality or disability.

Carotid Blowout Management in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potential complication of head and neck cancer, and its therapy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in endovascular techniques have improved patient outcomes. In this study, we report outcomes of emergent endovascular intervention for CBS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained neurovascular database and identified 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS from 2008-2019 at our institution. Data collection was performed on patient demographics, type of cancer, previous cancer treatments, type of CBS, location of bleed, diagnostic workup, endovascular treatment, and procedural outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS were performed from 2008-2019 at our single academic institution. Technical success was achieved in 100% of endovascular procedures. Procedural stroke occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, procedural mortality occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, recurrent CBS occurred in 4 (10.5%) procedures, and fatal rehemorrhage occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure. Regarding secondary outcomes, delayed stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, whereas there were no cases of delayed infectious complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The endovascular treatment of CBS is safe and effective with relatively low rates of morbidity and mortality compared with other currently available treatment modalities. However, the overall rate of complications demands attention and sheds light on the need for further improvement in management.