2
|
Bleiziffer S, Rudolph TK. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch After SAVR and TAVR. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:761917. [PMID: 35433878 PMCID: PMC9005892 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.761917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) remains one out of many factors to be considered during decision-making for the treatment of aortic valve pathologies. The idea of adequate sizing of a prosthetic heart valve was established by Rahimtoola already in 1978. In this article, the author described the phenomenon that the orifice area of a prosthetic heart valve may be too small for the individual patient. PPM is assessed by measurement or projection of the prosthetic effective orifice area indexed to body surface area (iEOA), while it is recommended to use different cut point values for non-obese and obese patients for the categorization of moderate and severe PPM. Several factors influence the accuracy of both the projected and the measured iEOA for PPM assessment, which leads to a certain number of false assignments to the PPM or no PPM group. Despite divergent findings on the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes, there is consensus that PPM should be avoided to prevent sequelae of increased prosthetic gradients after aortic valve replacement. To prevent PPM, it is required to anticipate the iEOA of the prosthesis prior to the procedure. The use of adequate reference tables, derived from echocardiographically measured mean effective orifice area (EOA) values from preferably large numbers of patients, is most appropriate to predict the iEOA. Such tables should be used also for transcatheter heart valves in the future. During the decision-making process, all available options should be taken into account for the individual patient. If the predicted size and type of a surgical prosthesis cannot be implanted, additional surgical procedures, such as annular enlargement with the Manougian technique, or alternative procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can prevent PPM. PPM prevention for TAVI patients is a new field of interest and includes anticipation of the iEOA, prosthesis selection, and procedural strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Bleiziffer
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Sabine Bleiziffer
| | - Tanja K. Rudolph
- Department for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia Bochum, University Hospital of the Ruhr University, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joury A, Duran A, Stewart M, Gilliland YE, Spindel SM, Qamruddin S. Prosthesis-patient mismatch following aortic and mitral valves replacement – A comprehensive review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 72:84-92. [PMID: 35235847 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz Joury
- Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America; King Salman Heart Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Antonio Duran
- Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America; Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
| | - Merrill Stewart
- Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America; Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
| | - Yvonne E Gilliland
- Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America; Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Stephen M Spindel
- Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, United States of America; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
| | - Salima Qamruddin
- Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America; Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doenst T, Zacharias J. Editorial comment: "Plug-In Hybrid"-Are we ready for this in heart valve surgery? J Card Surg 2021; 36:2426-2428. [PMID: 33834542 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
If we think about plug-in hybrids, the treatment of paravalvular leaks in cardiac surgery may not be the first thing that comes to mind. Yet, there appears to be an attractive analogy between the plug in hybrid car and an interventional device that may be "plugged in" intra-operatively to treat a paravalvular leak. Both technologies provide additional degrees of freedom to the fields, combine different technologies but may also be criticized for their increase in cost, introduction of new problems and their questionable practical need. We address this analogy based on a case series presented in this issue of the Journal of Cardiac Surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Joseph Zacharias
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dahlbacka S, Laakso T, Kinnunen EM, Moriyama N, Laine M, Virtanen M, Maaranen P, Ahvenvaara T, Tauriainen T, Husso A, Jalava M, Jaakkola J, Airaksinen J, Valtola A, Niemelä M, Mäkikallio T, Eskola M, Vento A, Juvonen T, Biancari F, Raivio P. Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Worsens Long-Term Survival: Insights From the FinnValve Registry. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 111:1284-1290. [PMID: 32805269 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is controversial. We sought to investigate the incidence of PPM and its impact on survival and reinterventions in a Finnish nationwide cohort. METHODS In the context of the nationwide FinnValve registry, we identified 4097 patients who underwent SAVR with a stented bioprosthesis with or without myocardial revascularization. The indexed effective orifice areas (EOAs) of surgical bioprostheses were calculated using literature-derived EOAs. PPM was graded as moderate (EOA 0.65-0.85 cm2/m2) or severe (EOA ≤0.65 cm2/m2). RESULTS The incidence of PPM was 46.0%. PPM was moderate in 38.8% (n = 1579) patients and severe in 7.2% (n = 297) patients. Time-trend analysis showed that the proportion of PPM decreased significantly from 74% in 2009 to 18% in 2017 (P < .01). Severe PPM was associated with increased 5-year all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.76; P = .02). Severe PPM was not associated with an increased risk of repeat AVR (adjusted HR, 5.90; 95% CI, 0.95-36.5; P = .06). In a subanalysis of patients greater than or equal to 70 years of age, in comparison with no PPM, any PPM (adjusted HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.45; P = .01) and severe PPM (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.17-2.00; P < 0.01) were associated with increased risk of 5-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS Severe PPM after SAVR had a negative impact on survival. This study demonstrated that the effects of PPM should not be overlooked in elderly undergoing SAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Teemu Laakso
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Noriaki Moriyama
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Laine
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marko Virtanen
- Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pasi Maaranen
- Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tuomas Ahvenvaara
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tuomas Tauriainen
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Maina Jalava
- Heart Center, Turku University Hospital University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jussi Jaakkola
- Heart Center, Turku University Hospital University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Juhani Airaksinen
- Heart Center, Turku University Hospital University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Antti Valtola
- Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Matti Niemelä
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Timo Mäkikallio
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Markku Eskola
- Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Vento
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tatu Juvonen
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, Finland
| | - Fausto Biancari
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Heart Center, Turku University Hospital University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, Finland
| | - Peter Raivio
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Das De S, Nanjappa A, Morcos K, Aftab S, Butler J, Pathi V, Curry P, Nair S. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival after aortic and mitral valve replacement: a 10 year, single institution experience. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14:214. [PMID: 31810475 PMCID: PMC6896267 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-019-1034-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence on the impact of patient-prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) on survival thus far has been conflicting. The aim of this study was to 1) study the effect of PPM on survival after isolated aortic and mitral valve replacement and 2) Assess the interaction between left ventricular function and PPM on survival. Methods The study cohort was patients who underwent isolated Aortic valve replacement (AVR) and Mitral valve replacement (MVR) over a 10-year period from 2008 to 2018. PPM was defined using the projected indexed effective orifice area (EOAi). The cohort was divided into different groups based on the degree of PPM. The severity of PPM was classified using threshold values of EOAi used in the literature. The Kaplan- Meier method was used to compare survival by degree of PPM. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to generate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals. An interactive term for ejection fraction (EF) was added to test whether EF modifies the effect of the PPM grade on survival. In addition, sub-group analysis based on left ventricular function was performed. Results In the AVR cohort, there were a total of 1953 patients. The distribution of patients in the different PPM categories was as follows: no PPM 59.7%; moderate PPM 36.8%; severe PPM 3.5%. There was no significant difference in survival between the different groups. At 10 years, the adjusted HR between patients with severe PPM versus no PPM was 1.1(CI 0.5–2.4, p > 0.05) and the HR between those with moderate PPM versus no PPM was 0.97 (CI 0.74–1.23, p > 0.05). In the MVR cohort, there were a total of 298 patients. The distribution of PPM is as follows: no PPM 59.4%; and with PPM 40.6%. Again, there was no significant difference in survival between the groups. At 5 years, the adjusted HR between patients with PPM versus no PPM was 1.45 (CI 0.67–3.14, p > 0.05). In both groups, there was no significant interaction between left ventricular function (LVF) and degree of PPM on survival. Conclusions In our study cohort, the degree of PPM was not an independent predictor of survival after AVR or MVR. There was also no significant interaction between LV function and degree of PPM on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudeep Das De
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Ashok Nanjappa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karim Morcos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sadia Aftab
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Butler
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Vivek Pathi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Philip Curry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sukumaran Nair
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|