Use of the RAM Cannula with Early Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Requires Higher Pressures: Clinical and In vitro Evaluations

Comparison of two different Nasal Interfaces used in Non-Invasive Respiratory support in terms of Neonate comfort

Background

Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is the first choice approach in neonates with sufficient respiratory effort that require respiratory support. The type of nasal interface used in NIV affects both efficacy and patient comfort. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different nasal interfaces used in NIV support on neonatal patient comfort.

Methods

Our study evaluated patients who received NIV support for 24 hours. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the type of nasal interface used, which were RAM cannula and short binasal prong (SBP). The patients' demographic and clinical data were noted. Their sleep was monitored for 24 hours with an actigraphy device.

Results

A total of 82 patients were evaluated. The sleep efficiency in the RAM cannula group was significantly higher (respectively, 65.7% [10.22-95.25] vs. 57.81% [2.49-77], p=0.004). Although not statistically significant, the neonates in the RAM cannula group exhibited longer total sleep time (respectively, 10.4 ± 4.28 hours vs. 9.02 ± 3.73 hours, p=0.161). Comparison of heart rates and respiratory rates indicate that the patients in the RAM cannula group were more comfortable.

Conclusions

Our study found that infants who received NIV support through a RAM cannula experienced more efficient sleep. Holistic approaches in neonatal intensive care units are vital for better neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborns. Although non-invasive, the interface used in NIV should also be a part of this holistic approach.

State of the art on neonatal noninvasive respiratory support: How physiological and technological principles explain the clinical outcomes

Noninvasive respiratory support has gained significant popularity in neonatal units because of its potential to reduce lung injury associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. To minimize lung injury, clinicians aim to apply for noninvasive respiratory support as early as possible. However, the physiological background and the technology behind such support modes are not always clear, and many open questions remain regarding the indications of use and clinical outcomes. This narrative review discusses the currently available evidence for various noninvasive respiratory support modes applied in Neonatal Medicine in terms of physiological effects and indications. Reviewed modes include nasal continuous positive airway pressure, nasal high-flow therapy, noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), synchronized NIPPV and noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. To enhance clinicians' awareness of each support mode's strengths and limitations, we summarize technical features related to the functioning mechanisms of devices and the physical properties of the interfaces commonly used for providing noninvasive respiratory support to neonates. We finally address areas of current controversy and suggest possible areas of research for implementing noninvasive respiratory support in neonatal intensive care units.

Outpatient Utilization of the RAM Cannula for Nasal Noninvasive Ventilation in Children

Background

The RAM cannula® consists of nasal prongs that can be used to administer oxygen, continuous, and bilevel positive airway pressure therapies. Studies have reported the efficacy and utility of the RAM cannula in inpatients requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV); however, there is limited literature on the use of the RAM cannula to provide NIV in the outpatient setting.

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of children who used NIV via RAM cannula in the outpatient setting.

Design

Retrospective review.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of children treated with outpatient NIV via RAM cannula at our institution between January 2010 and March 2023. The analyzed data included age, diagnoses, indications for NIV, duration of RAM cannula use, complications, and outcomes at 6 months.

Results

We identified 20 patients who used outpatient NIV via RAM cannula during the study period. The median age at initiation of NIV via RAM cannula was 5.8 months (IQR 2.4-9.9 months). Indications for NIV included sleep-related hypoventilation (15%), restrictive lung disease (25%), obstructive sleep apnea (45%), and chronic respiratory failure (50%), with 6 patients having ⩾2 indications for NIV. RAM cannula was utilized for inability to tolerate conventional NIV interfaces (80%), to alleviate dyspnea (60%), and to avoid tracheostomy (55%). Patients used NIV via RAM cannula for a median duration of 7.7 months (IQR 3.7-20.6 months). Patient outcomes included ongoing usage of RAM cannula (55%), changing to conventional NIV interfaces (15%) or oxygen (10%), weaning off respiratory support (5%), and death (15%). There were no complications related to using the RAM cannula.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the utility of outpatient NIV via RAM cannula in children with a variety of diagnoses until clinical improvement or tolerance of conventional interfaces, and for avoidance of tracheostomy.

Bubble CPAP respiratory support devices for infants in low-resource settings

Approximately 46% of the 5.2 million annual under-5 deaths derive from neonatal conditions commonly associated with hypoxemia or acute respiratory distress. It has been estimated that 98% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Effective implementation of noninvasive respiratory support at all levels of healthcare could significantly reduce neonatal mortality. Several factors limit the widespread and effective implementation of noninvasive respiratory support in LMICs, including inadequate infrastructure, lack of proper instrumentation, shortage of skilled staff, costly disposables, and difficulties in the supply of consumables and spare parts. The aim of this state-of-the-art paper is to provide a detailed evaluation of the commercially available devices providing noninvasive respiratory support in LMICs, focusing on bubblecontinuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP). bCPAP might be administrated using a variety of different commercial devices, including devices specifically designed for LMICs, as well as using self-made systems. We described all the equipment required for safe and effective implementation of bCPAP, including air and oxygen sourced, pressure-reducing valves and flowmeters, air-oxygen blending systems, humidifiers, respiratory support devices, patient circuits, and airway interfaces. Specifically, we critically evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of various existing solutions within the context of low-resource settings.

AK, Razak A, Trevisanuto D. Nasal Cannula with Long and Narrow Tubing for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Cannulas with long and narrow tubing (CLNT) are increasingly being used as an interface for noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) in preterm neonates; however, their efficacy compared to commonly used nasal interfaces such as short binasal prongs (SBP) and nasal masks (NM) has not been widely studied. Material and Methods: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating the efficacy of CLNT compared to SBP or NM in preterm neonates requiring NRS for primary respiratory and post-extubation support. A random-effects meta-analysis was used for data synthesis. Results: Three RCTs and three observational studies were included. Clinical benefit or harm could not be ruled out for the outcome of need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for CLNT versus SBP or NM [relative risk (RR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–3.04, certainty of evidence (CoE) low]. The results were also inconclusive for the outcome of treatment failure [RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.48–3.01, CoE very low]. Oropharyngeal pressure transmission was possibly lower with CLNT compared to other interfaces [MD −1.84 cm H20, 95% CI −3.12 to −0.56, CoE very low]. Clinical benefit or harm could not be excluded with CLNT compared to SBP or NM for the outcomes of duration of IMV, nasal trauma, receipt of surfactant, air leak, and NRS duration. Conclusion: Very low to low CoE and statistically nonsignificant results for the clinical outcomes precluded us from making any reasonable conclusions; however, the use of CLNT as an NRS interface, compared to SBP or NM, possibly transmits lower oropharyngeal pressures. We suggest adequately powered multicentric RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of CLNT when compared to other interfaces.

Early Physiological and Adrenal Effects of Budesonide Mixed with Surfactant in Large Observational Preterm Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The combination of surfactant and budesonide has been shown to decrease BPD rates and severity. Budesonide may be released systemically from lungs, and the effects on the immature adrenal glands are not known.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if adrenal suppression rates are higher in preterm infants receiving budesonide with surfactant compared to surfactant alone.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 608 infants ≤1,250 g received intubation for surfactant therapy from 2013 through 2020. In August 2016, budesonide was added to surfactant for these infants. Indicators of adrenal suppression, including mean blood pressures, plasma electrolyte levels, hydrocortisone use, and the use of vasoactive medications, were analyzed for the first 14 days after birth. Respiratory variables, biochemical signs of adrenal insufficiency, and neonatal morbidities were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no difference in hydrocortisone administration in the first 14 days between infants receiving budesonide with surfactant (n = 314) or surfactant alone (n = 294) (23% vs. 19%, p = 0.38). Budesonide exposed infants received hydrocortisone 3 days later than surfactant only infants (median DOL 5 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Infants receiving budesonide had higher blood pressures, required less dopamine (19% vs. 39%, p < 0.001) and dobutamine (2% vs. 6%, p = 0.02). Budesonide exposed infants were discharged home after a shorter NICU stay (85 days vs. 94 days, p = 0.02) and at a younger gestational age (39 vs. 40 weeks, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of surfactant and budesonide does not alter the rate of hydrocortisone use, but does delay the timing of treatment initiation and decreases the use of vasoactive medications.

Budesonide mixed with surfactant did not affect neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6 or 18 months corrected age in observational cohorts

BACKGROUND

The addition of budesonide to surfactant in very-low-birth-weight infants with less severe RDS decreased bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) severity. Long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up was needed to monitor for systemic effects of budesonide.

METHODS

Infants ≤1250 g who received intratracheal budesonide (0.25 mg/kg) with surfactant (n = 173) were compared to a historical cohort who received surfactant alone (n = 294). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales II at 4-6 months corrected age and Bayley Scales of Infant & Toddler Development III at 18-22 months corrected age were compared.

RESULTS

There were no differences in muscle tone or motor skills by Peabody exam. There were no differences in the cognitive, language, or motor domains between cohorts on Bayley III.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of infants treated with budesonide mixed with surfactant, there were no differences in developmental outcomes at 4-6 months or 18-22 months corrected age.

Interhospital Transport of Infants on Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure via Ground and Air

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a respiratory protocol for the interhospital transport of infants with respiratory distress on bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) and provide information on the safety of bCPAP during transport via ground and helicopter.

METHODS

We evaluated a retrospective cohort study of neonates (gestational age 22-41 weeks) transported to our level 4 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) before (n = 529) and after implementing (n = 540) protocols for increasing bCPAP and intubation criteria. Infants were evaluated for intubation before transport, the safety of transport, and the need for intubation shortly after arrival in the NICU.

RESULTS

After initiating the protocols, less infants received mechanical ventilation, and more infants received bCPAP for transport via ground and helicopter. Upon arrival to the NICU, infants using the protocols had lower fraction of inspired oxygen and higher continuous positive airway pressures, and similar numbers required intubations in the first 12 hours. There were no differences in the rate of pneumothoraces.

CONCLUSIONS

bCPAP can be used on both ground and helicopter transport of very small infants. Respiratory protocols decreased mechanical ventilation during transport without increasing the need for intubation within 12 hours of arrival.