Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Nonanatomic Stabilization Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients

[Patellofemoral instability in children and adolescents]

Patellofemoral instability is a common and clinically relevant disorder of multifactorial causes. Several concomitant problems such as genua valga, hyperlaxity, injuries or sports-related overuse may contribute to the development of instability and recurrent patellar dislocations. A thorough diagnosis is of paramount importance to delineate every contributing factor. This includes radiographic modalities and advanced imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging or torsional analyses. The authors recommend non-operative management (including physiotherapy, gait and proprioceptive training, orthoses) and, whenever non-operative measures fail, surgical patellar stabilization using, e.g. MPFL reconstruction.

The adductor magnus tendon is a viable option for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, but with a busy surrounding neurovascular topography

PURPOSE

To describe the proximity of the neurovascular structures surrounding the adductor magnus (ADM), to delineate a safe boundary focusing on the techniques used during graft harvest and to evaluate whether the length of the ADM tendon is sufficient for safe medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixteen formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The area surrounding the ADM, the adductor tubercle (AT) and the adductor hiatus was exposed. The following measurements were performed: the (1) total length of MPFL, (2) distance between the AT and the saphenous nerve, (3) the point where the saphenous nerve pierces the vasto-adductor membrane, (4) the point where the saphenous nerve crosses the ADM tendon, (5) the musculotendinous junction of the ADM tendon, and (6) the point where the vascular structures exit the adductor hiatus. Additionally, (7) the distance between the ADM musculotendinous junction and the nearest vessel (popliteal artery), (8) the distance between the ADM (at the level where the saphenous nerve crosses) and the nearest vessel, (9) the length between the AT and the superior medial genicular artery, and finally (10) the depth between the AT and the superior medial genicular artery were analyzed.

RESULTS

The in situ length of the native MPFL was 47.6 ± 42.2 mm. The saphenous nerve pierces the vasto-adductor membrane at a mean distance of 100 mm, although it crosses the ADM itself at an average of 67.6 mm. The vascular structures, on the other hand, become vulnerable at a distance of 89.1 ± 114.0 mm from the AT. After harvesting the ADM tendon, the mean length was found to be 46.9 mm, which was insufficient for fixation. Partial release from the AT resulted in a more adequate length for fixation (65.4 ± 88.7 mm).

CONCLUSION

The adductor magnus tendon is a viable option for the dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL. Knowledge of the surrounding busy neurovascular topography is paramount for a procedure typically performed in a minimally invasive way. The study results are clinically relevant, as they suggest that tendons should be shorter than the minimum distance from the nerve. If in some cases the length of the MPFL is longer than the distance of the ADM from the nerve, the results suggest that a partial dissection of the anatomical structures might be needed. Direct visualization of the harvesting region might be considered in such cases.

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in skeletally immature patients using the modified sling procedure: a novel technique for MPFL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patellar dislocation is common in young people. Although isolated anatomic double-bundle reconstruction of the MPFL is a common and effective surgical treatment for patellofemoral instability, concerns about the risk of injury to the epiphysis remain.

METHODS

A total of 21 children and adolescents (9 males, 12 females; mean age: 10.7 years; range: 8 to 13 years) with recurrent patella dislocation or symptomatic instability following a primary dislocation were enrolled in the study. In all patients, double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and femoral sling procedure were performed under arthroscopy, using an anterior half peroneus longus tendon (AHPLT) autograft. Functional outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and during follow-ups based on Kujala and Lysholm scores. Radiological examinations including radiographs, 3D-CT, and MRI were performed pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Among two-year postoperative follow-up (range: 24-42 months) showed significant improvement in functional scores (p < 0.01). The Lysholm score increased from 68 (44.5) to 100 (0) and the Kujala score increased from 26 (34.5) to 100 (2) The patellar tilt angel improved significantly (p < 0.01) from 24.3° ± 10.4 preoperatively to 11.9° ± 7.0 postoperatively. MRIs performed 6- and 12-months post operation did not show any signs of dysfunction of the reconstructed MPFL or cartilage degeneration.

STUDY DESIGN

Case Series; Level of evidence, 4.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the MPFL using the modified sling procedure is an effective procedure for the treatment of patellar instability in skeletally immature patients.

Combined Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament in Skeletally Immature Patients

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is challenging in skeletally immature patients due to the anatomical particularities at this age. Recently, the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) has received great interest for its ability to restrain the patella's instability along with MPFL. No gold-standard technique has been described so far to reconstruct both MPFL and MQTFL in skeletally immature patients. We present a technique to safely reconstruct the MPFL and the MQTFL in children and adolescents. The gracilis tendon autograft is harvested and passed through the medial collateral ligament as a pulley. The free ends of the graft are passed through the patella by an "L-shaped tunnel" and tied to itself. The other free end of the graft is pulled through the medial third of the quadriceps tendon and tied to itself to achieve tension. Our technique is reproducible, implant-free and avoids complications associated with femoral drilling and graft fixation. However no long-term follow-up results are available.

Is Caton–Deschamps Index Reliable and Reproducible in Preoperative Assessment of Patellar Height for Patellar Instability Surgery?

The patellar height measurement is fundamental for surgical planning in patellar instability. The Caton–Deschamps index (CDI) is a widely employed method, but a gold standard is still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of the CDI in a patellar height assessment and to hypothesize its employment in the preoperative planning of patellar stabilization surgery. A total of 29 cases of recurrent patellar instability undergoing surgical treatment were analyzed. The preoperative and postoperative CDI were measured by six different raters (three seniors and three juniors). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the six raters was calculated to evaluate the interobserver agreement. The seniors’ and juniors’ measurements were compared to assess the CDI reproducibility. The Fleiss kappa was calculated among the six raters to estimate the agreement in favor of an anterior tibial apophysis (ATA) transposition surgery. This study shows excellent absolute agreement in terms of the ICC for the raters’ average and for single raters as units, both preoperatively (p < 0.001) and postoperatively (p < 0.001). The agreement of the surgical choice between the six observers corresponds to “substantial agreement”. This study demonstrates that the CDI is reliable and reproducible, and it could represent a valuable tool in the clinical assessment, treatment choice and pre-surgical planning of patellar instability surgery.

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.

CONCLUSION

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.