Evaluation of Postoperative Deficits following Motor Cortex Tumor Resection using Small Craniotomy

Can Preoperative Mapping with Functional MRI Reduce Morbidity in Brain Tumor Resection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 68 Observational Studies

Background Preoperative functional MRI (fMRI) is one of several techniques developed to localize critical brain structures and brain tumors. However, the usefulness of fMRI for preoperative surgical planning and its potential effect on neurologic outcomes remain unclear. Purpose To assess the overall postoperative morbidity among patients with brain tumors by using preoperative fMRI versus surgery without this tool or with use of standard (nonfunctional) neuronavigation. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies across major databases from 1946 to June 20, 2020, were conducted. Inclusion criteria were original studies that (a) included patients with brain tumors, (b) performed preoperative neuroimaging workup with fMRI, (c) investigated the usefulness of a preoperative or intraoperative functional neuroimaging technique and used that technique to resect cerebral tumors, and (d) reported postoperative clinical measures. Pooled estimates for adverse event rate (ER) effect size (log ER, log odds ratio, or Hedges g) with 95% CIs were computed by using a random-effects model. Results Sixty-eight studies met eligibility criteria (3280 participants; 58.9% men [1555 of 2641]; mean age, 46 years ± 8 [standard deviation]). Functional deterioration after surgical procedure was less likely to occur when fMRI mapping was performed before the operation (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.53; P < .001]), and postsurgical Karnofsky performance status scores were higher in patients who underwent fMRI mapping (Hedges g, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.11; P = .004]). Craniotomies for tumor resection performed with preoperative fMRI were associated with a pooled adverse ER of 11% (95% CI: 8.4, 13.1), compared with a 21.0% ER (95% CI: 12.2, 33.5) in patients who did not undergo fMRI mapping. Conclusion From the currently available data, the benefit of preoperative functional MRI planning for the resection of brain tumors appears to reduce postsurgical morbidity, especially when used with other advanced imaging techniques, such as diffusion-tensor imaging, intraoperative MRI, or cortical stimulation. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

What effects does awake craniotomy have on functional and survival outcomes for glioblastoma patients?

PURPOSE

Neurosurgeons adopt several different surgical approaches to deal with glioblastomas (GB) located in or near eloquent areas. Some attempt maximal safe resection by awake craniotomy (AC), but doubts persist concerning the real benefits of this type of surgery in this situation. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the extent of resection (EOR), functional and survival outcomes after AC of patients with GB in critical locations.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with primary GB treated with the Stupp regimen between 2004 and 2019, for whom brain mapping was feasible, were included. We assessed EOR, postoperative language and/or motor deficits three months after AC, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Complete resection was achieved in 61% of the 46 GB patients. The median PFS was 6.8 months (CI 6.1; 9.7) and the median OS was 17.6 months (CI 14.8; 34.1). Three months after AC, more than half the patients asymptomatic before surgery remained asymptomatic, and one third of patients with symptoms before surgery experienced improvements in language, but not motor functions. The risk of postoperative deficits was higher in patients with preoperative deficits or incomplete resection. Furthermore, the presence of postoperative deficits was an independent predictive factor for shorter PFS.

CONCLUSION

AC is an option for the resection of GB in critical locations. The observed survival outcomes are typical for GB patients in the Stupp era. However, the success of AC in terms of the recovery or preservation of language and/or motor functions cannot be guaranteed, given the aggressiveness of the tumor.