Routine Use of Swallowing Outcome Measures Following Head and Neck Cancer in a Multidisciplinary Clinic Setting

Correlation between oral and oropharyngeal resection subsites and impact of reconstruction on speech and swallowing function in head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review

This review aims to provide a correlation between oral and oropharyngeal subsites and type of reconstruction used in the management of head and neck cancer patients. A literature search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science was conducted. All study types describing long-term speech and swallow outcomes of adults following head and neck oncological reconstruction, which used a subsite classification, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Robbins-1 tool. A total of 2270 patients were found in 26 studies. The number of subsites/studies ranged from 2 to 18. Subsites were predominantly divided on an anatomical basis. Other classifications included functionally grouped subsites. Seven articles considered combinations, unilateral and bilateral defects. Base of tongue, FOM, and defects crossing the midline are negatively correlated with post-operative speech and swallow. Lateral distributions were associated with superior outcomes. The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) was the most prevalent tool for speech and swallow assessment. Other factors that significantly affect speech and swallow outcomes include adjuvant therapy, size, type of reconstruction (free flap compared to pedicled or local). The role of neoadjuvant therapy remains unknown. A consistent and formalised approach including risk stratification for multiple contributing factors would be useful in clinical pre- and post-operative management.

Oncological and functional outcomes of transoral surgery compared with non-surgical management in small-volume oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to investigate oncological and functional outcomes following primary transoral surgery compared with non-surgical management in patients with small-volume (T1-2, N0-2) oropharyngeal cancer.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is rising. Transoral surgery was introduced to provide a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with small-volume oropharyngeal cancer and to avoid the morbidity that results from open surgery and the potential acute and late toxicities of chemoradiotherapy.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will include all studies on adult patients with small-volume oropharyngeal cancer managed by transoral surgery or non-surgical management with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. All patients must have undergone treatment with curative intent. Participants who underwent palliative treatment will be excluded.

METHODS

This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Eligible study designs will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and prospective or retrospective cohort studies. Databases to be searched will include PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and multiple trial registries from 1972. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed, and full-text articles will be retrieved if they meet the inclusion criteria. All eligible studies will be critically appraised by 2 independent reviewers using the appropriate JBI tools for experimental and observational designs. Where possible, outcome data from studies will be pooled with statistical meta-analysis to compare both oncological and functional outcomes between the two groups. All time to event to data will be converted to a common metric for oncological outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be followed to assess the certainty of findings.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD4202235209.

Addressing patients' concerns in speech and language therapy consultations following the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment impacts profoundly on patients' functional abilities, emotional well being and social interactions. Communication and swallowing are fundamental to everyday life, and the Speech and Language Therapist (SLT) has a critical role for both patients and their carers. In clinical practice, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a key part of the armamentarium of the SLT. The purpose of the review is to summarize how these measures can be beneficial in the context of time pressured SLT outpatient consultations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unmet needs in HNC are common and impact negatively on quality of life. There is an ever-increasing number of articles in this area, and it can be a challenge to identify, distil and summarize those specific to SLT.

SUMMARY

In this review, we discuss the scope of holistic evaluation, strengths and limitations of PROMs, the Patient Concerns Inventory-Head and Neck, barriers to the use of outcome measures, the carers perspective and surveillance. SLT are uniquely placed members of the multidisciplinary team and provide expert advice and intervention. The inclusion of PROMs in routine consultations provides a model of follow up, which helps address patients and carers complex and unmet needs, ultimately promoting better outcomes.

Functional outcomes following mandibulectomy and fibular free-flap reconstruction

There remains a paucity of evidence with regards to functional outcomes following the reconstruction of segmental defects in the mandible. It is, however, well recognised that oral rehabilitation following head and neck surgery is a driver of improved quality of life outcomes. We present a prospective service review of functional outcomes of a consecutive cohort of patients following segmental mandibulectomy and virtual surgical planning (VSP) composite fibular free-flap reconstruction. Twenty-five patients, who were identified as having a complete dataset with a minimum of 12 months' follow up, ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Validated functional outcome measures were used primarily to assess speech, diet, and swallowing outcomes. The results demonstrate a decline in both speech and swallowing outcomes at three months postoperatively, with a decline of 37% in the Speech Handicap Index from the preoperative baseline, and a decline of 35% in the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score over the same period. The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score improved at 12 months, whereas the Speech Handicap Index did not. Fundamentally a collaborative approach is required between members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) to enable optimal patient outcomes.

Acute Swallowing Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancers With the Mandibular Lingual Release Approach

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence, nature, severity, and recovery of early dysphagia in patients following surgical resection of oral and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with a mandibular lingual release approach (MLRA).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary head and neck cancer center.

METHODS

Inclusion of patients' after surgical resection of oral cavity and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma via an MLRA between 2012 and 2017. Data collection included acute medical care, enteral feeding, and swallowing outcomes derived from clinical swallow examination and videofluoroscopic swallowing study assessments at baseline, after surgery, and prior to discharge.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were eligible for participation (23 males; mean age, 63 years). Baseline clinical swallow examination findings revealed that 32% (n = 9) were tolerating normal diet and fluids preoperatively (Functional Oral Intake Scale [FOIS] = 7). Following surgery, the majority (n = 21, 75%) experienced severe dysphagia (FOIS ≤4), of which 15 were nil by mouth. Twelve patients received a postoperative videofluoroscopic swallowing study, with silent aspiration observed in 9 cases. At discharge, 12 (43%) patients had persistent severe functional dysphagia (FOIS ≤4) with ongoing enteral feeding requirements, of which 7 were nil by mouth. Eleven (39%) were managing diets of modified fluid/diet consistencies (FOIS = 5), and 5 (18%) had mild dysphagia (FOIS ≥6) at discharge. None were able to manage a normal diet. The average length of hospital stay was 27.9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Early dysphagia post-MLRA is a common and often severe complication of surgery. Patients require extended hospital admission with prolonged enteral feeding, which may persist postdischarge. This cohort requires early intervention by speech-language pathology services to aid swallow rehabilitation.