Selective Head versus Whole Body Cooling Treatment of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Comparison of Electroencephalogram and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings

Is Selective Head Cooling Combined with Whole-Body Cooling the Most Effective Hypothermia Method for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy?

This study aimed to compare combined hypothermia (CH) to the 2 classical therapeutic hypothermia (TH) methods selective head cooling (SHC) and whole-body cooling (WBC). This retrospective cohort study included neonates who underwent CH, SHC, and WBC between 2012 and 2020. Mean rectal temperature was maintained at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head and the body in the CH group, at 34.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head in the SHC group, and at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the body in the WBC group. The groups were compared in terms of side effects, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores, and status at discharge. The study included 60 neonates in the CH group, 112 in the WBC group, and 27 in the SHC group. There was no significant difference in side effects between the groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in brain MRI scores between the groups (p > 0.05); however, gray matter, white matter, and total MRI scores in the CH group were lower than in the WBC group. Duration of hospitalization was shorter in the CH group than in the other two groups (p = 0.022). CH was not associated with more side effects than the two classical TH methods. In addition, some of these findings suggest that CH might result in better clinical outcome than the two classical TH methods.

Use of Cranial Ultrasound Prior to the Start of Therapeutic Hypothermia for Newborn Encephalopathy

For a precise diagnosis of infant hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), neuroimaging is required. The nature and time of the brain injury, the imaging modalities used, and the timing of their application all affect the therapeutic usefulness of neuroimaging in neonatal HIE. Most neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across the world have access to cranial ultrasound (cUS), a safe, low-cost piece of technology that may be used at the patient's bedside. Infants undergoing active therapeutic hypothermia (TH) must undergo a cUS to be screened for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), according to the clinical practice guidelines. The guidelines advise brain cUS on days 4 and 10-14 of life after hypothermia therapy is finished in order to thoroughly assess the nature and severity of any brain impairment. Early cUS is meant to rule out major ICH, which is listed in the local guideline for TH as a relative exclusion factor. This study questions whether cUS should be a required screening method before the start of TH.

Administration of selective brain hypothermia using a simple cooling device in neonatal rats

BACKGROUND

The interruption of oxygen and blood supply to the newborn brain around the time of birth is a risk factor for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and may lead to infant mortality or lifelong neurological impairments. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia, the cooling of the infant's head or entire body, is the only treatment to curb the extent of brain damage.

NEW METHOD

In this study, we designed a focal brain cooling device that circulates cooled water at a steady state temperature of 19 ± 1 °C through a coil of tubing fitted onto the neonatal rat's head. We tested its ability to selectively decrease brain temperature and offer neuroprotection in a neonatal rat model of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.

RESULTS

Our method cooled the brain to 30-33 °C in conscious pups, while keeping the core body temperature approximately 3.2 °C warmer. Furthermore, the application of the cooling device to the neonatal rat model demonstrated a reduction in brain volume loss compared to pups maintained at normothermia and achieved a level of brain tissue protection the same as that of whole-body cooling.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Prevailing methods of selective brain hypothermia are designed for adult animal models rather than for immature animals such as the rat as a conventional model of developmental brain pathology. Contrary to existing methods, our method of cooling does not require surgical manipulation or anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Our simple, economical, and effective method of selective brain cooling is a useful tool for rodent studies in neonatal brain injury and adaptive therapeutic interventions.

Necessity of early and continuous monitoring for possible infectious complications in children undergoing therapeutic hypothermia

AIM

Since therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is known for its inhibitory effects on leucocyte migration and cytokine synthesis, our aim was to underline the necessity of early monitoring for potential immunomodulatory risks.

METHODS

Using a 13-year retrospective case-control study at the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Medical University in Vienna, all newborn infants and children receiving TH were screened and compared with a diagnosis-matched control group undergoing conventional normothermic treatment (NT). TH was accomplished by using a non-invasive cooling device. Target temperature was 32-34°C. Children with evident infections, a medical history of an immunodeficiency or undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, were excluded.

RESULTS

During the observational period, 108 patients were screened, 27 of which underwent TH. Culture-proven infections occurred in 22% of the TH group compared with 4% of the normothermic controls (P = .1). From the second day following PICU admission, median C-reactive protein (CRP) values were higher in the TH group (day two P = .002, day three P = .0002, day six P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Children undergoing TH showed earlier and higher increases in CRP levels when compared to normothermic controls. These data underline the necessity of early and continuous monitoring for possible infectious complications.