Reliability and Feasibility of the Self-Administered ISTH-Bleeding Assessment Tool

Bleeding assessment in a large cohort of patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is characterised by bone fragility. Among several features, easy bruising and multiple case reports on haemorrhagic events have been reported. This paper describes the diverse manifestations of bleeding and bruising in a large cohort of 328 OI patients. The aim of this study is to provide insight in the diverse aspects and therapeutic considerations of bleedings in OI.

METHODS

This descriptive cohort study was conducted at the National Expert Center for adults with OI in the Netherlands. Bleeding was assessed by the validated self-bleeding assessment tool (Self-BAT) The tool was distributed among 328 adults with different clinically confirmed types of OI.

RESULTS

195 of 328 invited patients (completion rate 60%) with OI type 1 (n = 144), OI type 3 (n = 17) and OI type 4 (n = 34), aged between 18 and 82 years, completed the tool. Self-BAT scores were above the normal range in 42% of all patients. For males Self-BAT scores were increased in 37% with a mean score of 3.7, ranged between 0 and 18. For females the Self-BAT scores were increased in 44% with a mean of 5.4 and a range of 0-24. No statistical differences in OI subtypes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding tendency appears to be a relevant complication in OI patients as this study confirms the presumption of bleeding tendency. There are specific recommendations to clinicians who treat OI patients to consider an assessment of bleeding tendency and use potential interventions to reduce haemorrhagic complications and improve quality of life.

Prophylactic and therapeutic strategies for intraoperative bleeding in women with von Willebrand disease and heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Optimal peri-operative management for women with Von Willebrand disease (VWD) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) remains undetermined.

AIM AND METHODS

To evaluate (pre)operative management in relation to (post)operative bleeding after endometrial ablation (EA) and hysterectomy in VWD women with HMB by performing a database search between 1994 and 2023.

RESULTS

Eleven cohort studies and 1 case-report were included, of overall 'low' quality, describing 691 operative procedures. Prophylaxis (Desmopressin, clotting factor concentrates or tranexamic acid) to prevent bleeding was described in 100% (30/30) of EA procedures and in 4% (24/661) of hysterectomies. Bleeding complications despite prophylaxis were described in 13% (3/24) of hysterectomies vs 0% (0/30) in EA.

CONCLUSION

VWD women often seem to experience bleeding complications during hysterectomy and all women with VWD received preprocedural hemostatic agents during EA, indicating potential under- and overdosing of current prophylactic strategies. Prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal (pre)operative strategy for gynecological surgical procedures in women with VWD.

Prevalence of Bleeding Symptoms in Denmark Using the Patient-administered Bleeding Assessment Tool (self-BAT)

INTRODUCTION

The patient-administered bleeding assessment tool (self-BAT) is a screening tool developed to identify individuals in need of work-up for bleeding disorders. Nonetheless, large studies on self-BAT scores on healthy individuals according to gender and age are lacking.

AIM

Determine cut-offs for abnormal total score of self-BAT and investigate the prevalence of bleeding symptoms in blood donors and individuals representative of the general Danish population.

METHODS

Blood donors, 15,600 children (<18 years) and 18,200 adults from the general Danish population, were invited to complete a Danish version of the self-BAT. To determine cut-offs for abnormal total self-BAT score, findings from healthy young children (0-11 years old), healthy adolescents (12-17 years old), healthy adult women and healthy adult men were used.

RESULTS

Among healthy young children (244 girls, 260 boys), healthy adolescents (58 girls, 83 boys), healthy women (n = 437) and healthy men (n = 278) from the general population, along with healthy blood donors (116 women, 176 men), the 95^th percentile for total score was two for young girls, three for young boys, four for adolescent girls, three for adolescent boys, eight for women and four for men.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the abnormal total self-BAT score is ≥3 for girls aged 0-11 years old, ≥4 for boys aged 0-11 years old, ≥5 for girls aged 12-17 years old, ≥4 for boys aged 12-17 years old, ≥9 for women and ≥5 for men. To establish the accuracy of these cut-offs for diagnosing bleeding disorders, further studies are needed.

Assessing Bleeding Symptoms in Pediatric Patients With Generalized Joint Hypermobility

OBJECTIVE

To assess bleeding symptoms in patients with generalized/benign joint hypermobility (GJH), compare bleeding scores to healthy historical pediatric controls, and determine whether a correlation exists between Beighton scores and bleeding scores.

METHODS

Patients with GJH ages 6-21 years seen by the rheumatology department at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio were eligible. Participants/guardians completed the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool, a validated questionnaire defining the presence, severity, and frequency of bleeding symptoms. Scores of ≥3 have been associated with an underlying bleeding disorder in pediatric patients.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients agreed to participate. The median age was 13 years (interquartile range 10-16 years), and the mean Beighton score was 6.3 (range 4-9). Commonly observed bleeding symptoms were oral bleeding (74%), easy bruising (59%), and bleeding with minor wounds (42%). Mean and median bleeding scores were 5.2 and 4, respectively, and were significantly higher than reported bleeding scores in pediatric controls, defined as those without bleeding symptoms or a previously diagnosed bleeding disorder (P < 0.001). Although 75% of patients (95% confidence interval 64-84) had an abnormal bleeding score, only 12.3% were previously assessed by hematology for bleeding symptoms. Among patients with GJH, higher Beighton scores were not associated with higher bleeding scores (Spearman's correlation -0.08).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of pediatric patients with GJH, three-fourths of participants had abnormal bleeding scores, with the mean bleeding score significantly elevated compared to healthy controls. We propose that screening for bleeding symptoms be integrated into routine care for GJH patients, with referral to hematology for patients with bleeding concerns.

Management of patients with elevated Self-BAT scores or other bleeding symptoms: Updated overview for primary care practitioners

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for management of patients presenting with elevated self-administered bleeding assessment tool (Self-BAT) scores or other bleeding symptoms in a primary care setting.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Primary research sources, clinical review articles, and interviews with research staff, hematologists, and family physicians were used to create the poster tools and reference guide resources.

MAIN MESSAGE

Recommendations to manage a patient with an elevated Self-BAT score or other bleeding symptoms include reviewing the results of the Self-BAT to clarify relevant symptoms, performing initial diagnostic laboratory tests, and doing basic symptom management. Clinical judgment should be used when determining whether referral to a hematologist is necessary, but referral should be considered if the bleeding score is abnormal or if initial management options are ineffective. Some bleeding symptoms warrant evaluation by a gastroenterologist, obstetrician-gynecologist, or otolaryngologist.

CONCLUSION

Primary care providers should conduct a thorough review of the Self-BAT results and associated management recommendations when working with a patient presenting with an elevated score or other bleeding manifestations. A review consists of the clarification of relevant symptoms, appropriate initial laboratory workups, and patient education. Treatment options for symptom management should be explored while recognizing the threshold for referral to a hematologist.

Approach to the Patient with Bleeding

Approach to the patient with bleeding begins with a thorough bleeding, medical, and family history to determine the nature of bleeding and severity of bleeding symptoms. Use of a Bleeding Assessment Tool allows the clinician to obtain a comprehensive bleeding history and ultimately determine the individual bleeding score that reflects bleeding severity and is classifiable as either normal or abnormal. In the absence of significant findings within patient history or presenting symptoms clearly pointing to a specific bleeding pathology, an approach to laboratory investigation is presented that proceeds through first-line, second-line, and third-line testing.

Use of electronic self-administered bleeding assessment tool in diagnosis of paediatric bleeding disorders

INTRODUCTION

In the era of electronic medical records, pen-and-paper-based physician-administered bleeding assessment tools (BAT) remain under-utilized in the clinical setting, as they are noted to be time-consuming.

AIM

The current study reviews the use of an electronic self-administered bleeding assessment tool (eBAT) prospectively in a paediatric haematology clinic and in comparison with a physician administered BAT (pBAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was reviewed and approved in the current form because the aims statement includes the method regarding comparison of 2 groups. So no additional section required.

RESULTS

A total of 94 BAT response pairs were available for analysis. The median time required for patients or parents to complete the eBAT was 8 min, with less than a third of the patients requiring over 10 min. The median bleeding scores noted in this study were 4 for both the BATs, with strong positive correlation between the eBAT and the physician administered bleeding questionnaire. The eBAT had a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 82.8%-98.7%), a specificity of 34.8% (95% CI 21.4%-50.3%), a positive predictive value (PV) of 60.0% (95% CI 54.5%-65.2%) and a negative PV of 84.2% (95% CI 62.5%-94.5%) for identifying a bleeding disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that eBAT is a valid and time-efficient screening tool for evaluating patients' bleeding symptoms, which can improve clinical applicability of BATs by reducing time for bleeding history review.

Translation, validation, and usability of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool (Self-ISTH-BAT)

BACKGROUND

Bleeding questionnaires are effective and recommended screening tools for potential bleeding disorder, but healthcare practitioner-administered bleeding assessment tools (expert-ISTH-BATs) are time-consuming. A patient-administered ISTH-BAT (self-ISTH-BAT) has been developed and validated. We translated, validated, and evaluated the usability of self-ISTH-BAT.

METHODS

We conducted a forward-backward translation of self-ISTH-BAT from English to Danish. Expert-ISTH-BAT and Danish self-ISTH-BAT were administered to 106 random individuals aged ≥18 years attending Odense University Hospital between August and November 2020 for elective blood sampling. Results comprise a score of bleeding symptoms.

RESULTS

Mean age of included individuals were 49 years (range: 18-83), and 59% were female. Median self-ISTH-BAT score was 2 (range: 0-18) and 1 (range: 0-22) for expert-ISTH-BAT (P = .09). All organ systems had ≥90% exact score agreement between expert-ISTH-BAT and self-ISTH-BAT, except gastrointestinal bleeding (77%) and other bleedings (72%). We found an acceptable correlation (r²  = .80) between expert-ISTH-BAT and self-ISTH-BAT. The self-ISTH-BAT had 82% sensitivity and 89% specificity at the recommended cutoff for expert-BAT (female:<6; male:<4). At this cutoff, 10 had abnormal self-ISTH-BAT scores with normal expert-ISTH-BAT. Three (3%) had normal self-ISTH-BAT with abnormal expert-ISTH-BAT.

CONCLUSION

Self-ISTH-BAT can replace expert-ISTH-BAT as a screening tool for bleeding disorders in Danish individuals as only 3% were not identified with the self-ISTH-BAT tool.