Review of Cross-Leg Flaps in Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Lower Extremity Wounds in a Microsurgical Unit

The Autonomization Principle in Vascularized Flaps: An Alternative Strategy for Composite Tissue Scaffold In Vivo Revascularization

Autonomization is a physiological process allowing a flap to develop neo-vascularization from the reconstructed wound bed. This phenomenon has been used since the early application of flap surgeries but still remains poorly understood. Reconstructive strategies have greatly evolved since, and fasciocutaneous flaps have progressively replaced muscle-based reconstructions, ensuring better functional outcomes with great reliability. However, plastic surgeons still encounter challenges in complex cases where conventional flap reconstruction reaches its limitations. Furthermore, emerging bioengineering applications, such as decellularized scaffolds allowing a complex extracellular matrix to be repopulated with autologous cells, also face the complexity of revascularization. The objective of this article is to gather evidence of autonomization phenomena. A systematic review of flap autonomization is then performed to document the minimum delay allowing this process. Finally, past and potential applications in bio- and tissue-engineering approaches are discussed, highlighting the potential for in vivo revascularization of acellular scaffolds.

Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19

Background

Previous reports have evidenced the disruptive effect of the COVID-19 in microsurgical and reconstructive departments. We report our experience with cross-leg free flaps and (CLFF) and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps (CLVCBF) for lower limb salvage, technical consideration to decrease morbidity, and some structural modifications to our protocols for standard of care adapted to the COVID-19.

Methods

We retrospectively included consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction with CLFFs and CLVCBFs for lower limb salvage from January 2003 to May 2022. We extracted data on baseline demographic characteristics, mechanism of trauma, and surgical outcomes.

Results

Twenty-four patients were included, 11 (45.8%) underwent reconstruction with CLFF while 13 had CLVCBFs (54.2%). Fifteen patients (62.5%) underwent lower limb reconstruction under general anesthesia while 9 (37.5%) had combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. During COVID-19 pandemic, six CLFF cases were performed under S-E (25%). The average time for pedicle transection of muscle CLFFs and muscle CLVCBFs was comparable between groups (60 days versus 62 days, p = 0.864). A significantly shorter average time was evidenced for pedicle division of fasciocutaneous flaps in the CLFF group when compared to CLVCBFs (45 days versus 59 days, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

In selected patients, CLFFs and CLVCBFs offer an optimal alternative for lower limb salvage using recipient vessels out of the zone of injury from the contralateral limb. Modification in the surgical protocols can decrease improve resource allocation in the setting of severely ill patients during COVID-19.Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic.

Team Approach: Perioperative Management of Pilon Fractures

»

Tibial pilon fractures are devastating injuries requiring complexsurgical management resulting in a challenging postoperativecourse.

»

A multidisciplinary approach is required to manage these injuries in addition to patients' medical comorbidities and concomitant injuries to achieve optimal outcomes.

»

The case presented here demonstrates the importance of communication and teamwork between specialties in the management of a patient with a tibial pilon fracture that was medically optimized for surgery using a team-based approach.

Cross-leg flap in a burn patient: our experience from a tertiary center from Northern Tanzania

Lower limb trauma with significant tissue loss poses a great challenge to the surgeons. Cross-leg flaps were first described in 1854 and are still used for limb-salvage surgeries in those not suitable for free tissue transfer or in resource-limited settings. Herein we present a case of a 16-year-old girl, otherwise well, who sustained burn injury to her right leg while cooking exposing the anterior aspect of her tibia. Limb-salvage surgeries were done including cross-leg 'fascio-cutaneous' flap with positive outcome. Herein, we share our experience showing an impactful and reliable option for limb salvage in resource-limited setting.

Modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure for complex lower extremity reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Complex lower limb reconstruction due to severe trauma remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Here, we introduce a modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure and evaluate its clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 22 patients (range 10 to 64 years old) with unilateral lower limb injury underwent modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedures. Among them, 16 cases were traffic accidents, 5 cases were persistent ulcers, and 1 case was a degloving injury. The arterial pedicle of the flap was prepared in a Y-shaped fashion and microanastomosed to the posterior tibial artery of intact leg in a flow-through style. A split-thickness skin graft was applied to wrap the vascular pedicle after anastomosis. The flap was designed in a single or bilobed fashion according to the shape of the tissue defect. The operation time, the intraoperative blood loss and the length of hospital stays were recorded. The vascular pedicle was divided 4 weeks after anastomosis. Doppler ultrasound was performed to evaluate the blood flow of the donor posterior tibial artery during postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

All 22 flaps survived. The tissue defects ranged from 12 × 6 to 21 × 18 cm². The flap sizes ranged from 14 × 7.5 to 24 × 21 cm². The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stays were 6.73 ± 1.49 h, 280.95 ± 59.25 ml and 30.55 ± 2.52 days, respectively. Eighteen flaps were designed in a single fashion, while four were in bilobed fashion. Twenty patients underwent fasciocutaneous flap transplantations, while two underwent musculocutaneous flap transplantations. Two cases developed local lysis of the flap which healed after further debridement. Direct suture of the incision after flap harvest was performed in 16 cases, while additional full-thickness skin grafting was performed in the remaining 6 cases. Further bone transport procedures were performed in 15 patients who had severe tibia bone defects. The blood flow of donor posterior tibial artery was confirmed in all patients during follow-ups. All patients recovered flap sensation at the final follow-up. The postoperative follow-ups ranged from 18 to 84 months, and no long-term complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure is an ideal method to repair severe lower limb trauma with tibial artery occlusion which avoids sacrificing the major artery of the uninjured lower limb.

The Versatility of the Pedicled Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: From Simple to Its Chimeric Pattern and Clinical Experience with 37 Cases

BACKGROUND

Defects in the knee area, popliteal fossa region, and upper third of the lower extremity can pose a challenge for reconstructive plastic surgeons. The purpose of this article is to report the authors' experience with the use of the pedicled medial sural artery perforator flap in its simple and chimeric form for reconstruction of defects in three different regions: knee, popliteal fossa, and proximal lower leg.

METHODS

From April of 2018 to April of 2019, 37 patients (29 men and eight women) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 18 to 78 years) underwent reconstruction with 37 pedicled medial sural artery perforator flaps. All flaps were harvested as pedicled perforator flaps in conventional or chimeric fashion and were based on one or two perforators. The defect locations included the knee (18 cases), popliteal fossa (seven cases), and proximal lower leg (12 cases). The cause of reconstruction was trauma in 22 patients (59 percent), tumor in 10 patients (27 percent), and donor-site closure of free medial sural artery perforator in five patients (14 percent).

RESULTS

The flap sizes varied from 3.5 × 5 cm to 5 × 10 cm. All but one flap, which showed distal tip necrosis, survived completely after surgery. The donor sites were all closed primarily. Minor complications included flap dehiscence (two cases) and minor wound infection delaying the healing process (four cases). All complications were treated conservatively. Follow-up observations were conducted for 3 to 12 months, and all patients had good functional recovery with satisfactory cosmetic results.

CONCLUSION

The pedicled medial sural artery perforator flap can be considered an optimal method of reconstruction for covering defects not only in the knee area but also in the popliteal fossa and upper lower leg.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Perforator-Based Pedicled Cross-Leg Flaps in Pediatric Patients: A New Idea to Increase Flap Reach

BACKGROUND

Distal lower limb reconstruction is one of the most difficult and challenging tasks in plastic surgery. Despite the continuous advances in microsurgical techniques, pedicled cross-leg flaps still have a major role particularly in pediatric patients. Many techniques have been described to maximize the potential of the cross-leg flaps. The introduction of fasciocutaneous flaps has provided more potentials and made lower leg reconstruction easier and more successful. The description of perforator system in the leg has also made a revolution in the regional reconstruction. In this report, we present a new modification that increases the reach and facilitates the inset of the flaps.

METHODS

The flap is taken from the posteromedial skin of the middle third of the leg. The design is determined by the location, size, and shape of the defect. The base of the flap should contain at least 2 perforators located by Doppler device. After elevation of the fasciocutaneous flap, 2 back cuts are performed in the upper and lower edge of the flap base preserving the 2 previously located perforators.

RESULTS

Fifty patients, 32 males and 18 females, were reviewed and presented. Age of the patients ranged from 4 to 13 years and the defect size ranged from 20 to 130 cm. All flaps survived with 3 flaps had mild marginal ischemia, 2 flaps had mild infection, and 1 flap had partial dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

Back cuts made at the edges of the base of a cross-leg flap, preserving the feeding perforators, can increase the flap reach without jeopardizing its viability. It is also an easy to do technique and does not require any extra equipment or time.