1
|
Beiene ZA, Tanghe KK, Neitzke CC, Hidaka C, Lyman S, Gausden EB, McLawhorn AS. Patient Selection in Randomized Controlled Trials of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Assessing Inclusion Criteria. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024; 106:553-563. [PMID: 38252710 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at widely disparate stages of osteoarthritis, raising the possibility of high heterogeneity among patients enrolled in TKA research studies. Obscuration of treatment effectiveness and other problems that may stem from cohort heterogeneity can be controlled in clinical studies by rigorously defining target patients. The purpose of this review was to determine the extent to which randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TKA use osteoarthritis severity, as defined by radiographic grade or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), in their inclusion criteria, and to investigate potential impact on outcome. METHODS A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases used a combination of terms involving TKA, PROMs, and radiographic scoring. A total of 1,227 studies were independently reviewed by 2 screeners for the above terms. RCTs with ≥100 patients (236) and with <100 patients (325) undergoing TKA were analyzed with regard to the specific inclusion criteria and recruitment process. RESULTS Among the identified RCTs with ≥100 patients, 18 (<8%, with a total of 2,952 randomized patients) used specific radiographic scoring or PROM thresholds in their inclusion criteria. Eleven of the 18 studies used specific radiographic scoring, such as the Kellgren-Lawrence or Ahlbäck classifications. Three studies used preoperative PROM thresholds: Knee Society Knee Score of <60, Knee Society Function Score of <60, Oxford Knee Score of <20, and Hospital for Special Surgery Score of <60. Among studies with <100 patients, 48 (<15%) used specific inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS The vast majority of RCTs (>85%) did not enroll patients based on disease severity, as measured by PROM score thresholds or radiographic classifications, in their inclusion criteria. The lack of consistent inclusion criteria likely results in heterogeneous cohorts, potentially undermining the validity of RCTs on TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zodina A Beiene
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Colin C Neitzke
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Chisa Hidaka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Stephen Lyman
- Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth B Gausden
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoskins W, Bingham R, Corfield S, Harries D, Harris IA, Vince KG. Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482:98-112. [PMID: 37339166 PMCID: PMC10723865 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a pragmatic and efficient means to evaluate the functional quality of arthroplasty beyond revision rates, which are used by most joint replacement registries to judge success. The relationship between these two measures of quality-revision rates and PROMs-is unknown, and not every procedure with a poor functional result is revised. It is logical-although still untested-that higher cumulative revision rates correlate inversely with PROMs for individual surgeons; more revisions are associated with lower PROM scores. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We used data from a large national joint replacement registry to ask: (1) Does a surgeon's early THA cumulative percent revision (CPR) rate and (2) early TKA CPR rate correlate with the postoperative PROMs of patients undergoing primary THA and TKA, respectively, who have not undergone revision? METHODS Elective primary THA and TKA procedures in patients with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis that were performed between August 2018 and December 2020 and registered in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry PROMs program were eligible. THAs and TKAs were eligible for inclusion in the primary analysis if 6-month postoperative PROMs were available, the operating surgeon was clearly identified, and the surgeon had performed at least 50 primary THAs or TKAs. Based on the inclusion criteria, 17,668 THAs were performed at eligible sites. We excluded 8878 procedures that were not matched to the PROMs program, leaving 8790 procedures. A further 790 were excluded because they were performed by unknown or ineligible surgeons or were revised, leaving 8000 procedures performed by 235 eligible surgeons, including 4256 (53%; 3744 cases of missing data) patients who had postoperative Oxford Hip Scores and 4242 (53%; 3758 cases of missing data) patients who had a postoperative EQ-VAS score recorded. Complete covariate data were available for 3939 procedures for the Oxford Hip Score and for 3941 procedures for the EQ-VAS. A total of 26,624 TKAs were performed at eligible sites. We excluded 12,685 procedures that were not matched to the PROMs program, leaving 13,939 procedures. A further 920 were excluded because they were performed by unknown or ineligible surgeons, or because they were revisions, leaving 13,019 procedures performed by 276 eligible surgeons, including 6730 (52%; 6289 cases of missing data) patients who had had postoperative Oxford Knee Scores and 6728 (52%; 6291 cases of missing data) patients who had a postoperative EQ-VAS score recorded. Complete covariate data were available for 6228 procedures for the Oxford Knee Score and for 6241 procedures for the EQ-VAS. The Spearman correlation between the operating surgeon's 2-year CPR and 6-month postoperative EQ-VAS Health and Oxford Hip or Oxford Knee Score was evaluated for THA and TKA procedures where a revision had not been performed. Associations between postoperative Oxford and EQ-VAS scores and a surgeon's 2-year CPR were estimated based on multivariate Tobit regressions and a cumulative link model with a probit link, adjusting for patient age, gender, ASA score, BMI category, preoperative PROMs, as well as surgical approach for THA. Missing data were accounted for using multiple imputation, with models assuming they were missing at random and a worst-case scenario. RESULTS Of the eligible THA procedures, postoperative Oxford Hip Score and surgeon 2-year CPR were correlated so weakly as to be clinically irrelevant (Spearman correlation ρ = -0.09; p < 0.001), and the correlation with postoperative EQ-VAS was close to zero (ρ = -0.02; p = 0.25). Of the eligible TKA procedures, postoperative Oxford Knee Score and EQ-VAS and surgeon 2-year CPR were correlated so weakly as to be clinically irrelevant (ρ = -0.04; p = 0.004 and ρ = 0.03; p = 0.006, respectively). All models accounting for missing data found the same result. CONCLUSION A surgeon's 2-year CPR did not exhibit a clinically relevant correlation with PROMs after THA or TKA, and all surgeons had similar postoperative Oxford scores. PROMs, revision rates, or both may be inaccurate or imperfect indicators of successful arthroplasty. Missing data may limit the findings of this study, although the results were consistent under a variety of different missing data scenarios. Innumerable factors contribute to arthroplasty results, including patient-related variables, differences in implant design, and the technical quality of the procedure. PROMs and revision rates may be analyzing two different facets of function after arthroplasty. Although surgeon variables are associated with revision rates, patient factors may exert a stronger influence on functional outcomes. Future research should identify variables that correlate with functional outcome. Additionally, given the gross level of function that Oxford scores record, outcome measures that can identify clinically meaningful functional differences are required. The use of Oxford scores in national arthroplasty registries may rightfully be questioned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne Hoskins
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Traumaplasty Melbourne, East Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Whangarei Hospital, Northland District Health Board, Whangarei, New Zealand
| | | | - Sophia Corfield
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Dylan Harries
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ian A. Harris
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Australia
| | - Kelly G. Vince
- Department of Orthopaedics, Whangarei Hospital, Northland District Health Board, Whangarei, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah OA, Spence C, Kader D, Clement ND, Asopa V, Sochart DH. Patellar resurfacing and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. ARTHROPLASTY 2023; 5:32. [PMID: 37268994 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00184-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Difficulty kneeling following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains highly prevalent, and has cultural, social, and occupational implications. With no clear evidence of superiority, whether or not to resurface the patella remains debatable. This systematic review examined whether resurfacing the patella (PR) or not (NPR) influences kneeling ability following TKA. METHODS This systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Three electronic databases were searched utilizing a search strategy developed with the aid of a department librarian. Study quality was assessed using MINROS criteria. Article screening, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent authors, and a third senior author was consulted if consensus was not reached. RESULTS A total of 459 records were identified, with eight studies included in the final analysis, and all deemed to be level III evidence. The average MINORS score was 16.5 for comparative studies and 10.5 for non-comparative studies. The total number of patients was 24,342, with a mean age of 67.6 years. Kneeling ability was predominantly measured as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), with two studies also including an objective assessment. Two studies demonstrated a statistically significant link between PR and kneeling, with one demonstrating improved kneeling ability with PR and the other reporting the opposite. Other potential factors associated with kneeling included gender, postoperative flexion, and body mass index (BMI). Re-operation rates were significantly higher in the NPR cohort whereas PR cohorts had higher Feller scores, patient-reported limp and patellar apprehension. CONCLUSION Despite its importance to patients, kneeling remains not only under-reported but also ill-defined in the literature, with no clear consensus regarding the optimum outcome assessment tool. Conflicting evidence remains as to whether PR influences kneeling ability, and to clarify the situation, large prospective randomized studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owais A Shah
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK.
| | | | - Deiary Kader
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK
| | - Nick D Clement
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK
| | - Vipin Asopa
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK
| | - David H Sochart
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Özdemir M, Yaradılmış YU, Özdemir FE, Tarğal AS, Öztürk Ö, Altay M. Does Early-Period Patient Dissatisfaction Turn Into Satisfaction Over Time After Total Knee Replacement? MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR : INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2022; 28:e936792. [PMID: 35842752 PMCID: PMC9302033 DOI: 10.12659/msm.936792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is frequently used in the treatment of end-stage gonarthrosis, and the patient satisfaction rate varies. This study aimed to reveal the change in mid-term patient satisfaction results and functional scores of patients with low early postoperative satisfaction scores. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 163 patients who underwent total knee prosthesis between September 2017 and February 2018. Among these patients, early (6 months) and mid-term (24 months) satisfaction and functional results of 34 patients with low satisfaction scores (Likert evaluations 1, 2, and 3) were evaluated. We assessed early-term functional results and satisfaction rates, mid-term analysis of patients who were not satisfied in the early period, and the relationship between functional scores and satisfaction. RESULTS The Likert score was 4 or 5 in 124 (80%) of 158 patients, and early dissatisfaction was detected in 34 patients (20%). In the early-period dissatisfied group, satisfaction scores 6 months after surgery were 1.9±1.1 (1-3) and 4.2±1 (3-5) 24 months after surgery. A statistically significant difference was observed between the dissatisfied group's early and mid-term KSS and KS values. A correlation was observed between satisfaction scores and KS and KSS scores (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients who do not have mechanical problems with total knee arthroplasty but are not satisfied with the surgery in the early period can be satisfied over time after regular follow-up, appropriate communication and information, and effective rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmut Özdemir
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, VM Medical Park Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Keçiören Health Practice and Research Center, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fırat Emin Özdemir
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Keçiören Health Practice and Research Center, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Safa Tarğal
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Adıyaman Besni State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Özkan Öztürk
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
| | - Murat Altay
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Keçiören Health Practice and Research Center, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fan XY, Ma JH, Wu X, Xu X, Shi L, Li T, Wang P, Li C, Li Z, Zhang QY, Sun W. How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients' satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:389. [PMID: 34140037 PMCID: PMC8212506 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the innovations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still a subset of patients who do not acquire significant relief or expected satisfaction after primary TKA. However, this subgroup of patients still gains improvements more or less in terms of objective or quantified assessments after the procedure. The purpose of our study is to explore the factors that correlate with patients’ satisfaction and identify minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) in clinical parameters. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 161 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty from January 2017 to December 2017. We collected the following parameters: body mass index (BMI), duration of disease, education level, depression state, preoperative flexion contracture angle of knee, HSS scores, 11-point NRS scores, and radiological parameters (preoperative minimal joint space width and varus angle of knee). The satisfaction was graded by self-reported scores in percentage (0–100). Results We revealed that 80.8% of patients were satisfied 3 years overall after primary TKA. HSS score change, NRS-Walking score change, age, and pre-mJSW showed significant difference between satisfied and dissatisfied group. The varus angle change revealed statistical significance according to the levels of satisfaction. Simple linear regression identified the MCID for HSS score to be 5.41 and for the NRS-Walking to be 1.24. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve identified the MIC for HSS score to be 25.5 and for the NRS-Walking score to be 6.5. Conclusions In summary, we identified several factors that correlated with patients’ satisfaction independently after TKA in a long term. In addition, we revealed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) for HSS and NRS score in these patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Yu Fan
- Peking University Health Science Center, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Jin Hui Ma
- Orthopedics Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xinjie Wu
- Peking University Health Science Center, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Peking Union Medical College, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Lijun Shi
- Peking Union Medical College, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Tengqi Li
- Peking University Health Science Center, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Peixu Wang
- Peking Union Medical College, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Chengxin Li
- Peking University Health Science Center, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Zhizhuo Li
- Peking University Health Science Center, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Qing Yu Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No. 324, Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Peking University Health Science Center, China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China. .,Orthopedics Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|