A Review on the Orthoplastic Approach to Lower Limb Reconstruction

Medial tab-type fasciocutaneous flap as an alternative for the management of soft tissue defects of the leg

BACKGROUND

Selecting the right technique for lower limb soft tissue reconstruction is a therapeutic challenge. Despite having several reconstruction options, it's important to choose a technique that is effective and with the least possible donor site morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

Demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of the medial tab flap in soft tissue reconstruction on the leg, compared to conventional flaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cohort study matched by age. 64 patients with soft tissue defects were selected and according to the intervention divided in: group 1)medial tab flap, and group 2)conventional flaps (sural, soleus, gastrocnemius) followed up to one year postoperatively.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

surgical time in minutes, healing, healing time in days, complications.

RESULTS

The patients who underwent surgery with medial tab flap and with conventional flaps healed completely. The healing time was 16.2±11.2 days in the tab flap and 16.1±11.2 days in conventional flaps, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P=.89). The surgical time for tab flaps was 225.2±117.8minutes, and 191.3±117.2minutes for the comparison flaps (P=.65), there were no statistically significant differences. There were no complications in the medial tab flaps.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that the medial tab flap technique is as effective as the conventional flap technique, with complete flap survival and healing, and without any major complications in this studied group.

Ortho-oncoplastic surgery in foot and ankle: A narrative overview on reconstruction of soft-tissue defects after oncologic resections

INTRODUCTION

Malignant tumors of the foot are rare, and treatment strategies are challenging considering the complex anatomy of this area. In recent years, dramatic advances in technology and collaborations between different specialties (such as orthopedic, oncology, radiology, plastic, and vascular surgery) significantly changed the approach to complex malignant tumors without resorting to limb removal. The combination of the strengths of both orthopedic surgery and plastic surgery constitutes the modern definition of "orthoplasty." The aim of this review article is to provide treatment strategies that are available for reconstruction of foot and ankle in limb-salvage surgery after tumor resection, with a specific focus on microsurgical techniques in plastic surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant papers across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. We included patient-based studies reporting on procedures for soft-tissue reconstruction with small and large soft tissue defects. Indications, pros and cons, and technique tips are discussed for each type of reconstructive technique.

RESULTS

The search was done using literature of the past 30 years (from 1990 to date), resulting in about 725 articles describing over 2000 cases. Cutaneous flaps included lateral supramalleolar flap, medial plantar flap, reverse sural neurocutaneous island flap, medial leg flap, and lateral leg flap. Free flaps included anterolateral thigh flap, radial forearm flap, latissimus dorsi flap, gracilis muscle flap, lateral arm flap, and rectus abdominis flap.

CONCLUSIONS

The orthoplastic approach in musculoskeletal oncology is a collaborative model of orthopedic and plastic surgeons working together, resulting in a higher rate of successful limb salvage in patients at risk for amputation. Protocols, biologic substitutes, and surgical techniques are largely improved in the last decades increasing the possibility of functional reconstruction. Microsurgical strategies represent the new frontiers in these demanding reconstructions.

Highlighting New Perspectives on Musculoskeletal Infections

The treatment of musculoskeletal and prosthetic joint infections represents a considerable challenge for patients, healthcare providers, and the healthcare system because of the high number of treatment failures and the significant economic burden [...].

Aesthetic Considerations in Extremity Salvage and Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Have an in-depth understanding of the functional and aesthetic requirements of lower extremity reconstruction. 2. Describe the considerations for achieving an optimal aesthetic outcome in the primary reconstruction settings. 3. Describe modalities of secondary flap revision for achieving an optimal aesthetic outcome.

SUMMARY

Significant advancements have been made in the management of lower extremity reconstruction since Dr. Taylor's seminal case in 1973. Improvements in our understanding of vascular anatomy and evolution of microsurgical techniques have allowed for an ever-increasing array of free tissue transfer options for lower extremity reconstruction. The resulting expertise has engendered a paradigm shift toward the reconstructive elevator approach, with increased emphasis on cosmetic results. In the primary setting, aesthetic considerations play an important role in precoverage wound preparation, flap selection, and harvest technique, with the goal of achieving excellent like-with-like reconstruction at the time of initial surgery. Flap selection should be made to best match the three-dimensional architecture of the wound, and take into account the defect thickness, flap thickness, flap composition, and pedicle length. Primary flap thinning and harvest in the superficial fascial plane has been shown to be an effective modality to address excess adiposity and improve contour. Despite these efforts, secondary procedures are often required to optimize the limb's final appearance and functional outcomes, particularly in the foot and ankle region. These include debulking, liposuction, and staged excisions. As the field of limb salvage keeps evolving, aesthetics will continue to play an important role in extremity reconstruction planning and execution.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB Open Fractures in 125 Patients

INTRODUCTION

This study describes single-centre outcomes of Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open fractures in relation to the current standards in the United Kingdom, which aim at performing skeletal fixation and soft tissue coverage at an early stage to salvage the limb and achieve bone union with a minimum infection rate.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients with 134 Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open fractures, who had definitive skeletal fixation with soft tissue coverage between June 2013 and October 2021, were prospectively followed up and included in this study.

RESULTS

Initial debridement was performed within 12 hours from the time of injury for 62 (49.6%) patients and within 24 hours for 119 (95.2%) patients (mean= 12.4 hours). Definitive skeletal fixation and soft tissue coverage were achieved within 72 hours for 25 (20%) patients and within seven days for 71 (57%) patients (mean= 8.5 days). The mean follow-up duration was 43.3 (6-100) months, and the limb salvage rate was 97.1%. The occurrence of deep infections was associated with time from injury to initial debridement (p=0.049). Three patients (2.4%) developed deep (metalwork) infections, all three had their initial debridement performed within 12 hours from the time of injury. There was no association between time to definitive surgery and the development of deep infection (p=0.340). Bone union was achieved in 84.3% of patients following their primary surgery. Time to union was associated with fixation modality (p=0.002) and type of soft tissue coverage (p=0.028), and was negatively correlated with time to initial debridement (p=0.002, correlation coefficient -0.321). There was a 0.27-month decrease in time to union for every hour delay in time to debridement (p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

Delaying initial debridement or definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage didn't increase the rate of deep (metalwork) infections. The time to achieve bone union was negatively correlated with the time from injury to initial debridement. We advise prioritising surgical technique and availability of expertise over strict adherence to time thresholds of surgeries.

Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction Review Article

Reconstruction plays a valuable role in the management of lower extremity wounds for limb salvage. The goals of reconstruction are to improve function and quality of life, return to work, and pain reduction while providing a long-lasting durable reconstruction. The plastics and reconstructive surgical approach in conjunction with the orthopedic or trauma team, referred often as the "orthoplastic" approach, can yield the best outcomes for patients. The following sections discuss reconstruction principles and techniques that can be applied broadly for lower extremity wounds secondary to trauma, infection, and tumor resection.

Use of muscular flaps for the treatment of hip prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Deep periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a serious and challenging complication for the orthopedic surgeon. Muscular flaps may represent a valid management option for the treatment of this condition. We present a systematic literature review about the use of muscular flaps for the treatment of hip prosthetic joint infection.

METHODS

The review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Seventy-seven articles, out of 279 titles, were considered eligible for the full-text analysis. Finally 15 studies that met inclusion criteria were included in this review.

RESULTS

Overall, 210 patients (49% males, 48.6% females and 2.4% not reported) suffering from THA infection treated with muscular flaps were collected. The mean age was 69.6 years. Mean follow-up, reported in all studies, was 3.3 years. The results presented by the different authors, highlight the effectiveness of muscular flaps for the treatment of periprosthetic infection, in terms of function, limb salvage, prevention of the recurrences, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle flaps provide an excellent management option for patients with persistent infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Addressing common orthopaedic calamities with microsurgical solutions

Reconstructive microsurgery has been an essential aspect of orthopaedic surgery and extremity reconstruction since the introduction of the operating microscope in the mid-20^th century. The reconstructive ladder ranges from simple healing by secondary intention to complex procedures such as free tissue transfer and vascularized composite allotransplantation. As orthopaedic surgery has evolved over the past 60 years, so too have the reconstructive microsurgical skills that are often needed to address common orthopaedic surgery problems. In this article, we will discuss a variety of complex orthopaedic surgery scenarios ranging from trauma to infection to tumor resection as well as the spectrum of microsurgical solutions that can aid in their management.

Institutional Experience and Orthoplastic Collaboration Associated with Improved Flap-based Limb Salvage Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Flap-based limb salvage surgery balances the morbidity and complexity of soft tissue transfer against the potential benefit of preserving a functional limb when faced with a traumatized extremity with composite tissue injury. These composite tissue injuries are well suited for multidisciplinary management between orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. Thus, it makes intuitive sense that a collaborative, orthoplastic approach to flap-based limb salvage surgery can result in improved outcomes with decreased risk of flap failure and other complications, raising the question of whether this orthoplastic team approach should be the new standard of care in limb salvage surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there an association between increased annual institutional volume and perioperative complications to include free and local flap failure (substantial flap viability loss necessitating return to the operating room for debridement of a major portion or all of the flap or amputation)? (2) Is an integrated orthoplastic collaborative approach to managing combat-related traumatic injuries of the extremities individually associated with a decreased risk of flap failure and overall flap-related complications? (3) What other factors, such as location of injury, injury severity score, and initial inpatient length of stay, were associated with flap necrosis and flap-related complications?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent flap-based limb salvage for combat-related extremity trauma in the United States Military Health System's National Capital Region between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2012. In total, 307 patients underwent 330 flap procedures. Of the 330 flaps, 59% (195) were local or pedicled flaps and 41% (135) were free flaps. Patients were primarily male (99% [303]), with a median (interquartile range) age of 24 years old (IQR 21 to 29), and 87% (267 of 307) of injuries were sustained from a blast mechanism. We collected data on patient demographics, annual case volume involving flap coverage of extremities, mechanism of injury, flap characteristics, perioperative complications, flap failure, flap revision, isolated orthopaedic management versus an integrated orthoplastic approach, and other salvage procedures. For the purposes of this study, orthoplastic management refers to operative management of flap coverage with microvascular surgeons present for soft tissue transfer after initial debridement and fixation by orthopaedic surgery. The orthoplastic management was implemented on a case-by-case basis based on individual injury characteristics and the surgeon's discretion with no formal starting point. When implemented, the orthoplastic team consisted of an orthopaedic surgeon and microvascular-trained hand surgeons and/or plastic surgeons. In all, 77% (254 of 330) of flaps were performed using this model. We considered perioperative flap complications as any complication (such as infection, hematoma, dehiscence, congestion, or necrosis) resulting in return to the operating room for re-evaluation, correction, or partial debridement of the flap. We defined flap failure as a return to the operating room for debridement of a major portion of the flap or amputation secondary to complete or near-complete loss of flap viability. Of the flap procedures, 12% (40 of 330) were classified as a failure and 14% (46 of 330) experienced complications necessitating return to the operating room. Over the study period, free flaps were not more likely to fail than pedicled flaps (11% versus 13%; p = 0.52) or have complications necessitating additional procedures (14% versus 16%; p = 0.65).

RESULTS

Our multiple linear regression model demonstrated that an increased number of free flaps performed in our institution annually in any given year was associated with a lower likelihood of failure per case (r = -0.17; p = 0.03) and lower likelihood of reoperation for each flap (r = -0.34; p < 0.001), after adjusting for injury severity and team type (orthoplastic or orthopaedic only). We observed a similar relationship for pedicled flaps, with increased annual case volume associated with a decreased risk of flap failure and reoperation per case after adjusting for injury severity and team type (r = -0.21; p = 0.003 and r = -0.22; p < 0.001, respectively). Employment of a collaborative orthoplastic team approach was associated with decreased flap failures (odds ratio 0.4 [95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9]; p = 0.02). Factors associated with flap failure included a lower extremity flap (OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.3 to 6.2]; p = 0.01) and use of muscle flaps (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.1 to 5.3]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although prior reports of combat-related extremity trauma have described greater salvage success with the use of pedicled flaps, these reports are biased by institutional inexperience with free tissue transfer, the lack of a coordinated multiservice effort, and severity of injury bias (the most severe injuries often result in free tissue transfer). Our institutional experience, alongside a growing body of literature regarding complex extremity trauma in the civilian setting, suggest a benefit to free tissue coverage to treat complex extremity trauma with adequate practice volume and collaboration. We demonstrated that flap failure and flap-related complications are inversely associated with institutional experience regardless of flap type. Additionally, a collaborative orthoplastic approach was associated with decreased flap failures. However, these results must be interpreted with consideration for potential confounding between the increased case volume coinciding with more frequent collaboration between orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. Given these findings, consideration of an orthoplastic approach at high-volume institutions to address soft tissue coverage in complex extremity trauma may lead to decreased flap failure rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Open tibial fractures: An overview

Open tibial fractures are complex injuries with multifactorial outcomes and variable prognosis. The close proximity of the tibia to the skin makes it prone to extensive soft tissue damage and subsequent detrimental complications, such as infection and non-union. Thus, they were historically associated with high rates of amputation, sepsis, or even death. The advancement of surgical instruments and techniques, along the emergence of evidence-based guidance, have resulted in a significant reduction in complications. Peculiarly though, modern management strategies have a strong foundation in practices described in the ancient times. Nevertheless, post-operative complications are still a challenge in the management of open tibial fractures. Efforts are actively being made to refine the surgical approaches used, while noteworthy is the emergence of the Orthoplastic approach. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the historical perspective of the management of open tibial fractures, their epidemiology and classification, up-to-date principles of surgical management and outcomes following injury.

Management of Chronic Osteomyelitis by an Orthoplastic Team: 7-Year Experience of a University Hospital

BACKGROUND

Treating chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremities is challenging. The treatment of acute lower limb trauma by orthoplastic teams has shown good results over the past few decades. This study aimed to characterize surgical outcomes of leg and heel chronic osteomyelitis by an orthoplastic team.

METHODS

The cases of 113 consecutive leg and heel chronic osteomyelitis patients undergoing soft-tissue reconstruction with an orthopedic procedure were reviewed in this retrospective single-center observational study. The main objective was to assess surgical outcomes of skin healing and gait recovery at the 1-year follow-up. The secondary objective was to evaluate the global success rate at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 19.7 months. A free flap was performed for 33 patients (29.2 percent) and a locoregional flap was used in 79 patients (69.9 percent). Seventy-two patients (63.7 percent) had chronic osteomyelitis on continuous bone. The others had a septic pseudarthrosis with a mean bone defect length of 42.9 mm. Forty-four patients (38.9 percent) underwent curettage only, eight (7.1 percent) underwent curettage and cement, 20 (17.7 percent) underwent curettage and bone fixation, and 39 (34.5 percent) underwent the Masquelet technique. At the 1-year follow-up, 72 patients (63.7 percent) had achieved skin healing and had recovered their gait. The success rate at all follow-up time points was 82.3 percent. The median time to achieve skin healing was 6.5 months and that to bone union in cases of septic pseudarthrosis was 7.9 months.

CONCLUSION

Orthoplastic management of leg and heel chronic osteomyelitis patients with combined soft-tissue reconstruction using an orthopedic procedure was a viable strategy that offered good results even though the time to complete healing was long.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Skin Graft Techniques

Management of extensive lower extremity soft tissue and skin loss can be a very difficult to achieve by any surgeon. There can be several associated comorbidities that need to be considered and addressed with these patients. The approach is multifactorial and requires commitment from both the surgeon as well as the patient. There are several protocols that have been formulated throughout the literature addressing soft tissue and skin coverage of the limbs. This article provides a review of the literature and describes the evaluation, harvesting, transplantation, and management of skin grafting techniques to the lower extremities.

The interest of "ortho-plastic" collaboration in management of complex limb injury

Constantly evolving knowledge on fracture management, soft tissue coverage, microsurgery and vasculo-nervous repair now permits salvage of limbs that previously would have had to be amputated. Management of complex limb injuries of which the severity inevitably entails functional and esthetic sequelae calls for mastery of the full spectrum of bone and soft tissue reconstruction. Such mastery is rarely attainable by a single surgical specialty; individually and isolatedly, an orthopedic or plastic surgeon cannot ensure optimal management of the above-mentioned patients. While the orthopedist performs a key function in provisional or definitive fixation, the plastic surgeon's expertise is essential to restoration of the cutaneous envelope. Collaboration between the two specialties from the outset and throughout treatment characterizes the modern-day concept of "ortho-plastic" surgery. Through unification of the theoretical competence and practical skills of orthopedists and plastic surgeons, it provides a patient with the best possible functional and esthetic results in a wide range of clinical situations. In this article, we present a review of the literature illustrating the interest of "ortho-plastic" collaboration in management of complex limb injury; concrete examples will be given through evocation of clinical cases encountered by the team that was put together in August 2015 at the university hospital (CHU) of Lille.